Citations

AbstractFibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC) is a rare variant of hepatocellular carcinoma, occurring in children and young adults without underlying liver disease. The diagnosis is based on morphological characteristics of the tumor, supplemented by immunohistochemistry and/or genetic testing. Recently, the presence of a characteristic DNAJB1‐PRKACA fusion gene has been associated with FLC. Herein, we report a case of FLC presenting as peritoneal carcinomatosis in a 14‐year‐old female. Interestingly, no liver tumor was seen on imaging, and an alternative possibility is that the tumor arose outside the liver as a hepatoid carcinoma with fibrolamellar features.

Abstract Sigma-1 receptor (S1R) is an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone that regulates mitochondrial respiration but also controls cellular defense against ER and oxidative stress. This makes S1R a potential therapeutic target in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Especially, as a missense mutation E102Q in S1R has been reported in few familial ALS cases. However, the pathogenicity of S1RE102Q and the beneficial impact of S1R in the ALS context remain to be demonstrated in vivo. To address this, we generated transgenic Drosophila that express human wild-type S1R or S1RE102Q. Expression of mutant S1R in fly neurons induces abnormal eye morphology and locomotor defects in a dose-dependent manner. This was accompanied by abnormal mitochondrial fragmentation, reduced ATP levels and a higher fatigability at the neuromuscular junction during high energy demand. Overexpressing IP3 receptor or glucose transporter mitigates the S1RE102Q-induced eye phenotype, further highlighting the role of calcium and energy metabolism in its toxicity. More importantly, we showed that wild-type S1R rescues locomotor activity and ATP levels of flies expressing the key ALS protein, TDP43. Moreover, overexpressing wild-type S1R enhances resistance of flies to oxidative stress. Therefore, our data provide the first genetic evidence that mutant S1R recapitulates ALS pathology in vivo while increasing S1R confers neuroprotection against TDP43 toxicity.

Background: The preoperative number of dislocations has been previously proved to be a major factor influencing the results after Bankart repair with more preoperative dislocations correlated with higher recurrence rates and more reoperations. This could possibly be because of the lower quality of the tissue repaired during the procedure after multiple dislocations. On the other hand, the Latarjet procedure does not “repair” but rather reconstructs and augments the anterior glenoid. Purpose/Hypothesis: The main objective was to report the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a Latarjet procedure after 1 dislocation versus multiple (≥2) dislocations. The hypothesis was that the preoperative number of dislocations would not influence clinical results. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients older than 18 years who had undergone a primary Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability with at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Three different techniques were used: a mini-open technique using 2 screws, an arthroscopic technique using 2 screws, and an arthroscopic technique using 2 cortical buttons. Patients were evaluated and answered a questionnaire to assess the number of episodes of dislocation before surgery, the time between the first dislocation and surgery, recurrence of the dislocation, revision surgery, the Walch-Duplay score, the Simple Shoulder Test score, and the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain. Results: A total of 308 patients were included for analysis with a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 0.8 years. Of that, 83 patients were included in the first-time dislocation group and 225 in the recurrent dislocation group. At last follow-up, the rates of recurrence and reoperation were not significantly different between groups: 4.8% in the first-time dislocation group versus 3.65% in the recurrent dislocation group and 6.1% versus 4.0%, respectively. The overall Walch-Duplay scores at last follow-up were also comparable between the 2 groups, 67.3 ± 24.85 and 71.8 ± 25.1, even though the first-time dislocation group showed a lower pain subscore (15.0 ± 8.6 vs 18.0 ± 7.5; P = .003). The VAS for pain was also significantly higher in the first-time dislocation group compared with the recurrent dislocation group (1.8 ± 2.3 vs 1.2 ± 1.7; P = .03). Conclusion: The number of episodes of dislocation before surgery does not affect postoperative instability rates and reoperation rates after the Latarjet procedure. However, patients with first-time dislocations had more postoperative pain compared with patients with recurrent dislocations before surgery.

