Citations

8550 Background: Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare lymphoplasmacytic malignancy characterized by the presence of a recurrent point mutation in the MYD88 gene (MYD88L265P) in 80-95% of cases. Patients with MYD88WT genotype comprise a small subset that responds poorly to ibrutinib and other Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We examined the characteristics and outcome of WM patients with MYD88WT genotype predominantly treated with non-BTK inhibitor based therapies. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of WM seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between 1996 and 2018 were included. Their characteristics and outcomes were assessed from the time of active disease. Marrow MYD88 genotyping was assessed with an allele specific PCR assay (analytic sensitivity 1%). Categorical and continuous variables were compared using Chi square and Wilcoxon tests, respectively. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan Meier test. Results: Of 986 patients with active WM, MYD88 genotype data were available in 331 (34 %) patients; 72 (22%) and 260 (78%) patients harbored MYD88WT and MYD88L265P genotypes, respectively. The median follow-up was 5.8 years (95% CI: 5.0-6.5 years) from active WM; 6 years MYD88WT vs 5.4 years for MYD88L265P cohort. Median age was 63 years and 66 years in the MYD88WT and MYD88L265P cohorts, respectively (p = 0.07) with 46% and 53% patients being ≥65 years of age, respectively (p = 0.36). Pre-treatment marrow lymphoplasmacytic (LPL) infiltrate (median 40% for MYD88WT vs 60% for MYD88L265P; p = 0.001) and beta-2 microglobulin (median 3 µg/mL for MYD88WT vs 3.9 µg/mL for MYD88L265P; p = 0.02) were lower in the MYD88WT compared to the MYD88L265P cohort; other laboratory parameters at active disease were comparable. Per IPSSWM prognostic criteria, MYD88WT had fewer patients in the high risk group (18% for MYD88WT vs 42% MYD88L265P; p = 0.03). Patients with MYD88WT had higher likelihood of histological transformation [18% for MYD88WT vs 4% for MYD88L265P; odds ratio 5.8 (95% CI: 2.5-13.5; p < 0.0001)]. Among patients with treatment data available, only 35 (11%) patients received ibrutinib. The 5-year overall survival (OS) from active disease was comparable (85% in MYD88WT vs 82% in MYD88L265P cohort; p = 0.7). Conclusions: MYD88WT genotype in WM is associated with lower marrow LPL infiltration, lower likelihood of high-risk IPSSWM categorization and a higher likelihood of histological transformation in comparison to MYD88L265P mutant subpopulation. MYD88 genotype does not affect the OS from active disease in predominantly non-BTK inhibitor treated patients.

7559 Background: Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare indolent lymphoma commonly treated with rituximab (R)-based therapy. The use of rituximab maintenance (mR) in WM is controversial. We present a case-control study of patients (pts) with WM treated with mR. Methods: Pts evaluated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester with active WM that received mR between 1/2000 & 6/2018 were included. Cases comprised pts who received mR following R-based induction as primary therapy. Cases were matched based on the time of diagnosis in 1:2 ratio with a control group treated with R-based primary induction therapy without mR. Time to event analyses were performed from initiation of R-based induction. Results: Of 776 pts with active WM, 42 (5%) cases received mR and 84 pts were selected as controls. The median follow-up and the proportion of high risk pts were comparable between the two cohorts (Table). Pts in the mR cohort show a trend toward longer time to next therapy (TTNT) and a significantly longer overall survival (OS) compared to the control group (Table). The R-based induction therapies were comparable in the two cohorts (p = 0.6). Median duration of mR was 1.9 yrs (95% CI 1.6-2) and mR was used most frequently every (q) 2 (range 1-6) months. Of the 42 mR pts, 25 (60%) received an R-based combination for induction and 17 (40%) received R monotherapy as induction. Five (12%) pts discontinued mR due to toxicity, infections were reported in 13 pts (31%) during mR therapy and 3 pts (7%) received IVIg infusions for recurrent infections. Conclusions: R-based induction followed by mR demonstrates a longer OS in WM compared to R-treated control population not receiving mR, albeit at a high rate of infections. Despite limitations of a retrospective study, with a heterogeneously treated cohort, these data add to the body of literature supporting Rituximab maintenance. Results from an ongoing randomized controlled trial are awaited. [Table: see text]

