Citations

Abstract Estrogen-induced Syrian hamster tumors in the kidney represent a useful model to gain insight into the role of estrogens in oncogenic processes. We provided evidence that early tumor foci in the kidney arise from interstitial ectopic uterine-like germinal stem cells, and that early tumor foci and well-established tumors are highly aneuploid (92–94%). The molecular mechanisms whereby estrogens mediate this process are unclear. Here, we report that estrogen treatment induced significant increases in Aurora A protein expression (8.7-fold), activity (2.6-fold), mRNA (6.0-fold), and Aurora B protein expression (4.6-fold) in tumors, compared with age-matched cholesterol-treated kidneys. Immunohistochemistry revealed that this increase in Aurora A and B protein expression was essentially confined to cells within early and large tumor foci at 3.5 and 6 months of estrogen treatment, respectively. Upon estrogen withdrawal or coadministration of tamoxifen for 10 days, a 78% to 79% and 81% to 64% reduction in Aurora A and B expression, respectively, were observed in primary tumors compared with tumors continuously exposed to estrogens. These data indicate that overexpressed Aurora A and B in these tumors are under estrogen control via estrogen receptor α. Aurora A coenriched with the centrosome fraction isolated from tumors in the kidney. Centrosome amplification (number and area/cell) was detected in early tumor foci and large tumors but not in adjacent uninvolved or age-matched control kidneys. Taken together, these data indicate that persistent overexpression of Aurora A and B is under estrogen control, and is coincident with centrosome amplification, chromosomal instability, and aneuploidy, and represent an important mechanism driving tumorigenesis. [Cancer Res 2007;67(7):2957–63]

Abstract Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] compounds are established human lung carcinogens. The carcinogenicity of Cr(VI) is related to its solubility, with the most potent carcinogens being the insoluble particulate Cr(VI) compounds. However, it remains unknown why particulate Cr(VI) is more carcinogenic than soluble Cr(VI). One possible explanation is that particulates may provide more chronic exposures to chromate over time. We found that aneuploid cells increased in a concentration- and time-dependent manner after chronic exposure to lead chromate. Specifically, a 24-hour lead chromate exposure induced no aneugenic effect, whereas a 120-hour exposure to 0.5 and 1 μg/cm2 lead chromate induced 55% and 60% aneuploid metaphases, respectively. We also found that many of these aneuploid cells were able to continue to grow and form colonies. Centrosome defects are known to induce aneuploidy; therefore, we investigated the effects of chronic lead chromate exposure on centrosomes. We found that centrosome amplification in interphase and mitotic cells increased in a concentration- and time-dependent manner with 0.5 and 1 μg/cm2 lead chromate for 120 hours, inducing aberrant centrosomes in 18% and 21% of interphase cells and 32% and 69% of mitotic cells, respectively; however, lead oxide did not induce centrosome amplification in interphase or mitotic cells. There was also an increase in aberrant mitosis after chronic exposure to lead chromate with the emergence of disorganized anaphase and mitotic catastrophe. These data suggest that one possible mechanism for lead chromate–induced carcinogenesis is through centrosome dysfunction, leading to the induction of aneuploidy. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(8): 4041-8)

Earlier studies of invasive breast tumors have shown that 60–80% are aneuploid and ≈80% exhibit amplified centrosomes. In this study, we investigated the relationship of centrosome amplification with aneuploidy, chromosomal instability, p53 mutation, and loss of differentiation in human breast tumors. Twenty invasive breast tumors and seven normal breast tissues were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization with centromeric probes to chromosomes 3, 7, and 17. We analyzed these tumors for both aneuploidy and unstable karyotypes as determined by chromosomal instability. The results were then tested for correlation with three measures of centrosome amplification: centrosome size, centrosome number, and centrosome microtubule nucleation capacity. Centrosome size and centrosome number both showed a positive, significant, linear correlation with aneuploidy and chromosomal instability. Microtubule nucleation capacity showed no such correlation, but did correlate significantly with loss of tissue differentiation. Centrosome amplification was detected in in situ ductal carcinomas, suggesting that centrosome amplification is an early event in these lesions. Centrosome amplification and chromosomal instability occurred independently of p53 mutation, whereas p53 mutation was associated with a significant increase in centrosome microtubule nucleation capacity. Together, these results demonstrate that independent aspects of centrosome amplification correlate with chromosomal instability and loss of tissue differentiation and may be involved in tumor development and progression. These results further suggest that aspects of centrosome amplification may have clinical diagnostic and/or prognostic value and that the centrosome may be a potential target for cancer therapy.