Citations

Background Automated individualized risk prediction tools linked to electronic health records ( EHR s) are not available for management of patients with peripheral arterial disease. The goal of this study was to create a prognostic tool for patients with peripheral arterial disease using data elements automatically extracted from an EHR to enable real‐time and individualized risk prediction at the point of care. Methods and Results A previously validated phenotyping algorithm was deployed to an EHR linked to the Rochester Epidemiology Project to identify peripheral arterial disease cases from Olmsted County, MN, for the years 1998 to 2011. The study cohort was composed of 1676 patients: 593 patients died over 5‐year follow‐up. The c‐statistic for survival in the overall data set was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74–0.78), and the c‐statistic across 10 cross‐validation data sets was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73–0.77). Stratification of cases demonstrated increasing mortality risk by subgroup (low: hazard ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.21–0.58]; intermediate‐high: hazard ratio, 2.98 [95% CI, 2.37–3.74]; high: hazard ratio, 8.44 [95% CI, 6.66–10.70], all P <0.0001 versus the reference subgroup). An equation for risk calculation was derived from Cox model parameters and β estimates. Big data infrastructure enabled deployment of the real‐time risk calculator to the point of care via the EHR . Conclusions This study demonstrates that electronic tools can be deployed to EHR s to create automated real‐time risk calculators to predict survival of patients with peripheral arterial disease. Moreover, the prognostic model developed may be translated to patient care as an automated and individualized real‐time risk calculator deployed at the point of care.

112 Background: Reducing hospitalizations for chemotherapy-related toxicities represents an opportunity to improve both the quality and cost of cancer treatment. Nausea and vomiting (NV) account for almost 10% of “avoidable” toxicity-related post-chemotherapy hospitalizations (2016 Medicare data). We sought to evaluate the event cost of NV-related hospitalizations among patients with cancer from a US payer perspective. Methods: From a large US claims database (Truven MarketScan), we identified hospitalizations with NV as the primary diagnosis and cancer as a secondary diagnosis (01/2011-06/2017). This method increases specificity for NV as the principal hospitalization factor, while underreporting the prevalence of NV as a contributory factor. To determine event costs, we evaluated hospital and other reimbursement during the hospitalization. To explore subgroup differences, we stratified results by tumor type, payer type, admission route, receipt of highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC; 2017 definition includes carboplatin AUC ≥4) and antiemetic prophylaxis. We adjusted all costs to 2017 US dollars. Results: Among 918,192 hospitalizations involving cancer, we identified 80,995 with both NV and a cancer diagnosis code. Of these, 5,293 had NV as the primary diagnosis and 62 lacked cost data. Patients (mean age = 57.7±16.2) were 67% female. Median hospital length of stay was 4 days and mean cost per hospitalization was $15,085. Non-Medicare admissions (82%) had a higher mean cost vs. Medicare ($15,737 vs. $12,111, p < 0.01). We found < $1,000 difference between the highest and lowest cost per hospitalization among the 6 most common tumor types. We found the 65% of patients with a chemotherapy claim ≤30 days prior to hospitalization had costs of $13,882 per event. Among the 45% of chemotherapies that were HEC, > 50% lacked an NK1 receptor antagonist as prophylaxis. Conclusions: The average cost of NV-related hospitalizations among patients with cancer exceeds $15,000 per event, highlighting the need to effectively address this symptom. Roughly half the hospitalizations involved HEC, with over half of those patients not receiving guideline-based antiemetic prophylaxis.

A 63-year-old man was admitted for severe acute pancreatitis. On day 3 of hospitalisation, he developed shortness of breath and acute pulmonary oedema. Echocardiogram revealed global hypokinesis with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 20%, and he was diagnosed with takotsubo cardiomyopathy. He developed cardiogenic shock which was treated successfully with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device. His left ventricular ejection fraction improved by hospital follow-up 3 weeks later.

