Citations

Introduction: CRT optimizations has the potential to improve the 30% non-response rate. Randomized trials (RCTs) comparing device and echo-guided CRT optimization have been overall small and results have been conflicting. Methods: We searched the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases from January 2008 through September 2020 for RCTs and prospective observational studies that randomized patients to either echo-guided or device-based CRT optimization. Included studies had to report on at least one of the following outcomes of interest: all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization (HFH), NYHA class improvement, mean EF at follow up, LVEDD, 6MWD, and QoL. A meta-analyses on the outcomes of interest was performed using random effects models. Results: We included seven RCTs representing a total of 2,730 patients. Of those, 1,113 patients were randomized to echo-guided optimization, and 1,617 were randomized to device-based optimization. The mean age of patients was 64.5 years, and they were predominantly men (60%). In the device-based optimization group, there was 93 deaths (5.7%) and 142 HFH (5.1%). In the echo-guided optimization group, there was 57 deaths (10.2%) and 112 HFH (12.4%). On random effects meta-analysis, the device-based optimization group had a lower rate of HFH compared with the echo-guided optimization group (OR 0.81, 95% CL 0.70-0.95, Figure). However, differences in the following outcomes between the two groups were not statistically significant: all-cause mortality, mean follow up EF, LVEDD, NYHA class improvement, 6MWD improvement range or QoL. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that echo-guided optimization of CRT is equivalent to device-based optimization in relation to the clinical outcomes of death, EF, LVEDD, NYHA and 6MWD but suggests that device-related optimization could reduce HFH. The latter merits further investigation in relation to different device-base optimization algorithms.

AbstractIntroductionSlower mobility is associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. We examined the interaction of endurance with gait speed on prevalent MCI and dementia.MethodsCross‐sectional multinomial regression in the ARIC cohort (n = 2844 participants; 71 to 94 years; 44% men; 18% Black persons) with cognitive status (normal/MCI/dementia), 4 m gait speed, and endurance (2 minute walk [2MW]).ResultsFaster gait speed (up to but not above 1 m/s) and better 2MW were separately associated with lower dementia risk. Good performance in both (2MW = 200 m, gait speed = 1.2 m/s) was associated with 99% lower dementia (Relative Prevalence Ratio [RPR] = 0.01 [95% CI: 0.0 to 0.06]) and 73% lower MCI, RPR = 0.27 (0.15 to 0.48) compared to poor performance in both (2MW = 100 m, gait speed = 0.8 m/s). Models incorporating a gait speed‐by‐2MW interaction term outperformed gait speed‐only models (P < .001).DiscussionGait speed relationships with dementia diminish at faster gait speeds. Combining endurance with gait speed may yield more sensitive markers of MCI and dementia than gait speed alone.

AbstractIntroductionMotoric cognitive risk (MCR), a clinical syndrome characterized by slow gait speed and subjective cognitive complaints, has been associated with dementia risk. The neuropathological features underlying MCR remain poorly understood.MethodsThe Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) community‐based cohort study classified participants using standardized criteria as MCR+/– and mild cognitive impairment (MCI)+/– at study baseline (2011–2013). We examined the 5‐year dementia risk and baseline brain structural/molecular abnormalities associated with MCR+ and MCI+ status.ResultsOf 5023 nondemented participants included, 204 were MCR+ and 1030 were MCI+. Both MCR+ and MCI+ participants demonstrated increased dementia risk. The pattern of structural brain abnormalities associated with MCR+ differed from that of MCI+. Whereas MCI+ was associated with comparatively smaller volumes in brain regions vulnerable to Alzheimer's disease pathology, MCR+ status was associated with smaller volumes in frontoparietal regions and greater white matter abnormalities.DiscussionMCR may represent a predementia syndrome characterized by prominent white matter abnormalities and frontoparietal atrophy.

AbstractRenal agenesis is a devastating birth defect, and although genes encoding retinoic acid signaling components have been shown to be important for renal...Renal agenesis (RA) is one of the more extreme examples of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). Bilateral renal agenesis is almost invariably fatal at birth, and unilateral renal agenesis can lead to future health issues including end-stage renal disease. Genetic investigations have identified several gene variants that cause RA, including EYA1, LHX1, and WT1. However, whereas compound null mutations of genes encoding α and γ retinoic acid receptors (RARs) cause RA in mice, to date there have been no reports of variants in RAR genes causing RA in humans. In this study, we carried out whole exome sequence analysis of two families showing inheritance of an RA phenotype, and in both identified a single candidate gene, GREB1L. Analysis of a zebrafish greb1l loss-of-function mutant revealed defects in the pronephric kidney just prior to death, and F0 CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis of Greb1l in the mouse revealed kidney agenesis phenotypes, implicating Greb1l in this disorder. GREB1L resides in a chromatin complex with RAR members, and our data implicate GREB1L as a coactivator for RARs. This study is the first to associate a component of the RAR pathway with renal agenesis in humans.

Abstract Emerging research on the long-term impact of concussions on athletes has allowed public recognition of the potentially devastating effects of these and other mild head injuries. Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a multifaceted disease for which management remains a clinical challenge. Recent pre-clinical and clinical data strongly suggest a destructive synergism between brain temperature elevation and mTBI; conversely, brain hypothermia, with its broader, pleiotropic effects, represents the most potent neuro-protectant in laboratory studies to date. Although well-established in selected clinical conditions, a systemic approach to accomplish regional hypothermia has failed to yield an effective treatment strategy in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Furthermore, although systemic hypothermia remains a potentially valid treatment strategy for moderate to severe TBIs, it is neither practical nor safe for mTBIs. Therefore, selective head-neck cooling may represent an ideal strategy to provide therapeutic benefits to the brain. Optimizing brain temperature management using a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) spacesuit spinoff head-neck cooling technology before and/or after mTBI in contact sports may represent a sensible, practical, and effective method to potentially enhance recover and minimize post-injury deficits. In this paper, we discuss and summarize the anatomical, physiological, preclinical, and clinical data concerning NASA spinoff head-neck cooling technology as a potential treatment for mTBIs, particularly in the context of contact sports.