Citations

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) negatively affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and with each relapse, patients with MM experience further declines in HRQoL. Patient-reported HRQoL is therefore an important treatment outcome, in addition to clinical response to therapy. CARTITUDE-1 (NCT03548207) is a phase 1b/2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; JNJ-68284528; LCAR-B38M CAR-T cells), a chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy with 2 B-cell maturation antigen-targeting single-domain antibodies, in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM. We evaluated symptoms, functioning, and overall HRQoL through patient-reported outcome measures, which is a secondary objective of CARTITUDE-1. Methods: Patients were ≥18 years of age with a diagnosis of MM per International Myeloma Working Group criteria, measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1. Patients had received ≥3 prior regimens for MM or were double-refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug, and had received an anti-CD38 antibody. Cilta-cel was given as a single infusion on Day 1 (target dose: 0.75×106 [range: 0.5-1.0×106] CAR+ viable T cells/kg) 5-7 days after start of lymphodepletion (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 + fludarabine 30 mg/m2 daily for 3 days). In the phase 2 portion of CARTITUDE-1, HRQoL was assessed at baseline, on Days 7, 28, 56, 78, and 100, and every 28 days thereafter using 3 patient-reported instruments: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), 4 items from the EORTC QLQ-Multiple Myeloma (MY20) module, and the 5-level EuroQol Five Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) measure. Raw EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-MY20 scores were linearly transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100; the EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (VAS) score ranges from 0 to 100. Clinically meaningful changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 symptoms, physical functioning, and overall HRQoL were based on anchor-based methods using a patient global impression of change item. Repeated-measures mixed-effects models were used to analyze mean changes in HRQoL from baseline to subsequent assessment time points in patients in the modified intent-to-treat population with ≥1 post-baseline assessment. Median time to event of HRQoL scores was calculated descriptively, using a change in score ≥0.5×standard deviation of values prior to cilta-cel infusion as improvement/worsening with death due to progression defined as worsening. Results: For the 68 patients in the phase 2 portion of CARTITUDE-1 (63.2% male; median age: 62.0 years [range: 43-78]), questionnaire completion rates at baseline and Day 100, respectively, were 92.6% and 69.2% for both the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-MY20 items and 92.6% and 70.8% for the EQ-5D-5L. For EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, clinically meaningful improvements at Day 100 were seen for 71.1% of patients for pain, 62.2% for fatigue, 72.1% for physical functioning, and 51.1% for global health status. Mean changes in pain and fatigue showed a reduction in these symptoms over time (following an initial worsening of fatigue at Day 7; Figure). This trend of improvements over time was also observed for overall HRQoL and EORTC QLQ-MY20 single items. Clinically meaningful improvements at Day 100, defined by a literature-based minimal important difference of 10 points in mean score, were observed for the EORTC QLQ-MY20 single items: thinking about illness and worries about dying or future health. Approximately 50% of the population reported an event of improvement or worsening in EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L scales, with the rest censored in this early data cut; among these patients, median time to improvement was approximately 1-2 months (with median time to worsening occurring less than 1 month after cilta-cel treatment). There was a trend for an improvement in mean EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status, physical functioning, pain, and fatigue, and EQ-5D-5L VAS at Day 100 with increased depth of response. Conclusions: Some patients with heavily pretreated MM showed rapid and clinically meaningful improvements in pain, fatigue, physical functioning, overall HRQoL, and future perspectives, consistent with their clinical outcomes. With additional follow-up, it is possible that these early improvements in symptoms will translate into greater improvement in overall HRQoL in the long term. Disclosures Martin: Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; AMGEN: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy. Lin:Vineti: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cohen:Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Patents/Intellectual property licensed, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Htut:City of Hope Medical Center: Current Employment. Stewart:Janssen, BMS, Sanofi-Aventis, GSK: Honoraria; Tempus, Inc., Genomics England LLC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hari:GSK: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Berdeja:Teva: Research Funding; Cellularity: Research Funding; Kesios: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; CURIS: Research Funding; EMD Sorono: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Glenmark: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vivolux: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Bluebird: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy. Madduri:Foundation Medicine: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Legend: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; Kinevant: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Usmani:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; SkylineDX: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Other; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding. Yeh:Janssen: Current Employment. Allred:Janssen: Current Employment. Olyslager:Janssen: Current Employment. Banerjee:Janssen: Current Employment. Goldberg:Johnson & Johnson: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Schecter:Janssen: Current Employment. Jackson:Janssen: Current Employment; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Consultancy. Deraedt:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gries:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fastenau:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wu:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Carrasco:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Akram:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Hossain:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Jakubowiak:AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive, Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jagannath:BMS, Janssen, Karyopharm, Legend Biotech, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy.

