Citations

Dysarthric speech poses significant challenges for clinical assessment and diagnosis due to wide variability in the nature and severity of speech impairments associated with it. To address this, this study investigates the phonetic variations in different types of dysarthric speech using the deep learning model Phonet. Recordings of the word “Catastrophe” from 54 patients diagnosed with dysarthria were analyzed to extract posterior probabilities of consonants and vowels. The analysis revealed distinct posterior probability patterns for consonants and vowels across three types of dysarthria, indicating disorder-specific articulatory-based speech characteristics. Moreover, within each dysarthric group, variations in posterior probabilities aligned with the severity of rated articulation difficulty, reflecting nuanced intra-disease phonetic differences. These findings demonstrate Phonet’s ability to capture subtle speech variations and link them to both dysarthria type and severity. By quantifying these phonetic alterations, this study offers a novel and robust framework for objectively evaluating articulation difficulties in dysarthric speech. The results emphasize the clinical potential of Phonet as an advanced tool for improving the diagnosis and monitoring of dysarthria, paving the way for innovative applications in speech-based clinical assessments.

Background: Progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS) is a neurodegenerative disorder most commonly arising from a 4-repeat tauopathy that affects the programming or planning of speech, although many patients develop a Parkinson-plus syndrome. The role of neuroinflammation as a disease mechanism is unknown. We investigated the spatial pattern of neuroinflammation in PAOS using PET and evaluated whether it is associated with disease severity, presence of Parkinson-plus features, and tau PET uptake. Patients and Methods: Twenty-five PAOS patients (13 with Parkinson-plus features) and 30 controls underwent inflammatory 11C-ER176 and tau 18F-flortaucipir PET scans as well as detailed clinical assessments. Multiple linear regression analyses compared the inflammatory standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) between PAOS and controls and assessed the relationship with clinical test scores. Pearson correlation analysis examined the relationship between inflammatory and tau SUVRs. Results: PAOS had greater neuroinflammatory SUVR than controls in the precentral, supplementary motor area, frontal gyri, putamen, pallidum, subthalamic nucleus, and red nucleus (adjusted P < 0.05). Greater neuroinflammation was associated with worse parkinsonism, and patients who had developed Parkinson-plus features showed a broader pattern of neuroinflammation, extending to prefrontal, temporal and parietal cortices. Neuroinflammation correlated with tau uptake in most (96%) PAOS patients (r > 0.3, P < 0.05). The higher correlation was associated with worse parkinsonism (r = 0.61, P < 0.05) and disease severity (r = 0.54, P < 0.05). Conclusions: 11C-ER176 PET analysis demonstrates neuroinflammation in frontal and subcortical regions in PAOS which is particularly severe and widespread with the development of Parkinson-plus clinical features. The colocalization of neuroinflammation and tau may support a relationship between these disease mechanisms.

ObjectivesThe four‐repeat (4R) tauopathies are a group of neurodegenerative diseases, including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), and globular glial tauopathy (GGT). This study aimed to characterize spatiotemporal atrophy progression using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to examine its relationship with clinical course and neuropathology in a cohort of autopsy‐confirmed 4R tauopathies.MethodsThe study included 85 autopsied patients (54 with PSP, 28 with CBD, and 3 with GGT) who underwent multiple 3T MRI scans, as well as neuropsychological, neurological, and speech/language examinations, and standardized postmortem neuropathological evaluations. An unsupervised machine‐learning algorithm, Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn), was applied to the cross‐sectional brain volumes to estimate spatiotemporal atrophy patterns and data‐driven subtypes and stages in each patient. The relationships among estimated subtypes, pathological diagnoses, and longitudinal changes in clinical testing were examined.ResultsThe SuStaIn algorithm identified 2 distinct subtypes: (1) the subcortical subtype, in which atrophy progresses from the midbrain to the cortex, and (2) the cortical subtype, in which atrophy progresses from the frontal cortex to the subcortical regions. The subcortical subtype was more associated with typical PSP, whereas the cortical subtype was more associated with atypical PSP with a cortical distribution of pathology and CBD (p < 0.001). The cortical subtype had a faster rate of change on the PSP Rating Scale than the subcortical subtype (p < 0.05).InterpretationSuStaIn analysis revealed 2 MRI‐driven subtypes with distinct spatiotemporal atrophy patterns, clinical courses, and neuropathology. Our findings contribute to a comprehensive and improved understanding of disease progression and its relationship to tau pathology in 4R tauopathies. ANN NEUROL 2025;98:492–507

ABSTRACTIndividuals with primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS) often develop parkinsonism and dysphagia. To evaluate the clinical correlates and impact of dysphagia in this population, we compared enrollment visit data between individuals with (n = 12) versus individuals without (n = 44) dysphagia symptoms. The group with dysphagia had more motor speech symptoms and parkinsonism. Longitudinal analysis revealed that almost everyone developed dysphagia before dying; the average time to death after developing dysphagia was 5.43 years and complications of dysphagia resulted in mortality for 35% of the individuals for whom data were available. These results emphasize the need for dysphagia management and provide useful prognostic estimates.

