Citations

We demonstrated previously that extracellular vesicles (EVs) released from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) play a critical role in angiogenesis. Here, we examine whether this pro-angiogenic efficacy is enhanced in EVs derived from MSCs overexpressing GATA-4 (MSCGATA−4). Methods and Results. EVs were isolated from MSCGATA-4 (EVGATA-4) and control MSCs transduced with an empty vector (EVnull). EVs from both cell types were of the same size and displayed similar molecular markers. Compared with EVnull, EVGATA-4 increased both a tube-like structure formation and spheroid-based sprouting of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). The EVGATA-4 increased the numbers of CD31-positive cells and hemoglobin content inside Matrigel plugs subcutaneously transplanted into mice for 2 weeks. Moreover, EVGATA-4 encapsulated higher levels of let-7 family miRs compared to EVnull. The transfer of exosomal let-7 miRs into HUVECs was recorded with an accompanied down-regulation of thrombospondin-1 (THBS1) expression, a major endogenous angiogenesis inhibitor. The loss-and-gain of function studies of let-7 miRs showed that let-7f knockdown significantly decreased EVGATA-4-mediated vascularization inside Matrigel plugs. In contrast, let-7f overexpression promoted HUVEC migration and tube formation. Conclusion. Our results indicate that EVs derived from genetically modified MSCs with GATA-4 overexpression had increased pro-angiogenic capacity due to the delivery of let-7 miRs that targeted THBS1 in endothelial cells.

Abstract Clinical question In adults with low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels >1.8 mmol/L (>70 mg/dL) who are already taking the maximum dose of statins or are intolerant to statins, should another lipid-lowering drug be added, either a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor or ezetimibe, to reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events? If so, which drug is preferred? Having decided to use one, should we add the other lipid-lowering drug? Current practice Most guidelines emphasise LDL cholesterol targets in their recommendations for prescribing PCSK9 inhibitors and/or ezetimibe in adults at high risk of experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event. However, to achieve these goals in very high risk patients with statins alone is almost impossible, so physicians are increasingly considering other lipid-lowering drugs solely for achieving LDL cholesterol treatment goals rather than for achieving important absolute cardiovascular risk reduction. Most guidelines do not systematically assess the cardiovascular benefits of adding PCSK9 inhibitors and/or ezetimibe for all risk groups across primary and secondary prevention, nor do they report, in accordance with explicit judgments of assumed patients’ values and preferences, absolute benefits and harms and potential treatment burdens. Recommendations The guideline panel provided mostly weak recommendations, which means we rely on shared decision making when applying these recommendations. For adults already using statins, the panel suggests adding a second lipid-lowering drug in people at very high and high cardiovascular risk but recommends against adding it in people at low cardiovascular risk. For adults who are intolerant to statins, the panel recommends using a lipid-lowering drug in people at very high and high cardiovascular risk but against adding it in those at low cardiovascular risk. When choosing to add another lipid-lowering drug, the panel suggests ezetimibe in preference to PCSK9 inhibitors. The panel suggests further adding a PCSK9 inhibitor to ezetimibe for adults already taking statins at very high risk and those at very high and high risk who are intolerant to statins. How this guideline was created An international panel including patients, clinicians, and methodologists produced these recommendations following standards for trustworthy guidelines and using the GRADE approach. The panel identified four risk groups of patients (low, moderate, high, and very high cardiovascular risk) and primarily applied an individual patient perspective in moving from evidence to recommendations, though societal issues were a secondary consideration. The panel considered the balance of benefits and harms and burdens of starting a PCSK9 inhibitor and/or ezetimibe, making assumptions of adults’ average values and preferences. Interactive evidence summaries and decision aids accompany multi-layered recommendations, developed in an online authoring and publication platform ( www.magicapp.org ) that also allows re-use and adaptation. The evidence A linked systematic review and network meta-analysis (14 trials including 83 660 participants) of benefits found that PCSK9 inhibitors or ezetimibe probably reduce myocardial infarctions and stroke in patients with very high and high cardiovascular risk, with no impact on mortality (moderate to high certainty evidence), but not in those with moderate and low cardiovascular risk. PCSK9 inhibitors may have similar effects to ezetimibe on reducing non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke (low certainty evidence). These relative benefits were consistent, but their absolute magnitude varied based on cardiovascular risk in individual patients (for example, for 1000 people treated with PCSK9 inhibitors in addition to statins over five years, benefits ranged from 2 fewer strokes in the lowest risk to 21 fewer in the highest risk). Two systematic reviews on harms found no important adverse events for these drugs (moderate to high certainty evidence). PCSK9 inhibitors require injections that sometimes result in injection site reactions (best estimate 15 more per 1000 in a 5 year timeframe), representing a burden and harm that may matter to patients. The MATCH-IT decision support tool allows you to interact with the evidence and your patients across the alternative options: https://magicevidence.org/match-it/220504dist-lipid-lowering-drugs/ . Understanding the recommendations The stratification into four cardiovascular risk groups means that, to use the recommendations, physicians need to identify their patient’s risk first. We therefore suggest, specific to various geographical regions, using some reliable risk calculators that estimate patients’ cardiovascular risk based on a mix of known risk factors. The largely weak recommendations concerning the addition of ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors reflect what the panel considered to be a close balance between small reductions in stroke and myocardial infarctions weighed against the burdens and limited harms. Because of the anticipated large variability of patients’ values and preferences, well informed choices warrant shared decision making. Interactive evidence summaries and decision aids linked to the recommendations can facilitate such shared decisions. The strong recommendations against adding another drug in people at low cardiovascular risk reflect what the panel considered to be a burden without important benefits. The strong recommendation for adding either ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors in people at high and very high cardiovascular risk reflect a clear benefit. The panel recognised the key uncertainty in the evidence concerning patient values and preferences, namely that what most people consider important reductions in cardiovascular risks, weighed against burdens and harms, remains unclear. Finally, availability and costs will influence decisions when healthcare systems, clinicians, or people consider adding ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors.

