Citations

Abstract Background: Intrinsic resistance has been linked to ER down-regulation and poor clinical outcome in breast tumors. Aurora-A kinase (AURKA) promotes distant metastases through activation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) programming and expansion of breast tumor initiating cells (BTICs) harboring a CD44high/CD24low phenotype. Moreover, AURKA induces down-regulation of ERα expression and resistance to endocrine therapy that is mediated by SMAD5 transcription factor (D’Assoro et al., Oncogene 2014: 33:599-610). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of AURKA in endocrine resistance induced by breast cancer stemness and ER down-regulation. Materials and Methods: We employed parental MCF-7 and variant MCF-7 cells ex-vivo (vMCF- 7/LCC9, vMCF-7/FR) that have high endogenous levels of AURKA, are ERlow, and exhibit in vivo resistance to fulvestrant. Real-Time Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis assays were performed to assess response to endocrine and/or AURKA-targeted therapy using the innovative IncuCyte ZOOM System. Stemness activity was assessed by culturing breast cancer cells under non-adherent conditions to generate mammospheres. Expression of ER, CD44 and CD24 markers was characterized by FACS analysis and immunofluorescence. Results: Pharmacologic inhibition of AURKA activity with the small molecule, alisertib, significantly restored sensitivity to fulvestrant in vMCF-7/LCC9 and vMCF-7/FR cells. To establish whether fulvestrant resistance was linked to enrichment of BTICs, breast cancer cells were cultured under non-adherent conditions to generate mammospheres. vMCF-7/FR cells generated mammospheres at higher efficiency compared to parental cells suggesting that vMCF-7/FR cells exhibited high self-renewal activity. vMCF-7/FR-derived mammospheres displayed a stem cell-like CD44high/CD24low phenotype that was further characterized by low levels of ER expression and resistance to fulvestrant. When vMCF-7 FR-derived mammospheres were treated with alisertib alone or combined with fulvestrant, the combination was more effective in mediating restoration of endocrine sensitivity. The phenotype of the alisertib-treated mammospheres was functionally linked to loss of CD44 expression, restoration of CD24 and ER expression, and sensitivity to fulvestrant. Conclusions: These findings provide further evidence that AURKA activity plays a central role in breast cancer progression through the genesis and clonal expansion of BTICs that are characterized by ER down-regulation and resistance to endocrine therapy. These results are important for the treatment of endocrine resistant breast tumors because they provide the rationale for the development of an innovative therapeutic approach to combine endocrine therapy with a targeted inhibitor of AURKA activity. Citation Format: Antonino B. D’Assoro, Tufia Haddad, Matthew Goetz, Mary Kuffel, John Hawse, Vera Suman, Jeffrey Salisbury, James Ingle, Evanthia Galanis. Pharmacologic targeting of Aurora-A kinase restores ERα expression and endocrine sensitivity through impairment of breast cancer stemness. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3313.

Abstract Background: During tumor progression, activation of Aurora A kinase (AURKA) is associated with epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) reprogramming and expansion of a subpopulation of tumor initiating cells harboring a CD44+/CD24low/- phenotype [D'Assoro, Oncogene 2014]. These cells are characterized by their capacity to self-renew, resist drug therapies, and promote distant metastases. In ER+ breast cancer (BC) models, activation of AURKA is associated with down-regulation of ERα expression and resistance to endocrine therapy. Alisertib, a selective inhibitor of AURKA, can reverse EMT and restore tumor ERα expression and sensitivity to endocrine therapy [Opyrchal, PLoS One 2014]. As a single agent in HR+ advanced BC, alisertib was associated with a 6-month clinical benefit rate of 54% and median PFS of 7.9 months [Melichar, Lancet Oncol 2015]. The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the toxicities and clinical activity of alisertib with fulvestrant in patients (pts) with HR+ advanced BC. Methods: In this standard 3+3 dose-escalation phase I study, pts were assigned to two different oral doses of alisertib (40-50 mg BID on days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17 q 28-day cycle) in combination with standard dose fulvestrant (500 mg IM on day 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and then day 1 q 28-day cycle thereafter). Eligibility included HR+ advanced BC, postmenopausal status, measurable disease or nonmeasurable bone disease by RECIST v1.1, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, unlimited prior endocrine therapies, and ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting. Results: Ten pts enrolled September 2014 - April 2015, and 9 were evaluable for the primary endpoint (one excluded due to ineligibility). The median pt age was 59 (range 48, 73). Prior endocrine therapies included AI (9, 100%), fulvestrant (6, 67%), and everolimus/exemestane (5, 56%). Eight pts (89%) had prior chemotherapy. A median of 4 cycles of therapy have been administered (range 1+, 9+). There were no severe (grade 3+) toxicities reported during cycle 1 at either dose level, thus the MTD was not reached. The cycle 1 grade 1/2 adverse events regardless of attribution were fatigue (6, 67%), neutropenia (5, 56%), anemia (5, 56%), leukopenia (4, 44%), diarrhea (3, 33%), nausea (3, 33%), and mucositis (1, 11%). As of June 3, 2015, 2 pts have discontinued treatment due to disease progression, and 7 remain on treatment with stable disease (Table). One pt with bone only disease had a near CR on PET scan. Dose LevelAlisertib Dose (BID)Treatment Cycles≥ Grade 3 Toxicity, All CyclesProgression-Free Survival (days)1 (n=3)40 mg4, 7+, 9+ 117, 170+, 223+2 (n=6)50 mg1+, 2, 3+, 3+, 4+, 5+grade 4 neutropenia (1 pt)28+, 56, 56+, 57+, 112+, 116++ indicates patients still receiving treatment Conclusion: Alisertib in combination with fulvestrant was well-tolerated. The recommended phase II dose is 50 mg twice daily on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15-17 q 28-day cycle with standard dose fulvestrant. Promising antitumor activity was observed. Correlative tissue evaluation of AURKA expression and other EMT biomarkers is underway. Funding: This work was funded by Takeda Oncology and supported by NIH Grant K12 CA90628 [TCH]. Citation Format: Haddad TC, D'Assoro AB, Suman VJ, Opyrchal M, Goetz MP, Ingle JN. A phase I trial to evaluate the safety of the addition of alisertib to fulvestrant in hormone receptor positive (HR+), advanced breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-13-04.

