Citations

Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) represent a novel, non-invasive therapeutic modality in oncology that employs low-intensity, intermediate-frequency alternating electric fields to disrupt mitotic processes and induce cancer cell death. This review integrates mechanistic, preclinical, and emerging clinical evidence supporting the integration of TTFields with immunotherapeutic strategies in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Although immunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape across multiple malignancies, its efficacy in PDAC remains limited due to the tumor’s dense stroma, immunosuppressive microenvironment, and low immunogenicity. Preclinical investigations suggest that TTFields may potentiate immune-based therapies by enhancing antigen presentation, modulating the tumor microenvironment (TME), and attenuating mechanisms of immune resistance. We highlight studies evaluating TTFields in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), adoptive cellular therapies, and cancer vaccines, emphasizing their potential synergistic effects in PDAC. Clinically, the phase II PANOVA-2 trial demonstrated feasibility and encouraging survival outcomes with TTFields in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, providing the rationale for the ongoing phase III PANOVA-3 trial and the phase II PANOVA-4 trial, which combines TTFields with chemotherapy and atezolizumab. Additional clinical experiences in glioblastoma (GBM) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) further substantiate the broader applicability of TTFields as an immunomodulatory adjunct. Remaining challenges include optimizing treatment sequencing, identifying predictive biomarkers, and managing TTFields-associated toxicities. Collectively, current evidence positions TTFields as a promising strategy to augment immunotherapy in PDAC, warranting further translational and clinical investigation to establish its role in reshaping therapeutic paradigms.

With limited therapeutic progress despite aggressive multimodal treatment, glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the deadliest primary brain tumors. Emerging evidence suggests that GSCs are key drivers of tumor initiation, intratumoral heterogeneity, therapeutic resistance, and recurrence. GSCs retain self-renewal capacity, multilineage differentiation potential, and remarkable plasticity, enabling them to adapt to diverse microenvironmental cues. These properties are upheld by dysregulated developmental and oncogenic signaling pathways, including Notch, Wnt/β-catenin, Hedgehog, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and STAT3, as well as epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming. In addition, dedicated niches such as hypoxic and perivascular microenvironments critically support GSC maintenance and immune evasion. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the molecular pathways governing GSC biology, examine their interactions with the tumor microenvironment, and discuss emerging therapeutic strategies targeting GSCs, including pathway inhibition, differentiation therapy, immunotherapy, and nanomedicine-based drug delivery. We highlight key challenges and future directions for translating GSC-targeted approaches into effective clinical interventions for GBM.

We previously reported initial results of the pivotal phase II trial of atezolizumab for patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03141684 ). Here, we report on three additional years of observation. Fifty-three patients with ASPS received atezolizumab. Median duration of response increased to 37.0 months. Objective response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) remained essentially as previously reported (35.8% [95% CI, 23.1 to 50.2] and 20.8 months [IQR, 7.6-not reached], respectively). ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion type was determined for 47/53 patients; ORR and mPFS were higher among the 41 patients expressing type 1 (43.9% [95% CI, 28.5 to 60.2] and 28.3 months [IQR, 9.2-not reached], respectively) than the six patients expressing type 2 (0% [95% CI, 0 to 45.9] and 7.5 months [IQR, 3.9-not reached], respectively, PFS HR, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.01 to 10.2]). Eleven patients chose a per-protocol drug holiday (range, 3.5-26.4 months) after ≥2 years of treatment; two experienced disease progression during the holiday. Nine eligible patients elected to receive bevacizumab plus atezolizumab after progressing on monotherapy; ORR was 0% and mPFS was 18.5 months (IQR, 7.9-21.1) in this small cohort. Long-term results support using atezolizumab to treat ASPS, even for several years; a drug holiday with careful monitoring may be an option for some patients.

