Citations

PURPOSE Immunotherapy has demonstrated limited efficacy in the treatment of microsatellite-stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to date. We evaluated whether an off-the-shelf, multipeptide vaccine, PolyPEPI1018, in conjunction with standard chemotherapy can induce broad antitumor immune responses, potentially improving disease control in refractory mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS This single-arm, open-label study enrolled adults with MSS mCRC who had progressed after ≤2 previous lines of therapy for metastatic disease. PolyPEPI1018 was administered subcutaneously to four anatomical sites on days 1 and 15 and TAS-102 orally twice a day on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were treated for seven cycles or until disease progression. The primary end point was safety. Secondary end points were overall response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immune and genetic correlates. RESULTS Fifteen patients were enrolled; 80% had liver metastases and 67% had KRAS mutations. Adverse events (AEs) related to PolyPEPI1018 were grade 1 and 2 local skin reactions (n = 14). Grade 3 AEs (n = 15) at least possibly related to treatment were fatigue, decreased lymphocyte and neutrophil counts, and diarrhea. None had objective tumor response; the disease control rate was 53.3%. The median PFS (mPFS) was 4.0 (95% CI, 2.2 to 6.1) months and the median OS (mOS) was 8.7 (95% CI, 6.4 to 15.2) months. In post hoc subgroup analyses, patients without active liver metastasis had improved mPFS of 9.7 months and mOS of 14.8 months. In addition, patients who were predicted to have broader immune responses to vaccine based on human leukocyte antigen genotype had longer mOS (10.3 v 4.6 months, hazard ratio, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.07 to 1.17]). CONCLUSION The addition of PolyPEPI1018 to TAS-102 was safe and induced immunological responses that were associated with improved clinical outcomes. Further investigation of this chemo-immunotherapeutic is warranted.

Objective To provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the treatment and management of non‐renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); treatment and management of lupus nephritis are addressed in a separate guideline. Methods Clinical questions for treatment and management of SLE were developed in the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were developed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess evidence quality and formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus of ≥70% agreement on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. Results We present recommendations and ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the treatment and management of SLE that are applicable to pediatric and adult patients. Recommendations emphasize uniform treatment with hydroxychloroquine, limiting duration of glucocorticoid use, and early introduction of conventional and/or biologic immunosuppressive therapies to achieve and maintain control of SLE inflammation (remission or a low level of disease activity), reduce SLE‐related morbidity and mortality, and minimize medication‐related toxicities. Conclusion This guideline presents direction regarding treatment and management of SLE and provides a foundation for well‐informed, shared clinician–patient decision‐making. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each person with SLE.

Objective To provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the treatment and management of non‐renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); treatment and management of lupus nephritis are addressed in a separate guideline. Methods Clinical questions for treatment and management of SLE were developed in the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were developed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess evidence quality and formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus of ≥70% agreement on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. Results We present recommendations and ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the treatment and management of SLE that are applicable to pediatric and adult patients. Recommendations emphasize uniform treatment with hydroxychloroquine, limiting duration of glucocorticoid use, and early introduction of conventional and/or biologic immunosuppressive therapies to achieve and maintain control of SLE inflammation (remission or a low level of disease activity), reduce SLE‐related morbidity and mortality, and minimize medication‐related toxicities. Conclusion This guideline presents direction regarding treatment and management of SLE and provides a foundation for well‐informed, shared clinician–patient decision‐making. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each person with SLE.

Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is a common and debilitating symptom of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The epileptogenic zone, defined as cortex responsible for seizure generation, is located at the peritumoral region for most tumors, and lower-grade intrinsic brain tumors have the highest seizure incidence. Surgery is often the most effective treatment for the reduction in seizures in BTRE. However, surgical decisions have historically often been made exclusively for oncologic reasons, with less emphasis on seizure control. Surgical approaches for all tumor types are reviewed, highlighting relevant risk factors. Adjunctive tools during surgery, such as intraoperative electrocorticography (ECoG), may help identify and remove surrounding brain areas which are epileptogenic. Minimally invasive surgery is also gaining traction, given its utility in treating seizures deep-seated tumors. This review explores epileptogenic brain tumors, surgery for BTRE, and emerging strategies to better achieve seizure control.

Background: Cuffless blood pressure (BP) monitoring devices with the ability to continuously and noninvasively collect data could transform the screening and management of hypertension. While some wearable devices can estimate BP, their accuracy and reliability remain limited. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of using a wrist-worn photoplethysmography (PPG) device (Lifeleaf®) in combination with a supervised learning algorithm to infer clinically useful BP measurements. Methods: A total of 87 patients undergoing electrophysiology procedures were enrolled (Table 1). Time-synchronized BP data from an intra-arterial line served as the reference. These data were divided into (1) a training set to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) and (2) a testing set to assess the algorithm’s predictive performance. Data from 60 patients were used to train the model, and the remaining 27 patients were used for validation. Results: Data from 81 of 87 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 63.6 ± 10.5 years, and 69.1% were male. A total of 6,977 paired PPG and arterial BP readings were analyzed. The mean absolute deviation for systolic BP was 13.08 ± 17.22 mm Hg, and for diastolic BP, 8.42 ± 10.56 mm Hg. Subgroup analysis revealed reduced correlation in patients with BP >140/90 mm Hg, likely due to fewer training samples in this range. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of extracting clinically meaningful BP measurements from a PPG device using a supervised learning algorithm. The use of arterial line BP as the reference standard adds methodological rigor. Future work will focus on enhancing model performance, particularly in the hypertensive cohort.

