Citations

Abstract Objective Biomagnetic liver susceptometry (BLS) is a noninvasive method to quantify liver iron concentration (LIC). Here we report our findings from a prospective study which validates in vivo LIC from a SQUID biosusceptometer by in vitro LIC in fresh tissue and paraffin-embedded biopsies from patients at risk for iron overload.Materials and Methods LIC was measured by BLS and biopsy. LIC by biopsy were measured in 40 dry weight fresh tissue and paraffin-embedded liver biopsy samples. LIC from biopsies and total iron scores from histology were compared to biosusceptometry. In addition, the wet-to-dry weight ratio was determined.Results Liver iron concentrations measured by BLS and in 40 fresh tissue biopsies were related by a factor of 6.0 ± 0.2 (r2 = 0.88). Similar results were obtained from comparisons with deparaffinized biopsies (6.6±0.3, r2=0.87) and histology (6.7±1.3, r2=0.47). In contrast, a mean wet-to-dry weight ratio of 4.1 ± 0.7 was achieved from biopsies immediately weighed after the biopsy procedure.ConclusionLIC derived from two independent measures, the historical biopsy gold standard and biosusceptometry, were highly correlated. When comparing biosusceptometry with wet weight biopsies, the liver tissue sample size is critical.

IMPORTANCE: At the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, medications repurposed for management of coronavirus disease 2019 were used in the absence of clinical trial evidence. OBJECTIVES: To describe the variation and evolution in use of repurposed medications for coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational cohort study of adults hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 between February 15, 2020, and April 12, 2021, across 76 United States and international hospitals within the Society of Critical Care Medicine’s Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study coronavirus disease 2019 registry. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospital variation was quantified using multivariable adjusted random effects logistic regression models and unsupervised clustering. Repurposed medications included antivirals, corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine, immunomodulators, and therapeutic dose anticoagulants. RESULTS: Among 7,069 adults hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019, 1,979 (28%) received antivirals, 2,876 (41%) received corticosteroids, 1,779 (25%) received hydroxychloroquine, 620 (9%) received immunomodulators, and 2,154 (31%) received therapeutic dose anticoagulants. Contribution of hospital site to risk-adjusted variation was 46% for antivirals, 30% for corticosteroids, 48% for hydroxychloroquine, 46% for immunomodulators, and 52% for therapeutic dose anticoagulants. Compared with the early pandemic, the later pandemic practice phenotypes converged with increased use of antivirals (odds ratio, 3.14; 95% CI, 2.40–4.10) and corticosteroids (odds ratio, 5.43; 95% CI, 4.23–6.97), with decreased use of hydroxychloroquine (odds ratio, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01–0.04) and immunomodulators (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34–0.70). There was no clinically significant change in the use of therapeutic dose anticoagulants (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01–1.02). There were no differences in risk-adjusted mortality between hospitals with high rates of repurposed medication use compared with hospitals with low rates of use. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Hospital variation in the use of repurposed medications varied widely across hospitals early in the pandemic and later converged with the emergence of randomized clinical trials. Platforms developed for rapid activation and enrollment in clinical trials of repurposed medications are needed prior to the next pandemic to expedite effective, evidence-based practice.

Background and Purpose: Studies of carotid artery disease have suggested that high-grade stenosis can affect cognition, even without stroke. The presence and degree of cognitive impairment in such patients have not been reported and compared with a demographically matched population-based cohort. Methods: We studied cognition in 1000 consecutive CREST-2 (Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial) patients, a treatment trial for asymptomatic carotid disease. Cognitive assessment was after randomization but before assigned treatment. The cognitive battery was developed in the general population REGARDS Study (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke), involving Word List Learning Sum, Word List Recall, and Word List fluency for animal names and the letter F. The carotid stenosis patients were >45 years old with ≥70% asymptomatic carotid stenosis and no history of prevalent stroke. The distribution of cognitive performance for the patients was standardized, accounting for age, race, and education using performance from REGARDS, and after further adjustment for hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking. Using the Wald Test, we tabulated the proportion of Z scores less than the anticipated deviate for the population-based cohort for representative percentiles. Results: There were 786 baseline assessments. Mean age was 70 years, 58% men, and 52% right-sided stenosis. The overall Z score for patients was significantly below expected for higher percentiles ( P <0.0001 for 50th, 75th, and 95th percentiles) and marginally below expected for the 25th percentile ( P =0.015). Lower performance was attributed largely to Word List Recall ( P <0.0001 for all percentiles) and for Word List Learning (50th, 75th, and 95th percentiles below expected, P ≤0.01). The scores for left versus right carotid disease were similar. Conclusions: Baseline cognition of patients with severe carotid stenosis showed below normal cognition compared to the population-based cohort, controlling for demographic and cardiovascular risk factors. This cohort represents the largest group to date to demonstrate that poorer cognition, especially memory, in this disease. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02089217.

