Citations

11119 Background: Evaluation of prognostic factors in carcinoid tumors of the lung is limited due to the rarity of disease. This study assessed Ki-67 expression and other clinical variables as prognostic factors in 262 patients. Methods: A systematic search of Mayo Clinic lung cancer epidemiology and tumor registry databases from 1997 to 2009 identified 449 consecutive patients, with 262 having available tissue blocks [40 atypical carcinoids (AC) and 222 typical carcinoids (TC)]. Clinical data were collected by chart review. Tissue blocks were reviewed by 1/3 pathologists using WHO criteria. Tumors were tested for the Ki-67 index using digital image analysis (tumor tracing) by two operators. The association and predictive value of the factors with recurrence-free and overall survival (RFS and OS) were explored using univariable Cox proportional Hazards model and concordance (c) index. Results: Age, stage, smoking history, lymph node (LN) involvement and Ki-67 index were significant prognostic factors for RFS and OS. Median follow-up on alive-patients is 5 years (range: 0.006-5). Median percentage of Ki-67 index of AC and TC were 1.61% and 0.56% (P<0.0001), respectively. Patients with Ki-67 ≥ 1% had significantly worse RFS (HR=3.69, P<0.0001) and OS (HR=3.69, P=0.0007) compared with Ki-67 < 1% group. The c-index of Ki-67 (0.65) was comparable to the pathologic distinction between AC and TC (0.62 for original diagnosis and 0.63 for central-reviewed diagnosis). Conclusions: Ki-67 index cutoff value of 1% is a valuable prognostic biomarker for pulmonary carcinoids based on this large cohort. Our data also provide strong evidence for clinical variables such as age, stage, smoking history, and LN involvement as clinical prognostic factors in pulmonary carcinoids. A prognostic calculator incorporating Ki-67 and clinical variables is under development. [Table: see text]

7568 Background: The molecular events in the initiation and progression of invasive lung adenocarcinoma remain poorly characterized. These tumors are thought to develop through an adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), invasive adenocarcinoma (AD) sequence. The goal of our study was to assess lineage relationships between in situ and invasive components within adenocarcinomas with prominent lepidic growth patterns. Methods: Frozen tissue from fourteen lung adenocarcinomas with mixtures of AD together with an adjacent in situ component (AIS), varying in ratio between 40 to 80%, were selected from our Lung Specimen Registry. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) of each component was performed separately for each tumor. Genomic DNA was isolated using a direct in situ whole genome amplification (WGA) methodology, and Next Generation Sequencing performed using an Illumina Mate Pair (MP) library protocol. MP sequence reads were mapped to the human genome and primers spanning the fusion junctions were used in validation PCRs. Results: Genomic break points identical and unique to a specific patient were identified between the AIS and AD components in 13 (of 14) cases. The total number of events per case ranged from 4-215, and the number of identical events shared between the AIS and AD components ranged from 30 to 90%. Recurrent genomic breakpoints between cases were also observed, with the 2 most common involving 8q24.3 in 5 cases and FAM19A2 on chromosome 12 in 4 cases. PCR validation of selected genomic alterations confirmed the genomic break points identified from sequencing in both the AIS and AD in all cases. Interestingly, we also observed a limited number of genomic alterations present in a zonal distribution of surrounding normal lung around the tumor mass. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates unique chromosomal alterations present in both the AIS and AD components of individual lung tumors with features of lepidic growth. These data provide evidence for lineage relationship and clonal relatedness between the two components, and provide genomic evidence for a model of stepwise progression from AIS to invasive AD in this subset of lung adenocarcinomas.

7545 Background: Interpretation of lung cancer clinical trials is complicated by the heterogeneity of the patient population due to disease burden and comorbidities making pre-trial assessment of OS probability challenging. Methods: To create and validate a scoring system to estimate OS and improve the quality of future trials, this study evaluated the pretreatment prognostic factors of 2,442 pts with NSCLC. Univariate (UV) and multivariate (MV) Cox models were used to evaluate the prognostic importance of each baseline factor on OS. Those prognostic factors significant on both UV and MV analyses that were used to develop the scoring system included overall quality of life, age, sex, stage, ECOG performance status, the presence of other cancers, and smoking cessation. The score for each factor was determined by dividing the 5-year OS rate (in %) by 10 and summing these scores to form a total score. Multivariate models and the score for each factor were validated using bootstrapping with 1000 iterations from the original samples. Results: The score for each factor ranged from 1 to 7 points and the total scores ranged between 23 and 39 points. Higher scores reflected better OS. Categorization of the score was delineated first by clinician expert opinion (see Table) and then by multiple statistically defined empirical cut points. All categorization schemes demonstrated successful prognostic power. The bootstrap method confirmed the reliability of multivariate Cox model and score (Spearman correlation coefficient= 0.45). Conclusions: Prognostic factors significantly associated with OS on both UV and MV analysis were used to construct a valid scoring system which can be used to predict survival of NSCLC pts. This scoring system can be used by clinicians in counseling pts and for stratification in future trial design. [Table: see text]