Background: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; JNJ-68284528; LCAR-B38M CAR-T cells) is a chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy with 2 B-cell maturation antigen-targeting single-domain antibodies designed to confer avidity. In the phase 1 LEGEND-2 study in China, LCAR-B38M yielded deep, durable responses with a manageable safety profile in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). The phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study (NCT03548207) is further evaluating cilta-cel in this pt population in the US. We present updated data from the phase 1b portion along with initial phase 2 data. Methods: Eligible pts (aged ≥18 y) were diagnosed with MM per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria and had measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, received ≥3 prior regimens or were double-refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug, and received an anti-CD38 antibody. After apheresis, bridging therapy was permitted. Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 and fludarabine 30 mg/m2 daily for 3 d were used for lymphodepletion. A single infusion of cilta-cel at a target dose of 0.75×106 (range 0.5-1.0×106) CAR+ viable T cells/kg was administered 5-7 d after start of lymphodepletion. The primary objective of the phase 1b portion was to characterize cilta-cel safety and establish the recommended phase 2 dose; the primary objective of the phase 2 portion was to evaluate cilta-cel efficacy. Response was assessed per IMWG criteria and minimal residual disease (MRD) by next-generation sequencing. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using CTCAE v5.0. In the phase 1b portion, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was graded by Lee et al (Blood 2014) and neurotoxicity by CTCAE v5.0; in the phase 2 portion, CRS and neurotoxicity were graded by American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) criteria. In this combined analysis, Lee et al and CTCAE v5.0 were mapped to ASTCT criteria for CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), respectively. Results: As of the May 20, 2020 clinical cutoff, 97 pts (58.8% male; median age 61.0 y [range 43-78]) with R/R MM received cilta-cel (29 in phase 1b; 68 in phase 2). Median follow-up duration was 8.8 mo (range 1.5-20.4). Pts had received a median of 6 prior lines of therapy (range 3-18); 83.5% were penta-exposed, 87.6% were triple-refractory, 41.2% were penta-refractory, and 97.9% were refractory to last line of therapy. Overall response rate per independent review committee (primary endpoint) was 94.8% (95% CI 88.4-98.3), with a stringent complete response rate of 55.7% (95% CI 45.2-65.8), very good partial response rate of 32.0% (95% CI 22.9-42.2), and partial response rate of 7.2% (95% CI 3.0-14.3). All pts achieved a reduction in M-protein. Median time to first response was 1.0 mo (range 0.9-5.8; 80.4% ≤1.0 mo), and median time to complete response or better was 1.8 mo (range 0.9-12.5; 74.1% ≤3.0 mo); responses deepened over time (Figure). Median duration of response was not reached (NR). Of 52 MRD-evaluable pts, 94.2% were MRD-negative at 10-5. The 6-mo progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates (95% CI) were 87.4% (78.9-92.7) and 93.8% (86.7-97.2), respectively; median PFS and OS were NR. Ten deaths occurred during the study; 8 were due to AEs (both related and unrelated; CRS/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, neurotoxicity, respiratory failure, sepsis, septic shock, pneumonia, lung abscess, and acute myelogenous leukemia [n=1 each]), and 2 due to progressive disease. AEs reported in >70% of pts were CRS (94.8%; grade [gr] 3/4 4.1%), neutropenia (90.7%; gr 3/4 90.7%), anemia (81.4%; gr 3/4 68.0%), and thrombocytopenia (79.4%; gr 3/4 59.8%). Median time to CRS onset was 7.0 d (range 1-12) and median duration 4.0 d (range 1-27, excluding n=1 with 97 d). CAR-T cell-related neurotoxicity was reported in 20.6% of pts (gr 3/4 10.3%). Cilta-cel CAR+ T cells showed maximum peripheral expansion at 14 d (range 9-43). Among pts with 6 mo' individual follow-up, 67% had cilta-cel CAR+ T cells below the level of quantification (2 cells/µL) in peripheral blood. Conclusions: Preliminary phase 1b/2 data from CARTITUDE-1 indicate a single low-dose infusion of cilta-cel leads to early, deep, and durable responses in heavily pretreated pts with MM with a safety profile consistent with LEGEND-2. Further investigation of cilta-cel in other MM populations is underway. Disclosures Madduri: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Foundation Medicine: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Legend: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; Kinevant: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau. Berdeja:Teva: Research Funding; Bluebird: Research Funding; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; EMD Sorono: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Prothena: