Citations

Abstract Background Older adults remain underrepresented in prospective trials of immunotherapy for advanced lung cancer. To estimate pembrolizumab adverse events, we conducted a multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label phase 2 trial of oncologist-choice first-line pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy for older adults with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Methods Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology A171901 enrolled patients aged 70 years and older with stage IV or recurrent lung adenocarcinoma starting oncologist’s choice of first-line pembrolizumab with or without carboplatin and pemetrexed. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing a solicited grade 3 or greater adverse event within 6 months. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, quality of life, and association of a geriatric assessment toxicity risk score with severe adverse events. Results Among 95 evaluable patients, 43 (45.3%) received pembrolizumab and 52 (54.7%) received pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. Median age was 77 years (range = 70-92 years); 11.6% had an E Performance Status of 2 or higher. During 6 months of treatment, 25.6% (95% CI = 13.5% to 41.2%) experienced a solicited grade 3 or greater adverse event in the monotherapy group and 42.3% (95% CI = 28.7% to 56.8%) in the combination group. Median overall survival was 16.4 months (95% CI = 10.1 to not estimable) with monotherapy and 29.9 months (95% CI = 16.4 to not estimable) with combination therapy. Quality of life worsened during treatment. The geriatric assessment toxicity risk score was not associated with severe adverse events with pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy. Conclusions Older adults with advanced lung adenocarcinoma receiving pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy had comparable adverse event rates to those in prior registration trials that excluded medically frail patients. These findings can inform shared decision making and support inclusion of older adults in future trials. Clinical Trial NCT04533451 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04533451)

Abstract Genetic counseling assistants (GCAs) support genetic counselors (GCs) and genetics clinic workflows, but their potential roles in pretest genetic counseling for rare diseases have not been explored. A pilot within the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine's Genetic Testing and Counseling Clinic (GTAC), which offers predefined tests for patients with rare disease, explored the impact of GCA pretest education on appointment time and patient questions. After training, GCAs met GTAC patients prior to the GC to provide scripted information on genetics concepts, the visit purpose, and the test including result types and disclosure plans. Data from the pilot and a control group were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics and two‐sided t ‐tests. Patient cohort characteristics did not differ between the two models. When a GCA provided pretest education, the GC spent an average of 11.2 minutes less with the patient during their session compared to visits completed solely by the GC ( p < 0.0001). Total appointment time was not impacted by GCA education. Questions asked to GCAs were often not within GCA scope to answer (72.7%), and some patients asked repetitive questions to both the GC and GCA (63.2%). Reduction in GC time per patient could lead to increased accessibility by allowing additional patients to be seen in a day. Similar models may support GCA professional development while allowing GCs to remove repetitive education from their genetic counseling sessions, leading to less burnout and/or increased job satisfaction. Impact on administrative workflows, access, revenue, patient satisfaction and outcomes and GC/GCA satisfaction and benefits can continue to be explored when trialing models incorporating GCAs in pretest education roles.

Introduction Female distance runners are at elevated risk for impaired bone remodeling due to high mechanical loading, potential low energy availability, and sustained inflammatory stress. Collagen peptide (CP) supplementation has been proposed as a nutritional strategy to support type I collagen synthesis and modulate osteoimmune signaling; however, evidence in premenopausal endurance athletes is limited. This pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial examined the effects of four weeks of high-dose CP supplementation on markers of bone metabolism and inflammatory activity in endurance-trained premenopausal women. Methods Twenty-two participants (18–35 years; ≥35 miles/week [&gt;56km/week]) were randomized to CP (INT; 20 g/day) or isocaloric maltodextrin (CON). Pre- and post-intervention assessments, conducted in the early follicular phase, included serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), plasma C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-1), serum soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (sRANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), the sRANKL/OPG ratio, and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Repeated-measures ANCOVAs were performed, adjusting for accumulated running distance and vitamin D status. Results A significant group × time interaction was observed for P1NP ( p = 0.04), with increases in INT and no change in CON. No significant interaction was observed for CTX-1 ( p = 0.13). Significant interactions were also observed for sRANKL ( p = 0.046) and IL-6 ( p = 0.03). No significant interaction effects were detected for sRANKL, OPG, or the sRANKL/OPG ratio. Discussion Short-term CP supplementation increased a marker of bone formation, altered osteoclast-related signaling, and reduced IL-6 in endurance-trained premenopausal women. These findings support the potential for CP-mediated modulation of bone turnover and inflammatory activity and warrant further investigation in larger, adequately powered trials incorporating structural bone outcomes.