2579 Background: HA, a glycosaminoglycan, accumulates in ~25% of solid tumors and is associated with poor prognosis. Tumors that accumulate HA develop high interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) and become resistant to chemotherapy. In animal models, PEGPH20 reduced tumor-associated HA and increased efficacy of chemotherapy. Methods: This ongoing phase 1 study was designed to assess safety, tolerability, PK, PD, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PEGPH20 as a single agent in patients with treatment-refractory solid tumors. IV PEGPH20 was administered in a twice weekly or a once weekly dosing schedule with oral dexamethasone (dex) pre-and post dose. Biomarkers included tumor histochemistry to detect HA depletion, plasma HA catabolites, and DCE-MRI or FDG-PET. Results: Fifteen patients have been enrolled into the study. Dose administration ranged from 0.5 µg/kg to 5 µg/kg. Musculoskeletal events (MSEs) were the most common and dose limiting toxicities. To date, up to 3 µg/kg twice weekly IV infusions of PEGPH20 were well tolerated with manageable Grade 1 MSEs in most patients. MTD has not been reached. Plasma concentrations of PEGPH20 showed dose proportional exposure with a terminal half life of ~2 days. Enzymatic activity of PEGPH20 was reflected by dose-dependent HA catabolites in plasma. Pre- and post-dose tumor biopsies from 2 colon patients demonstrated 23-60% reduction in tumor HA after 4 weeks of dosing. Serial DCE-MRI and FDG-PET demonstrated increased tumor perfusion (Ktrans) and decreased metabolic activity 8 and 24hrs post-PEGPH20 in one patient each. Doses of ≤3 µg/kg were tolerated with intermittent Grade 1-2 MSE. Enrollment at dose levels > 3 µg/kg is ongoing. Conclusions: Repeated IV PEGPH20 infusion resulted in dose-dependent systemic exposure and is tolerated with concomitant dex treatment. HA catabolites in plasma demonstrated the in vivo enzymatic activity of PEGPH20. Reduced HA in tumor biopsies and serial DCE-MRI and FDG-PET images confirmed PD activity. Increased tumor perfusion by PEGPH20 may enhance drug delivery to tumor. Combination studies of PEGPH20 with cytotoxic chemotherapy are planned.

1610 Background: Low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans have reduced lung cancer deaths by 20.3% in high risk populations, although there is an unknown balance between the benefits and harms of LDCT scans as a screening tool. Our purpose was to compare health-related QOL issues among lung cancer patients who were initially detected by LDCT scans; 4 comparison groups included: lung cancer diagnosed by a screening chest X-ray, as an incidental finding from procedures taken for other medical reasons, or based on symptoms indicative for lung cancer and routinely diagnosed, and individuals who were LDCT screened but found no lung cancer (controls who participated in Mayo’s lung cancer CT screening trial). Methods: A total of 1,658 lung cancer patients (cared at Mayo Clinic) in the 4 groups (37, 151, 389, and 1081 respectively) and 488 controls were compared on following patient-reported outcomes (collected via validated tools): overall QOL, four symptoms (cough, pain, dyspnea, fatigue), mental/ physical/ emotional/ social/ spiritual QOL, and other concerns (e.g., family/ friends/ financial/ legal). A clinically significant deficit was defined as at least 10-points in difference (or <50 points) on a 0-100 scale. The rates of deficits were compared via Fisher’s exact tests and average QOL values via Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Overall QOL and individual symptoms were significantly worse (p<0.05) in all lung cancer groups than in controls, except for pain. LDCT-screened patients reported the greatest deficit among the 4 lung cancer groups in physical (41%), emotional (24%), social (38%), and spiritual QOL (24%); whereas chest X-ray detected patients had the least deficit in overall QOL (22%) and pain (32%). All 4 lung cancer groups experienced much worse fatigue (52-64%) than the controls (32%). Conclusions: Our preliminary results suggest that LDCT-screening detected lung cancer patients reported a different QOL profile from other lung cancer patients and non-lung cancer controls. The clinical course, smoking behavior, and QOL related health issues associated with LDCT screening for lung cancer warrant thorough investigation.

