Citations

AbstractImpedance has traditionally been employed in esophageal disease as a means to assess bolus flow and reflux episodes. Recent and ongoing research has provided new and novel applications for this technology. Measurement of esophageal mucosal impedance, via either multichannel intraluminal impedance catheters or specially designed endoscopically deployed impedance catheters, provides a marker of mucosal integrity. Mucosal impedance has been shown to segregate gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis from non‐GERD controls and may play a role in predicting response to reflux intervention. More data are needed with regard to other esophageal subgroups, outcome studies, and functional disease. Our paper reviews the history of impedance in esophageal disease, the means of assessing baseline and mucosal impedance, data with regard to the newly developed mucosal impedance probes, the clinical utility of mucosal impedance in specific clinical conditions, and limitations in our existing knowledge, along with suggestions for future studies.

Abstract All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) syndrome is a complex constellation of symptoms that arise in about 15% of patients who receive retinoic acid as therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia (PML). This syndrome typically consists of fever, dyspnea, weight gain, pulmonary infiltrates, pleural or pericardial effusions, episodic hypotension, renal dysfunction, and leukocytosis. Rarely does this entity present as typical chest pain suggestive of an acute myocardial infarction. A 39-year-old man diagnosed with acute PML treated with idarubicin and ATRA was admitted for febrile neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, cough, and epigastric pain despite being on ciprofloxacin and metronidazole at home. He continued to have low-grade fevers despite being on antibiotics and antifungals. On hospital day three, he was transferred to the CCU for worsening non-radiating left substernal chest pain associated with nausea and vomiting, new inferior lead 2 mm ST segment elevation, lateral lead T wave inversion, troponin and CKMB elevation, and hypotension not responding to frequent fluid boluses. A Swan-Ganz catheter was placed and pressors were started. The patient was found to have a dramatic neutrophil-predominant leukocytosis only hours after a CBC showed neutropenia. He also developed anuric acute renal failure. A cardiac catheterization was considered but could not be performed because of thrombocytopenia and the patient’s renal status. Subsequent EKG’s revealed more impressive changes. New 3 mm ST segment elevations and T wave inversions were noted in the lateral leads, the inferior lead ST segment elevations persisted and new inferior lead T wave inversions were present. An emergent echocardiogram was obtained which showed a significantly decreased LVEF at 36% and global LV hypokinesis without pericardial effusion. The constellation of symptoms was more suggestive of ATRA syndrome versus acute coronary syndrome and intravenous dexamethasone was started. The patient’s chest pain resolved spontaneously over the next three hours, the dramatic EKG findings and elevated cardiac enzymes resolved over the next few days, and the patient was transferred back to the admitting hematology service. A follow-up echocardiogram before discharge revealed a normal LVEF at 74% and no residual wall motion abnormalities. He eventually required hemodialysis for continued renal failure, which was continued as an outpatient after discharge. Of note, the patient’s fever resolved after beginning dexamethasone and multiple blood, urine, stool, and sputum cultures obtained remained negative throughout the hospital stay. This clinical situation presents a very distinct dilemma in how to proceed with clinical care. The presenting symptoms, signs, diagnostics, and imaging alone were all suggestive of a worsening ischemic cardiac process. But in considering the clinical presentation as a whole, especially the concomitant renal failure, fever in the setting of broad-spectrum coverage, and dramatic leukocytosis, we were more convinced of a systemic reaction to recent ATRA use. We maintained a low threshold for beginning an acute coronary syndrome protocol involving antiplatelet agents but were supported in our diagnosis by the patient’s remarkable recovery shortly after beginning intravenous steroids.

