Citations

Background and Purpose: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing rates of recanalization, good neurological outcome, and mortality between patients treated with three modern devices used for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Materials and Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search on studies reporting outcomes of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. We selected studies including≥30 patients treated with either the Trevo stent-retriever, Penumbra aspiration system or the Solitaire stent-retriever. Outcomes studied included mrs≤2, 90-day mortality, symptomatic and intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), recanalization. Outcomes were pooled across studies using a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: 27 articles with 2666 patients were included (1514 Solitaire, 260 Trevo and 892 Penumbra). Rates of good neurological outcome (mRS≤2) were higher in the Solitaire group (54.0%, 95%CI=49.0-58.0%) than the Penumbra group (39.0%, 95%CI=31.0%-47.0%) (P<0.01). There was a trend towards higher rates of good neurological outcome in the Solitaire compared to the Trevo group (P=0.08). Rates of 90-day mortality were significantly lower in the Solitaire group (16.0%, 95%CI=11.0%-22.0%) than in the Penumbra group (27.0%, 95%CI=24.0%-30.0%) (P<0.01) and the Trevo group (23.0%, 95%CI=13.0-33.0)(P=0.01). Recanalization rates were similar between groups at 80.0% (95%CI=75.0%-84.0% for the Solitaire group, 82.0% (95%CI=75.0%-88.0%) for the Penumbra group (P=0.54) and 76.0% (95%CI=68.0-83.0) for the Trevo group (P=0.13 vs Penumbra and P=0.27 vs. Solitaire). Conclusions: Meta-analysis of incidence rates in noncomparative series reporting on over 2500 patients suggests that the Solitaire device maybe associated with superior neurological outcomes and lower rates of 90-day mortality. Comparative studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Introduction: Five randomized trials proving the efficacy and safety of mechanical embolectomy for ischemic stroke patients used differing radiological methods to select patients for treatment. Hypothesis: The percentage of patients evaluated in a non-clinical trial setting that would meet radiological criteria to be included in the five trials will differ substantially. Methods: Retrospective study of consecutive ischemic stroke patients who were considered for endovascular stroke therapy based on confirmed intracranial large vessel occlusion (M1, M2, or carotid terminus) at an academic medical center from April 2010 - November 2014. All patients underwent CT perfusion and CT angiogram. Results: The table shows baseline characteristics of 119 patients. Median age was 69 years (IQR 57-79) and median NIHSS 18 (IQR 14-21). Most patients had ASPECTS score ≥ 6 (n=105, 88.2%). The M1 segment of MCA was the most common vessel occluded (n=81, 68%). All 119 patients (100%) met radiological criteria for MR CLEAN while 105 (88.2%) met criteria for SWIFT-PRIME, 96 (80.7%) for REVASCAT, 80/116 (69.0%) for EXTEND IA, and 74 (62.2%) for ESCAPE. IV TPA was given to 58 patients (48.7%) and acute endovascular stroke therapy attempted in 66 (55.5%). Any intracranial hemorrhage was more common in the patients treated with endovascular therapy than in those who were not (36% vs. 17%, p=0.025). The frequency of symptomatic ICH did not significantly differ between these two groups (6.1% vs 3.8%, p=0.691). Conclusions: The percentage of patients with acute stroke and large vessel occlusion that would qualify for endovascular stroke trials based on radiological criteria varies considerably (62%-100%) in a non-clinical trial cohort from an academic comprehensive stroke center. Additional individual patient characteristics influence treatment decisions in non-clinical trial settings.