Consultancy; Cellularity: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; CURIS: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Glenmark: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vivolux: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kesios: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Usmani:Celgene: Other; BMS, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; SkylineDX: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding. Jakubowiak:Adaptive, Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cohen:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Patents/Intellectual property licensed, Research Funding. Stewart:Janssen, BMS, Sanofi-Aventis, GSK: Honoraria; Tempus, Inc., Genomics England LLC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hari:Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. Htut:City of Hope Medical Center: Current Employment. Munshi:OncoPep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; C4: Current equity holder in private company. Deol:Novartis: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria. Singh:Janssen: Current Employment. Zudaire:Janssen: Current Employment. Yeh:Janssen: Current Employment. Allred:Janssen: Current Employment. Olyslager:Janssen: Current Employment. Banerjee:Janssen: Current Employment. Goldberg:Johnson & Johnson: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Schecter:Janssen: Current Employment. Jackson:Janssen: Current Employment; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Consultancy. Deraedt:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zhuang:Janssen: Current Employment. Infante:Janssen: Current Employment. Geng:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Wu:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Carrasco:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Akram:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Hossain:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Rizvi:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Fan:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Jagannath:BMS, Janssen, Karyopharm, Legend Biotech, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy. Lin:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Vineti: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martin:AMGEN: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Abstract Background Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a molecular phenotype characterized by the lengthening or shortening of tandem DNA repeats within the human genome. MSI phenomenon has been reported in various solid tumors as the consequence of DNA mismatch repair deficiency. It is generally associated with good prognosis and effective immunotherapy treatment. The current MSI tests are based on various methodologies, including immunohistochemistry, polymerase chain reactions, or next-generation sequencing (NGS). Each testing methodology has its own technical advantages, but they either fail at liquid biopsy specimen or implement complicated and expensive experimental interventions. Methods A designated analysis pipeline was developed individually for tissue biopsy and liquid biopsy to evaluate the stability of MSI sites within a NGS panel testing targeting over 400 genes at a common depth of coverage (<1000X for tissue biopsy and <5000X for liquid biopsy). The liquid biopsy algorithm implements a signal enhancing module based on a pool of normal samples to boost assay performance. We validated the tissue biopsy testing with an exploratory cohort of 90 gastrointestinal tract cancer patients. Retrospective review of over 10,000 pan-cancer patient-matched tissue-cfDNA sample pairs permitted a comprehensive evaluation of the liquid biopsy MSI testing performance. Results For tissue biopsy specimen validation, the assay system displayed 0.97 area-under-the-curve (AUC) in receiver operative characteristics (ROC) curve analysis against the comparator assay, out-performing publicly available MSI analysis software. Unfortunately, the tissue MSI analysis pipeline and publicly available software fails with less than 10% sensitivity and 0.55 AUC when applied to liquid biopsy specimen with the patient-matched tissue MSI status used as the gold standard. In contrast, the dedicated cfDNA analysis pipeline significantly boosted the assay performance to 0.73 without additional experimental interventions, such as wild-type allele depletion or molecular barcode. Conclusions MSI testing in liquid biopsy specimen remains challenging due to the low fraction of tumor originated cfDNA and consequently weak signal intensity. The implementation of the signal enhancing MSI analysis algorithm demonstrated high proficiency at improving the signal-to-noise ratio. This bioinformatics approach offered a cost-effective and non-invasive alternative for MSI testing without significantly modifying the NGS library preparation protocols. Citation Format: Xiangyuan Ma, Hua Bao, Xiaoling Tong, Zhili Chang, Xunbiao Liu, Xiuyan Zhang, Ryan S. Robetyore, Xue Wu, Yang W. Shao. Validation of a NGS-based MSI testing workflow in liquid biopsy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 730.