Abstract Objective To compare the impact of ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in adults taking maximally tolerated statin therapy or who are statin intolerant. Design Network meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to 31 December 2020. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised controlled trials of ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors with ≥500 patients and follow-up of ≥6 months. Main outcome measures We performed frequentist fixed-effects network meta-analysis and GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation) to assess certainty of evidence. Results included relative risks (RR) and absolute risks per 1000 patients treated for five years for non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. We estimated absolute risk differences assuming constant RR (estimated from network meta-analysis) across different baseline therapies and cardiovascular risk thresholds; the PREDICT risk calculator estimated cardiovascular risk in primary and secondary prevention. Patients were categorised at low to very high cardiovascular risk. A guideline panel and systematic review authors established the minimal important differences (MID) of 12 per 1000 for MI and 10 per 1000 for stroke. Results We identified 14 trials assessing ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors among 83 660 adults using statins. Adding ezetimibe to statins reduced MI (RR 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.80 to 0.94)) and stroke (RR 0.82 (0.71 to 0.96)) but not all-cause mortality (RR 0.99 (0.92 to 1.06)) or cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.97 (0.87 to 1.09)). Similarly, adding PCSK9 inhibitor to statins reduced MI (0.81 (0.76 to 0.87)) and stroke (0.74 (0.64 to 0.85)) but not all-cause (0.95 (0.87 to 1.03)) or cardiovascular mortality (0.95 (0.87 to 1.03)). Among adults with very high cardiovascular risk, adding PCSK9 inhibitor was likely to reduce MI (16 per 1000) and stroke (21 per 1000) (moderate to high certainty); whereas adding ezetimibe was likely to reduce stroke (14 per 1000), but the reduction of MI (11 per 1000) (moderate certainty) did not reach MID. Adding ezetimibe to PCSK9 inhibitor and statin may reduce stroke (11 per 1000), but the reduction of MI (9 per 1000) (low certainty) did not reach MID. Adding PCSK9 inhibitors to statins and ezetimibe may reduce MI (14 per 1000) and stroke (17 per 1000) (low certainty). Among adults with high cardiovascular risk, adding PCSK9 inhibitor probably reduced MI (12 per 1000) and stroke (16 per 1000) (moderate certainty); adding ezetimibe probably reduced stroke (11 per 1000), but the reduction in MI did not achieve MID (8 per 1000) (moderate certainty). Adding ezetimibe to PCSK9 inhibitor and statins did not reduce outcomes beyond MID, while adding PCSK9 inhibitor to ezetimibe and statins may reduce stroke (13 per 1000). These effects were consistent in statin-intolerant patients. Among moderate and low cardiovascular risk groups, adding PCSK9 inhibitor or ezetimibe to statins yielded little or no benefit for MI and stroke. Conclusions Ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors may reduce non-fatal MI and stroke in adults at very high or high cardiovascular risk who are receiving maximally tolerated statin therapy or are statin-intolerant, but not in those with moderate and low cardiovascular risk.

