Citations

237 Background: AA/P is an approved treatment for mCRPC but there are no known predictive markers of response or resistance. We conducted a prospective trial to evaluate if Androgen Receptor (AR) & AR-variant (ARV) expression in tissue metastases can predict resistance to AA/P. Methods: mCRPC stage patients (pts) initiating pre-chemo AA/P underwent metastatic site biopsies prior to (pre-AA/P) and after 12 weeks of treatment. Composite progression at 12 weeks, (primary endpoint) was evaluated with PSA, RECIST, bone scan and symptoms (per PCWG2). mRNA expressions of pre-AA/P ARFL, ARV3, ARV7, ARV9, ARV23, ARV45, four cell cycle division genes, Chromogranin-A (CHGA) together with PSA/testosterone levels, Gleason Score (GS) at initial diagnosis; high versus low volume disease; time from starting hormone therapy to mCRPC stage and serum CHGA levels were evaluated using a logistic regression model for predicting resistance at 12 weeks of therapy. A final multivariate model fitted only those factors thought to be clinically relevant or with an entry threshold of p ≤ 0.3 in univariate analysis. Results: Between 6/2013 & 3/2015, 82 pts were enrolled of which 52 had complete mRNA expression & disease assessment data at the12-week time point for analysis. Median age of the cohort was 72.5 yrs (IQR: 68.5-78); median pre-AA/P PSA was 18 ng/ml (IQR: 8.1- 46.6); GS distribution at initial diagnosis for GS 2-6; 7; 8-10 was 11; 14; 27 respectively. Progression was observed in 21/52 pts after 12 weeks. At the univariate level elevated pre-AA/P expression of ARV3 (p = 0.08), ARV7 (p = 0.26), ARV9 (p = 0.04), and cell division cycle gene CDC45 (p = 0.19) along with GS at diagnosis (p = 0.29) met the threshold for inclusion into multivariate analysis. Elevated expression of pre-therapy ARV9 in metastases alone was associated with progression at 12 weeks (OR: 3.9; CI 1.07 – 14.16; C-Index: 0.63). The 12-week biopsy of pts with progression had increased ARV9 mRNA expression compared to pts responding at 12 weeks (p = 0.14). Conclusions: Increased ARV9 mRNA expression in metastases is associated with early resistance to AA/P. This observation will need further validation in comparable datasets. Clinical trial information: NCT #0195364.

187 Background: Patient-reported evaluations of interpersonal quality of care are essential elements of quality of cancer care assessment. At times, patients may be unable to report themselves on their care experience and systems may rely on proxy reports. The validity of this approach is dependent on the degree to which family caregiver assessments are concordant with patient assessments. Methods: A VA cohort of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and their caregivers both completed a self-administered questionnaire on the quality of VA cancer care in 3 specific domains: surgery, chemotherapy overall and chemotherapy nursing care, all measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Because the kappa statistic penalizes skewed distributions which are commonly seen in patient satisfaction reports, agreement between patients and caregivers on perceptions of quality care were measured using Gwet’s AC2 statistic. Stratified analyses on caregiver burden, race, education, and age as well as patient’s stage of disease were used to assess variation in agreement. Results: 417 caregiver-patient dyads completed the survey (70% response rate), of whom 362 (86.8%) had surgery and 195 (46.8%) had chemotherapy. Overall agreement was high for the 3 quality of care domains: AC2 (95% CI): 0.870 (0.838, 0.903) for surgery, 0.835 (0.786, 0.884) for chemotherapy overall and 0.906 (0.868, 0.944) for chemotherapy nurses. Stratified analyses of agreement showed particular populations of higher or lower agreement; however the findings were inconsistent across the three domains and most were not statistically significant. Patients with lower stage (I-II) had higher agreement than higher stages (III-IV) (AC2: 0.967 and 0.879 respectively, P = 0.006) but only in the chemotherapy nurses domain. For the surgery domain, age was the only significant difference in agreement (0.816, 0.912, and 0.838 for < 50, 51-65, and > 65 respectively, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Family caregiver reports on the quality of CRC care were highly concordant with patient reports. Therefore, family caregivers may be able to provide reasonable proxy report on measures of quality of cancer care when patient reports are unavailable.