ABSTRACT Background Quality of life and symptom burden of patients with myelofibrosis are well recognized and compounded in those with anemia; however, the effects of transfusion burden or anemia severity on quality of life have not been comprehensively characterized. This post hoc descriptive analysis explored the association between transfusion status or hemoglobin improvement and patient‐reported outcomes (PROs). Methods The analysis used pooled populations across treatment arms from 3 clinical trials (SIMPLIFY‐1, SIMPLIFY‐2, MOMENTUM); sample sizes for each PRO measure were dependent on the trials in which they were administered. Results At both baseline and week 24, transfusion independence was associated with umerically greater mean SF ‐36v2 and EORTC QLQ ‐ C30 scores than transfusion dependence; in the subgroup that was transfusion dependent at baseline, those who achieved transfusion independence at week 24 had greater PRO improvements than those who remained reliant on transfusions. Regardless of transfusion status, patients who achieved a hemoglobin improvement ≥ 1, ≥ 1.5, or ≥ 2 g/ dL from baseline also had clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life (assessed via mean EQ ‐ 5D ‐ 5L or SF ‐36v2 scores) and symptoms (assessed via PGIC or MPN ‐ SAF / MFSAF Total Symptom Score) at week 24 compared with those who did not. Conclusions Collectively, these results provide preliminary insights into the associations of transfusion status and anemia severity with quality of life in myelofibrosis; as current PRO measures do not directly evaluate the relationship between symptoms such as fatigue and anemia, development of new measures to more comprehensively capture the patient experience for those with anemia in myelofibrosis may be warranted. Trial Registration NCT01969838, NCT02101268, NCT04173494

Abstract Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is driven predominantly by oncogenic KRAS signaling and characterized by an immunosuppressive, fibrotic tumor microenvironment that limits therapeutic responses. RMC-6236, a pan-KRAS inhibitor, and ONIOYID, an investigational anti-tumor agent, each demonstrate partial activity in KRAS-mutant cancers. However, their combined therapeutic potential in PDAC remains unexplored. Here, we evaluated the anti-tumor efficacy, survival benefit, and immunomodulatory effects of RMC-6236, ONIOYID and irinotecan alone and dual combinations multiple in vitro and in vivo PDAC models. Methods: In vitro cytotoxicity assays were performed using KPC, PANC-1, AsPC-1, and PANC-02 cell lines. In vivo therapeutic studies were conducted in orthotopic KPC and PANC-1 tumor models. RMC-6236 was administered orally at 10 mg/kg; ONIOYID and irinotecan was administered intravenously at 5 mg/kg. Tumor growth inhibition, survival, collagen deposition, and immune cell infiltration were analyzed. Tumor microenvironment remodeling was quantified via immunohistochemistry for CD8, CD4, collagen I, and fibronectin. Results: The combination of RMC-6236 and ONIOYID elicited potent anti-tumor effects across all evaluated PDAC cell lines, achieving greater than 90% growth inhibition in vitro. In vivo, co-treatment resulted in more than 90% tumor regression in both KPC and PANC-1 xenograft models, markedly surpassing the efficacy of individual monotherapies and other dual-agent controls. Combination therapy significantly extended overall survival and produced sustained suppression of tumor progression. Mechanistic analyses revealed a substantial reduction in collagen and fibronectin deposition within the tumor microenvironment, consistent with attenuation of desmoplasia. Immune profiling demonstrated a robust enhancement of intratumoral CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell infiltration, along with a pronounced decrease in survivin expression. Importantly, no observable systemic toxicity was detected in treated animals. Conclusions: RMC-6236 combined with ONIOYID yields synergistic anti-tumor effects, remodels the fibrotic PDAC microenvironment, enhances T-cell infiltration, and significantly improves survival in aggressive pancreatic tumor models. These findings provide strong rationale for clinical evaluation of RMC-6236-based combination therapies for KRAS driven PDAC. Citation Format: Hari Krishnareddy Rachamala, Fang Wei, Debabrata Mukhopadhyay, Hani M. Babiker. Combined KRAS pathway inhibition and ONIOYID treatment enhances tumor regression, attenuates desmoplasia, and augments T cell infiltration in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5842.

