Citations

Background Prior authorization (PA) is a major source of administrative burden, treatment delay, and clinician burnout. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), is increasingly used to assist with clinical documentation, yet its reliability for payer-facing administrative tasks remains uncertain. Objective To evaluate the quality of PA letters drafted by ChatGPT-5 for commonly used medications requiring PA in nephrology. Quality was evaluated based on correctness and strength of clinical reasoning. Methods We created a single standardized prompt and applied it across 29 nephrology scenarios to generate PA letters. Each PA letter was reviewed against four criteria: 1) absence of false statements or hallucinations, 2) correctness of ICD-10 coding, 3) presence and validity of citations, and 4) clinical reasoning, rated on a 4-point Likert scale (illogical, weak, adequate and strong). FDA drug labels, KDIGO guidelines and related randomized controlled trials were used as reference standards. Results Out of 29 letters, one letter (3.5%) contained false statements mentioning an irrelevant clinical trial. The ICD-10 diagnosis code was correct in 23 letters (79.3%), most errors were related to chronic kidney disease (CKD) staging or internal diagnostic inconsistencies. 27 letters (93.1%) cited valid references, with one letter citing an incorrect trial and another one citing a correct KDIGO guideline with inaccessible link. Twenty-six letters (89.7%) demonstrated strong clinical reasoning, supported by guideline-oriented or FDA label–aligned justification. The remaining 3 letters were rated as adequate reasoning. The main areas for improvement involved citing relevant references and emphasizing special considerations, for example Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) compliance for eculizumab. Conclusions ChatGPT-5 can generate clinically coherent PA drafts for nephrology medications, but limitations in coding precision and citation reliability persist. With appropriate oversight, AI-assisted documentation may reduce administrative burden while maintaining safety and accuracy.

ABSTRACT Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalised children is a major complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) models may enable early detection and risk stratification. This systematic review evaluates the performance of AI/ML models for predicting paediatric AKI across clinical settings. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies applying AI/ML models to predict AKI in paediatric populations. Studies reporting performance metrics such as the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and F1 score were included. Results Among 470 records identified, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 14 AI/ML models used. The overall sample size included 33 949 paediatric patients with an AKI proportion of 12.5%. Meta-analyses of the AUC were conducted on neural network, gradient boosting, and logistic regression. Gradient boosting had the highest pooled AUC of 0.873 (95% confidence interval 0.836–0.909). Random forest demonstrated the highest median sensitivity (0.821), specificity (0.942), PPV (0.860), NPV (0.935), and accuracy (0.821); however, these metrics could not be pooled due to inconsistent reporting and limited validation. Conclusion Gradient boosting, random forest, and logistic regression demonstrated reasonable predictive performance for paediatric AKI prediction within specific clinical contexts. However, small sample size, heterogeneity, lack of testing/validation cohorts, insufficient data, and inconsistent patient populations and AKI diagnostic criteria restrict generalisability.

Key Points Baseline kidney function and chronic structural injury strongly predicted both renal recovery and long-term clinical outcomes. Tubulointerstitial nephritis was the predominant lesion in Sjögren syndrome with renal involvement. Early detection and management of renal involvement in Sjögren syndrome are critical to preventing irreversible kidney damage. Background Renal involvement in primary Sjögren syndrome (SS) is uncommon but clinically consequential. Previous studies have been limited by small samples and incomplete biopsy data. We evaluated a large biopsy-confirmed cohort to characterize clinicopathologic features of SS with renal involvement and identify predictors of renal recovery and long-term outcomes. Methods We retrospectively identified adults with SS and kidney biopsy at Mayo Clinic (2012–2025). Clinical, laboratory, and histologic data were extracted. Predictors of complete renal recovery within 6 months, defined as serum creatinine (sCr) returning to within 25% of baseline or <1.4 mg/dl if baseline was unknown, were evaluated using logistic regression. Cox regression assessed long-term risk of a composite end point: newly developed or progressive CKD, ESKD, or all-cause mortality. Results Fifty-six patients were included (median age 57 years; 91% female). Extraglandular manifestations occurred in 76% and baseline CKD in 65%. The median sCr at baseline and biopsy was 1.3 and 1.6 mg/dl, respectively. Anti-Sjogren's syndrome antigen A, often linked with Ro ribonucleoprotein was positive in 80%. Low C3 occurred in 14% and low C4 in 25%. Tubulointerstitial nephritis was the predominant lesion (71%). Moderate/severe interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and arteriosclerosis were present in 36% and 41%, respectively. Immunosuppressive therapy was applied in 84%. Complete recovery occurred in 67%. Over a median 3.9 years (interquartile range, 1.4–7.2), 43% reached the composite end point. Baseline sCr ≥2 mg/dl, 24-hour proteinuria ≥1 g, and presence of segmental glomerulosclerosis were associated with lower odds of recovery (odds ratio=0.16, 0.13 and 0.11, P = 0.02, 0.001 and 0.008, respectively) and higher long-term risk (hazard ratio=4.51, 2.92 and 3.52; P = 0.002, 0.01 and 0.02, respectively). Moderate/severe arteriosclerosis also increased long-term risk (hazard ratio=2.56; P = 0.03). Conclusions In biopsy-confirmed SS-related renal involvement, the severity of kidney dysfunction and the extent of chronic glomerular and vascular injury strongly predict renal prognosis. Early detection and targeted management of high-risk features may improve long-term renal outcomes.