Abstract Objectives: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological cancer in the developed countries with rising incidence rates. However, the knowledge about targeted therapies that can improve response rates to chemotherapy in EC is limited. Of the cancer afflicting women, women with metabolic disorders such as diabetes and obesity have an increased risk of developing EC. 6-Phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3), a glycolytic enzyme, is found to be highly expressed in many solid tumors. This study aimed to investigate the role and molecular mechanism of PFKFB3 in endometrial cancer. Methods: HEC-1B and ARK-2 endometrial cancer cell lines were used as models to evaluate the potential antitumor effects of pharmacological (treatment with PFK158, a selective PFKFB3 inhibitor) and genetic (PFKFB3 knockdown using CRISPR/Cas9 technology) inhibition of PFKFB3 on EC. In vitro, we evaluated the effects of PFKFB3 inhibition, and its synergistic effects when combined with carboplatin (CBPt) or cisplatin on cell viability, glucose metabolism, autophagy, apoptosis, and changes of cell signaling using MTT and colony formation assays, Chou-Talalay methodology, immunofluorescence assay, flow cytometry and western blotting. In vivo, two EC subcutaneous xenograft models derived from HEC-1B and ARK-2 cell lines were used to investigate the effect of single-agent PFK158 and in combination with CBPt on tumor growth, followed by western blotting, TUNEL and immunohistochemistry staining of excised tumor tissue. Results: Targeting PFKFB3 via PFK158 considerably reduced glucose uptake, ATP production, lactate release in EC cell lines. In vitro, inhibition of PFKFB3 induced cell death and synergistically enhanced CBPt/cisplatin sensitivity in EC cell lines by suppressing cell viability, inducing autophagy and apoptosis in a time- and dose-dependent manner. In vivo xenograft studies revealed that treatment with PFK158, either alone or in combination with CBPt, led to a marked reduction in tumor growth. In addition, PFK158 caused significant upregulation of cleaved PARP, cleaved caspase 3, and reduction of mTOR, Akt, ERK phosphorylation levels, both in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: Our results indicate that PFKFB3 plays a prominent role in the growth and chemoresistance in EC cells. Therefore, a selective PFKFB3 inhibitor or in combination with chemotherapy, may be used as a novel therapeutic strategy for patients with chemoresistant EC. Citation Format: Yinan Xiao, Ling Jin, Sayantani Sarkar Bhattacharya, Julie Staub, Chaolin Deng, Xiaoling Fang, Viji Shridhar. Inhibition of 6-Phosphofructo-2-kinase (PFKFB3) induces cell death and synergistically enhances chemosensitivity in endometrial cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 6222.

Abstract Cellular senescence restrains the expansion of neoplastic cells through several layers of regulation, including epigenetic decoration of chromatin structure and functional modulation of bioactive components. Here we report that expression of the histone H3-specific demethylase KDM4 is upregulated in human stromal cells upon cellular senescence. In clinical oncology, upregulated KDM4 and diminished H3K9/H3K36 methylation are correlated with adverse survival of cancer patients post-chemotherapy. Global chromatin accessibility mapping via ATAC-seq and expression profiling through RNA-seq reveal extensive reorganization of chromosomes and spatiotemporal reprogramming of the transcriptomic landscape, events responsible for development of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Selectively targeting KDM4 dampens the SASP of senescent stromal cells and enhances the apoptotic index of cancer cells in the treatment-damaged tumor microenvironment (TME), together prolonging overall survival of experimental animals. Our study supports the dynamic change of H3K9/H3K36 methylation marks during cellular senescence, identifies an unusually permissive chromatin state, unmasks KDM4 as a key modulator of the SASP, and presents a novel therapeutic avenue to manipulate cellular senescence and curtail age-related pathologies.

