Abstract Rationale No previous studies have examined the role of prehospital vulnerability in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) development and mortality in an acutely ill adult population. Objectives To describe the association between prehospital vulnerability and 1) the development of ARDS, 2) 28-day mortality, and 3) 1-year mortality. Methods This was a longitudinal prospective cohort study nested within the multicenter LIPS-A (Lung Injury Prevention Study-Aspirin) trial. We analyzed 301 participants who completed Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES) at baseline. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were used to describe the association between vulnerability and short-term outcomes (ARDS and 28-day mortality) and long-term outcomes (1-year mortality), respectively. Results The VES score ranged from 0 to 10 (median [interquartile range], 2.0 [0–6]); 143 (47.5%) fit criteria for prehospital vulnerability (VES ≥ 3). Vulnerability was not significantly associated with ARDS development (10 [7.0%] vulnerable patients developed ARDS as per LIPS-A study criteria vs. 20 [12.7%] without vulnerability; P = 0.10; adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)], 0.54 [0.24–1.24]; P = 0.15). Nor was vulnerability associated with 28-day mortality (15 [10.5%] vulnerable patients were dead by Day 28 vs. 11 [7.0%] nonvulnerable patients; P = 0.28; adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 0.95 [0.39–2.26]; P = 0.90). Vulnerability was significantly associated with 1-year mortality in hospital survivors (35 [26.9%] vs. 13 [9.3%]; adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI], 2.20 [1.10–4.37]; P = 0.02). Conclusions In a population of adults recruited for their high risk of ARDS, prehospital vulnerability, measured by VES, was highly prevalent and strongly associated with 1-year mortality.
Ebselen inhibits QSOX1 enzymatic activity and suppresses invasion of pancreatic and renal cancer cell lines
Abstract Introduction: QSOX1 is a flavin-dependent sulfhydryl oxidase and the only known human enzyme with both disulfide generating and transferring activities. Using tissue microarrays, we previously demonstrated that QSOX1 is over-expressed in multiple tumor types including breast, pancreas, prostate and myeloma. Loss of QSOX1 leads to a significant decrease in tumor cell proliferation and invasion. The over-expression of QSOX1 in tumor cells compared to non-malignant cells combined with its role in tumor cell proliferation and invasion make it an attractive target for potential anti-neoplastic agents. Methods: Using a high throughput screening assay to detect sulfhydryl oxidase activity, we screened a library of compounds for inhibition of the QSOX1 enzyme. We used ROS-GloTM, a luciferase-based assay that detects H2O2, to determine if any compounds in the library inhibited QSOX1-mediated disulfide bond formation using reduced RNAse A as a substrate. QSOX1 generates H2O2 as a by-product of disulfide bond formation. To determine if compounds that showed activity in the enzymatic assay were also active against tumor cells, we treated pancreatic, breast, and myeloma cells with the compounds in a dose-dependent fashion, using non-malignant cells as controls. We assayed growth/viability by MTT and CellTiter-Glo assays. Invasive activity of tumor cells was assessed using matrigel-coated inserts in a modified Boyden chamber assay. Results: High throughput library screening identified 4 compounds that specifically inhibited QSOX1 activity (designated A-D) compared to a glucose oxidase counter-screen. Growth/viability assays showed that compound D suppressed the growth of tumor cells with IC50s between 300nM-750nM, depending on tumor cell line. In non-malignant cells the IC50s for compound D were more than 10-fold higher than in tumor cells. Compounds A and D also inhibited invasion of breast and pancreatic tumor cells through Matrigel. Conclusion: This is the first report of chemical compounds that inhibit QSOX1 enzymatic activity. The discovery of QSOX1 inhibitors with cellular efficacy establishes the chemical tractability of the target. Our data demonstrate that these First-In-Class compounds have potential as anti-neoplastic therapeutics via inhibition of QSOX1. Citation Format: Paul D. Hanavan, Douglas O. Faigel, Chen-Ting Ma, Eduard Sergienko, Nathalie Meurice, Joachim L. Petit, Yvette W. Ruiz, Benjamin A. Katchman, Douglas F. Lake. Small molecule inhibitors of QSOX1 suppress tumor cell growth and invasion. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 1790. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-1790