Abstract Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains highly lethal due to aggressive biology, stromal desmoplasia, and profound immunotherapy resistance. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) disrupt mitosis and induce immunogenic cell death (ICD), type I interferon signaling, and microenvironment remodeling, providing a rationale for combining TTFields with immune checkpoint inhibition. This is the first systematic review to comprehensively synthesize mechanistic and clinical evidence for TTFields immunotherapy combinations across solid tumors, with emphasis on their translation relevance to PDAC. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted through October 26, 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies evaluated TTFields combined with immunotherapy. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data using Covidence. Evidence was summarized narratively by tumor type, study design, and immunotherapeutic approach. Results: Thirty-seven studies met criteria, including preclinical and clinical investigations across glioblastoma, NSCLC, mesothelioma, PDAC, and other tumors. Preclinical models consistently showed that TTFields trigger ICD hallmarks such as calreticulin exposure, HMGB1 and ATP release, and activate STING/type I interferon pathways, enhancing dendritic-cell maturation and T-cell and NK-cell function. Across in vivo models, TTFields combined with PD-1 or CTLA-4 blockade, vaccines, or other immunotherapies reduced tumor growth and increased lymphocyte infiltration. Clinical evidence, although early-phase and heterogeneous, indicates the combination is feasible, with toxicity dominated by low-grade skin reactions and no excess immune-related adverse events. In glioblastoma, adding TTFields to pembrolizumab and temozolomide showed numerically improved survival. The LUNAR phase 3 trial in metastatic NSCLC demonstrated an overall survival advantage when TTFields were added to systemic therapy, including immunotherapy. Evidence in PDAC remains preliminary, but the ongoing PANOVA-4 study combining TTFields with atezolizumab and chemotherapy highlights emerging translational relevance. Conclusions: TTFields enhance antitumor immunity when combined with immunotherapy across solid tumors. In PDAC, these mechanisms may help counteract the immunosuppressive microenvironment. Ongoing gastrointestinal trials will clarify optimal combinations, biomarkers of response, and the clinical role of TTFields-based immunomodulation. Citation Format: Douaa Albelal, Hari Krishnareddy Rachamala, Hani Babiker. Synergistic immunomodulation by Tumor Treating Fields combined with immunotherapy across solid tumors: A systematic review with translational relevance to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3813.

Lipid-based delivery systems (LDS), including lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and liposomes, have become indispensable tools in modern biomedicine owing to their biocompatibility, capacity to encapsulate diverse therapeutic agents, and potential for targeted delivery. Despite their clinical success, conventional batch-based manufacturing methods are hindered by variability, limited scalability, and complex processing steps, slowing their broader translation. Microfluidic technologies offer a transformative solution by enabling precise fluid handling, rapid mixing, and reproducible production of LDS with tunable physicochemical attributes such as particle size, lamellarity, and drug-loading efficiency. This review highlights advances in microfluidic design strategies, including hydrodynamic flow focusing, staggered herringbone mixers, and toroidal micromixers, and evaluates how critical parameters such as flow rate, solvent composition, and lipid concentration influence LDS performance. Furthermore, we discuss the application of microfluidics in drug delivery, nucleic acid therapeutics, and vaccine platforms, underscoring its role in improving scalability, quality control, and clinical translation. Finally, we examine current challenges, including throughput limitations and solvent handling, while outlining future directions for integrating emerging materials and additive manufacturing to optimize LDS fabrication. Collectively, microfluidic platforms provide a promising pathway for next-generation lipid nanomedicines with enhanced precision, reproducibility, and therapeutic efficacy.

Abstract Background: Breast cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women globally, with metastatic disease accounting for >90% of deaths. Current staging and histopathological features inadequately predict individual recurrence risk. Approximately 20-30% of early-stage patients develop distant metastases despite optimal therapy, while others are overtreated. Circulating microRNAs (MIRNAs) represent a paradigm shift toward liquid biopsy, offering real-time tumor assessment through minimally invasive blood sampling. These stable molecules reflect dynamic tumor behavior and metastatic potential, making them ideal for personalized surveillance strategies. Methods: This prospective proof-of-concept study included 46 breast cancer patients from Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital, India: 37 with metastatic disease (plasma collected at progression, 2024) and 9 disease-free controls (≥3-year follow-up). MIRNA isolation used MIRVANA method with samples processed within 2 hours, stored at -80°C. Expression levels of MIR-21, MIR-30d, and MIR-425 were quantified by TaqMan qRT-PCR, normalized to MIR-16 control. Logistic regression analysis of the transcript levels yielded a probability of predictive accuracy ranging from 0-1. Cut-off of high expression was chosen based on the best sensitivity and specificity by ROC curve analysis. Clinicopathological parameters (CPP) were correlated with MIR expression(Mann-Whitney U test). A combined model of MIR and CPP was built using logistic regression and ROC curve analysis. Results: Patient demographics(in Table) Difference in median age, subtypes and nodal status are interesting to note. MIR-21 showed elevated expression in metastatic cases, particularly hormone receptor-positive tumors. MIR-30d demonstrated significant correlation with grade 3 and node-positive status (p=0.038 for N0 vs N1, p=0.006 for N0 vs N3), with high expression associated with poor progression-free survival (p=0.0057, HR=3.24). MIR-425 exhibited significant differential expression between metastatic and non-metastatic groups with strong correlation to advanced nodal stages (p=0.0018). Univariate analysis with all clinicopathological parametres with DFS revealed LN status as significant predictor (AUC=0.68). Similarly combined MIR score of MIR-425 and MIR-30d achieved 72% predictive accuracy of DFS (AUC=0.716). Interestingly, multivariate analysis of MIR score and LN with DFS, enhanced the AUC to 0.81. Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study suggests circulating MIR-30d and MIR-425 may serve as potential biomarkers for breast cancer recurrence risk stratification. The integrated signature shows promise for enhancing surveillance strategies. Assay also standardized methods for using plasma to measure circulating MIRNA levels. Validation in larger multicenter cohorts is underway for clinical assay development. Citation Format: A. Korlimarla, V. Sasimouli, L. Krishna, S. Shree, H. P.S, B. Sivaraman, S. Appachu, S. Srihari, G. Guhan, P. Advani, S. B.S. Circulating MIRNA Signature Predicts Breast Cancer Metastasis: A Pilot Study for Non-Invasive Risk Stratification [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-01-04.