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is increasingly used because of its enhanced theoretical clearance of diverse uremic toxins, particularly middle molecules and inflammatory cytokines, relative to conventional hemodialysis (HD), yet evidence on its biochemical benefits remains conflicting. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of HDF versus HD on uremic toxins, inflammation, anemia, and nutritional parameters. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify relevant studies. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to evaluate changes in the prespecified outcomes. Twenty-four RCTs involving 6072 dialysis patients were included. Compared with conventional HD, HDF was associated with significant reductions in serum phosphorus (weighted mean difference [WMD] −0.28 mg/dL; 95% CI −0.44 to −0.12) and β2-microglobulin (WMD −4.84 mg/dL; 95% CI −6.13 to −3.54). HDF also significantly reduced serum urea and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, along with weekly erythropoietin requirements. Serum albumin levels were slightly but significantly lower in the HDF group than in the conventional HD group (WMD –0.06 g/dL; 95% CI −0.10 to −0.01); however, the clinical significance of such a difference remains uncertain. Higher convective volumes were identified as a key determinant of greater reductions in β2-microglobulin and CRP. Compared with conventional HD, HDF demonstrated superior reductions in several surrogate endpoints, including serum phosphorus, urea, β2-microglobulin, CRP, and weekly erythropoietin requirements. Reduced need for phosphate binders and anemia management may lower treatment-related costs.

ABSTRACT Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common genetic kidney disorder leading to kidney failure. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are transforming the diagnosis, risk stratification, management and prognostication in ADPKD by enabling more accurate assessments and individualized care. AI-powered imaging tools enhance the measurement of total kidney volume (TKV), improving the precision and efficiency of monitoring disease progression and more reliable assessment of therapeutic response. Machine learning algorithms can integrate genetic, imaging and clinical data to predict kidney function decline, facilitating personalized treatment strategies. In addition, AI is being used to identify genetic variants and to refine genotype–phenotype relationships, offering deeper insights into disease variability. AI-enabled monitoring technologies can support longitudinal tracking of TKV measurements obtained through magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography, thereby improving clinical decision-making and management. Furthermore, AI can optimize clinical trial design by improving patient selection, prediction of treatment responses and safety monitoring. Despite these promising developments, integrating AI into the clinical practice remains controversial and may pose several challenges. This review highlights the emerging clinical applications of AI in ADPKD, emphasizing its potential to advance precision medicine and improve patient outcomes.

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI), encompassing machine learning, deep learning and generative AI, is poised to redefine nephrology by enabling earlier detection, more precise risk stratification and workflow-integrated clinical decision support across the spectrum of kidney disease. This state-of-the-art review synthesizes emerging applications of AI in acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), dialysis and kidney transplantation, with attention to clinical integration, real-world validation, workflow implementation and translational challenges. In AKI, predictive models trained on high-frequency electronic health record data and intensive care unit telemetry have demonstrated strong performance in forecasting critical events, yet translation into routine clinical workflows remains limited. In CKD, machine learning tools support progression risk stratification and phenotype clustering, with the potential to inform individualized surveillance and therapy. AI-enabled dialysis management systems optimize ultrafiltration, anemia control and vascular access surveillance, while generative AI and large language models offer novel capabilities for clinical documentation, triage and patient education. In transplantation, AI applications span organ allocation, dynamic graft monitoring and digital pathology-assisted rejection classification, with validated tools such as the iBox system gaining regulatory recognition. Implementation challenges include data heterogeneity, bias, interpretability, regulatory uncertainty and workflow integration. Looking ahead, multimodal integration of imaging, pathology and multi-omics data may support biologically informed precision nephrology. Reinforcement learning, digital twins and ambient intelligence are emerging as adaptive decision-support paradigms rather than autonomous care systems. Regulatory frameworks are evolving to accommodate adaptive algorithms, underscoring the need for clinician engagement in model development, validation and deployment. As AI matures from pilot to practice, nephrologists who embrace and help shape these tools will lead the transition toward a more personalized, efficient and equitable future for kidney care.

Background/Objectives: The study aimed to investigate whether malnutrition influences the obesity paradox and to explore the relationship between obesity with/without malnutrition and in-hospital outcomes among hospitalized ESKD patients. Methods: The study used the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2021. Hospitalized ESKD patients were included and categorized into three groups: non-obese, obese without malnutrition, and obese with malnutrition. The association between obesity with/without malnutrition and in-hospital outcomes, compared to non-obese patients, were analyzed. Results: Of 674,367 hospitalized ESKD patients included, 125,978 (18.7%) had obesity. Obese ESKD patients without malnutrition were associated with a decreased risk of mortality (odd ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.84–0.91), whereas obese patients with malnutrition were associated with an increased risk of mortality (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.90–2.27), compared to non-obese patients. Furthermore, obesity, with or without malnutrition, was linked to higher infection-related complications and resource utilization, especially when malnutrition was present. Conclusions: Our findings show that obesity is significantly associated with lower in-hospital mortality among ESKD patients without malnutrition. However, when malnutrition coexists, this survival advantage is reversed, underscoring the importance of detecting malnutrition in obese ESKD patients.