Citations

Introduction: In recent years, increasing evidence suggests an important role of tumor-infiltrating B lymphocytes (TIL-Bs) in cancer immunity. In various types of solid tumors, high density of TIL-Bs and presence of mature tertiary lymphoid structures consistently correlate with better prognosis and response to immune checkpoint blockade therapies. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a type of aggressive lymphoma arising from mature B cells. TIL-Bs have been identified in DLBCL based on single-cell gene-expression data in several previous studies, but their prognostic significance in DLBCL is unknown. In this study, we determined the clinical significance of TIL-B abundance and investigated the potential underlying mechanisms. Patients and Methods: This abstract includes a discovery study in which we distinguished TIL-Bs from malignant B-cells by immunoglobulin gene (IG) clonotype analysis and a validation study using flow cytometry. In the discovery study, a molecularly well-characterized DLBCL cohort assembled by the International DLBCL R-CHOP Consortium Program was analyzed. DNA samples from DLBCL patients were sequenced by high-throughput ultra-deep sequencing assays using multiplexed forward and reverse primers. Based on the IG heavy chain (IGH) sequencing results, malignant B-cell and TIL-B VDJ clonotypes were identified for 138 patients, and the frequencies and numbers of TIL-B clonotypes in individual sequence repertoires were calculated. In 79 DLBCL cases, a DJ-only sequence was predominant and no productive VDJ sequences met the criteria for diagnostic sequences. Total frequencies of productive VDJ sequences in the sequence repertoires were then used to access high and low TIL-B frequencies. TIL-B frequencies were also evaluated by IG light chain clonotypes for these 217 patients and additional 52 patients. The TIL-B frequencies were correlated with patient survival, gene-expression profiling (GEP) data GSE31312, and frequencies of DLBCL-infiltrating immune cells quantified by fluorescent multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC). To validate the prognostic significance of TIL-B frequencies, we assembled a validation cohort of 94 DLBCL patients treated at Duke University Medical Center. TIL-Bs in tissues were quantified by flow cytometry immunophenotyping. Ratios of TIL-Bs to abnormal B cells were assessed for prognostic effects. Results: First, we found thathigh frequencies of TIL-Bs and clonotypic diversity were associated with significantly favorable prognostic effects in 138 DLBCL patients with their malignant B-cell IGH-VDJ clonotypes identified (Figure A). The prognostic effects of TIL-Bs outweighed those of the germinal center B-cell-like/activated B-cell-like classification (Figure B). Second, patients with high frequencies of TIL-Bs compared with those without had significant upregulation of immune response genes by GEP (Figure C), higher CD4 T cell infiltration quantified by fluorescent mIHC (Figure D), and enrichment of EcoTyper-defined specific cell states, including significantly increased frequencies of B cell state S2 (pre-memory), CD4 T cell state S3 (naïve), follicular helper T cell state S3, and endothelial cell state S3, whereas lower frequencies of B cell state S5 (plasmablast) and follicular helper T cell state S1. Third, high TIL-B abundance in 79 ‘DJ-only’ clonotype cases and additional 52 cases assessed by light chain clonotype analysis showed similar favorable prognostic effects and associations with upregulated immune gene expression and CD4 T cell infiltration. Fourth, the identified GEP signatures, prominent with genes involved in T-dependent B cell activation and T cell activation and differentiation, showed significant prognostic effects in two GEO datasets. Fifth, TIL-B abundance showed significant prognostic effects in DLBCL cases infiltrated with T-cells in both the discovery study (Figure E) and validation study (Figure F, flow cytometry cohort). Conclusions: TIL-B frequencies and clonotypic diversity have remarkable prognostic and biological effects in DLBCL, which has significant implications for developing novel therapeutic strategies. Our study identified a new prognostic biomarker in DLBCL and an important player in anti-lymphoma immune responses, providing a new point of view to analyze the tumor biology in aggressive B-cell lymphoma and precisely identify prognostic determinants.