Abstract Systemic capillary leak syndrome (SCLS) is a vascular disorder characterized by intermittent episodes of hypotension and edema from increased vascular permeability. Patients present with resultant dramatic shifts in plasma volume from intravascular to extravascular spaces. Diagnosis requires observation of severe hemoconcentration and hypoalbuminemia during acute attacks. Typically, laboratory evaluation of hematocrit and albumin is normal when patients are not symptomatic. Concomitantly, and of unknown significance, a monoclonal protein is also frequently discovered. We present the case of a patient whose increased hematocrit suggested polycythemia vera, but whose total clinical picture of hypotension, hemoconcentration and hypoalbuminemia confirmed the diagnosis of SCLS. A 54-year old gentleman was referred for evaluation of polycythemia vera that was diagnosed after a series of dramatic hospitalizations for near-syncope. The patient had no chronic illnesses, negative family history for hematologic abnormalities, and was otherwise in his usual state of good health when a complaint of sudden lightheadedness and pre-syncope led to an emergency room evaluation. There he was found to be severely hypotensive and was resuscitated with intravenous fluids. Initial laboratory evaluation showed a hematocrit of 60%. Further workup revealed an increased red cell mass. For the presumptive diagnosis of polycythemia vera, the patient was phlebotomized once and, interestingly, did not require any further phlebotomy for almost three years. During this interim, he remained relatively asymptomatic with only occasional bouts of lightheadedness that would abort with increased fluid hydration. Phlebotomy was again used when the patient presented with near-syncope, hypotension, and vomiting accompanied by significant extremity swelling. The hematocrit was found to be greater than 80%. The patient recovered with aggressive fluid resuscitation and was discharged on a low-dose aspirin with the continued empiric diagnosis of polycythemia vera. During that year, the patient recovered from four other similar episodes that resolved after fluid resuscitation and where phlebotomy was used. The most severe episode involved a protracted ICU stay for severe hypotension complicated by severe extremity edema and resultant compartment syndrome and ischemic muscle necrosis. With the concern of adrenocortical dysfunction leading to these hypotensive episodes, the patient was started on low dose daily steroids. While on this, the patient reported less frequency and severity of his almost-daily symptoms of lightheadedness and edema. In fact, attempts at tapering the steroid dose down resulted in a return of the minor symptoms and with continued steroids, no further hospitalizations were needed. During our evaluation, we confirmed a normal hematocrit and albumin while asymptomatic and the presence of a monoclonal protein. This case represents a common clinical history of patients who are ultimately diagnosed with SCLS. Often, the significance of the observed hypotension in concert with laboratory evidence of hemocentration and hypoalbuminemia is not initially appreciated. Although current attack prophylaxis regimens for SCLS use terbutaline and theophylline, steroids had historically shown occasional benefit in some patients. SCLS still carries a significant mortality risk and prompt recognition of this syndrome and initiation of an appropriate prophylaxis regimen is crucial.

Objective This study aimed to develop and validate a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in acute pancreatitis (AP) as an endpoint centred on the patient. Design A PROM instrument (PAtieNt-rePoRted OutcoMe scale in acute pancreatItis, an international proSpEctive cohort study, PAN-PROMISE scale) was designed based on the opinion of patients, professionals and an expert panel. The scale was validated in an international multicentre prospective cohort study, describing the severity of AP and quality of life at 15 days after discharge as the main variables for validation. The COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments) methodology was applied. Both the design and validation stages considered the content and face validity of this new instrument; the metric properties of the different items, reliability (reproducibility and internal consistence), the construct, structural and criterion validity, responsiveness and interpretability of this scale. Results PAN-PROMISE consists of a seven-item scale based on the symptoms that cause the most discomfort and concern to patients with AP. The validation cohort involved 15 countries, 524 patients. The intensity of symptoms changed from higher values during the first 24 hours to lower values at discharge and 15 days thereafter. Items converged into a unidimensional ordinal scale with good fit indices. Internal consistency and split-half reliability at discharge were adequate. Reproducibility was confirmed using test–retest reliability and comparing the PAN-PROMISE score at discharge and 15 days after discharge. Evidence is also provided for the convergent-discriminant and empirical validity of the scale. Conclusion The PAN-PROMISE scale is a useful tool to be used as an endpoint in clinical trials, and to quantify patient well-being during the hospital admission and follow-up. Trial registration number NCT03650062