Objective To determine the harms of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in people who need lipid-lowering therapy. Methods This systematic review included randomised controlled trials that compared PCSK9 inhibitors with placebo, standard care or active lipid-lowering comparators in people who need lipid-lowering therapy with the follow-up duration of at least 24 weeks. We summarised the relative effects for potential harms from PCSK9 inhibitors using random-effect pairwise meta-analyses and assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) for each outcome. Results We included 32 trials with 65 861 participants (with the median follow-up duration of 40 weeks, ranging from 24 to 146 weeks). The meta-analysis showed an incidence of injection-site reaction leading to discontinuation (absolute incidence of 15 events (95% CI 11 to 20) per 1000 persons in a 5-year time frame, high certainty evidence). PCSK9 inhibitors do not increase the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus, neurocognitive events, cataracts or gastrointestinal haemorrhage with high certainty evidence. PCSK9 inhibitors probably do not increase the risks of myalgia or muscular pain leading to discontinuation or any adverse events leading to discontinuation with moderate evidence certainty. Given very limited evidence, PCSK9 inhibitors might not increase influenza-like symptoms leading to discontinuation (risk ratio 1.5; 95% CI 0.06 to 36.58). We did not identify credible subgroup analyses results, including shorter versus longer follow-up duration of trials. Conclusions PCSK9 inhibitors slightly increase the risk of severe injection-site reaction but not cataracts, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, neurocognitive events, new-onset diabetes or severe myalgia or muscular pain.

Introduction: The potential use of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) in clinical practice is tempered by concern about their portability among diverse populations. To prevent disparities in genomic medicine, there is an urgent need to conduct genome-wide association studies in non-European ancestry cohorts. Methods: We conducted whole genome sequencing (WGS) with 30x coverage on coronary heart disease patients (n=1,067, mean age ± SD = 59.96 years ± 10.99; 70.32% males) and controls (n=6,170, mean age ± SD = 40.02 years ± 12.56; 43.45% males) in a Middle Eastern cohort to compare the performance of available PRSs for CHD (LDpred, metaGRS, lassosum, and P+T) and identify common variants associated with CHD (via generalized linear mixed models). Results: Excepting lassosum, all PRSs performed well. LDpred and metaGRS performed similarly (AUC= ~0.685) and outperformed P+T (AUC=0.667). Based on the OR per 1 SD increase (OR 1sd ), P+T (OR 1sd =1.85 [1.69-2.02], P =3.69x10 -41 ) outperformed other PRSs (OR 1sd =1.61 [1.48-1.74], P =3.02x10 -31 for LDpred and OR 1sd =1.61 [1.49-1.75], P =9.47x10 -31 for metaGRS). After binning PRSs into 10 deciles, the odds of CHD in the top decile compared to all others was highest for metaGRS (3.87 [3.07-4.88]) and LDpred (3.45 [2.74-4.341]). Thirty-two known GWAS loci (e.g., ABCG8 , CELSR2 , and SLC22A4 ) were replicated in our analysis with P <0.05. Seven suggestive new loci/genes ( P <10 -6 ) with relevant biological function were identified (e.g., CORO7 , RBM47 , and PDE4D ). The well-established 9p21 locus was not replicated. Conclusions: Genome-wide PRSs derived from European ancestry cohorts performed well in a Middle Eastern cohort. Further studies are needed to develop and validate an ancestry specific PRS and to confirm the suggestive loci/genes.

BackgroundDespite routine evaluation of cytogenetics in myeloma, little is known regarding the impact of high‐dose therapy (HDT) consolidation on overall survival (OS) or progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients who have high‐risk cytogenetics. The authors performed a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the heterogeneity of HDT efficacy according to cytogenetic risk.MethodsAll RCTs in patients who had newly diagnosed myeloma from 2000 to 2021 that compared upfront HDT versus standard‐dose therapy (SDT) consolidation were included. The primary objective was to assess the difference in HDT efficacy between standard‐risk and high‐risk cytogenetics in terms of the OS or PFS log(hazard ratio) (HR). The pooled OS and PFS HR was calculated according to cytogenetic‐risk subgroup using a random‐effects model, and heterogeneity (I2) (the percentage of total observed variability explained by between‐study differences) was assessed using an interaction test.ResultsAfter screening 3307 citations, 6 RCTs were included for PFS analysis, and 4 were included for OS analysis. The median follow‐up ranged from 3.1 to 7.8 years. The pooled OS HR for HDT versus SDT consolidation in patients with standard‐risk and high‐risk cytogenetics was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70‐1.17; I2 = 0%) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.45‐0.97; I2 = 0%), respectively. The difference in HDT efficacy in terms of OS between standard‐risk and high‐risk patients was statistically significant in favor of the high‐risk group (P for interaction = .03). The pooled PFS HR for HDT versus SDT was 0.65 (95% CI 0.56‐0.76; I2 = 0%) versus 0.52 (95% CI, 0.33‐0.83; I2 = 55%), respectively. The difference in HDT efficacy in terms of PFS between standard‐risk and high‐risk patients was not significant (P for interaction = .25).ConclusionsThe magnitude of OS benefit with upfront HDT is cytogenetics‐dependent. Patients with high‐risk cytogenetics should preferably receive upfront rather than delayed HDT consolidation.Lay Summary Upfront autologous stem cell transplantation improves overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma harboring high‐risk cytogenetics.