Abstract Background CDI is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in SOT and HCT patients (pts). In retrospective single-center analyses, severe disease and relapse were common. We undertook a multicenter prospective observational study to evaluate outcomes of CDI among both SOT and HCT patients. Methods Adults with a first episode of CDI, defined as 3 liquid stools/24 h with the detection of C. difficile toxin in stool, within the first 2 years of SOT or HCT were recruited from 12 centers internationally in the INSIGHT network. At enrollment, demographics, comorbidities, medication histories and outcomes were collected prospectively over 90 days to assess clinical cure, recurrences and complications and to define baseline risk factors for clinical cure and recurrent CDI. Results 132 patients (81 SOT, 51 HCT (32 allogeneic)) were enrolled: median age 56 years, 62.1% were males, 97% were hospitalized. 80.3% were diagnosed by DNA assay. CDI occurred a median of 20 days post transplant (IQR: 6–133). 108 patients were on PPIs. 98.5% were on antibiotics before CDI. 1st line treatment regimen was oral vancomycin in 66 patients (40 SOT, 26 HCT), metronidazole in 48 patients (27 SOT, 21 HCT), both drugs in 14 (10 SOT, 4 HCT), fidaxomicin (3) and linezolid (1). Rejection within 60 days before CDI was uncommon (6.2% SOT) as was GVHD (27.5%). 110 patients (83%, 95% CI: 46–89)) (65 SOT, 45 HCT) had clinical cure; 18% (95% CI: 11–27) had recurrent CDI, 2 were admitted to the ICU due to CDI, 11 (8.3%) died (2 HCT related to CDI). Among baselines variables, only first-line regimen was associated with a higher rate of clinical cure (P = 0.003), most notably for SOT. Factors that did not have a statistically significant negative impact on clinical cure included sex, age > 60, race, country, transplant type, steroids, diabetes, CMV viremia/disease, WBC > 15,000, creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL, or specific antibiotic given prior to CDI. Higher recurrence rates were associated with metronidazole-only regimen (OR: 4.6, 95% CI: 1.6–12.8; P = 0.004) and a history of CMV after transplant (OR: 5.2, 95% CI: 1.7–15.7; P = 0.003). Conclusion Despite their immunosuppressed state, recurrence, ICU admission and mortality occurred in a minority of SOT and HCT with CDI. Initial use of metronidazole and CMV viremia/disease were associated with higher recurrence rates. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Abstract The identification of mutations in BRAFV600E and other kinases in systemic histiocytoses changed our understanding of the pathophysiology of these disorders from inflammatory non-malignant conditions to clonal disorders driven by altered MAP kinase signaling. In addition, BRAFV600E mutations have recently been noted in bone marrow (BM) CD34+ cells of patients with Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH), suggesting that LCH represents a clonal disorder arising from hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). However, it is unknown if HSPCs from LCH or other histiocytoses patients can functionally give rise to these disorders. Moreover, whether or not patients with histiocytosis have additional hematological disorders related to the presence of HSPC-based mutations is unclear. Here we attempted to understand the spectrum of hematological disorders in patients with histiocytoses and the cell-of-origin of histiocytic neoplasms by functionally analyzing HSPCs from histiocytoses patients. We first analyzed a multicenter cohort of 190 adult histiocytoses patients. This unexpectedly identified a high frequency of patients with a co-existing myeloid malignancy. Of the 190 patients, 9.5% (18/190) were diagnosed with Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) and/or LCH concomitantly with a classic MPN (3.7%; 7/190), MPN/MDS overlap (4.7%; 9/190), or MDS (1.1%; 2/190) (Figure). This clinical observation was confirmed by detection of co-existing histiocytoses-associated kinase mutations (including BRAF, MAP2K1, NRAS, or KRAS mutations) with JAK2 or CALR mutations, as well as other mutations recurrently found in myeloid malignancies (such as IDH1/2, ASXL1, and TET2 mutations (Figure)). These data therefore reveal a heretofore-unrecognized clinical overlap of adult-onset systemic histiocytoses and WHO-classified myeloid malignancies while further highlighting the possibility of an aberrant HSPC origin for histiocytic neoplasms. In most cases, the BRAF/MAP2K1/RAS mutation predominated in the histiocytic lesion while the JAK2/CALR mutation predominated in the BM/peripheral blood suggesting likely distinct clones driving each clinical condition. Next, to test the self-renewal and differentiation capacity of HSPCs from histiocytoses patients, CD34+ cells were purified from 8 patients including 6 with ECD or LCH plus a concomitant myeloid neoplasm, and 2 with ECD alone. 