7509 Background: Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare lymphoma for which scant comparative data exist to guide frontline therapy. Herein, we compare 3 commonly used regimens in WM: R-Benda, DRC, and BDR in frontline setting. Methods: Patients (Pts) with active WM seen at Mayo Clinic between 2000 & 2018 who received R-Benda, DRC or BDR as primary therapy were included in this retrospective study. Response rates were assessed by Consensus Criteria. All time to event analyses were performed from the frontline therapy, using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The study included 172 pts with active WM (R-Benda, n=67, DRC, n=75, BDR, n=30).The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 3.7 years (y) (95% CI 3.7-3.0). Baseline characteristics, including IPSS, and time to frontline therapy from WM diagnosis were similar across the 3 cohorts. Clinically relevant endpoints are shown in the Table. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were similar across the 3 groups. Grade 3 neuropathy requiring treatment discontinuation was encountered in 13% pts treated with BDR. 56 pts received subsequent salvage therapy [(10% in R-Benda arm, 44% in DRC arm, & 53% in BDR arm]; 29% pts in the R-Benda arm and 30% pts in DRC arm received a PI-based regimen while 69% pts in the BDR arm received alkylator-rituximab based therapy. Conclusions: Outcomes (MRR, TTNT and EFS) with frontline R-Benda are superior in comparison to frontline DRC or BDR in patients with WM. Clinically relevant endpoints are not significantly different with DRC vs. BDR. The toxicity profile across the 3 groups was comparable. [Table: see text]

AbstractHistological transformation in Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is an uncommon complication, with limited data, particularly regarding the impact of MYD88 L265P mutation on transformation. We examined risk factors and outcomes associated with transformation in WM, highlighting the role of MYD88 L265P mutation. Patients with WM seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA and University Hospital of Reims, France, between 01/01/1996 and December 31, 2017 were included; 50 (4.3%) of 1147 patients transformed to a high‐grade lymphoma, with median time‐to‐transformation of 4.5 (range 0‐21) years in the transformed cohort. The MYD88 L265P mutation status was known in 435/1147 (38%) patients (406 with non‐transformed WM and 29 patients in transformed cohort). On multivariate analysis, MYD88 WT status alone was an independent predictor of transformation (odds ratio, 7[95%CI: 2.1‐23]; P = .003). Additionally, the MYD88 WT status was independently associated with shorter time‐to‐transformation (HR 7.9 [95%CI: 2.3‐27; P = .001]), with a 5‐year transformation rate of 16% for MYD88 WT vs 2.8% with MYD88 L265P mutated patients. Patients with transformation demonstrated a significant increase in risk of death compared to patients who did not transform (HR 5.075; 95%CI: 3.8‐6.8; P < .001). In conclusion, the MYD88 WT status is an independent predictor of transformation and associated with a shorter time‐to‐transformation. Additionally, transformation conferred an inferior overall survival in patients with WM.