13013 Background: The glutathione metabolic pathway is directly involved in the inactivation of platinum compounds. Our earlier work indicated that genotypes corresponding to varied glutathione-related enzyme activities may predict survival in patients with advanced lung cancer. Herein, we evaluated the role of glutathione-related genotypes on clinical outcomes in stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer patients who were stable or responding from one prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: DNA samples from patients who had tumor regression or stable disease after treatment with one platinum based chemotherapy regimen were analyzed using 6 polymorphic DNA markers that encode 5 important enzymes in the glutathione metabolic pathway. The contrasting genotypes used in the analysis were GCLC (homozygous repeat 77 vs. heterozygous 7*), GPX1 (CC vs. other), GSTP1-I105V (AA vs. other), GSTP1-A114V (CC vs. other), GSTM1 (null vs. present), and GSTT1 (null vs. present). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, treatment arm, ECOG performance status, stage, and prior tumor response, were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of the genotypes at each locus. Results: Data from 112 patients with a median follow-up of 10.6 (range: 0.4–56.3) months was used. No significant difference in time to disease progression was observed for any of the genotypes. Among the 6 genomic DNA markers, the GCLC genotype was an important prognostic factor for overall survival after adjusting for other factors. In particular, patients carrying a 77 repeat genotype (homozygous) had a significantly worse survival (Hazard ratio = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.05–2.63). Conclusions: Genotypes of glutathione-related enzymes, especially GCLC, may be used as host factors in predicting patients’ prognosis after platinum-based chemotherapy. Further investigation to define and measure the effects of these genes in chemotherapeutic regimens is needed. (This work was partly supported by NIH research grants CA77118, CA80127, and CA84354.) No significant financial relationships to disclose.

18037 Background: Platinum compounds are major chemotherapeutic agents in lung cancer and are metabolized by the glutathione pathway enzymes. We reported that genotypes of glutathione-related enzymes, especially GCLC, may be host factors in predicting survival of patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer who were stable or responding from prior platinum-based chemotherapy (Yang et al., ASCO 2006). NCCTG investigators previously correlated allelic variants in 5-FU metabolizing genes with QOL in colorectal cancer patients (Sloan et al., ASCO 2004). We sought to evaluate the role of glutathione pathway genotypes on QOL. Methods: DNA samples were analyzed using 6 polymorphic DNA markers in the glutathione metabolic pathway. The contrasting genotypes in the analysis were GSTM1 and GSTT1 (null vs. present), GSTP1-I105V (AA vs. GA/GG), GSTP1-A114V (CC vs. CT/TT), GPX1 (CC vs. TT/TC), and GCLC (homozygous repeat 77 vs. heterozygous 7*). Forty-six patients completed the FACT-L and the UNISCALE QOL questionnaires at baseline and week-8, and we have results for all 6 genotypes. A clinically significant decline (CSD) in QOL was defined as a 10% decrease from baseline to week-8. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association of all 6 genotypes with a CSD in QOL. Results: Patients carrying the GPX1-CC genotype had a CSD in the UNISCALE (Odds Ratio (OR): 10.0; p=0.02), total FACT-L score (OR: 7.9; p=0.03), the FACT-L physical well being construct (OR: 13.7; p=0.02), and the FACT-L functional well being construct (OR: 5.3; p=0.05). Other constructs, i.e., emotional, social and family, and additional concerns were not significantly associated with the genotypes. Conclusions: Genotypes of glutathione-related enzymes, especially GPX1 may be inherited factors in predicting patients’ QOL after platinum-based chemotherapy. Further investigation to define and measure the direct or indirect effects of these genes on QOL is critical, particularly, via drug responses, toxicities, and disease recurrence. (This work was partly supported by NIH grants CA77118, CA80127, and CA84354.) No significant financial relationships to disclose.

