Citations

BACKGROUND Ibrutinib, an irreversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been associated with an increased risk of bleeding. There is a paucity of data on the risk of bleeding in patients on ibrutinib undergoing dermatologic surgery. OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency of bleeding complications associated with ibrutinib in patients undergoing dermatologic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective, single-center, case–control study of patients on ibrutinib undergoing skin surgery between January 2013 and March 2020 compared with sex, disease, and age-matched control patients undergoing cutaneous surgeries. RESULTS A total of 75 surgeries performed on 37 case patients and 116 surgeries performed on 64 control patients were included. Ibrutinib was associated with a statistically significant increased rate of bleeding events (6/75 [8%] vs 1/116 [0.8%], p -value = .02). Compared with ibrutinib patients who did not have a bleeding event, those on ibrutinib who suffered bleeding were all men, older (mean age 82.7 vs 73.0, p -value= .01), and had lower mean platelet counts (104.0 vs 150.5 K/μL, p -value = .03). CONCLUSION Ibrutinib may be associated with increased risk of bleeding in patients with hematologic malignancies, particularly older men with lower platelet levels and on multiple anticoagulants. Transient discontinuation of ibrutinib should be considered for dermatologic surgeries.

ObjectiveFailure to recognize symptoms of non‐human papillomavirus‐associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV(−)OPSCC) at presentation can delay diagnosis and treatment. We aim to identify patient factors and provider practice patterns that delay presentation and care in HPV(−)OPSCC.MethodsRetrospective review at a tertiary care center. Patients with HPV(−)OPSCC receiving treatment from 2006 to 2016. Patients were excluded if their date of symptom onset or diagnosis was unknown after thorough review of the electronic medical record or their tissue was not tested for HPV or p16. Clinical data, workup, and care timelines were abstracted. Univariate and multivariable linear regressions were performed to determine associations between patient and provider factors and delays in care.ResultsOf 70 included patients, 52 (74%) were male and mean age was 60.5 (SD = 9.0). Median time to diagnosis was 69 days (IQR = 32–127 days), with a median latency of 30 days (IQR = 12–61 days) from symptom onset to first presentation and 19.5 days (IQR = 4–46 days) from the first presentation to diagnosis. Most patients visited at least 2 providers (n = 52, 74%) before diagnosis. Evaluation by 3 or more providers prior to diagnosis was associated with significant delays in diagnosis of nearly a year (357.7 days, p < 0.001) and being treated or prescribed analgesia prior to diagnosis was significantly associated with delays in diagnosis (p = 0.004) on univariate regression analysis.ConclusionsDelays in care related to evaluations by multiple providers and misdiagnosis prolonged time to diagnosis in HPV(−)OPSCC. Improved patient and provider education is necessary to expedite the diagnosis of HPV(−)OPSCC.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 133:1394–1401, 2023

AbstractObjectiveEsthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) is a rare malignant neoplasm arising from the olfactory epithelium of the cribriform plate. The goal of this study was to update our oncologic outcomes for this disease and explore prognostic factors associated with survival.Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients with ENB treated at a single tertiary care institution from January 1, 1960, to January 1, 2020. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed. Overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS) were reported.ResultsAmong 143 included patients, the 5‐year OS was 82.3% and the 5‐year PFS was 51.6%; 5‐year OS and PFS have improved in the modern era (2005–present). Delayed regional nodal metastasis was the most common site of recurrence in 22% of patients (median, 57 months). On univariate analysis, modified Kadish staging (mKadish) had a negative effect on OS, PFS, and DMFS (p < 0.05). Higher Hyams grade had a negative effect on PFS and DMFS (p < 0.05). Positive margin status had a negative effect on PFS (p < 0.05). Orbital invasion demonstrated worsening OS (hazard ratio, 3.1; p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, high Hyams grade (3 or 4), high mKadish stage (C+D), and increasing age were independent negative prognostic factors for OS (p < 0.05). High Hyams grade (3+4), high mKadish stage (C+D), age, and positive margin status were independent negative prognostic factors for PFS (p < 0.05). High Hyams grade (3+4) was an independent negative prognostic factor for DMFS (p < 0.05).ConclusionsPatients with low Hyams grade and mKadish stage have favorable 5‐year OS, PFS, and DMFS.

Purpose Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) rates in women with unilateral breast cancer are increasing despite controversy regarding survival advantage. Current scrutiny of the medical costs led us to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CPM versus routine surveillance as an alternative contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk management strategy. Methods Using a Markov model, we simulated patients with breast cancer from mastectomy to death. Model parameters were gathered from published literature or national databases. Base-case analysis focused on patients with average-risk breast cancer, 45 years of age at treatment. Outcomes were valued in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Patients' age, risk level of breast cancer, and quality of life (QOL) were varied to assess their impact on results. Results Mean costs of treatment for women age 45 years are comparable: $36,594 for the CPM and $35,182 for surveillance. CPM provides 21.22 mean QALYs compared with 20.93 for surveillance, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $4,869/QALY gained for CPM. To prevent one CBC, six CPMs would be needed. CPM is no longer cost-effective for patients older than 70 years (ICER $62,750/QALY). For BRCA-positive patients, CPM is clearly cost-effective, providing more QALYs while being less costly. In non-BRCA patients, cost-effectiveness of CPM is highly dependent on assumptions regarding QOL for CPM versus surveillance strategy. Conclusion CPM is cost-effective compared with surveillance for patients with breast cancer who are younger than 70 years. Results are sensitive to BRCA-positive status and assumptions of QOL differences between CPM and surveillance patients. This highlights the importance of tailoring treatment for individual patients.