Abstract Breast cancer is the number one diagnosed cancer in women. Luminal breast cancers express steroid hormone receptors (SR) and these cases can be effectively treated with endocrine therapies that block estrogen receptor (ER) activity or estrogen synthesis. Unfortunately, at least 40% of women develop resistance to anti-estrogen treatments and progress to metastatic disease. One of the important transitions from hormone responsive (ER+/PR+ luminal A) to refractory (ER+ luminal B) disease involves the loss of progesterone receptor (PR) protein expression. However, data from large clinical trials showed that exposure to a synthetic progestin (MPA) and estrogen, but not estrogen alone, increased breast cancer incidence and tumor grade. These data, while somewhat controversial, implicate PR action in breast cancer development and progression. PR isoforms (A and B) are ligand-activated transcription factors, though they can be activated in the absence of progestin via signaling pathways commonly elicited downstream of growth factor receptors. We have shown that growth factor signaling (EGF or heregulin) through PR-B can initiate rapid proliferation and survival of breast cancer cells growing in soft-agar. PR-B is phosphorylated and hyperactived by mitogenic protein kinases, including MAPK, CDK2, and CK2. Notably, over-expression and activation of Aurora A kinase (downstream of MAPKs) is associated with invasive breast cancer and poor prognosis. We hypothesize that activation of protein kinases commonly overexpressed in breast cancer provide a context for aberrant PR activity, resulting in upregulation of Her2/erbB2 signaling, EMT, and increased expression of mammary stem-cell mediators (stemness). To model this process, we over-expressed oncogenic Raf1 in ER+/PR+ MCF-7 breast cancer cells. MCF-7-Raf1 cells exhibited constitutive activation of the MAPK pathway and upregulation of both ER and PR mRNA and protein relative to parental controls. Addition of progestin to MCF-7-Raf1 cells increased PR phosphorylation and soft agar growth that was blocked by MLN8237, an Aurora kinase inhibitor. Interestingly, passage of MCF-7-Raf1 cells as mouse xenografts (1GX) led to rapid tumor progression that was associated with increased Aurora A phosphorylation, loss of PR mRNA and protein, expression of epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) markers, increased stemness, and tamoxifen resistance. These data suggest that Aurora A kinase and PR cross-talk may drive early breast cancer progression in response to growth promoting signals. Targeting this cross-talk with Aurora kinase inhibitors and anti-progestins, in conjunction with conventional estrogen-blocking therapies, may improve survival outcomes by preventing progression to endocrine failure. MCF-7-Raf1 and MCF-7-Raf-1 (1GX) cells may provide a useful model for the study of SR-loss during luminal A to luminal B transition. Citation Format: Katherine A. Leehy, Tarah M. Regan Anderson, Andrea R. Daniel, Antonino B. D'Assoro, Carol A. Lange. Aurora A kinase and progesterone receptor cross talk in breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2107. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2107