0.1-0.8x106 CD34+ cells from each patient were transplanted by intrafemoral injection into sublethally irradiated NOD/SCID IL2Rγ transgenic human GM-CSF, IL-3, and SCF expressing (NSG-SGM3) mice. Human engraftment was monitored by monthly flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood until mice became moribund. Thereafter, animals were sacrificed and tissues were analyzed using flow cytometry, histology, immunohistochemistry, and sequencing analyses to detect driver mutations identified in the histiocytosis/co-occurring myeloid neoplasm. Successful engraftment of human myeloid cells was verified in grafts generated from 2/8 patients after a mean of 90 days (range: 60-120 days). This included lethal engraftment of KRAS-mutated ECD patient cells at 90 days manifested by infiltration of human hCD45+ cells co-expressing human myeloid and monocyte lineage markers hCD33 and hCD14 in the bone marrow, spleen, liver, lung, and kidney (Figure). Immunostains revealed that tissues were infiltrated by an hCD45+hCD163+hCD68+ population of foamy histiocytes, characteristic of ECD (Figure). Furthermore, genomic analysis of DNA from the engrafted animals BM and spleen revealed the same KRASG12S mutation found in the donor patients ECD lesion. Engraftment of a patient diagnosed with concomitant BRAFV600E-mutant ECD and ASXL1/TET2-mutant CMML was seen at 60 days. In this case, however, only engraftment of human CMML was detected without evidence of the BRAFV600E-mutant ECD component. This study suggests that adult histiocytic neoplasms frequently co-occur with other myeloid neoplasms. Moreover, histiocytosis disease-driver mutations are present in the CD34+ HSPCs, which we show for the first time can initiate disease that resembles human histiocytosis in a patient-derived xenograft. Importantly, however, even though the CD34+ compartment gives rise to both the histiocytic and myeloid neoplasm disease component, each disease is likely initiated by distinct precursors. Figure. Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Histiocytic neoplasms are clonal, hematopoietic disorders characterized by an accumulation of abnormal monocyte-derived dendritic cells or macrophages in Langerhans Cell (LCH) and non-Langerhans (non-LCH) histiocytoses, respectively. The discovery of the BRAF V600E mutation in ~50% of patients with LCH and the non-LCH Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) provided the first molecular target in these patients and novel insights into the pathogenesis of these disorders. However, recurrent mutations in the majority of the ~50% of BRAF V600E-wild type patients with non-LCH are unknown. Moreover, recurrent mutations outside of the MAP kinase pathway are undefined throughout histiocytic neoplasms. To address these issues, we performed whole exome sequencing (WES) of frozen biopsies from 24 patients with LCH (n=10) or ECD (n=14) paired with peripheral blood mononuclear cells. 13/24 patients also underwent RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). All mutations in activating kinases were validated by droplet-digital PCR, while targeted-capture next-generation sequencing validated all others. Both adult (n=18; n=2 with LCH) and pediatric cases (n=9; n=8 with LCH) were included. Using combined WES/RNA-seq, activating kinase alterations were identified in 100% of patients. In LCH, 60% and 40% had BRAF V600E and MAP2K1 mutations, respectively. In non-LCH 51%, 14%, 14%, and 7% were BRAFV600E, ARAF, MAP2K1, and NRAS mutant (Fig1A). Overall, a mean of 7 non-synonymous mutations per adult patient was identified (range 1-22) compared with 5 mutations per pediatric patient (range 4-9; p =ns). Mutations affecting diverse cellular processes were found to co-exist with kinase mutations including mutations in epigenetic modifiers and the p38/MAPK pathway. In addition to kinase point mutations, RNA-seq identified recurrent, in-frame kinase fusions-a first for these disorders. All identified fusions were validated using FISH and RT-PCR. This includes novel fusions in BRAF (RNF11-BRAF and CLIP2-BRAF), as well as therapeutically important fusions in ALK (2 separate KIF5B-ALK fusions) and NTRK1 (LMNA-NTRK1;Fig1B). Expression of each fusion in Ba/F3 cells conferred cytokine-independent growth. Importantly, the BRAF fusions were found to be sensitive to MEK inhibition but resistant to vemurafenib while the ALK fusions conferred sensitivity to the ALK inhibitors crizotinib or alectinib. We next interrogated a validation cohort of 37 BRAF V600E-wild