226 Background: Patients undergoing cancer treatment often need support from an informal caregiver to help manage symptoms. Self-efficacy (SE) in caregiving refers to confidence in being able to care for the patient’s needs. Low SE has been associated with increased caregiver burden and mental health symptoms, which in turn, can affect the quality of informal care provided. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between caregiver training received from cancer care providers and SE in caregivers of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Caregivers of CRC patients diagnosed in 2009 were invited to complete a self-administered questionnaire. Caregivers were asked about specific patient problems (pain, bowel, fatigue, medications, and other). Caregiver perceptions of training adequacy and SE were assessed on a problem specific basis. The patient’s stage of disease was obtained from cancer registry data. Associations between training and SE were examined for each problem using multivariate logistic regression and adjusted for age, relationship to patient, race, care burden, level of education, stage of disease, perception of patient’s health, and general confidence as a caregiver. Results: 417 caregivers completed the survey (70% response rate), of whom 374 (90%) were female and 284 (68%) were the patient’s spouse/partner. The number of caregivers reporting inadequate training for CRC-related problems were pain 77 (38%), bowel 80 (38%), fatigue 121 (48%), medication 65 (26%), and other 101 (40%). The odds of having low SE were significantly higher among those with perceptions of inadequate training across the following CRC-related problems: pain, 10.10 (3.36, 30.39); bowel, 5.04 (1.98, 12.82); fatigue, 8.45 (3.22, 22.15); managing medications, 9.00 (3.30, 24.51); and other, 3.87 (1.68, 8.93). Conclusions: This study showed a significant association between caregiver training and SE in a cross-sectional study. Given that the perception of inadequate training among caregivers was common, further exploration of the longitudinal impact of training on caregiver SE should be done to identify interventions to help improve the experience of cancer caregivers.

