Citations

OBJECTIVE Advancements in microsurgical technique and technology continue to improve outcomes in patients with skull base tumor. The primary cranial nerve eight monitoring systems used in hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannomas (VSs) are direct cranial nerve eight monitoring (DCNEM) and auditory brainstem response (ABR), although current guidelines are unable to definitively recommend one over the other due to limited literature on the topic. Thus, further research is needed to determine the utility of DCNEM and ABR. The authors performed a retrospective cohort study and created an interactive model that compares hearing preservation outcomes based on tumor size in patients receiving ABR+DCNEM and ABR-only monitoring. METHODS Twenty-eight patients received ABR+DCNEM and 72 patients received ABR-only monitoring during VS hearing preservation surgery at a single tertiary academic medical center between January 2008 and November 2022. Inclusion criteria consisted of adult patients with a preoperative American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) hearing classification of A or B. Tumor size was measured as the maximal medial to lateral length, including the internal auditory canal component. RESULTS Overall hearing preservation (word recognition score [WRS] > 0%) was achieved in 31 patients with ABR-only monitoring (43.1%) and in 18 patients with ABR+DCNEM (64.3%). Serviceable hearing preservation (AAO-HNS class A or B) was attained in 19 patients with ABR-only monitoring (26.4%) and in 11 patients with ABR+DCNEM (39.3%). There was no difference in overall hearing preservation between the two groups (p = 0.13). Change in tumor size was not associated with the odds of serviceable hearing preservation for the ABR-only group (p = 0.89); however, for ABR+DCNEM, there was some indication of an interaction between tumor size and the association of ABR+DCNEM versus ABR-only monitoring, with the odds of serviceable hearing preservation at p = 0.089. Furthermore, with ABR+DCNEM, every 0.5-cm increase in tumor size was associated with a decreased odds of serviceable hearing preservation on multivariable analysis (p = 0.05). For both overall and serviceable hearing preservation, a worse preoperative AAO-HNS classification was associated with a decreased odds of preservation (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19–0.97, p = 0.042; OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.053–0.55, p = 0.0031, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The result of this interactive model study proposes that there may be a higher chance of hearing preservation when using ABR+DCNEM rather than ABR alone for smaller tumors, with that relationship reversing as tumor size increases.

8106 Background: Due to lack of prospective data, the optimal first line treatment approach for patients (pts) with pure LCNEC histology remains uncertain. Methods: Across 17 centers, we conducted a retrospective analysis of metastatic pure LCNEC (diagnosed at local institutions) who received 1st-line systemic therapy between 2015-2023. Pts were either treated with chemotherapy (chemo), immunotherapy (IO), or a combination (chemoIO). Clinical outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rates (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (trAE) as defined using CTCAE 5.0. Survival analysis by genomic alteration status ( TP53, RB1, STK11, KEAP1, KRAS) and PD-L1 status were performed. Results: We identified 161 pts with median age of 67 years (IQR: 58-83) at 1st line systemic therapy; 54% (n = 87) were males. Median follow-up was 55 months (mo), 62 mo, and 29 mo for the chemo, IO, and chemoIO groups, respectively. 79% (n = 127) were former or current smokers. 1st-line treatments were chemo (n = 94), IO (n = 11), or chemoIO (n = 56). Of 85 pts with PD-L1 status, 58 (68%) were 0% and 27 (32%) were ≥1%. The most common chemo regimen was platinum-etoposide (n = 72, 78%). ChemoIO regimens included carboplatin/etoposide/atezolizumab (n = 23, 43%) and carboplatin/pemetrexed/pembrolizumab (n = 17, 31%). In the IO group, 1 patient received dual IO. Lung (n = 74, 46%) and liver (n = 71, 41%) were the most common sites of metastasisThere was no significant difference in PFS across the groups (median PFS [mPFS] chemoIO: 5.7 mo, 95% CI: 5.0-6.3, chemo: 5.1 mo, 95% CI: 3.1-5.9; IO: 3.6 mo, 95% CI: 1.7-6.5) on multivariable analysis adjusting for ECOG and “M” stage (p = 0.2 and 0.24 for chemoIO-chemo and chemoIO-IO comparisons, respectively). There was no difference in OS (mOS chemo: 11 mo, 95% CI: 7.6-17.4; IO: 13.6 mo, 95% CI: 5.9-not reached; chemoIO: 12.2 mo, 95% CI: 7.4-20.6, p = 0.5 and 0.8 for chemoIO-chemo and chemoIO-IO comparisons, respectively). ORR was 35.2% (31/88) in chemo, 25% (2/8) in IO, and 35.7% (20/56) in chemoIO ( p= 0.46). There were no significant differences in PFS and OS outcomes by treatment group when divided by genetic profile (n = 79, methods), or by PD-L1 status (0% vs ≥1%). Any grade trAE occurred in 48 (51%), 5 (45%), and 28 (50%) pts treated with chemo, IO, and chemoIO, respectively. Grade ≥3 toxicity profiles are shown (table). Conclusions: For 1st-line treatment of LCNEC, similar PFS, OS, and ORR were seen for chemo, IO, and chemoIO. This questions the added benefit of chemoIO compared to chemo alone, and warrants future clinical trials to discern the optimal 1st line treatment. [Table: see text]