8522 Background: CC-223 is an ATP-competitive inhibitor of the mTOR kinase, including both TORC1 and TORC2 complexes. CC-223 was selected to address resistance of rapamycin analogues mediated by TORC2 activation. Methods: Following establishment of the MTD (reported at ASCO 2012), subjects with advanced DLBCL, MM and select solid tumors were enrolled in parallel expansion cohorts of up to 20 evaluable subjects. CC-223 was dosed at 45 mg once daily in 28 day cycles until disease progression. Results: As of 09 January, 2013, 35 subjects were enrolled including DLBCL (21) and MM (14). Results in solid tumor cohorts are reported separately. The most common (> 20%) related adverse events (all grades) were fatigue, hyperglycemia, rash, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. In addition, related serious adverse events included infection (2), pneumonitis (1), renal insufficiency (2), pancreatitis (1) and thrombocytopenia (1). CC-223 dose reduction was required in 9 subjects (27%), usually during cycle 1 or 2, and 4 additional subjects with DLBCL dropped out during cycle 1 due to toxicity. Systemic exposure was similar between the two tumor cohorts and was associated with inhibition of TORC1 (p4EBP1) and TORC2 (pAKT) biomarkers in blood cells. Reduction in glucose uptake (32 – 98% decrease) on PET imaging at day 15 was observed in 7/7 DLBCL subjects with results currently available. Three of 17 evaluable subjects with DLBCL had partial responses (PR) after 2 cycles; two with rapid and near complete regression (> 90%) of target lesions by CT and PET with PR confirmed and treatment ongoing at 6 and 8 cycles. Both had failed multiple prior treatment regimens (5 and 3, respectively), including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). No responses were observed in 10/14 evaluable subjects with MM although 2 subjects have prolonged stable disease (SD) with treatment ongoing at 12 and 14 cycles. Conclusions: Encouraging signals of biomarker and clinical activity were observed in DLBCL, including two near complete responses, which are ongoing. Due to dose reductions and interruptions, a starting dose of 30 mg QD is recommended for future studies. Clinical trial information: NCT01177397.

Abstract MYCN is a major driver for the childhood cancer, neuroblastoma, however, there are no inhibitors of this target. Enhanced MYCN protein stability is a key component of MYCN oncogenesis and is maintained by multiple feedforward expression loops involving MYCN transactivation target genes. Here, we reveal the oncogenic role of a novel MYCN target and binding protein, proliferation-associated 2AG4 (PA2G4). Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies demonstrated that MYCN occupies the PA2G4 gene promoter, stimulating transcription. Direct binding of PA2G4 to MYCN protein blocked proteolysis of MYCN and enhanced colony formation in a MYCN-dependent manner. Using molecular modeling, surface plasmon resonance, and mutagenesis studies, we mapped the MYCN–PA2G4 interaction site to a 14 amino acid MYCN sequence and a surface crevice of PA2G4. Competitive chemical inhibition of the MYCN–PA2G4 protein–protein interface had potent inhibitory effects on neuroblastoma tumorigenesis in vivo. Treated tumors showed reduced levels of both MYCN and PA2G4. Our findings demonstrate a critical role for PA2G4 as a cofactor in MYCN-driven neuroblastoma and highlight competitive inhibition of the PA2G4-MYCN protein binding as a novel therapeutic strategy in the disease. Significance: Competitive chemical inhibition of the PA2G4–MYCN protein interface provides a basis for drug design of small molecules targeting MYC and MYCN-binding partners in malignancies driven by MYC family oncoproteins.