Background: Tissue reperfusion is a critical determinant of outcomes after intra-arterial therapy (IAT). However, there is no standardized method for grading angiographic reperfusion. We sought to compare the two most commonly used reperfusion scales, TIMI and modified TICI (m-TICI), for predicting good long-term outcome following IAT. Methods: From a multicenter database, we evaluated acute stroke patients presenting with middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 occlusions who underwent IAT. Clinical and angiographic data were collected. Reperfusion for each case was graded using the TIMI and m-TICI scales. The primary distinction between these scales is that partial reperfusion (TIMI 2) is sub-divided into minor (m-TICI 2A: <50%) and major (m-TICI 2B: 50-99%) grades in the m-TICI system. The performance of these scales for predicting a good 90-day outcome (mRS 0-2) was evaluated using the c-statistic. Results: There were 313 acute stroke patients with MCA M1 segment occlusions who underwent IAT at 6 academic centers; 171 (54.6%) were female. Mean age was 65.3±16.5 years. There were 157 (50.2%) right-sided strokes. Median baseline NIHSS score was 17 (IQR 15-20). Good outcome at 90 days was achieved in 32.5%. For predicting good outcome, the c-statistic was significantly higher for m-TICI (0.74 vs. 0.68; p<0.0001). The threshold that maximized predictive accuracy was m-TICI ≥2B (sensitivity 78%, specificity 65%; figure). Conclusions: The modified TICI scale is superior to the TIMI scale for predicting clinical outcome after IAT, and should be the standard tool for grading angiographic reperfusion. An m-TICI score ≥2B (≥50% reperfusion) is the optimal biomarker for successful reperfusion.

Background and Purpose: Rabbit aneurysm models are used in the testing of embolization devices as well as elucidating the mechanisms human intracranial aneurysm growth and healing. We employed ribonucleic acid sequencing (RNA-seq) technology to identify genes relevant to induced rabbit aneurysm biology and compare these with genes related to human intracranial aneurysms to identify genes of potential clinical interest. This included sequencing micro RNA, which are important regulatory non-coding RNA. Materials and Methods: Elastase-induced saccular aneurysms were created at the origin of the right common carotid artery (CCA) in 5 rabbits. Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and micro ribonucleic acid (miRNA) was isolated from the aneurysm and the control unoperated left CCA at 12 weeks and was processed using RNA-seq technology. The results from RNA-seq were analyzed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Results: 9396 genes were analyzed using RNA-seq, of which 649 (6.9%) were found to be significantly differentially expressed between aneurysm and control tissues (p < 0.05, false discovery rate 2). Of these, 500 were up-regulated in the aneurysm and 149 were down-regulated as compared to controls. Using the same criteria, 3 miRNA were identified as down regulated and 5 were identified as up regulated. Pathway analysis associated these genes with inflammatory response, cellular migration, and coagulation, among other functions and pathologies. Conclusion: RNA-seq next-gen analysis of rabbit aneurysms shows similarities to human intracranial aneurysms with respect to regulation of some key pathways.

Background and Purpose: The Hydrocoil Endovascular aneurysm occlusion and Packing Study (HELPS) was a randomized controlled trial comparing Hydrocoil to bare platinum coils . We performed a subgroup analysis of angiographic and clinical outcomes of medium sized aneurysms in the HELPS trial. Methods: We selected all patients with medium sized aneurysms (5mm-9.9mm) in the HELPS trial. The following outcomes were compared between the HydroCoil and control groups: 1) any recurrence, 2) major recurrence, 3) retreatment and 4) good neurological outcome defined as mRS≤2. Outcomes of recently ruptured and non-recently ruptured aneurysms were compared separately. Comparisons between groups were performed using Fisher’s exact test. A multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for aneurysm neck size, shape, use of adjunctive device and rupture status was performed. Results: A total of 288 patients with medium sized aneurysms were randomized (144 in each group). At 15-18 months post-treatment, major recurrence rate was significantly lower in the HydroCoil group than the control group (18.6% versus 30.8%, P=0.03, respectively). For recently ruptured aneurysm patients, major recurrence rate was significantly lower for HydroCoil than controls (20.3% versus 47.5%, P=0.003), while rates were similar between coil types for unruptured aneurysms (16.7% versus 14.8%, P=0.80). On multivariate analysis for patients with recently ruptured aneurysms, HydroCoil was associated with lower odds of any recurrence as compared to bare platinum (OR=0.37, 95%CI=0.18-0.76, P=0.006) and major recurrence (OR=0.27, 95%CI=0.12-0.58, P=0.0007). There was a trend towards lower retreatment rates in the recently ruptured group treated with HydroCoil (OR=0.00, 95%CI=0.00-2.01, P=0.12). Conclusion: For recently ruptured, medium sized aneurysms, as compared to bare platinum coils HydroCoils were associated with lower rates of major recurrence that were both statistically significant and clinically relevant. These findings suggest that HydroCoils should be the preferred treatment for this subset of patients.