8013 Background: For patients (pts) with unresectable locally-advanced NSCLC, standard of care involves durva consolidation after concurrent CRT, although its benefit in ALK+ tumors is unclear. The ALINA trial demonstrated adjuvant efficacy of alectinib in resected ALK+ NSCLC, but the optimal consolidation strategy for unresectable locally-advanced ALK+ NSCLC remains elusive. Methods: This multi-institutional international retrospective analysis included pts with stage III unresectable ALK+ NSCLC who received an ALK TKI, durva, or obs alone after concurrent CRT between 2015-2022. Baseline characteristics of age, sex, smoking history, and PD-L1 status were collected. Clinical outcomes including real-world progression-free survival (rw-PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (trAE) as defined using CTCAE 5.0 were assessed, and multivariate cox regression models were performed. Results: Sixty-four pts across 16 institutions were included. The median age was 57 (IQR 49-66) and 61% were females. The majority had adenocarcinoma (97%) and had never smoked (58%). 15 received ALK TKI (10 alectinib, 3 crizotinib, 1 brigatinib, 1 lorlatinib), 30 received durva, and 19 received obs alone. There was no significant difference in stage of cancer (IIIA, B, or C) or PD-L1 status among groups. After adjusting for stage and age at CRT initiation, median rw-PFS was significantly longer for ALK TKI (rw-PFS not reached [NR], 95% CI 22.7-NR) vs durva (11.3 months (mo), 95% CI 9.2-18.5, p= 0.005, HR = 0.12) or obs (7.4 mo, 95% CI 3.4-12.5, p < 0.0001). Two (13%) pts progressed on ALK TKI. 25 pts (83%) progressed on durva leading to treatment with ALK TKI in 23, and 18 (95%) progressed while under obs leading to treatment with ALK TKI in 15. 3-year OS was 100% for ALK TKI vs 90.5% for durva vs 63.5% for obs. Median OS was NR (95% CI NR-NR) for both ALK TKI and durva vs 70.6 mo (24.9-NR) in the obs group ( p= 0.03 for both ALK TKI and durva compared to obs). Median duration of therapy was 24.7 mo with ALK TKI and 6.5 mo with durva. Grade ≥3 trAE occurred in 27%, 7%, 6% of pts treated with ALK TKI (1 fatigue, 1 diarrhea, 1 hyperbilirubinemia, 1 pneumonitis), durva (1 fatigue, 1 neutropenia), and obs (1 neutropenia) respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 4 (27%) with ALK TKI and in 3 (10%) with durva. Conclusions: In this retrospective study of stage III ALK+ NSCLC, consolidation ALK TKI demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and OS over durva and obs, while showing a slightly higher rate of trAE over dura and obs. Furthermore, we show a high rate of progression following CRT alone in ALK+ NSCLC. These findings underscore the need for prospective molecularly driven trials to determine the optimal consolidation therapy for unresectable ALK+ NSCLC.

Abstract Purpose: Lenvatinib, a potent multikinase inhibitor, improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with radioiodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer; however, most patients experience disease progression, warranting further therapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in these patients. Patients and Methods: We enrolled patients with progressive, RAI-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who were either naïve to multikinase inhibitors (cohort 1) or who had progressed on lenvatinib (cohort 2). Patients received oral lenvatinib daily (cohort 1, 20 mg; cohort 2, dose at progression) and intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 21 days. Results: In cohorts 1 and 2, 30 and 27 patients were enrolled, respectively. Adverse events were consistent with those observed in other cancers. In cohort 1, the confirmed overall response rate was 65.5%. There were no complete responses (primary endpoint). The 12- and 18-month PFS were 72.0% and 58.0%, respectively, and the median PFS was 26.8 months. In cohort 2, the confirmed overall response rate was 16% (primary endpoint), and the median PFS was 10.0 months (95% confidence interval, 7.0–17.9 months). Tumor histology, driver mutations, and immune-related biomarkers, including PD-L1 expression, thyroid-specific antibody levels, and CD8+ T-cell tumor infiltrate, did not correlate with response to therapy. Increased baseline peripheral blood monocytes and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio were associated with a worse PFS in cohort 1. Conclusions: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab may enhance the durability of lenvatinib monotherapy in lenvatinib-naïve patients. Furthermore, the addition of pembrolizumab may be a viable salvage therapy for patients who have progressed on lenvatinib.

