Citations

62 Background: We have previously reported that mutations in SPOP promote bromodomain and extra-terminal motif (BET) protein upregulation and BET inhibitor resistance in prostate cancer (Zhang et al., Nature Medicine 23(9):1055-1062, 2017). Other studies indicate that histone acetyltransferases (HATs) such as P300 are also upregulated in SPOP-mutated prostate cancer (Blattner et al., Cancer Cell 31: 436-451, 2017). Methods: We examined the anti-cancer effect of NEO2734 (Epigene Therapeutics Inc), a novel dual inhibitor of both BET and CBP-P300, in prostate cancer using cell line, organoid and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) as working models. We examined the anti-cancer effect of NEO2734 (Epigene Therapeutics Inc), a novel dual inhibitor of both BET and CBP-P300, in prostate cancer using cell line, organoid and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) as working models. Results: We demonstrated that while prostate cancer cell lines expressing F133V, the most frequent SPOP mutant, are very resistant to both BET inhibitor JQ1 and CBP/P300 inhibitor CPI-637, they are very sensitive to simultaneous cotreatment with JQ1 and CPI-637. Similarly, we demonstrated that F133V mutant cells are also very sensitive to NEO2734. We established PDX and organoid models from a patient with prostate cancer expressing a novel SPOP mutation Q165P. Computer simulation analysis reveals that the Q165P mutation causes larger conformational fluctuation, indicating that the structure of Q165P is less stable than that of wild type SPOP. Accordingly, co-immunoprecipitation assay showed that Q165P mutation impaired the dimerization ability of SPOP. We further showed that the Q165P mutant organoid was very sensitive to NEO2734 in vitro and the Q165P mutant PDX was very sensitive to NEO2734 in mice. Conclusions: These PDX-based pre-clinical studies indicate that the inhibition of both BET and CBP-P300, either by co-administration of two agents, or by treatment with the dual inhibitor, NEO2734, is effective in SPOP-mutated prostate cancer. These data provide a strong rationale for the inclusion of patients with SPOP-mutated prostate cancer in clinical studies of NEO2734.

Abstract The emergence of tumor cells with certain stem-like characteristics, such as high aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity due to ALDH1A1 expression, contributes to chemotherapy resistance and tumor relapse. However, clinically applicable inhibitors of ALDH activity have not been reported. There is evidence to suggest that epigenetic regulation of stem-related genes contributes to chemotherapy efficacy. Here, we show that bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) inhibitors suppress ALDH activity by abrogating BRD4-mediated ALDH1A1 expression through a super-enhancer element and its associated enhancer RNA. The clinically applicable small-molecule BET inhibitor JQ1 suppressed the outgrowth of cisplatin-treated ovarian cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. Combination of JQ1 and cisplatin improved the survival of ovarian cancer–bearing mice in an orthotopic model. These phenotypes correlate with inhibition of ALDH1A1 expression through a super-enhancer element and other stem-related genes in promoter regions bound by BRD4. Thus, targeting the BET protein BRD4 using clinically applicable small-molecule inhibitors, such as JQ1, is a promising strategy for targeting ALDH activity in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Res; 76(21); 6320–30. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: The initiation, progression, and maintenance of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) results from the interplay of genetic and epigenetic events. While the genetic alterations of PDAC have been well characterized, epigenetic pathways regulating PDAC remain, for the most part, elusive. The goal of this study was to identify novel epigenetic regulators contributing to the biology of PDAC. Experimental Design: In vivo pooled shRNA screens targeting 118 epigenetic proteins were performed in two orthotopic PDAC xenograft models. Candidate genes were characterized in 19 human PDAC cell lines, heterotopic xenograft tumor models, and a genetically engineered mouse (GEM) model of PDAC. Gene expression, IHC, and immunoprecipitation experiments were performed to analyze the pathways by which candidate genes contribute to PDAC. Results: In vivo shRNA screens identified BRD2 and BRD3, members of the BET family of chromatin adaptors, as key regulators of PDAC tumor growth. Pharmacologic inhibition of BET bromodomains enhanced survival in a PDAC GEM model and inhibited growth of human-derived xenograft tumors. BET proteins contribute to PDAC cell growth through direct interaction with members of the GLI family of transcription factors and modulating their activity. Within cancer cells, BET bromodomain inhibition results in downregulation of SHH, a key mediator of the tumor microenvironment and canonical activator of GLI. Consistent with this, inhibition of BET bromodomains decreases cancer-associated fibroblast content of tumors in both GEM and xenograft tumor models. Conclusions: Therapeutic inhibition of BET proteins offers a novel mechanism to target both the neoplastic and stromal components of PDAC. Clin Cancer Res; 22(16); 4259–70. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract The numerous and diverse genetic lesions in multiple myeloma (MM) make it difficult to discern those genetic abnormalities that may be suitable therapeutic targets. We have observed that the MYC locus is frequently rearranged in MM (about half of both patients and cell lines), suggesting that MYC dysregulation is a common feature of this disease. To evaluate MYC suppression as a therapeutic strategy in MM, we treated human myeloma cell lines with CPI203, a potent and selective inhibitor of bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins. The bromodomain inhibitor CPI203 has potency and selectivity similar to that of JQ1, but has improved pharmacokinetics for in vivo studies. From our collection of MM cell lines we have identified sensitive and resistant cell lines and characterized their response to CPI203 in detail. A number of conclusions have emerged from this work. First, response correlates with MYC protein levels after 3 days of treatment. MYC levels are significantly suppressed in sensitive lines and much less affected in resistant lines, supporting the hypothesis that MYC suppression alone determines cell fate in MM cell lines. In sensitive cell lines treatment with CPI203 caused a rapid (within 90 min.) decrease in MYC transcription that is consistent with the response being an intrinsic property of the cell lines. Inhibition of MYC transcription was followed by eventual cell cycle arrest and limited apoptosis in these sensitive cell lines. Both sensitive and resistant cell lines exhibited induction of Histone2H2BE gene in response to CPI203 treatment, indicating that drug efflux pumps alone do not mediate resistance. Surprisingly, several of the resistant cell lines exhibited an initial phase of sensitivity to BET inhibition. Upon drug addition, MYC transcription and MYC protein levels are repressed 2- to 5-fold, followed by a gradual recovery of MYC message and protein levels to the initial levels. In this second phase the cells are truly insensitive to BET inhibition: the drug remains active during this incubation and addition of fresh medium with drug does not affect MYC transcription. Furthermore, many aspects of the BET inhibition gene expression profile remain constant throughout this transition between sensitivity and resistance. These results suggest that the recovery phase is not a simple reversal of BET inhibition but rather the emergence of an alternative-signaling pathway that activates MYC expression in the presence of BET inhibition. Presently we are analyzing gene expression data to identify genes and signaling pathways responsible for this “induced resistance”. The identification of such pathways will help us better understand the molecular basis of the response to BET inhibition, which in turn might enable us to identify predictive biomarkers of the therapeutic response. Citation Format: Daniel L. Riggs, Marta Chesi, P Leif Bergsagel. Targeting MYC in multiple myeloma by BET protein inhibition. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 5489. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-5489