type, non-LCH, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples using targeted mutational profiling for MAP2K1, ARAF, NRAS, KRAS, and PIK3CA. This revealed activating mutations in MAP2K1 (32%; n=12), NRAS (16%; n=6), KRAS (11%; n=4), PIK3CA (8%; n=3), and ARAF (3%; n=1). Three of the investigated non-LCH patients with refractory disease and progressive organ dysfunction were treated with targeted therapies based on the discovery of novel kinase alterations described above. Treatment of 2 refractory MAP2K1- mutant, non-LCH patients with MEK inhibitors (trametinib or cobimetinib) resulted in dramatic clinical improvement (Fig1C). Both patients have been maintained on MEK inhibitor single-agent therapy with a sustained clinical response for >100 days. Further evidence of effective targeted inhibition was found in a refractory ECD patient carrying an ARAF S214A mutation. This patient failed to respond to 3 lines of prior therapies and suffered near blindness due to disease infiltration in the retina and optic nerves. Given a recent report of complete response to sorafenib in a lung cancer patient with an ARAF S214C mutation, we initiated sorafenib. Within 12 weeks, there was improvement in the patientÕs eyesight and decreased infiltrative disease, coinciding with >50% decrease in mutant ARAF DNA in plasma cell-free DNA. Whole exome and transcriptome sequencing identified activating kinase mutations or translocations in all patients with the common downstream effect of activating the MAPK pathway. The preliminary, dramatic, clinical efficacy observed with use of MEK and RAF inhibitors in MAP2K1 - and ARAF-mutated, non-LCH patients further supports the central role of targeting the MAPK pathway in these tumors. The discovery of the discussed mutations and fusions in diverse kinases provides critical new insights into the genetic events central to a spectrum of adult and pediatric histiocytic neoplasms. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Off Label Use: This abstract describes use of MEK inhibitors (both tremetinib and cobimetinib) as well as sorafenib for MEK1 and ARAF mutant histiocytosis. . Stephens:Foundation Medicine, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Miller:Foundation Medicine, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ross:Foundation Medicine Inc.: Employment. Ali:Foundation Medicine Inc.: Employment. Hyman:Chugai Pharma: Consultancy; Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Atara: Consultancy, Honoraria.

3583 Background: The Microsatellite instability (MSI) or deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) phenotype is usually taken as a single biological entity whereas no data are available concerning prognosis and response to chemotherapy between sporadic and familial dMMR cases. Methods: Resected KRAS exon 2 wild-type (WT) tumor stage III colon cancers (N = 4596) from patients (pts) randomly assigned to FOLFOX +/- cetuximab in two adjuvant large phase III trials were prospectively analyzed for MSI status and dMMR mechanism (sporadic vs familial). Stratified Cox models were used to assess prognostic and predictive values of dMMR mechanism by treatment arms, adjusting for age, gender, tumor grade, ECOG PS, pT/pN stage and primary tumor location. Results: Among dMMR patients with complete data for dMMR mechanism analysis (N = 354), there were 255 (72%) sporadic ( BRAF mutated or WT with MLH1 methylation) and 99 (28%) familial (loss of MSH2 or MSH6, or loss MLH1 with BRAF WT and unmethylated MLH1) cases. A large proportion of dMMR sporadic cases were mutated for BRAF (n = 200; 80%). In pts treated with FOLFOX, the disease-free survival (DFS) was not statistically different by dMMR mechanism, while for pts treated with FOLFOX + cetuximab, the sporadic cases did worse than familial cases (DFS; adjusted (adj) HR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.02-7.08; P= 0.04). Considering the predictive value, a deleterious effect of adding cetuximab to FOLFOX was observed in sporadic (DFS; adjHR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.01-2.79; P= 0.04) but not in familial dMMR pts (interaction P value regarding treatment effect = 0.03). Furthermore, a non-significant trend to a deleterious effect of adding cetuximab to FOLFOX was observed in BRAF mutant (DFS; adjHR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.95-2.92; P= 0.07) but not in BRAF WT pts. Conclusions: The addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX was associated with reduced DFS in patients with sporadic dMMR cases. Further studies including the methylator phenotype (CIMP) analysis are needed to validate these results. Clinical trial information: NCT00265811 and NCT00079274.