Background. Chronic systemic inflammation is associated with mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. The goal of this study was to examine the relationship between pretransplant inflammatory biomarkers (growth differentiation factor-15 [GDF-15], interleukin-6 [IL-6], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1, monokine induced by gamma interferon/chemokine [C-X-C motif] ligand 9 [MIG/CXCL9], monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, soluble FAS, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-15, and interleukin-1β) and death with function (DWF) after kidney transplantation (KT). Methods. We retrospectively measured inflammatory biomarker levels in serum collected up to 1 y before KT (time from blood draw to KT was 130 ± 110 d) in recipients transplanted between January 2006 and December 2018. Kaplan-Meier estimation, Cox regression, and Gradient Boosting Machine modeling were used to examine the relationship between inflammatory biomarkers and DWF. Results. Our cohort consisted of 1595 KT recipients, of whom 62.9% were male and 83.2% were non-Hispanic White. Over a mean follow-up of 7.4 ± 3.9 y, 21.2% of patients (n = 338) experienced DWF. Patients with the highest quartile levels of GDF-15 (>4766 pg/mL), IL-6 (>6.11 pg/mL), and MIG/CXCL9 (> 5835 pg/mL) had increased rates of DWF, and each predicted mortality independently of the others. When adjusted for clinical factors (age, diabetes, etc), the highest quartile levels of GDF-15 and IL-6 remained independently associated with DWF. Adding inflammatory markers to a clinical Cox model improved the C-statistic for DWF from 0.727 to 0.762 using a Gradient Boosting Machine modeling approach. Conclusions. These findings suggest that pre-KT serum concentrations of GDF-15, IL-6, and MIG/CXCL9 may help to risk stratify and manage patients undergoing KT and suggests that chronic inflammation may play a role in mortality in KT recipients.

AbstractIntroductionSurgical techniques for sellar reconstruction include no reconstruction, use of synthetic materials, autologous grafts, and/or vascularized flaps. The aim of this study was to conduct a multi‐center study comparing the efficacy and postoperative morbidity associated with different sellar reconstruction techniques.MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors from five participating sites between January 2021 and March 2023 was performed. The variables included demographics, tumor characteristics, reconstruction technique, postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (CSF) leak, and 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) scores. Comparisons of postoperative complications, SNOT‐22 scores, and duration of surgery by type of onlay reconstruction were evaluated using Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance, and Kruskal‒Wallis test.ResultsFive hundred and one patients were identified. The median tumor size was 2.1 cm, and 64% were non‐functioning. Intraoperative CSF leak was identified in 38% of patients. A total of 89% of patients underwent onlay reconstruction: 49% were reconstructed with mucosal grafts, 35% with nasoseptal flaps, and 5% with other onlay techniques. Nasoseptal flaps were utilized more frequently in the setting of giant pituitary adenomas (>3 cm), medial cavernous sinus wall resection, and high‐flow intraoperative CSF leaks. Cases who utilized mucosal grafts had an overall shorter operating time (median: 183 min vs. 240 min; p < 0.001). Five postoperative CSF leaks were identified, and therefore, statistical analysis could not be performed for this complication.ConclusionThe effectiveness and morbidity of different sellar reconstruction techniques are comparable. Vascularized flaps were utilized more frequently in the setting of larger tumors and high‐flow intraoperative CSF leaks.