Background: Older adults with severe aortic stenosis (AS) are at high risk of mortality unless treated by aortic valve replacement (AVR). The Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) score is primarily used clinically to determine mortality risk from surgical AVR. Due to geriatric comorbidities unique to older adults, traditional methods of risk stratification with STS may have significant shortcomings. Administratively derived risk scores that have prognostic significance in the geriatric population may prove valuable. Methods: We reviewed patients at our hospital system with AS undergoing AVR (surgical and transcatheter) and administratively derived an Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) score from the health record. The ERA score is a composite of age, marital status, number of hospitalized days in previous 2 years, and comorbidities (diabetes, coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure, stroke, pulmonary disease, cancer, and dementia). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival by ERA score tertile. Cox regression was used to determine association between ERA and survival after accounting for STS predicted risk. Results: There were a total of 228 patients that underwent AVR (TAVR: 59 (26.1 %); SAVR 167 (73.9%) and had ERA scores derived. The average age was 79.6 (SD 7.6) years) and there were 93 (40.8%) women. Patients were stratified by ERA score tertiles: low (≤6), mid (6-13), or high (≥14). Over a mean follow up of 5.8 (SD 3.1) years, lower ERA scores were associated with better long-term survival (p<0.001). After accounting for age, sex, and STS score, mid ERA (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.00-2.59; p<0.001) and high (HR 2.90; 95% CI 1.79-4.69; p<0.001) were associated with mortality (reference: low ERA). For every 10-point increase in the ERA, there was a 2-fold increase in adjusted mortality risk (HR 2.14; 95% CI 1.58-2.90; p<0.001). Conclusions: Older adults undergoing AVR for severe AS have specific geriatric comorbidities that may be better characterized using the ERA score. This administratively derived score was independently associated with survival after accounting for the widely used STS risk score.

Introduction Implementation science research increases the uptake of evidence-based interventions, which may improve health equity among racial and ethnic minorities. However, it is unclear how anti-racism and anti-colonialism practices have been integrated into implementation science research. The objectives of this scoping review are to describe the current conceptualisations of racism and colonialism within the USA, examine racism or colonialism-conscious approaches and analyse gaps in the operationalisation of anti-racism or anti-colonialism within implementation science studies. Methods and analysis This scoping review will be conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. The Center for Chronic Disease Reduction and Equity Promotion Across Minnesota conceptual framework and an implementation science anti-racism lens will guide the study design and analysis. To determine study eligibility for the scoping review, articles will undergo abstract and full-text screening by two independent reviewers and discrepancies will be settled together. Data charting will be extracted from included articles by eight independent reviewers. The search strategy will use controlled vocabulary and natural language keywords related to health equity, health disparities and anti-racism/colonialism on six databases. The scoping review will include studies that applied implementation science theories, models or frameworks among US-based populations. Additionally, included studies will report any of the following implementation activities: implementation strategies, implementation outcomes, adaptations to evidence-based interventions, or evaluations of pre-implementation or implementation context. Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval was required for the scoping review. Dissemination will be through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations.

Background Immune checkpoint therapies targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) have been met with limited clinical responses in the treatment of patients of varying cancer types. Current US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies function to prevent PD-1 binding to PD-L1, thereby preventing T-cell suppression. However, these therapies fail to prevent PD-L1 intrinsic signaling and recycling, which can render these treatments ineffective. Moreover, most research primarily focuses on how these antibodies affect tumor cells and their interactions with T cells. Myeloid cells, which also express PD-L1 and influence T-cell responses, are integral to the efficacy of these therapies. However, strategies that can target these cells to boost antitumor responses have not been effective. Methods Our group has developed a new anti-PD-L1 antibody (H1A), which disrupts PD-L1 recycling and redirects it towards degradation. Due to the loss of available PD-L1 protein, H1A effectively prevents PD-L1 intrinsic signaling. Using in vivo humanized PD-1/PD-L1 mouse tumor models, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of H1A against current FDA-approved PD-L1 blocking antibodies. Using human-derived immune cell in vitro assays, we pinpoint the biological consequences of H1A-induced PD-L1 degradation in myeloid cells. Results H1A demonstrated improved tumor control and established immunological memory responses in vivo in the treatment of tumors with moderate immunogenicity that are less responsive to current immunotherapies. This was supported by enhanced activation of myeloid cells (major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-II and CD80) and frequencies of effector T-cell populations found intratumorally. Human myeloid cells treated with H1A were also observed to have increased activation (MHC-II and CD80) and cytokine secretion. Similar to our in vivo findings, human peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures demonstrated increased frequencies of effector T-cell populations and greater tumor cell killing. Conclusions This work highlights the importance of targeting PD-L1 recycling and intrinsic signaling, specifically in myeloid cells, to boost antitumor responses. Our studies suggest that H1A can provide a solution to the lack of responses seen with current therapeutics, while also revealing previously unknown intrinsic functions of PD-L1 in myeloid cells.