Abstract Background and Aims Women are underdiagnosed and undertreated for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Automatic quantification of breast arterial calcification (BAC) on screening mammography can identify women at risk for CVD. This study aimed to determine whether artificial intelligence–based automatic quantification of BAC from screening mammograms predicts CVD and mortality beyond PREVENT scores in a large, racially diverse, multi-institutional population. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 123 762 women from two healthcare systems who had screening mammograms. Breast arterial calcification was quantified using a transformer-based neural network for segmentation. Breast arterial calcification severity was categorized as zero (0 mm2), mild (>0–10 mm2), moderate (>10–25 mm2), and severe (>25 mm2). Kaplan–Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards, and Fine–Gray competing event models were used to examine the association between BAC and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Results Breast arterial calcification was detected in 16.1% (internal cohort) and 20.6% (external cohort) of women and provided significant prognostic value incremental to the PREVENT score. In PREVENT adjusted models, a clear dose–response was observed. Compared with zero BAC, mild [internal: hazard ratio (HR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10–1.59; external: HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.17–1.39], moderate (internal: HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.23–2.50; external: HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.55–2.06), and severe BAC (internal: HR 3.29, 95% CI 2.15–5.05; external: HR 2.80, 95% CI 2.36–3.32) were all prognostic for any MACE. Each 1 mm2 increase in BAC conferred an additional 2%–3% risk for MACE (P < .001). Conclusions Automatically quantified BAC is an independent predictor of MACE and mortality, adding prognostic value to the PREVENT score. This approach may provide an opportunistic cardiovascular risk assessment during routine mammography screening without additional radiation exposure to guide earlier and more effective preventive care for women.

ABSTRACT The senescent cell (SC) fate is linked to aging, multiple disorders and diseases, and physical dysfunction. Senolytics, agents that selectively eliminate 30%–70% of SCs, act by transiently disabling the senescent cell antiapoptotic pathways (SCAPs), which defend those SCs that are proapoptotic and pro‐inflammatory from their own senescence‐associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Consistent with this, a JAK/STAT inhibitor, Ruxolitinib, which attenuates the pro‐inflammatory SASP of senescent human preadipocytes, caused them to become “senolytic‐resistant”. Administering senolytics to obese mice selectively decreased the abundance of the subset of SCs that is pro‐inflammatory. In cell cultures, the 30%–70% of human senescent preadipocytes or human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) that are senolytic‐resistant (to Dasatinib or Quercetin, respectively) had increased p16 INK4a , p21 CIP1 , senescence‐associated β‐galactosidase (SAβgal), γH2AX, and proliferative arrest similarly to the total SC population (comprising senolytic‐sensitive plus‐resistant SCs). However, the SASP of senolytic‐resistant SCs entailed less pro‐inflammatory/apoptotic factor production, induced less inflammation in non‐senescent cells, and was equivalent or richer in growth/fibrotic factors. Senolytic‐resistant SCs released less mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and more highly expressed the anti‐inflammatory immune evasion signal, glycoprotein non‐melanoma‐B (GPNMB). Transplanting senolytic‐resistant SCs intraperitoneally into younger mice caused less physical dysfunction than transplanting the total SC population. Because Ruxolitinib attenuates SC release of proapoptotic SASP factors, while pathogen‐associated molecular pattern factors (PAMPs) can amplify the release of these factors rapidly (acting as “senosensitizers”), senolytic‐resistant and senolytic‐sensitive SCs appear to be interconvertible.