11118 Background: Lung cancer survivors experience more physical and mental challenges, heavier symptom burden, and poorer quality of life than survivors of other cancers. Many symptoms persist or worsen for survivors beyond 5 years of cancer diagnosis, referred as long-term lung cancer survivors (LTLCS). Social determinants of health (SDoH) factors negatively impact patient reported outcomes (PROs) among cancer survivors, but their role in outcomes is under reported in lung cancer survivors and unknown in LTLCS. We investigated the impact of SDoH on PROs in a 20-year prospective lung cancer cohort. Methods: Our cohort includes 19,251 lung cancer patients (cases) diagnosed from 1997 through 2016 and followed up to 27 years, of whom 4799 (25%) became LTLCS. SDoH information was obtained by a lung cancer study PRO questionnaire or an institution SDoH questionnaire. Analyzed in this report are 2982 cases and 480 controls who had a low-dose chest CT scan and were ruled out for cancer, all answered at least one PRO questionnaire (first response); and 1366 LTLCS answered 5 years after diagnosis (long-term response). Along with fatigue and dyspnea, 5 SDoH variables, i.e., financial concerns, legal concerns, family and friends support, spiritual well-being, and social activity were scored on a 0 (worst) - 10 (best) scale and dichotomized as 0-5 (deficit/worse/lower) or 6-10 (no deficit/better/higher). We also assessed employment and health-related work experience. A difference of 1.0 unit or more in score was considered clinically meaningful along with a 2-sided test P-value less than 0.05; Chi-square or Fisher’s Exact Test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used accordingly. Results: Compared to controls, cases were younger (mean age: 62 vs. 65 years, P<0.05); more women than men reported worse financial concerns (56% vs. 38%, P<0.01) and lower spiritual well-being (43% vs. 26%, P=0.04) at first response; this sex disparity reduced but remained significant at long-term. Worse dyspnea (4.4-4.8 vs. 5.6) and fatigue (4.7-4.8 vs. 5.8-5.9) were seen in cases with more financial and legal concerns compared to those with fewer concerns (Ps<0.01). Cases with higher family and friends support, spiritual well-being and social activity had less dyspnea (5.7-6.0 vs. 4.2-4.5) and fatigue (5.5-5.9 vs. 3.9-4.4) than those with lower scores (Ps<0.04). Employment and health-related work experience data were provided by 2213 responders: Comparing 1735 cases to 478 controls, a lower proportion of cases was employed (28% vs. 39%), more cases “often felt tired after work” (49% vs. 28%), and more cases had “quite a lot” of difficulty in daily work or could not work at all” (26% vs. 9%, Ps<0.01). Conclusions: We found that in lung cancer survivors, more women than men reported worse financial concerns, and lower SDoH status was correlated with worse dyspnea and fatigue, indicating SDoH-driven interventions are important to improve lung cancer survivors’ PROs.

6554 Background: Acute graft- versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a life-threatening complication following allo-HCT. Microbiome dysfunction and associated GI barrier disruption may contribute to aGvHD via activation of inflammatory immune responses. Circulating biomarkers in the peri-transplant period are correlated with risk of severe aGvHD, including suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2), regenerating islet-derived 3-alpha (Reg3a) and inflammatory cytokines (IL6, IFNϒγ & TNFα). SER-155 is an investigational cultivated oral microbiome therapeutic designed to restructure the GI microbiome, improve GI barrier integrity and reduce GI inflammation and is being assessed in a 2-part Phase 1b study in adults undergoing allo-HCT. We present preliminary safety, GvHD, PK, and exploratory biomarker data from the completed open-label Cohort 1 through Day 100 post-HCT. Methods: Adult recipients of allo-HCT were eligible. HCT conditioning and aGvHD prophylaxis were per investigator discretion. Patients received 2 courses of SER-155 (pre-HCT and post-neutrophil engraftment, each comprised of 4 days of microbiome conditioning with oral vancomycin followed by 10 days oral SER-155. The primary endpoint was safety. Strain engraftment (PK) and biomarkers were assessed in stool and plasma samples. Results: Fifteen adults enrolled; 13 received at least 1 course of study drug (median age 67; 54% male), and 11 underwent allo-HCT. Following each course, the majority of the 16 SER-155 strains were detected in stool. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported in all patients with GI AEs the most common. No serious AEs (SAEs) were deemed related to SER-155. Most SAEs and AEs of special interest (ie, BSIs, invasive or GI infections) occurred between HCT and the 2nd SER-155 course. There were no deaths before Day 100. No BSIs were attributable to SER-155 strains. The rate of grade 2-4 aGvHD based on MAGIC criteria through Day 100 was 45.5%; no severe grade 3-4 aGvHD was observed. Median levels of plasma biomarkers REG3α, ST2 and inflammatory cytokines were not elevated relative to a reference range (Table). Conclusions: In this small open-label cohort, SER-155 was generally well-tolerated through Day 100 without drug-related SAEs and no severe aGvHD. Plasma biomarkers were not elevated at HCT Day 0 or neutrophil recovery. These preliminary observations align with the design and preclinical evaluation of SER-155. Clinical trial information: NCT04995653 . [Table: see text]