Abstract BACKGROUND: Breast cancer affects thousands of women each year. Epithelial to Mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been associated with increased metastatic potential of cancer cells as well as resistance to chemotherapy. Predicatively, presence of EMT leads to worse prognosis in patients with breast cancer. We have recently showed that Aurora-A plays a key role in development of EMT and increased ability of breast cancer cells for self renewal. Therefore we hypothesized that inhibition of Aurora-A in breast cancer cells will lead to increased sensitivity to chemotherapy. RESULTS: Increased Aurora-A expression, as assessed by IHC staining, in patients with locally advanced disease was associated with worse prognosis. We show that in ER+ cell line, MCF7, activating MAPK pathway through overexpression of Raf1 leads to increase in Aurora-A activity. These cells have decreased sensitivity to treatment with paclitaxel when compared to untransfected cells in MTT assays. This effect is even more exacerbated with over-expression of Aurora-A. The sensitivity to paclitaxel was restored with inhibition of Aurora-A by specific inhibitor, Alisertib. This was further explored in triple negative (MDA-MB-231) or Her-2/neu expressing (SUM149) cell lines. These cells express higher levels of Aurora-A. Inhibition of Aurora-A activity in combination with paclitaxel was superior when compared to either therapy alone. Similar effect was seen with use of anthracyclines. Inhibition of Aurora-A resulted in decreased SMAD5 expression as well as decreased Akt phosphorylation. Current studies are looking at a role of Aurora-A in activating SMAD5 and its role in resistance to chemotherapy. In vivo experiments evaluating combination therapies in breast cancer animal model are ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of Aurora-A by a specific inhibitor, MLN8237, resulted in decreased SMAD5 expression and increased effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents in breast cancer cells. These results contribute to better understanding of signaling pathways involved in resistance of breast cancer cells to chemotherapy. This knowledge could be very useful in developing more effective treatments for breast cancer patients in neo-adjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic settings. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-09-07.

New-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) may complicate 2–50% of kidney transplantation, and it is associated with reduced graft and patient survivals. In this retrospective study, we applied a conversion protocol to sirolimus in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients with NODAT. Among 344 kidney transplant recipients, 29 patients developed a NODAT (6.6%) and continued with a reduced dose of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) (8 patients, Group A) or were converted to sirolimus (SIR) (21 patients, Group B). NODAT resolved in 37.5% and in 80% patients in Group A and Group B, respectively. In Group A, patient and graft survivals were 100% and 75%, respectively, not significantly different from Group B (83.4% and 68%, resp.,P=0.847). Graft function improved after conversion to sirolimus therapy: serum creatinine was 1.8 ± 0.7 mg/dL at the time of conversion and 1.6 ± 0.4 mg/dL five years after conversion to sirolimus therapy (P<0.05), while in the group of patients remaining with a reduced dose of CNI, serum creatinine was 1.7 ± 0.6 mg/dL at the time of conversion and 1.65 ± 0.6 mg/dL at five-year followup (P=0.732). This study demonstrated that the conversion from CNI to SIR in patients could improve significantly the metabolic parameters of patients with NODAT, without increasing the risk of acute graft rejection.

Abstract In this study we demonstrate that gain of HER-2/Neu expression in human breast cancer xenografts harboring constitutive active Raf-1 induces Aurora-A over-expression that ultimately drives the transition from a luminal to a highly invasive basal-like phenotype. Over-expression of Aurora-A was induced by phosphorylation and protein stabilization by HER-2/Neu rather than increased Aurora-A gene expression. Moreover, Aurora-A stabilization induced an increase of HER-2/Neu expression in breast cancer cells defining a novel positive feed-back loop between Aurora-A and HER-2/Neu oncogenic signaling pathways. Basal-like tumor cells over-expressing Aurora-A and HER-2/Neu underwent to loss of CD24 surface receptor, expressed epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers and acquired stem cell-like properties such as mammospheres formation and self-renewal. Pharmacologic inhibition of HER-2/Neu signaling pathway with lapatinib in cancer cells over-expressing Aurora-A demonstrated that Aurora-A was downstream to HER-2/Neu in the development of EMT and stemness. To determine whether Aurora-A induced a cancer stem cell-like phenotype through development of chromosomal instability and tumor cell phenotypic heterogeneity, we performed a SKY analysis on the breast cancer cell lines employed in this study. Our results demonstrate that invasive breast cancer cells harboring a basal-like phenotype did not develop higher chromosomal instability compared to luminal non-invasive cancer cells, signifying that Aurora-A has a direct effect on the development of basal-like breast cancer cells with stemness properties. Importantly, pharmacologic inhibition of Aurora-A kinase activity with the small molecule MLN8237 restored CD24 expression and reversed EMT leading to the re-establishment of a luminal phenotype and suppression of distant metastases. Our findings implicate for the first time the mitotic kinase Aurora-A in the development and maintenance of CD24 negative basal-like tumor stem cells responsible for breast cancer recurrence and progression. These observations have also important implications for the development of molecular targeted therapies to inhibit Aurora-A kinase activity and stemness improving the overall survival of breast cancer patients. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 328. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-328