64 Background: The goals of our Lymphoma Survivorship Clinic (SC) are to coordinate care, educate patients, and create a survivorship care plan (SCP). The aim of this study was to determine if patient-centered outcomes are improved after a SC visit. Methods: From 11/13-5/15, surveys were mailed to recently-treated lymphoma patients who were within 4 weeks of their last visit and in remission. Quality of life (QOL) was measured with PROMIS and distress was measured with the Impact of Events scale. Responses between those who attended SC and those who were eligible but did not attend were analyzed. Results: There were 96 surveys sent to the SC group; 59 were returned (61% response rate). Of the non-SC group, 140 surveys were sent and 84 were returned (60% response rate). Mean age was 57 years (range 23-77) in the SC group and 59 years (23-88) in the non-SC group. There were more females in the SC group (52% vs 30%) but no differences in race, marital status, education, or health literacy. Those who attended the SC were more likely to recall receiving a summary of cancer treatment and recommendations for follow-up care (90% SC vs. 75% non-SC, p = 0.03). Furthermore, SC attendees were more likely to “definitely” recall discussion on improving health or preventing illness (89% vs. 53%), getting help in making changes in habits/lifestyle (76% vs. 50%), diet (80% vs. 31%), and exercise (82% vs. 51%), all p < 0.001. There were no differences in discussions regarding smoking, follow-up testing, and symptom monitoring. The SC group was less likely to need more information regarding sexuality (6% vs 20%, p = 0.045). There were no differences in need for information regarding anxiety, fitness, familial cancer risk, fertility, complementary therapies, and social issues. The SC group was slightly more confident that they could get information or advice related to cancer (completely confident 76% vs. 61%, p = 0.07). There were no differences in QOL or distress. Conclusions: A Lymphoma SC visit increased receipt of SCP and provided more information on survivorship issues, particularly health behaviors, but did not improve QOL or distress. Further study is needed to determine if this leads to long-term health benefits.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported what seem to be false-positive results using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved HercepTest (Dako Corp, Carpinteria, CA) to profile Her-2/neu amplification and overproduction in breast carcinoma. False-positive status has been based on comparisons with gene copy enumeration by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and with comparisons to immunohistochemistry (IMH) results using a monoclonal antibody. However, simple overexpression by tumor cells that have normal gene copy has not been evaluated by profiling mRNA expression, ie, such cases could simply represent true-positive, transcriptionally upregulated overexpression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred infiltrating ductal carcinomas of breast were evaluated by IMH using monoclonal (CB11; Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Tucson, AZ) and polyclonal (HercepTest; Dako) antibodies after antigen retrieval (AR). A polyclonal antibody sans AR (PCA/SAR) was also used. All IMH stains were evaluated and scored according to the guidelines for the FDA-approved HercepTest. A total of 145 of 400 carcinomas were subsequently evaluated by direct and digoxigenin-labeled (Dig) FISH, and 144 of 400 were evaluated by detection of mRNA overexpression via autoradiographic RNA:RNA in situ hybridization. RESULTS: Overall HercepTest/CB11 IMH discordance was 12%. Expression of mRNA was highly concordant with FISH and DigFISH amplification and with CB11 and PCA/SAR immunohistology. IMH false-positive cases (no Her-2/neu gene amplification) occurred with both HercepTest (23%) and CB11 (17%), and the majority of false-positive results (34 of 44) were scored as 2+. All 2+ false-positive cases were mRNA-negative. Combined results of HercepTest and CB11 showed that 79% (38 of 48) of 3+ cases were Her-2/neu gene amplified, but only 17% (seven of 41) of 2+ cases had increased gene copy. CONCLUSION: Discordant HercepTest/FISH results, and to a lesser extent discordance with CB11 IMH, are most commonly false-positive results with a score of 2+. The 2+ score as defined in the guidelines for the FDA-approved HercepTest should not be used as a criterion for trastuzumab therapy unless confirmed by FISH. Determination of Her-2 gene copy number by FISH may be a more accurate and reliable method for selecting patients eligible for trastuzumab therapy.

PURPOSE: We have completed a phase I study, followed by three phase I/II studies, in patients with metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and sarcoma in order to evaluate the safety, toxicity, and antitumor activity of Leuvectin (Vical Inc, San Diego, CA), a gene transfer product containing a plasmid encoding human interleukin (IL)-2 formulated with the cationic lipid 1,2-dimyristyloxypropyl-3-dimethyl-hydroxyethyl ammonium bromide/dioleyl-phosphatidyl-ethanolamine (DMRIE/DOPE) and administered intratumorally. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients were treated in the phase I study. Leuvectin doses were 10 μg, 30 μg, or 300 μg weekly for 6 weeks. In three subsequent phase I/II studies, a total of 52 patients (18 with melanoma, 17 with RCC, and 17 with sarcoma) were treated with further escalating doses of Leuvectin: 300 μg twice a week for 3 weeks, 750 μg weekly for 6 weeks, and 1,500 μg weekly for 6 weeks. RESULTS: There were no drug-related grade 4 toxicities and only one grade 3 toxicity, but the majority ofpatients experienced mild constitutional symptoms after treatment. In the phase I/II studies, 45 patients were assessable for response (14 with RCC, 16 with melanoma, and 15 with sarcoma). Two patients with RCC and one with melanoma have achieved partial responses lasting from 16 to 19 months and continuing. In addition, two RCC, three melanoma, and six sarcoma patients had stable disease lasting from 3 to 18 months and continuing. The plasmid was detected by polymerase chain reaction assay in the posttreatment samples of 29 of 46 evaluated patients. Immunohistochemistry studies on serial biopsy specimens showed increased IL-2 expression and CD8+ infiltration after treatment in the tumor samples of several patients (12 and 16, respectively). CONCLUSION: Direct intratumoral injection of Leuvectin is a safe and possibly effective immunotherapeutic approach in the treatment of certain tumor types.