7529 Background: iAEs, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), can occur after infusion of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies such as ide-cel, but are typically low-grade and manageable with tocilizumab and corticosteroids. Although high-grade iAEs are rare with ide-cel, identification of patients at increased risk may improve management and remains an unmet need. Three composite biomarkers (multivariate models) of iAE risk were previously developed in a discovery cohort from the KarMMa and KarMMa-2 studies of ide-cel in RRMM (Mashadi-Hossein A, et al. J Clin Oncol 2023;41(16_suppl):e20005). Here, we validate these 3 prototype models for risk of developing high-grade iAEs after ide-cel infusion. Methods: Two models used pretreatment patient and routine clinical laboratory parameters; the third model also included change in 6 exploratory cytokines from baseline to 1 day following ide-cel infusion. To validate, each model was retrospectively applied to KarMMa-3 (NCT03651128) data in a blinded fashion, and sensitivity and specificity to identify grade ≥3 CRS and any-grade MAS were determined. Model performance thresholds used for sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 50%, respectively. Performance for identifying grade 2 CRS was also analyzed post hoc. Results: The first and simplest model comprised a manual algorithm with 7 features; it identified patients with grade ≥3 CRS or MAS with 85% sensitivity and 60% specificity. The second model comprised 19 routinely measured pretreatment features; it identified grade ≥3 CRS with 91% sensitivity and 59% specificity, and any-grade MAS with 60% sensitivity and 88% specificity. The third and most complex model comprised 7 pretreatment clinical features and 6 exploratory cytokines; it identified grade ≥3 CRS with 100% sensitivity and 51% specificity, and any-grade MAS with 100% sensitivity and 81% specificity. None of the models identified grade ≥2 CRS with passable sensitivity or specificity. Clustering analyses across all features showed that only a subset of grade 2 CRS cases was within the previously identified high-risk iAE cluster while the remaining grade 2 CRS cases were spread across other clusters. Conclusions: Two of the 3 composite biomarkers met validation criteria for grade ≥3 CRS risk. Criteria were not met for grade 2 CRS, suggesting these models are specific to higher-grade events and that grade 2 CRS represents a more heterogeneous group of patients. While high-grade iAEs are rare with ide-cel, these models may further optimize the robust benefit–risk profile that ide-cel has demonstrated by helping identify, prior to or shortly after infusion, patients most at risk for severe events. Clinical trial information: NCT03651128 .

e15138 Background: Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are poorly characterized due to their innate heterogeneity, thus limiting treatment and clinical trial options for patients. Here, we used whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to explore the genetic and microenvironmental landscape of NECs in order to understand the unique features of different NEC types, with the aim of improving treatment modalities. Methods: We analyzed 51 NEC clinical samples morphologically verified by a pathologist: lung NEC (20 small cell NEC and 1 large cell NEC cases), gastroenteropancreatic NEC (GEP, 12 cases), cancer of unknown primary (7 cases), Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC, 5 cases), genitourinary tract NEC (3 cases), and breast NEC (3 cases). Findings on tumor mutational burden (TMB, mut/Mb), microsatellite instability (MSI), gene expression signatures, and tumor microenvironment (TME) profiling were reported. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) subtyping was performed as reported by Gay et al. on the entire NEC cohort. Results: Half of the patients with lung NEC and 84% of those with extrapulmonary NEC satisfied the molecular inclusion criteria for clinical trials, with the most frequent criterion being KRAS G12X or G13X mutations. Among the extrapulmonary NEC samples, 13.7% were deemed eligible for targeted therapy, specifically for cases with BRAF V600E mutation and/or high TMB (> 10 mut/Mb). We detected varying TMB and distinct gene expression features across the entire cohort. Specifically, we found 2 MCC cases to be Merkel cell polyomavirus-positive with low TMB and devoid of UV-associated mutations. One GEP-NEC case exhibited a high MSI (MSI-high) status. We detected 6 SCLC cases (3 non-smokers, 3 former smokers) with surprisingly low levels of tobacco-associated mutations (<10% of all mutations). Two GEP-NEC cases had high levels of mutations associated with tobacco smoking. While TME profiling showed no significant difference in cell population makeup across all samples, transcriptional SCLC subtyping revealed significant differences among the cases. Inflammatory SCLC (SCLC-I) samples showed statistically significant enrichment of all subpopulations of the immune microenvironment (i.e., B cells, T cells, NK cells), supporting the use of immune checkpoint blockade for treatment. The POU2F3+ SCLC (SCLC-P) samples showed low expression of all neuroendocrine diagnostic markers (i.e., INSM1, NCAM1, SYP, CHGA). Conclusions: Given the heterogeneous molecular features across diverse NEC tumors, a uniform treatment strategy is unlikely to benefit all NEC patients. Hence, our ability to detect these unique molecular features is crucial for matching individual NEC patients with specific clinical trials and targeted therapies that may improve their outcomes. Thus, a concerted effort using in-depth genomic, transcriptomic, and TME profiling for NEC tumors is warranted.