7613 Background: Factors influencing the pattern of disease relapse after curative surgical resection in early stage NSCLC is unknown. We sought to evaluate the effect of tumor- and patient-related characteristics on the pattern of disease recurrence (local relapse and/or metastatic disease) and survival in relation to surgical resection for NSCLC. Methods: A consecutive retrospective series of 488 patients seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester who had complete resection of NSCLC between 1997 and 1998 was utilized. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the effect of age, gender, smoking status, TNM stage, number of lymph node (LN) involved, number of LN resected, and histopathologic diagnosis on RFS. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect on recurrence or death within the first 2 years after surgical resection. Results: Data on 342 patients with a median follow-up of 85 months (range: 0.1 to 162) are reported. 60% were male, and 81% had N0 stage at diagnosis. There were 26 (7.6%) never smokers. Median number of LN resected was 20 (interquartile range [IQR]: 14–29). Median age at surgery was 71 years (IQR: 64 to 76). A bi-modal pattern of local recurrence (N=62) after surgery for early stage NSCLC was observed, with 57% of patients having a local recurrence within 2 years and 21% of patients having a local recurrence from 5–7 years post-surgery. The median duration from surgery to first documented recurrence was 16 months (IQR: 8 to 39). While age, N stage, number of LN involved, and T stage were significant predictors of RFS univariately, only lesser LN resected (p=0.008), older age (p<0.0001) and higher T-stage (p=0.003) were significant adverse predictors of RFS in the multivariate analysis when adjusted for all factors. Higher T-Stage was associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrence or death within the first 2 years after surgical resection (p =0.004). Updated results using data from all 488 patients will be presented in the meeting. Conclusions: A trend towards a bimodal distribution of local recurrences after surgical resection of early stage NSCLC was observed. Increased number of LN resected, younger age and lower T stage were associated with better RFS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy directed against B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has shown promising results for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in several phase 1 studies. Persistence of CAR T cells post infusion may be one determinant of duration of response. bb21217 is a next-generation anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy based on investigational therapy idecabtagene vicleucel (bb2121) (Friedman 2018, Hum Gene Ther 29:585) that uses the same lentiviral CAR T design as bb2121, but adds the phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor bb007 during ex vivo culture to enrich the drug product for memory-like T cells. Evidence suggests that CAR T cells with this phenotype may be more persistent and more potent than unselected CAR T cells. CRB-402 is a first-in-human study of bb21217 in patients with RRMM designed to assess safety, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and duration of effect. Methods: CRB-402 (NCT03274219) is an ongoing, multi-center phase 1 dose escalation trial of bb21217 planning to enroll 74 patients with RRMM who received ≥ 3 prior regimens, including a proteasome inhibitor and an immuno-modulatory agent, or are double-refractory to both classes. During dose escalation, enrollment is restricted to patients with ≥ 50% BCMA expression by IHC on malignant plasma cells. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells are collected via leukapheresis and sent to a central facility for transduction, expansion and release testing prior to being returned to the site for infusion. Patients undergo lymphodepletion with fludarabine (30 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) daily for 3 days, then receive bb21217 as a single infusion. Planned dose levels are 150, 450, 800, and 1,200 x 106 CAR+ T cells and intermediate dose levels are allowed. The primary outcome measure is incidence of adverse events (AEs), including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Additional outcome measures are quality and duration of clinical response assessed according to the IMWG Uniform Response Criteria, evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD), progression-free and overall survival, and quantification of CAR+ T cells in blood. Results: Asof April 20, 2019, 22 patients (median age 63 [min;max 42 to 74]) have received bb21217 (12 at 150, 6 at 300 and 4 at 450). Eleven had high tumor burden, defined as ≥ 50% bone marrow plasma cells pre-infusion. Patients had a median of 7 (min;max 4 to 17) prior lines of therapy and 18/22 had prior autologous stem cell transplant; 7/22 had high-risk cytogenetics. Of the 22 patients, 19 received prior daratumumab, 13 received prior Bort/Len/Car/Pom/Dara. Median follow-up after bb21217 infusion was 23 weeks (&lt;1 to 77 weeks). As of data cut-off, 13/22 patients developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 5 G1, 7 G2, 1 G3) and responded to supportive care, tocilizumab and/or corticosteroids. Five patients developed neurotoxicity [1 G1, 2 G2, 1 G3 (vertigo/dizziness), 1 G4 (encephalopathy, previously reported)]. For the 1 patient with G4 neurotoxicity, G3 CRS was also reported; both have resolved. A total of 18 patients were evaluable for response with ≥ 2 months of follow up or PD within 2 months. Fifteen (83%) patients demonstrated clinical response per IMWG criteria. Six of these subjects subsequently progressed. Nine patients remained in response, including 2 patients with ongoing response at months 15 and 18. MRD negative results at 10-5 nucleated cells or better were obtained by NGS in 10/10 evaluable responders at month 1. Overall, 6/8 patients evaluable at 6 months and 2/2 patients evaluable at 12 months had detectable CAR T cells in blood. Updated data from this study will be presented, including extended follow-up on the initial patients treated and early clinical and CAR T cell persistence data from at least 15 additional patients treated with up to 450 x 106 CAR+ T cells. Conclusions: The adverse events observed to date were manageable and consistent with known toxicities of CAR T therapies. Initial efficacy results with bb21217 CAR T therapy in heavily pretreated RRMM are encouraging, with 83% of patients demonstrating clinical response. Emerging data demonstrate long-term persistence of CAR T cells in long-term responders. Updated data to be presented will help determine whether treatment with bb21217 results in sustained CAR T cell persistence and durable clinical responses, and whether bb21217 is tolerated at higher doses. Disclosures Berdeja: AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bluebird Bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene Corporation, Constellation Pharma, Curis Inc, Genentech, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Biotech Inc, Kesios Therapeutics, Lilly, Novartis, Poseida: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Amgen Inc, BioClinica, Celgene Corporation, CRISPR Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma Inc, Prothena, Servier, Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Alsina:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Shah:Celgene, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teneobio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Indapta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Oncopeptides, Karoypharm, Surface Oncology, Precision biosciences GSK, Nektar, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; University of California, San Francisco: Employment. Siegel:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Medicom: Speakers Bureau; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy. Madduri:Abbvie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; undation Medicine: Consultancy. Kaufman:Janssen: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University: Employment; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Munshi:Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Rosenblatt:BMS: Other: Advisory Board ; Parexel: Consultancy; Imaging Endpoint: Consultancy; Partner Tx: Other: Advisory Board; Dava Oncology: Other: Education; BMS: Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Research Funding; Merck: Other: Advisory Board. Turka:bluebird bio: Employment. Lam:bluebird bio: Employment. Massaro:bluebird bio: Employment. Campbell:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hege:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Mersana Therapuetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arcus Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Petrocca:bluebird bio: Employment. Raje:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy.