PURPOSE Remote symptom monitoring using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been shown to improve symptom control and physical function among patients with advanced cancer. However, it is unclear whether these benefits are similar across demographic groups. This exploratory analysis of the PRO-TECT trial examined whether the effects of electronic symptom monitoring varied by race, age, sex, and educational attainment. METHODS PRO-TECT was a cluster randomized trial conducted across 52 US community oncology practices comparing weekly electronic symptom monitoring with usual care (UC). Adult patients with metastatic solid tumors receiving systemic therapy were enrolled (N = 1,191). Participants in the PRO arm completed weekly symptom surveys including the PRO-CTCAE, triggering alerts to the care team for severe or worsening symptoms. Patients chose whether to complete weekly PROs online or via telephone-based interactive voice response not requiring Internet access. Outcomes were measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 symptom control and physical function scales. Subgroup analyses were performed by race (Black v White), age (<65 v ≥65 years), sex (male v female), and educational attainment (≤high school v >high school). RESULTS From baseline to 3 months, PRO participants showed greater improvements in symptom control (+2.37 v −0.20, P = .002) and physical function (+1.54 v −0.93, P = .02) versus UC. Benefits were most pronounced among younger, female, Black, and less educated participants. Black participants in the PRO arm were more likely to report that symptom reporting made them feel more in control of their care compared with White participants. CONCLUSION Electronic symptom monitoring improved quality-of-life outcomes overall, including among groups who have historically experienced higher symptom burden or barriers to communication. Remote PRO systems may represent an equitable strategy to enhance cancer care delivery.

Background: Southeast Asian Americans (SEAAs) experience a disproportionately high burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with incidence in several subgroups (i.e., Cambodian, Laotian, and Vietnamese individuals) reaching up to nine times that of non-Hispanic Whites. HCC in SEAAs is largely driven by chronic hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD). Despite established screening guidelines, under-detection and delayed diagnosis remain common. Objective: To summarize epidemiologic patterns, risk factors, screening challenges, and potential interventions aimed at reducing HCC disparities among SEAAs. Design and Methods: This narrative review synthesized evidence from population based epidemiologic studies, community-based interventions, health services research, and policy analyses. Attention was given to studies reporting disaggregated SEAA subgroup data. Findings derived from SEAA specific studies were distinguished from evidence drawn from broader Asian American or general cirrhosis populations, with inferential steps explicitly noted where subgroup specific data were limited. Key Findings: HCC incidence varies widely across SEAA subgroups, with elevated HBV- and HCV-related HCC in Vietnamese, Cambodian, and Laotian communities, and increasing MASLD-related HCC including among lean individuals who fall outside many surveillance frameworks. Screening and surveillance remain suboptimal, with fewer than 30% of patients with cirrhosis receiving recommended semiannual HCC surveillance and even lower uptake among SEAAs. Barriers include low HBV/HCV screening rates, limited disease awareness, language barriers, underinsurance, provider knowledge gaps, and lack of automated EHR-based reminders. Structural challenges such as poverty, transportation barriers, and limited access to specialty care further delay diagnosis. Proposed Interventions: Culturally tailored outreach programs, bilingual navigators, and community-based screening initiatives have demonstrated improved HBV/HCV testing and linkage to care. AI-enabled EHR tools may enhance identification of high-risk patients, streamline follow-up, and increase surveillance adherence. Expanded use of non-invasive fibrosis assessment and recognition of MASLD-related risk in non-obese individuals may support earlier detection. Policy priorities include mandatory Asian subgroup data disaggregation, expanded insurance coverage, and strengthened community-level healthcare infrastructure. Conclusions: SEAAs face a substantial and preventable HCC burden. A coordinated approach combining culturally tailored community engagement, improved provider support systems, and policy reforms is essential to improving early detection and reducing HCC disparities in this diverse population.