BACKGROUND: Several markers of oxygenation are used as prognostic markers in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Real-world use is limited by the need for invasive measurements and unreliable availability in the electronic health record. A pragmatic, reliable, and accurate marker of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is needed to facilitate epidemiologic studies, clinical trials, and shared decision-making with patients. F IO 2 is easily obtained at the bedside and from the electronic health record. The F IO 2 trajectory may be a valuable marker of recovery in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. METHODS: This was a historical cohort study of adult subjects admitted to an ICU with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to community-acquired pneumonia and/or ARDS. RESULTS: Our study included 2,670 subjects. F IO 2 and S pO 2 were consistently more available than was P aO 2 in the electronic health record: (F IO 2 vs S pO 2 vs P aO 2 : 100 vs 100 vs 72.8% on day 1, and 100 vs 99 vs 21% on day 5). A worsening F IO 2 trajectory was associated with reduced ventilator-free days. From days 2 to 5, every increase in F IO 2 by 10% from the previous day was associated with fewer ventilator-free days (on day 2: adjusted mean –1.25 [95% CI –1.45 to –1.05] d, P < .001). The S pO 2 /F IO 2 trajectory also provided prognostic information. On days 3 – 5, an increase in S pO 2 /F IO 2 from the previous day was associated with increased ventilator-free days (on day 3: adjusted mean 2.09 (95% CI 1.44–2.74) d; P < .001). S pO 2 /F IO 2 models did not add predictive information compared with models with F IO 2 alone (on day 2: adjusted F IO 2 vs S pO 2 /F IO 2 R2 0.122 vs 0.119; and on day 3: 0.153 vs 0.163). CONCLUSIONS: F IO 2 and S pO 2 /F IO 2 are pragmatic and readily available intermediate prognostic markers in acute hypoxic respiratory failure. The F IO 2 trajectory in the first 5 d of ICU admission provided important prognostic information (ventilator-free days). Although the S pO 2 /F IO 2 trajectory was also associated with ventilator-free days, it did not provide more information than the F IO 2 trajectory alone.

Abstract Background The multicenter prospective CREST‐2 Registry (C2R) provides recent experience in performing carotid artery stenting (CAS) for interventionists to ensure safe performance of CAS. Objective To determine the periprocedural safety of CAS performed using a transradial approach relative to CAS performed using a transfemoral approach. Methods Patients with ≥70% asymptomatic and ≥50% symptomatic carotid stenosis, ≤80 years of age and at standard or high risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are eligible for the C2R. The primary endpoint was a composite of severe access‐related complications. Comparisons were made using propensity‐score matched logistic regression. Results The mean age of the cohort was 67.6 ± 8.2 years and 1906 (35.1%) were female. Indications for CAS included 4063 (74.9%) for primary atherosclerosis. A total of 2868 (52.8%) cases underwent CAS for asymptomatic disease. Transradial access was used in 213 (3.9%) patients. The transradial cohort had lower use of general anesthesia (1.5% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.007) and higher use of distal embolic protection (96.7% vs. 89.4%, p = 0.0004). There were no significant differences between radial and femoral access groups in terms of a composite of major access‐related complications (0% vs. 1.1%) or a composite of periprocedural stroke or death (3.3% vs. 2.4%; OR = 1.4 [confidence intervals 0.6, 3.1]; p = 0.42). Conclusion We found no significant differences in rates of major access‐related complications or periprocedural stroke or death with CAS performed using transradial compared to transfemoral access. Our results support incorporation of the transradial approach to clinical trials comparing CAS to other revascularization techniques.