Abstract The amplified MYCN gene serves as an oncogenic driver in approximately 20% of high-risk pediatric neuroblastomas. Here we show that MYC itself is a potent transforming gene in a separate subset of high-risk neuroblastoma cases (~10%), based on (i) its upregulation by focal enhancer amplification or genomic rearrangements leading to enhancer hijacking, and (ii) its ability to transform neuroblastoma precursor cells in a transgenic animal model. The aberrant regulatory elements associated with oncogenic MYC activation include focally amplified distal enhancers or translocation of highly active enhancers from other genes to within topologically associating domains containing the MYC gene locus. The clinical outcome for patients with high levels of MYC expression is virtually identical to that of patients with amplification of the MYCN gene, a known high-risk feature of this disease. Together, these findings establish MYC as a bona fide oncogene in a clinically significant group of high-risk childhood neuroblastomas. Citation Format: Mark W. Zimmerman, Yu Liu, Shuning He, Adam D. Durbin, Brian J. Abraham, John Easton, Ying Shao, Beisi Xu, Shizhen Zhu, Xiaoling Zhang, Nina Weichert-Leahey, Richard A. Young, Jinghui Zhang, A. Thomas Look. MYC activation through enhancer hijacking or focal enhancer amplification drives a subset of high-risk pediatric neuroblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Pediatric Cancer Research: From Basic Science to the Clinic; 2017 Dec 3-6; Atlanta, Georgia. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(19 Suppl):Abstract nr IA19.

Abstract The amplified MYCN gene serves as an oncogenic driver in approximately 20% of high-risk pediatric neuroblastomas. Here we show that c-MYC itself is a potent transforming gene in a separate subset of high-risk neuroblastoma cases (~10%), based on (i) its upregulation by focal enhancer amplification or genomic rearrangements leading to enhancer hijacking, and (ii) its ability to transform neuroblastoma precursor cells in a transgenic animal model. The aberrant regulatory elements associated with oncogenic c-MYC activation include focally amplified distal enhancers or translocation of highly active enhancers from other genes to within topologically associating domains containing the c-MYC gene locus. The clinical outcome for patients with high levels of c-MYC expression is virtually identical to that of patients with amplification of the MYCN gene, a known high-risk feature of this disease. Together, these findings establish c-MYC as a bona fide oncogene in a clinically significant group of high risk childhood neuroblastomas. Citation Format: Mark W. Zimmerman, Yu Liu, Shuning He, Adam D. Durbin, Brian J. Abraham, John Easton, Ying Shao, Xu Beisi, Shizhen Zhu, Xiaoling Zhang, Zhaodong Li, Nina Weichert-Leahey, Richard A. Young, Jinghui Zhang, A. Thomas Look. c-MYC drives a subset of high-risk pediatric neuroblastoma and is activated through mechanisms including enhancer hijacking and focal enhancer amplification [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4135.

Abstract The amplified MYCN gene serves as an oncogenic driver in approximately 20% of high-risk pediatric neuroblastomas. Here, we show that the family member MYC is a potent transforming gene in a separate subset of high-risk neuroblastoma cases (∼10%), based on (i) its upregulation by focal enhancer amplification or genomic rearrangements leading to enhancer hijacking, and (ii) its ability to transform neuroblastoma precursor cells in a transgenic animal model. The aberrant regulatory elements associated with oncogenic MYC activation include focally amplified distal enhancers and translocation of highly active enhancers from other genes to within topologically associating domains containing the MYC gene locus. The clinical outcome for patients with high levels of MYC expression is virtually identical to that of patients with amplification of the MYCN gene, a known high-risk feature of this disease. Together, these findings establish MYC as a bona fide oncogene in a clinically significant group of high-risk childhood neuroblastomas. Significance: Amplification of the MYCN oncogene is a recognized hallmark of high-risk pediatric neuroblastoma. Here, we demonstrate that MYC is also activated as a potent oncogene in a distinct subset of neuroblastoma cases through either focal amplification of distal enhancers or enhancer hijacking mediated by chromosomal translocation. Cancer Discov; 8(3); 320–35. ©2017 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 253