Citations

Summary Background Pregabalin is a calcium channel α2δ ligand that modifies visceral hypersensitivity in IBS patients. Clinical data for pregabalin in IBS are lacking. Aim To test the efficacy of pregabalin on gastrointestinal symptoms in IBS patients. Methods A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial was performed. Adults meeting IBS Rome III criteria with ≥3 pain attacks per month were randomised to pregabalin 225 mg vs placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. Questionnaires were completed weekly. The primary endpoint was average pain Bowel Symptom Scale (BSS) scores weeks 9‐12. An intention‐to‐treat analysis of covariance evaluated treatment effects on quantitative endpoints, adjusting for age and gender. Adequate relief and change in pain score were assessed using a chi‐squared test. Results Eighty‐five patients were recruited and randomised. Sample characteristics include: mean age 39.4 (SD = 14.6); 73 (86%) female; 37 (44%) IBS‐D, 29 (35%) IBS‐M, 18 (21%) IBS‐C. The pregabalin arm had lower average pain‐BSS scores weeks 9‐12 (25 vs 42, P = 0.008). Compared with placebo, the overall IBS BSS severity score was lower in the pregabalin arm (26 vs 42, P = 0.009). Differences were observed for the diarrhoea‐BSS and bloating‐BSS scores ( P = 0.049 and 0.016, respectively). No differences between groups were seen for constipation‐BSS scores. Adequate relief was not different between the two arms (46% vs 36%, P = 0.35). 63% pregabalin vs 45% placebo had a change in pain score ≥30 at week 12 from baseline ( P = 0.10). Post‐treatment IBS‐QoL scores did not differ between groups. Conclusion This trial suggests that pregabalin may be beneficial for IBS abdominal pain, bloating and diarrhoea.

Goals and Background: Baseline impedance measured during high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) can distinguish patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) from controls, presumably due to differences in esophageal acid exposure. The characteristics of regurgitation and reflux in rumination syndrome and GERD are very different, and thus we investigated whether baseline esophageal impedance would differ in these 2 patient groups compared with controls. Study: We compared 20 patients with rumination syndrome with 20 patients who had GERD and 40 controls. Baseline impedance was measured over 15 seconds during the landmark period of HRIM in all 18 impedance sensors on a HRIM catheter. Results: The mean distal baseline impedance measured in ohms during HRIM was 1336 Ω [95% confidence interval (CI)=799, 1873) in patients with GERD, 1536 Ω in rumination syndrome (95% CI=1012, 2061), and 3379 Ω in controls (95% CI=2999, 3759) (P<0.0001). Proximal impedance was significantly lower in the GERD and rumination groups compared with controls; rumination syndrome (2026; 95% CI=1493, 2559 Ω), GERD (2572; 95% CI=2027, 3118 Ω), and controls (3412; 95% CI=3026, 3798 Ω) (P<0.001). Conclusions: Baseline impedance measured during HRIM in patients with rumination syndrome is significantly lower than controls and appears similar to patients with GERD both in the proximal and distal esophagus. These findings suggest that the postprandial regurgitation in rumination syndrome alters both the distal and proximal esophageal mucosal barrier.

Background The Nepean Dyspepsia Index (NDI) has been in widespread use since its publication in 1999 and the addition of a short form in 2001. The NDI was one of the first disease-specific quality-of-life instruments created for functional dyspepsia (FD). However, its psychometric properties have never been validated in an independent sample. Aim This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the NDI in an a-priori driven approach in an independent population. Patients and methods In 289 individuals who fulfilled the Rome criteria for FD enrolled in a randomized placebo-controlled trial (FD treatment trial), we examined construct validity, convergent validity, and internal consistency. Results Construct validity was supported in its 25-item unweighted and weighted forms as well as the 10-item short form. All items in the 25-item form yielded considerable (>0.5) standardized loadings on their respective latent variables and all reached statistical significance ( P <0.0001), supporting their relationships with the hypothesized domains. Convergent validity was strongly supported, with every domain being correlated with multiple external instruments; the majority of correlations were in the range 0.3–0.5 (in absolute values). The items comprising each domain showed good internal consistency, with the lowest value of Chronbach α at 0.80. Scores based on the short form (10-item) version of the NDI correlated strongly with the full 25-item form (tension ρ =0.88, interference ρ =0.94, eat/drink ρ =0.95, knowledge ρ =0.84 and work/study ρ =0.97; all P <0.0001). Conclusion The NDI is a valid instrument that can be used to measure the disease-specific impact of FD on quality of life.

Goals: To evaluate agreement of MCM6-13910 with self-report of dairy sensitivity (DS) and lactose hydrogen methane breath test (LHMBT) results in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Background: IBS is a functional gastrointestinal disorder with symptoms including abdominal pain, variable bowel habits, and bloating. Adult patients with lactose malabsorption may present with similar symptoms. Patients with lactose malabsorption have a lactase nonpersistent (LNP) phenotype. Recent studies found 2 single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with LNP: G/A-22018 and C/T-13910. Study: Genotyping the MCM6-13910 variant of LNP in 538 IBS patients and 317 controls (without IBS). Subjects completed questionnaires pertaining to gastrointestinal problems and dietary consumption, with charts abstracted. Results: Self-reported DS was higher in IBS (45%) than controls (9.8%, odds ratio=6.46, P<0.001). The C/C-13910 genotype was similar in IBS cases and controls, 81 (15.1%) and 47 (14.8%). Among subjects reporting DS, 49 (18.0%) had the C/C genotype. Overall agreement between genotype and self-reported DS was 0.06 in IBS and 0.07 in controls. There were 20 subjects with LHMBT results; 3 had positive results, 17 were negative. LNP genotypes were found in all 3 of positive LHMBT results; 16 had negative LHMBT among the 17 who were lactase persistent. Agreement between C/C-13910 genotype and LHMBT was excellent with κ-statistic of 0.83 (0.50-1.00). Conclusions: In IBS patients, self-report of lactose intolerance are highly prevalent but are a poor indicator of underlying C/C-13910 genotype. LHMBT had excellent agreement with C/C-13910 genotype.

AbstractBackgroundIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder, diagnosed on symptom‐based criteria. Many have reported discrepancies between formal Rome criteria and diagnoses made in clinical practice. The aim of the study was to explore whether a quantitative version of the Rome criteria would better represent a clinical diagnosis of IBS than the current dichotomous criteria for symptom measure.MethodsAs part of a large, case‐control study, participants completed a validated bowel disease questionnaire. Rome criteria were analyzed based on 15 individual symptoms. Penalized logistic regression model with stepwise selection was used to identify significant symptoms of IBS which were independently associated with case‐control status.Key ResultsIn cases with a clinical diagnosis of IBS, 347 (70%) met Rome criteria for IBS. Increasing number of Rome symptoms were found related to the odds of being diagnosed with IBS. Nearly half of the Rome‐negative case group experienced infrequent symptoms suggesting milder disease. Five of 15 Rome symptoms were associated with predicting case‐control status in the final model, with 96% correctly classified among Rome‐positive cases, 76% for Rome‐negative cases, and 91% for controls.Conclusions and InferencesIrritable bowel syndrome appears to be a spectrum disorder. Quantifying individual symptoms of Rome criteria has greater utility than the current application in representing the degree of IBS affectedness and appears to better reflect a clinical diagnosis of IBS applied by physicians. The use of a quantitative diagnostic Rome “score” may be helpful in clinical practice and research studies to better reflect the degree an individual is affected with IBS.