Background: Flow diversion has been proposed as a valid option for patients with proximal internal carotid artery aneurysms. We analyzed a consecutive series of 38 patients with proximal (to the origin of the posterior communicating artery) internal carotid artery aneurysms treated with flow diversion over a 28-month interval. Methods: Clinical information and angiographic follow-up data were prospectively collected in a consecutive series of patients with proximal internal carotid artery aneurysms treated with flow diversion. No patients were lost to follow-up and every eligible patient (with at least 6 months of follow-up) underwent catheter angiography at 6 months. Results: The series include 38 patients (37 women and 1 man). Most of the aneurysms were large or giant and with a wide neck. In two patients, we failed to deliver the device to the target segment because of proximal vessel tortuosity; thus 36 patients underwent flow diversion. There were no permanent periprocedural neurological deficits. One patient experienced a transient neurological deficit and another patient suffered slight transient worsening of a third nerve paresis. Complete angiographic occlusion of the aneurysm was observed in 75% of patients at 6 months and in 87% of the eligible patients at one year. One patient was found to have asymptomatic internal carotid occlusion. Conclusion: Flow diversion is an effective and safe method to treat internal carotid artery aneurysms not amenable to other endovascular techniques.

Background and Purpose- It is important to know the costs for hospitalization for endovascular embolectomy patients so that comparisons can be made to payments to hospitals. Methods- Using the National Inpatient Sample, we evaluated the costs for hospitalization for patients treated with endovascular embolectomy in the United States from 2006-2008. The primary endpoint examined in this study was total hospital costs, and these were correlated with clinical outcome. Hospitalization costs were then compared with Medicare payments for their respective outcomes. MS-DRG 24 was the diagnostic related group code (DRG) for mechanical embolectomy with good outcome and MS-DRG 23 was the DRG code for mechanical embolectomy with major complications. Medicare payments were available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov . Results- A total of 3864 patients received endovascular embolectomy. 1649 patients were <65 years old and 2205 patients were ≥65 years old. Median hospital costs in 2008 dollars were $36,999 (IQR $26,662-$56,405) for patients with good outcome, $50,628 (IQR $33,135-$76,063) for patients with severe disability, and $35,109 (IQR $25,053-$62,621) for patients with mortality. Reimbursement in the year 2008 for DRG 24 (good outcome) was $22075 and reimbursement for DRG 23 (major complications) was $26639. Conclusions- Our study of the NIS shows that hospitalization costs in the United States for ischemic stroke patients treated with endovascular embolectomy are rather high, probably due to the serious nature of their illness. Medicare payments have not been adequate in reimbursing these hospitalizations. Further work is needed to ensure the future reconciliation of costs with payments.