Background: Preliminary evidence examining ibogaine in neuropsychiatric and substance use disorders is accumulating. As patient interest and off-label use grow, clinicians require an understanding of emerging dosing strategies, investigational protocols, and reported adverse effects to appropriately counsel patients and contextualize potential risks and benefits. Methods: Databases were searched for human studies of ibogaine, noribogaine, or 5-MeO-DMT with relevant clinical outcomes, prioritizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), microdosing paradigms, and sequential protocols. Results: Only three RCTs were identified. First, a double-blind pilot study in 20 cocaine-dependent adults found that a single 1800 mg dose of ibogaine was associated with reduced craving versus placebo over follow-up of up to 24 weeks. Second, an ascending-dose trial in 36 healthy volunteers showed that noribogaine doses of 3–60 mg were safe and well-tolerated, without opioid-agonist effects. Third, a randomized crossover trial in 27 opioid-dependent patients receiving noribogaine 60–180 mg demonstrated dose-dependent heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation with non-significant reductions in withdrawal symptoms. Thus, two RCTs enrolled substance-dependent populations, while one focused on safety and pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Microdosing and escalating sequential protocols remain experimental, lack standardized definitions, and are supported only by preliminary observational data. Adverse effects include neurologic, psychiatric, and cardiac events, including QTc prolongation; fatalities have occurred in the presence of medical and substance use comorbidities. Conclusions: The available evidence is confined to case reports, observational analyses, and small early-phase or proof-of-concept studies. Given ibogaine’s cardiotoxicity and narrow therapeutic margin, clinical use cannot be recommended without confirmation from larger, well-controlled trials.

Background/Objectives. Decades of research have failed to uncover effective approaches to prevent chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a common side effect of neurotoxic chemotherapy. Increased interest in placebo response as a potentially under-recognized confounder in CIPN trials was recently sparked by the results of a multisite NCI-funded phase II-III CIPN prevention study of duloxetine, a promising serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that enhances pain-inhibitory mechanisms within the central nervous system. Study findings revealed high and nearly equivalent response rates in three randomized treatment groups—little to no CIPN was reported by 65.2%, 66.0%, and 68.0% of study participants who received duloxetine 30 mg, 60 mg, or placebo treatment, respectively. Methods. We performed a meta-analysis of placebo response rates from seven randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials conducted over the past 20 years and comprising 191 placebo participants that were specifically testing interventions for oxaliplatin- and paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy and that serially collected patient responses on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy questionnaire. Additionally, we sought to identify trial- and patient-specific factors that predicted higher placebo response rates from a participant-level pooled analysis. Results. The placebo response rate was 10.0% [95% CI: 5.8%, 16.6%] when response was defined more conservatively as patients reporting no neuropathy at all. When the placebo response was defined more broadly based on patients reporting no or a little neuropathy, the placebo response rate was higher (39.6% [95% CI: 27.4%, 53.2%]). Male participants, receipt of oxaliplatin, and a 2:1 randomization ratio favoring the intervention arm were individually associated with a higher placebo response. Conclusions. High placebo response rates can threaten scientific progress toward identifying effective treatments for cancer treatment-associated side effects, like CIPN. Careful attention to study design factors, participant eligibility, and patient and research staff expectations may help to minimize placebo response rates in future CIPN intervention studies.