To inform guidelines for screening family members of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), we designed a clinical trial to compare the yield of cascade screening in FH patients with and without an identifiable pathogenic variant. Participants with hypercholesterolemia (Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > 155 mg/dL) underwent sequencing of LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9 and genotyping of six single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with LDL-C followed by calculation of a polygenic score for LDL-C. We identified 24 patients with definite FH (pathogenic variant in one of the three FH genes), 76 patients with probable FH (Dutch lipid clinic network (DLCN) score ≥ 6, no pathogenic variant), and 262 patients with possible FH (DLCN score 3–5, no pathogenic variant). We will enroll 50 patients with definite FH by recruiting an additional 26 from the FH Clinic at Mayo and 50 patients each with probable and possible FH, matching on age and sex. Family members of patients with definite FH will undergo testing for the relevant pathogenic variant using saliva kits and family members of those with probable/possible FH will have a lipid profile checked. We will assess the number of new cases detected (defined as presence of a pathogenic variant in the family member of definite FH patient or LDL-C > 155 mg/dL (>130 mg/dL in children) in family members of probable/possible FH patients, and the cost of detecting a new case. The proposed clinical trial will compare the yield and cost of cascade screening for FH patients with/without an identifiable pathogenic variant, and thereby inform guidelines for cascade screening for FH.

Abstract Lung cancer is the deadliest cancer in the United States, contributing approximately 25% of all cancer deaths. Lung cancer risk is well-documented to increase in response to environmental factors, particularly tobacco smoking. As one might expect for a complex trait, there is also a significant genetic risk component in lung cancer, though it is not very well studied. We obtained whole exome sequencing (WES) genotype data from Washington University on 204 subjects from 25 extended families. These individuals were recruited from families with a history of lung cancer and previous analyses showed these 25 families be informative. The purpose of this study is to identify potential risk variants for lung cancer by performing genetic linkage analysis. Quality control was performed on the sequence data, filtering on parameters such as depth (less than 10), genotype quality (less than 10), missingness, and Mendelian inconsistencies. Identity-by-descent (IBD) values were also calculated to verify correct familial relationships. Quality control procedures left approximately 500,000 SNVs and indels for analysis. We performed two-point parametric linkage analysis assuming an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance with a disease allele frequency of 1%, a 10% penetrance for carriers and a 1% penetrance for non-carriers. Two discrete sets of linkage analyses were performed. One was a variant-based analysis, which evaluated linkage between the phenotype and individual SNVs or indels. The second was gene-based analysis, which created a multi-allelic pseudomarker corresponding to a gene from haplotypes of rare variants (minor allele frequency &lt;= 0.01) located within that particular gene. Two-point linkage analysis was then performed on the pseudomarkers. While the variant-based analysis did not identify any genome-wide significant results, several were identified by the gene-based analysis. The highest HLOD scores were both greater than the genome-wide significance level of HLOD = 3.3 and were located on two regions of chromosome 1q: 1q42.13-43 and 1q21.2-21.1. In both regions, the significant HLOD scores clustered around known cancer genes. At the 1q42.13-43 region, signals centered on the cancer-implicated genes OBSCN and RYR2 (also a known mesothelioma gene), while at 1q21.2-21.1 the signals centered on five genes in the neuroblastoma breakpoint family (NBPF) genes, a cluster of recently duplicated genes. NBPF genes have previously been implicated in a variety of different cancers including lung cancer. We are currently performing additional analyses to corroborate the significant results, as well as examining the individual families to determine which families are driving the significant signals. Citation Format: Anthony M. Musolf, Haiming Sun, Bilal A. Moiz, Diptasri Mandal, Mariza de Andrade, Colette Gaba, Ping Yang, Yafang Li, Ming You, Elena Y. Kupert, Marshall W. Anderson, Ann G. Schwartz, Susan M. Pinney, Christopher I. Amos, Joan E. Bailey-Wilson. Whole exome sequencing identifies significantly linked regions on multiple chromosomes in families with a history of lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3276.