3525 Background: Microsatellite instable/deficient mismatch repair (MSI) metastatic colorectal cancers have been reported to be of poor prognosis. The interaction between MSI and BRAFV600E mutation complicates the picture. Methods: Patients with resected stage III CC from 7 studies with disease recurrence and data available for MSI and BRAFV600E status were analyzed. The primary endpoint was survival after recurrence (SAR) to assess the prognostic roles of MSI and BRAFV600E, respectively. Associations of markers with SAR were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for clinicopathologic features (data collected 12/1998 to 11/2009). Results: Among 2630 patients with cancer recurrence (1491 men [56.7%], mean age, 58.5 [19-85] years), multivariable analysis revealed that patients with MSI tumors (n = 220) had significantly better SAR (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98; P = .029) than patients with microsatellite stable /proficient MMR (MSS) tumors (n = 1766). This was also observed when looking at patients treated by the standard FOLFOX adjuvant regimen only (aHR, 0.76; 0.58-1.00; P = .048). Same trends were observed when looking at MSI/dMMR patients outcome in BRAFV600E wild-type (aHR, 0.84; P = .10) and mutant (aHR, 0.88; P = .43) subgroups separately, without reaching statistical significance. As previously described poor SAR was observed in BRAFV600E mutants vs wild type patients (n = 244; aHR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.73-2.46; P < .0001) and this was also true in BRAFV600E mutants MSI/dMMR patients (n = 77, aHR, 2.65 ; 95% CI, 1.67-4.21; p < .0001). Other factors associated with a poor SAR were : olderage, male gender, T4/N2, proximal primary tumor location, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and early recurrence (by 1y increase). Conclusions: In stage III colon cancer patients recurring after adjuvant chemotherapy and before the era of immuno-oncologic agents, MSI/dMMR was associated with a better survival compared to MSS. BRAFV600E mutation seems to be a poor prognostic factor for both MSI/dMMR and MSS/pMMR patients.

3520 Background: Duration of adjuvant FOLFOX or CAPOX for stage III CC is being guided by pt stratification into low (T1-3N1) and high (T4 or N2) risk groups based on the IDEA study. We determined the relative contributions of clinical and molecular features for prediction of time-to-recurrence (TTR) and survival after recurrence (SAR) within each risk group. Methods: Stage III CC (N=5,430) from 2 trials of adjuvant FOLFOX ± cetuximab with similar outcome by study arm [NCCTG N0147 (Alliance), PETACC-8] were used. Tumors were analyzed for mismatch repair (dMMR vs pMMR), mutations in KRAS (exon 2) and BRAFV600E. Median pt follow-up was 83.4 months. Relative contributions to predicting outcome were assessed using χ2 (Harrell’s rms) based on multivariable (MV) Cox models. Results: N (50.8%) and T (31.8%) stage were the top two contributors to prediction of TTR which supports risk grouping. High risk (n=2566) vs low risk (n=2774) pts had poorer TTR (HR 2.7, 95% CI, 2.4-3.0) and SAR [HR 1.6 (1.4-1.9)], both p<.0001. TTR: KRAS contributed the most to predicting TTR among high (58.6%) and low (51.1%) risk pts (Table). Contribution of MMR (16%) to predicting TTR was limited to low risk pts. Contribution of BRAFV600E to TTR was nearly 3-fold increased in high vs low risk pts. SAR: BRAFV600E contributed the most to predicting SAR, especially in high vs low risk pts (2-fold increase). Tumor sidedness and performance status (PS) were key contributors to SAR, but not TTR. MV associations: TTR: low risk, KRAS [HR 1.7 (1.4-2.3], MMR [HR 0.55 (.35-.87), gender (M/F) [HR 1.3 (1.0-1.5)], all p<.04]; high risk: BRAF [HR 1.3 (1.1-1.7)], sidedness (R vs L) [HR 1.14 (1.0-1.3)], KRAS [HR 1.4 (1.2-1.6)], all p<.04]. SAR: BRAF, sidedness, PS (all p<.05). Conclusions: KRAS mutation was the strongest predictor of shorter TTR in both risk groups whereas BRAFV600E was the primary driver of SAR, especially in high risk pts. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; BMS, Pfizer, Sanofi. NCT00079274.[Table: see text]