Citations

424 Background: Advances in prostate cancer (PC) care have led to a 98% 10-year survival rate. Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) is the primary method of follow-up after definitive radiotherapy (RT), with benign PSA ‘bounce’ occurring in up to 30% of patients, causing uncertainty and anxiety. Distinguishing between PSA bounce and biochemical recurrence (BCR) remains challenging. The Phoenix Criteria is the standard definition of BCR since 2006, defined as PSA nadir + 2 ng/dl, but does not consider patient specific information. Our study aims to explore factors associated with bounce and BCR and develop a predictive tool to differentiate between these two events. Methods: PC patients who received RT at our institution between 2006 and 2022 were identified, including only patients with a PSA increase during follow-up. Exclusion criteria included palliative RT, prostatectomy, or insufficient follow-up information. Patients’ clinical data was collected, and PSA increase was classified as bounce or BCR. Variables were compared using Kruskal Wallis or Chi-square. Multivariate logistic regression was performed in the subset of patients with absolute PSA value >2 (n= 581). Results: Of 1783 patients reviewed due to PSA rise after treatment, 694 met the inclusion criteria. There were 213 (30.7%) with PSA bounce and 481 (69.3%) with recurrence. Prior to meeting the Phoenix Criteria, 20 (4.2%) had biopsy-proven recurrence and 18 (3.7%) imaging-proven recurrence. The median delta PSA was 0.8 ng/mL for bounce vs 5 ng/mL for recurrence (p<0.001). The median time from treatment to event was 14.4 months for bounce vs 45.3 months for BCR (p<0.001). Recurrence was significantly associated (p<0.001) with older age at diagnosis, N1 stage, higher risk category, Gleason score, and higher baseline PSA. In the subgroup of patients without ADT, recurrence was associated with a lower median first PSA post-RT (1.9 vs. 2.4, p=0.046) and a lower median nadir before event (0.6 vs. 1.8, p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression achieved an accuracy of 0.94, with a sensitivity of 0.83, specificity of 0.98, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97. Conclusions: Our results highlight significant differences in clinical factors between bounce and recurrence in post-RT patients. The multivariate logistic regression differentiated the events with 94% accuracy for patients with a rising PSA value >2 subgroup. We highlight the possible improvement that could be accomplished by personalizing a PSA threshold for recurrence versus the Phoenix definition. This tool offers patients and providers a highly specific tool to differentiate between PSA recurrence and bounce, and may reduce stress and unnecessary testing, or help diagnosis recurrence faster. Next steps include prospective validation of the model to assess the impact on clinical practice costs, patient experience, and cancer outcomes.

Abstract Insulin-producing pancreatic tumors are a common subtype of neuroendocrine tumor. Standard of care includes surgical resection of the pancreatic tumor and medical management with somatostatin analogs. For patients with metastatic disease, tumor control and hypoglycemic symptom relief can be achieved through surgical resection of the tumor, hepatic artery embolization, radiofrequency ablation, or radioembolization using radioactive isotopes as well as with systemic therapy such as somatostatin analogs and everolimus. We present the case of a 74-year-old male with metastatic insulin-producing pancreatic carcinoma. After a long history of successfully controlling his hypoglycemic episodes post-liver wedge resection, bland embolizations subsequently failed to maintain control of the frequency and severity of his hypoglycemic symptoms. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with protons was used to achieve symptomatic control and led to partial radiographic response with complete resolution of his hypoglycemic episodes. This case demonstrates the potential utility of proton SBRT in metastatic insulinomas.

Objective: Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has demonstrated success in treating radioresistant disease within the head and neck, owing to its unique physical and radiobiological properties. Construction cost remains prohibitive; a center offering only a horizontal port may bridge this difficulty, but removal of the vertical port may prohibit treatment of disease near critical organs-at-risk. Building a center only containing a horizontal treatment port has been proposed as one method for cost savings. Methods: 20 complex cases of head and neck cancer previously treated with conventional CIRT were retrospectively planned using horizontal-port-only treatment incorporating non-coplanar treatment angles to achieve greater degrees of freedom. These were dosimetrically compared with the previous plans. Results: Comparable D95 coverage of both planning target volume and gross tumor volume with ability to meet organ-at-risk constraints were feasible with horizontal-port-only treatment. Collectively differences were noted in PTV D95, brain stem Dmax, contralateral eye Dmax and V10 Gy (RBE); further qualitative differences were noted on a plan-by-plan basis dependent on disease location. Conclusion: Horizontal-port-only treatment employing non-coplanar angles was feasible for complicated head and neck disease typically treated with CIRT, though careful consideration is necessary on a plan-by-plan basis. Advances in knowledge: It is worth noting that non-coplanar approaches are not typically used with the current treatment gantry and may extend further the difference between horizontal port planning and a gantry-based gold-standard.

No standard treatment paradigm exists for previously irradiated locally recurrent rectal cancer (PILRRC). Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) may improve oncologic outcomes and reduce toxicity compared with combined modality therapy (CMT). Eighty-five patients treated at Institution A with CIRT alone (70.4 Gy/16 fx) and eighty-six at Institution B with CMT (30 Gy/15 fx chemoradiation, resection, intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT)) between 2006 and 2019 were retrospectively compared. Overall survival (OS), pelvic re-recurrence (PR), distant metastasis (DM), or any disease progression (DP) were analyzed with the Kaplan–Meier model, with outcomes compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. Acute and late toxicities were compared, as was the 2-year cost. The median time to follow-up or death was 6.5 years. Median OS in the CIRT and CMT cohorts were 4.5 and 2.6 years, respectively (p ≤ 0.01). No difference was seen in the cumulative incidence of PR (p = 0.17), DM (p = 0.39), or DP (p = 0.19). Lower acute grade ≥ 2 skin and GI/GU toxicity and lower late grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities were associated with CIRT. Higher 2-year cumulative costs were associated with CMT. Oncologic outcomes were similar for patients treated with CIRT or CMT, although patient morbidity and cost were lower with CIRT, and CIRT was associated with longer OS. Prospective comparative studies are needed.