Background and Objectives: Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Recent studies have suggested the feasibility and potential utility of remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS) to improve different types of impairments in various neurological conditions. This scoping review provides a critical appraisal of RS-tDCS as an adjunct therapy to enhance recovery after stroke. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature review was systematically conducted using PubMed through Nested Knowledge software. A supplementary search was conducted in Google Scholar. Two independent authors screened and identified related studies investigating RS-tDCS in patients with stroke from inception to February 2025. Results: Studies showed that RS-tDCS was safe, with only mild side effects. Additionally, it was feasible, with high adherence rates likely due to ease of use. Regarding efficacy, RS-tDCS preliminarily yielded improvements in upper- and lower-limb motor functions and increased language and cognitive performance. However, the studies were underpowered and heterogeneous, limiting generalization of findings. Conclusions: RS-tDCS is safe and feasible, affording beneficial effects in the motor, language, and cognitive functions of patients with post-stroke impairments. RS-tDCS has the potential to improve access and reduce disparities for post-stroke experimental treatments. However, adequately powered randomized trials are needed to further investigate the efficacy.

Background and Objectives: Hearing loss is relatively common in older individuals, and individuals with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are no exception; this can exacerbate communication difficulties stemming from speech-language impairments. The co-occurrence of these symptoms can contribute to increased frustration and isolation for patients and their communication partners. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of self-administered hearing testing. Ultimately, this could be administered remotely, which would increase access to assessment and inform management for this population. Method: Seventeen patients with underlying FTLD, clinically presenting with progressive apraxia of speech with and without agrammatic aphasia, independently completed the Home Hearing Test supervised while in office. Results: Three patients self-reported hearing loss, but results for 100% recommended formal evaluation. Eleven patients demonstrated good test accuracy. Six patients had “poor” or not computable accuracy; among them, five had evidence of cognitive impairment and/or behavioral changes, and one had known severe hearing loss, although differences between those with good and poor test accuracy were not significant. Patients with poor test accuracy had more difficulty with limb praxis. Conclusions: Most participants independently completed the test, though some had reduced test accuracy that may have been associated with cognitive impairment and/or limb apraxia. This study supports the need for hearing screenings in all patients with progressive apraxia of speech and aphasia and highlights both the feasibility and caution required in implementing self-administered testing protocols. Further work should evaluate the feasibility of in-home hearing screenings in a broader range of FTLD phenotypes and directly compare sensitivity and specificity of hearing loss detection with in-clinic administration. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28306613

Abstract Background The language symptomology associated with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), namely word finding difficulties with loss of word meaning, leads to multimodal communication difficulties. Given that communication plays an intricate role in establishing and sustaining relationships, svPPA can impact relationships, including those with spouses, in a manner that can only be understood by firsthand experiences. This study aimed to describe a spouse’s experiences of communicating with an individual with svPPA along with the role of communication supports and expectations for speech‐language therapy. Method A semi‐structured interview using open‐ended questions was conducted with the spouse of an individual with svPPA. The interview transcript was reviewed and analyzed using thematic analysis by both authors. Result The themes that emerged when discussing living with an individual with svPPA included: the role of communication in their prior life; changes in communication and behavior; emotional impact; adjustments and accommodations; and community engagement and supports. Themes associated with communication supports included: external tools; adaptive strategies; individualization and adaptation; and utility. The spouse in the current study described a tool, specifically a notebook in the form of a dictionary that was initiated and developed by the individual with svPPA. The tool increased his confidence in communication as it aided comprehension and recognition of words. Caregiver inclusion, learning about the patient, and evolving strategies are themes surrounding the spouse’s expectations from speech therapy. Conclusion The study revealed challenges in the spouse of an individual with svPPA understanding and expressing thoughts to her partner, which resulted in feeling more distant as well as changes in social dynamics. The study also describes the benefits of communication supports for both the spouse and the individual with svPPA. Additionally, the study revealed the important role the SLP, and the community plays in enhancing well‐being. Although the findings from the current study cannot be ubiquitously generalized, it provides insight into the changing dynamics of a couple navigating svPPA and reiterates the importance of including patients and their care partners in treatment planning and the benefit of communication supports and speech therapy across the disease course.

AbstractBackgroundDiscussion surrounding the nomenclature of the “nonfluent/agrammatic” spectrum of progressive speech‐language disorders has largely focused on the clinical‐pathological and neuroimaging correlations, with some attention paid to the prognostication afforded by differentiating clinical phenotypes. Progressive apraxia of speech (AOS), with or without agrammatic aphasia, is generally associated with an underlying tauopathy; however, patients have offered a unique perspective on the importance of distinguishing between difficulties with speech and language that extends beyond pathological specificity. This study aimed to provide insight into the experience of patients with primary progressive AOS (PPAOS), with particular attention to their diagnostic journey.MethodA qualitative research approach was used. Structured interviews were conducted with three prosodic and one phonetic predominant PPAOS patients, judged representative of our research cohort, who were previously received other diagnoses, including primary progressive aphasia (PPA). A current PPAOS diagnosis and willingness to discuss the details of their diagnostic workup and reflect upon their experience were the inclusion criteria. One patient preferred to provide written responses. Each interview was reviewed, and the collective contents were examined using thematic analysis.ResultThe primary themes were identity, community, and planning. Patients expressed: 1) the importance of the alignment of AOS with their difficulties, specifically that they had no difficulty with thinking of words or with comprehension (i.e., no aphasia); 2) not sharing attributes with PPA patients and their observed clinical presentations; and 3) the desire to capitalize upon their retained skills for treatment, for example “I intend to retain my ‘voice’ even as I lose my speaking ability.”ConclusionUnderstanding the experiences of PPAOS patients may inform future iterations of progressive speech‐language spectrum diagnostic criteria and the consistency of their use, along with intervention recommendations. The specificity of a PPAOS diagnosis is meaningful to patients as it relates to their identity, sense of community, and approach to future planning. Further work will evaluate the experience of patients with a broader spectrum of progressive speech‐language disorders along with their care partners. More work is underway to outline the predictive value of an AOS diagnosis, relative to co‐occurring aphasia severity, to inform better prognostication.