TPS592 Background: For advanced CCA, standard of care 1L systemic treatment is GEM + CIS. Genetic alterations in intrahepatic CCA provide potential therapeutic targets. Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2 gene rearrangements driving CCA tumorigenesis were identified almost exclusively in intrahepatic CCA patients (pts) (incidence, 10–16%). In phase 2, PEM (INCB054828), a selective, potent, oral FGFR1–3 inhibitor elicited an objective response rate (ORR) of 35.5% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.9 months (mo) in previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic CCA with FGFR2 rearrangements (NCT02924376). FIGHT-302, a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study will evaluate efficacy and safety of 1L PEM vs GEM + CIS in unresectable/metastatic CCA with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements (NCT03656536). Methods: Eligible pts are adults with confirmed unresectable/metastatic CCA; no prior systemic therapy for advanced disease < 6 mo before enrollment; radiographically measurable/evaluable disease (per RECIST v1.1); ECOG PS ≤1; documented FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements. Exclusions include clinically significant corneal or retinal disorder; history of calcium and phosphate homeostasis disorder or systemic mineral imbalance with ectopic soft tissue calcification; untreated CNS metastases or history of uncontrolled seizures. Pts will be randomized (1:1; stratified by region and tumor burden) to PEM 13.5 mg QD on a 21-day (d) cycle or GEM (1000 mg/m2) + CIS (25 mg/m2) on D1 and D8 of 21-d cycles (max 8). Crossover to PEM allowed after confirmed progression. PEM titration to 18 mg from cycle 2 allowed for pts without hyperphosphatemia (serum phosphate > 5.5 mg/dL) and Grade ≥2 treatment-related adverse events during cycle 1. Hyperphosphatemia will be managed with diet modifications, phosphate binders, diuretics, or dose adjustments. Treatment will continue until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint is PFS (by independent review). Secondary endpoints are ORR, overall survival, duration of response, disease control rate, safety, and quality of life. Four pts (target N = 432) are enrolled as of Sep 25, 2019. Clinical trial information: NCT03656536.