PURPOSE For patients with breast cancer undergoing breast conservation, escalating the dose (boost) of radiation to the lumpectomy cavity after whole-breast irradiation (WBI) reduces ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) but extends treatment duration. This phase III trial investigated whether boost delivery during WBI versus after WBI provides noninferior IBR and preserves cosmetic appearance. METHODS NRG/RTOG 1005 randomly assigned patients at higher risk for IBR after lumpectomy and axillary surgery to either a sequential boost of 12 Gy in six fractions(F) or 14 Gy in 7F after WBI of 50 Gy in 25F or 42.7 Gy in 16F (sequential arm) or a concurrent boost of 8 Gy in 15F of 0.53 Gy per day with WBI of 40 Gy in 15F (concurrent arm) using 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (RT) or intensity-modulated RT. Based on 1.59% 5-year IBR for the sequential arm, defining the noninferiority margin as a hazard ratio upper limit on the 90% CI of 2.12, 2,312 patients provide 80% power for noninferiority of IBR as first recurrence for the concurrent arm. Secondary end points included disease-free survival and overall survival, adverse events (AEs), and cosmetic outcomes. RESULTS Between May 24, 2011, and June 20, 2014, 2,354 patients were randomly assigned, with 2,255 eligible for analysis (sequential arm, n = 1,118; concurrent arm, n = 1,137). With median follow-up of 7.3 years, there were 56 IBR events; 5- and 7-year IBR were 2.1% and 2.2% on the sequential arm and 1.9% and 2.6% on the concurrent arm, respectively. The noninferiority criterion was met: HR (90% CI): 1.31 (0.84 to 2.04), P = .037. No differences were observed in AEs, cosmetic outcomes, or survival between arms. CONCLUSION Concurrent boost during WBI results in noninferior IBR compared with sequential boost without worsening toxicity or cosmetic outcomes and reduces overall treatment time.

Background The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is facilitated by consensus identification of synovial biomarkers, which may be aided by targeted microbial next generation sequencing (NGS) of synovial fluid. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate NGS performance across 3 years to ICM 2018 minor criteria for PJI. Methods Synovial fluid specimens submitted from 2020–2022 by outpatient surgical clinics to MicroGenDX for matched synovial biomarker and NGS analysis were selected for retrospective analysis. Synovial biomarkers tested included C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC) count, and polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocyte percentage. Synovial fluid analysis compared NGS microbial positivity with positive incidence of PJI determined by scoring of synovial biomarkers using ICM 2018 minor criteria for infection. Results The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of NGS to ICM diagnosed PJI across 2,011 specimens was 76.4% [95% CI, 0.723–0.801], 92.3% [0.91–0.94], and 88.7% [0.87–0.90], respectively. When comparing the diagnostic performance of NGS and individual biomarkers to infection, NGS was more specific to PJI than synovial CRP (specificity = 0.894, 95% CI: 0.88–0.91), but not PMN or WBC. NGS was positive in 7.7% of ICM negative samples. NGS positive: ICM negative samples were associated with significantly elevated synovial PMN ( p = 0.001) and WBC ( p &lt; 0.0001) compared to NGS negative: ICM negative samples. Across all samples, NGS positivity was associated with significantly elevated results for all tested biomarkers ( p &lt; 0.0001). Eight bacterial species dominated the composition in 68% of samples, whereas 46 different microbes were dominant in the remaining third. Conclusion Microbial targeted NGS positivity was concordant with ICM minor criteria for PJI and should be considered a useful tool for diagnosis. There is a low risk of false positive detections comparable to ICM biomarkers. Elevated biomarkers in NGS positive: ICM negative samples may indicate infection occurring that is poorly captured by the three measured synovial biomarkers. Uncommon species are collectively common to PJI and NGS is uniquely positioned to detect such species as they are frequently missed by conventional microbiological testing, including culture and quantitative PCR. These results suggest formal diagnostic schemes would benefit from the addition of NGS as a diagnostic criterion.

Abstract Background and Aims Burnout affects millions of healthcare workers worldwide, from food service and nurses to physicians and leaders, impairing worklives and threatening health system stability. Methods An international collaborative, PREVAIL, was created to reduce burnout globally. Leaders from six continents shared structured insights into the local state of wellness and burnout contributors and mitigators, which were then subjected to a formal thematic (qualitative) analysis to identify common and region-specific themes. Results Across continents, findings showed the global state of well-being was in danger, though threats varied by region: long shifts in Africa, heavy workloads in Asia, austerity-prone environments in Europe and financially driven care in North America. Vulnerable worker groups included women, nurses, and primary care. Mitigators included workload and schedule adjustments (Africa), shift policies with fair pay (Asia), leader support and regular well-being assessments (Australia), improved psychosocial services (Europe), organizational wellness support and career development (North America), and trainee support (South America). Conclusions A proposed “common pathway” framework explains shared drivers of poor workforce well-being and provides actionable steps for promoting compassionate, supportive environments worldwide. Implications/Learning Points Adopting a coordinated international approach may prevent devastating workforce shortages over the comingdecades. Burnout assessment and reduction in the global workforce is a high priority.