Introduction: BCMA-directed CAR-T and Bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) therapies have shown remarkable overall response rates in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This has led to the approval of idecabtagene vicleucel, ciltacabtagene autoleucel and teclistamab by the FDA, EMA and other regulatory agencies. We performed a global survey on accessibility, practice patterns, and toxicity management of commercially available CAR-T and BiTE therapies. Methods: An online survey was completed by clinicians attending the International Myeloma Society's Immune Effector Cell Therapies in Multiple Myeloma Workshop, in-person or virtually, made available for 30 days after the meeting held in March 2023, Boston, MA. Results: 87 clinicians from 16 countries completed the survey, most practicing in an academic practice (86%) and in an urban environment (89%). Sixty-four percent of the respondents practice in North America followed by Europe (25.3%) including Germany, United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, France, Greece, and Cyprus, and 6.9% from Asia and 3.4% from Australia. Seventy-seven percent reported CAR-T cell therapy was approved in their country with 44.8% treating 1-5 patients and 14.9% treating >5 patients per month; 67% reported BiTE therapy was approved in their country with 14.9% treating >5 patients per month. Of evaluable responses (n = 40), 62% administered CAR-T therapy inpatient and 15% administered CAR-T therapy outpatient ≥ 50% of the time. Length of time between decision to treat with CAR-T therapy to infusion was 6-12 weeks for 42% of responders and <6 weeks for only 20%. Most (75%) reported inpatient administration of BiTE therapy step-up dosing; 17.5% reported outpatient step-up dosing administered ≥ 50% of the time. Use of institutional or practice SOPs for CAR-T and BiTE therapy patient selection was reported by 85% and 58%, respectively, with the factors influencing SOP outlined in Table 1. Of available CAR-T therapies, 53% prefer cilta-cel and 23% reported CAR-T therapy preference depended most on patients' co-morbidities/frailty (89%), timing of next available apheresis (67%), age (56%), CNS disease (44%) and other factors. Maintenance therapy after CAR-T therapy was reportedly used by 25% and 5% of respondents in 1-10% and 11-50% of their patients, respectively, to “maintain level of response achieved” (50%) or “achieve a deeper level of response” (25%). About half (43%) of the respondents reported using an SOP or particular criteria for secondary Hemophagocytic Lympho-Histiocytosis/Macrophage Activation Syndrome/CAR-related-HLH (sHLH/MAS/CarHLH) management that varied between the use of ASTCT Working Group IEC associated HLH-like syndrome Criteria (47%) (Hines 2023), CARTOX HLH Criteria (24%) (Neelapu 2017) and HLH-2004 criteria (6%). Tocilizumab was used as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) prophylaxis only by one responder. Keppra neurologic prophylaxis was used by 47.5% and 15% of responders for CAR-T and BiTE therapy, respectively. Delayed neurotoxicity with CAR-T was reported in 1-5% of patients by 57.5% of responders and 6-10% of patients by 15% of responders; most common manifestations were other movement/neuromuscular disorder (62%), nerve palsy (55%), and Parkinsonism (45%). Infectious prophylaxis was used to protect against HSV (92.5%), PJP (90%), bacterial pathogens (55%), fungal pathogens (60%), and IVIG (77.5%). However, criteria for infectious prophylaxis use varies widely incorporating IgG levels, infectious history, CD4+ count, B-cell aplasia and cytopenias (48.1 - 88.9%). Most respondents (46.3 - 86.5%) reported completing an infectious work-up including CMV, EBV, Hep B/C, and HIV ( Table 2). Conclusions: Trends of CAR-T and BiTE therapy use and patterns of concurrent prophylactic and supportive care in MM vary widely among academic centers across the globe, demonstrating a need for further understanding of toxicity pathogenesis, toxicity management and consistent guidelines. This survey also demonstrates the great unmet need for access beyond urban centers among the international myeloma community. Prospective studies and claims data analysis should be utilized to evaluate the longitudinal cost of care, quality of life, duration of response and management of infectious disease, neurological or related complications of CAR-T and bispecific TCE therapies.

Background: DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (dMMR), which leads to genomic and microsatellite instability, is a biomarker that predicts response to immunotherapies and has variable prognostic effects for chemotherapies in solid tumors. The dMMR can be detected using gene sequencing or immunohistochemistry for four essential MMR proteins: MSH6, MSH2, MLH1, and PMS2. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive lymphoma. Previous studies have suggested the role of MMR gene variants in DLBCL lymphomagenesis, yet the prognostic role of dMMR in DLBCL has not been well studied. Methods: We performed targeted next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry for MSH6, MSH2, MLH1, and PMS2 in a large cohort of DLBCL patients treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy. Gene expression profiling (GEP) was performed using the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarray (data in GSE31312). Fluorescent multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) was performed using MultiOmyx multiplexing immunofluorescence staining protocols and antibodies against 13 immune markers. We investigated the frequencies of dMRR and MMR protein expression and correlated the mutation status and expression levels with patient survival and DLBCL biology, including the number of mutated genes, GEP data, previously analyzed DLBCL biomarkers, and immune cell immunophenotypes. Results: MMR gene mutations and loss of MMR protein expression were infrequent in DLBCL (Figure A) and did not show a significant prognostic impact. MMR proteins were commonly expressed in DLBCL samples and the germinal centers of reactive tonsil controls (Figure B), with higher mean and median percentages of tumor cells expressing MSH6 and MLH1 proteins than in the solid tumor samples used for comparison. High expression of MMR proteins was associated with Ki-67, MYC, and p53 overexpression as determined by immunohistochemistry. GEP analysis identified significantly upregulated genes involved in the mitotic cell cycle and DNA metabolism and prominent downregulated immune gene signatures in DLBCL with high MMR protein expression. Fluorescent mIHC confirmed the associations with decreased T cell abundance in MSH6/MSH2/MLH1/PMS2 highly expressing DLBCL (Figure C) independent of p53 and MYC expression status, whereas MSH6/ MLH1 mutations were associated with increased T cell frequencies. High versus low expression of MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2 showed significant unfavorable prognostic effects in DLBCL when the optimal cutoffs were used for high expression. However, when the median percentages were used as cutoffs, the prognostic effects were not significant; nonetheless, MSH6 and PMS2 high expression showed significant adverse prognostic effects in the MYC¯ DLBCL subset. Interestingly, when we used Ki-67, MYC + or BCL2 + percentages in DLBCL assessed by immunohistochemistry to subtract MMR protein percentages and then correlated the differences to survival, we found significant favorable prognostic impact by higher percentage expression differences between MMR proteins and BCL2, or by intermediately higher differences between MMR proteins and MYC. For MSH2/MLH1/PMS2, the higher percentages compared with MYC/BCL2 showed no significant correlations with T cell infiltration levels, whereas the higher differences between MSH6 and MYC/BCL2 were associated with significantly lower T cell frequencies (Figure D). Conclusions: This study revealed that high expression of MMR proteins is a common feature of DLBCL associated with lower tumor-infiltrating T cells, MYC and p53 overexpression, and context-dependent prognostic effects. In contrast, dMMR and loss of MMR proteins are infrequent and have no significant prognostic effects in DLBCL treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy. These results may have implications for understanding DLBCL biology and the low efficacy of PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in DLBCL.