Purpose: To assess the association of procedure time with neurologic adverse events post Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) placement for intracranial aneurysm treatment. Methods: In the IntrePED Registry, a retrospective review was performed at 17 centers to identify consecutive intracranial aneurysms treated with the PED following regulatory approval in the given country. All patients in whom at least one PED was placed and follow-up was available prior to IRB approval were enrolled. “Primary adverse events” included major stroke, major hemorrhage, and neurological mortality. Results: 793 patients with 906 aneurysms, including 311 large ICA, 536 other anterior and 59 posterior circulation aneurysms were enrolled and followed for a mean duration of 19.3 months. 689 (77%) of 906 aneurysms were saccular and 116(13%) were fusiform. 824 (91%) were unruptured. 308 (34%) treated with multiple PEDs. Incidence of major hemorrhage, stroke and neurological mortality was 2.4%, 4.7% and 3.8% respectively. Heparin was administered in 89% of the patients during the procedure. An average of 1.5 PEDs were utilized per case. The mean procedure time was 101.5 ± 50.5 mins. Patients with a major complication (major stroke, major hemorrhage, neurological mortality) had procedure time of 138.2 + 81.5 min, and those without a major complication had procedure time of 98.3 + 45.5 min (p< 0.001). A logistic regression incorporating aneurysm size and number of PEDs used still showed a highly significant relationship between major complications and procedure time (p<0.001) and also found aneurysm size to be an independent predictor of longer procedures (p=0.007). Conclusions: The present analysis of IntrePED Registry subjects demonstrates a strong association of procedure time with complication rates. Further analyses of factors leading to longer procedure times is needed.

Background and aim The use of endoluminal flow diversion in bifurcation aneurysms has been questioned due to the potential for complications and lower occlusion rates. In this study we assessed outcomes of endovascular treatment of intracranial sidewall and bifurcation aneurysms with flow diverters Methods In July 2020, a literature search for all studies utilizing endoluminal flow diverter treatment for sidewall or bifurcation aneurysms was performed. Data were collected from studies that met our inclusion/exclusion criteria by two independent reviewers and confirmed by a third reviewer. Using random-effects meta-analysis the target outcomes including overall complications (hematoma, ischemic events, minor ischemic stroke, aneurysm rupture, side vessel occlusion, stenosis, thrombosis, transient ischemic stroke, and other complications), perioperative complications, and follow-up (long-term) aneurysm occlusion were intestigated. Results Overall, we included 35 studies with 1084 patients with 1208 aneurysms. Of these aneurysms, 654 (54.14%) and 554 (45.86%) were classified as sidewall and bifurcation aneurysm, respectively, based on aneurysm location. Sidewall aneurysms had a similar total complication rate (R) of 27.12% (95% CI, 16.56%–41.09%), compared with bifurcation aneurysms (R, 20.40%, 95% CI, 13.24%–30.08%) (p = 0.3527). Follow-up angiographic outcome showed comparable complete occlusion rates for sidewall aneurysms (R 69.49%; 95%CI, 62.41%–75.75%) and bifurcation aneurysms (R 73.99%; 95% CI, 65.05%–81.31%; p = 0.4328). Conclusions This meta-analysis of sidewall and bifurcation aneurysms treated with endoluminal flow diverters demonstrated no significant differences in complications or occlusion rates. These data provide new information that can be used as a benchmark for comparison with emerging devices for the treatment of bifurcation aneurysms.

Introduction: Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a key component of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) thrombi. The aim of our prospective study was to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of VWF in clots and to evaluate whether VWF is associated with certain subtypes of AIS. Methods: VWF immunostaining was performed on 79 thrombi collected as part of the multi-center Stroke Thromboembolism Registry of Imaging and Pathology (STRIP) registry. The cases were classified according to TOAST criteria. The VWF expression was quantified using Orbit Image Analysis (www.Orbit.bio) machine learning software. IBM SPSS statistics 25 was used to assess the relationship between the VWF levels and different etiology subtypes. Results: A cardioembolic stroke was defined in 39 cases (49.4%) whereas an atherosclerotic origin was identified in 13 patients (16.5%). Other causes accounted for 12 cases (15.1%). Unknown etiology was reported in 15 cases (19%). The mean VWF content in the clots was 12.8%. According to the Mann-Whitney U-test, the level of VWF was significantly higher in the cases with unknown etiology compared to cardioembolic origin (p=0.044). We found also that patients with unknown etiology of stroke had higher VWF expression as compared to the other two subtypes, although this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Among the patients with ischemic stroke included in this study, the VWF expression was significantly increased in those with unknown etiology compared to the group with cardioembolic stroke. Our finding provides new insights into clot composition in cryptogenic stroke and may influence the treatment and secondary prevention in these cases.