We recently reported activation of TGF-β superfamily pathways and activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the pathogenesis of myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD), which may converge upon increased Runx2 expression. We also demonstrated that chronic in vivo administration of angiotensin II (AngII) recaptures various molecular aberrations characteristic of human disease -including increased TGF-β signaling and activation of Runx2- in mouse mitral valves. Here, we sought to determine whether Runx2 haploinsufficiency can attenuate molecular and/or phenotypic effects of AngII infusion in mouse mitral valves. We implanted littermate matched Runx2+/+ and Runx2+/- mice with osmotic minipumps delivering AngII (1000ng/kg/min) or saline for 2 weeks. We measured changes in mRNA (qRT-PCR) and protein (immunohistochemistry) levels in mitral valves, and assessed mitral valve function by echocardiography. In Runx2+/+ mice, AngII elicited increased mRNA levels of TGF-β3 and the TGF-β target COL3A1, and increased staining for canonical (p-SMAD2/3) and non-canonical (p-AKT) TGF-β signaling proteins. Runx2 haploinsufficiency attenuated AngII-induced changes in COL3A1 expression and p-AKT staining, without impacting AngII-mediated alterations in TGF-β3 and p-SMAD2/3. Evaluating collagen thickness by picrosirius red staining and visualization under circularly polarized light, AngII infusion in Runx2+/+ mice was associated with increased collagen density at the base of posterior mitral valve leaflets, a change that was abrogated by Runx2 haploinsufficiency. Similarly, Runx2-haploinsufficiency was again protective when examining mRNA and protein levels of the proliferation marker KI67 in response to AngII. Echocardiography identified a trend towards increased mitral valve regurgitation following AngII infusion that was unaltered by Runx2 haploinsuffiency. Collectively, these data suggest that increases in Runx2 expression in the mitral valve may serve to orchestrate tissue fibrosis and cellular proliferation that are hallmarks of MMVD, and that future pharmacological strategies aimed at reducing activity of Runx2 in the mitral valve may yield viable non-surgical alternatives for the management of this condition.

Increased BMP signaling and markers of osteogenic differentiation are strongly associated with regions of valvular calcification in aortic valves from humans with end-stage calcific aortic valve stenosis. While oxidative stress is also markedly elevated in these regions, it is unknown whether increasing antioxidant capacity can reduce pro-osteogenic signaling and valvular calcification. Therefore, we hypothesized that overexpression of manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) can reduce pro-osteogenic signaling in the aortic valves from hypercholesterolemic mice, ultimately resulting in reduced valvular calcification and improved valvular function. We used Ldlr -/- /ApoB 100/100 (LA) mice that were wild-type for MnSOD (LA-MnSOD 0/0 ) or overexpressing MnSOD (LA-MnSOD Tg/0 ) and fed a western diet (TD88137) for six months. We first measured mRNA levels of the BMP ligands BMP2 and BMP4 (qRT-PCR), both of which were unchanged between LA-MnSOD 0/0 and LA-MNSOD Tg/0 mice. While there was a small but significant increase in Runx2 mRNA levels in LA-MnSOD Tg/0 mice compared to wild-type littermates (1.22±0.09, 1.0±0.09, qRT-PCR, p < 0.05.) gene expression levels of late stage osteoblast marker Sp7 were reduced by approximately 50% in LA-MnSOD Tg/0 compared to wild-type littermates (0.53±0.15, 1.0±0.24, qRT-PCR, p < 0.05). Sp7 protein levels (immunohistochemistry) were also significantly reduced in LA-MnSOD Tg/0 compared to wild-type littermates (164.5±12.3 RFU vs 259.6±10.4 RFU, p < 0.05). Critically, aortic valve calcification (Alizarin Red) was also significantly reduced in LA-MnSOD Tg/0 mice compared to their LA-MnSOD 0/0 littermates. Functionally, aortic valve cusp separation distance (high resolution echocardiography) was slightly improved in LA-MnSOD Tg/0 mice compared to LA-MnSOD 0/0 mice (0.98±0.04 mm vs 0.91±0.03 mm, p = n.s.). Collectively, these data suggest that increasing mitochondrial antioxidant capacity can reduce pro-osteogenic signaling and attenuate aortic valve calcification, and may be a potential therapeutic target to slow the progression of valvular calcification and dysfunction in patients with calcific aortic valve stenosis.