Introduction: The landmark VE-BASKET trial demonstrated that Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) patients with the BRAF-V600E mutation can be effectively treated with vemurafenib 1920 mg/day. However, all patients required dose reductions due to adverse effects. The efficacy of low dose BRAF-inhibitors is not well established in ECD. Further, as Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) also harbors BRAF-V600E mutations in 50-60% of patients, BRAF-inhibitors may be effective in this disease as well. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of low dose BRAF-inhibitors (vemurafenib and dabrafenib) in the treatment of ECD and LCH. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of ECD and LCH patients who were seen at our institution from January 1998 to July 2018. All patients had a diagnosis of ECD and LCH determined by clinical criteria in conjunction with histopathologic findings. Based on the standard doses approved for malignant melanoma and ECD, patients were categorized into the low dose BRAF-inhibitor group if they were treated with vemurafenib < 960 mg/day or dabrafenib ≤ 150mg/day at any point in time. We used a simple response criteria that defined clinical progressive disease (PD) as worsening of symptoms attributed to ECD/LCH or radiologic PD as a progression or worsening of proven or suspected lesions due to ECD/LCH. The minimum duration for symptom improvement to be considered a response was set at 3 months. Results: A total of 89 ECD patients and 186 LCH patients were identified. Within the ECD cohort, 24 of 44 (55%) patients who were tested had the BRAF-V600E mutation. Eight patients were included in the low dose BRAF-inhibitor group. The median age at diagnosis was 57 years (range 37-74) and 5 (63%) were male. The most common areas of involvement included bone (88%), cardiovascular system (63%), kidneys (63%), and brain parenchyma (50%). The median time of follow up was 66 months (range 23-165) and the median time on low-dose BRAF-inhibitor was 10 months (range 1-27) [Table 1]. Three patients had a starting dose of vemurafenib 1920 mg/day, 4 had 960 mg/day, and 1 had 480 mg/day. All patients required dose reductions and 50% of the patients ultimately discontinued vemurafenib due to side effects. Side effects included fatigue, pruritus, nausea, facial swelling, blisters, papillomas, and/or subcutaneous nodules. Four patients were able to remain on low-dose vemurafenib for a median follow up time of 24.5 months (range 12-28) with ongoing response and no signs of clinical or radiologic PD. Within the LCH cohort, 18 of 31 tested (58%) patients had the BRAF-V600E mutation. Four patients were included in the low dose BRAF-inhibitor group. The median age at diagnosis of this cohort was 43 years (range 34-69) and 2 (50%) were male. Areas of involvement included bone (100%), brain parenchyma (hypothalamus/optic stalk and pons; 50%), and skin (25%). The median time of follow up was 31 months (range 21-46) and the median time on low-dose BRAF-inhibitor was 4 months (range 3-24) [Table 2]. Two patients had a starting dose of vemurafenib 960mg/day. The patients with brain parenchymal involvement had a starting dose of dabrafenib 150mg/day or 100mg/day. All patients taking vemurafenib 960mg/day required dose reductions and one patient discontinued treatment due to skin blistering in her feet. In the patients taking dabrafenib, no side effects have yet been reported. 3 patients had an ongoing response and did not have clinical or radiologic PD. Patient #10 however, had clinical and radiologic PD after being on vemurafenib 720mg/day for 22 months. Conclusion: Our study suggests a potential role for lower doses of BRAF-inhibitors in ECD and LCH patients harboring BRAF-V600E mutations. Dabrafenib was found to be particularly efficacious and well-tolerated in LCH involving the brain parenchyma. However, patients who undergo dose reductions should be closely monitored due to the risk of disease progression. Careful balance of toxicities and efficacy is needed for optimizing patient outcomes with targeted therapies. Disclosures Bennani: Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board. OffLabel Disclosure: Vemurafenib and dabrafenib for Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Vemurafenib dosage for Erdheim-Chester disease is less than the approved dose of 960mg every 12 hours.

Introduction Minimal residual disease (MRD) status at day 100 following autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients is an important determinant of prognosis. Bone marrow (BM) based assays, i.e. next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) that are currently used in determining MRD are vulnerable to sampling biases due to patchy marrow involvement and extramedullary disease. BM examination alone may lead to false-negative results. MRD assessment through newer, more sensitive peripheral blood based methodologies such as mass spectrometry (MS) can potentially overcome the limitations associated with BM based assays. At our institution, traditional immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) has been replaced by a MS method termed Mass-Fix which utilizes the unique light chain mass associated with each patient's monoclonal protein to monitor disease over time. In this study, we assessed the prognostic impact of serum Mass-Fix MRD status in MM patients who were MRD negative by NGF around day 100 post-ASCT. Methods Patients with MM who underwent ASCT between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2018 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester were included in this study provided they had attained post ASCT day 100 complete response (CR) by IMWG 2016 criteria and MRD- state as assessed by BM based NGF, utilizing 2 eight-color tubes (total 10 colors), with a minimum sensitivity 10-5. Presence of non-secretory MM and unavailability of pre-ASCT serum samples or serum IFE results were important exclusion criteria. Peripheral blood samples drawn concurrently with the BM assessment were evaluated by Mass-Fix as described previously (Mills et al., Clin. Chem, 2016). The isotype and mass of the M-protein light chain (LC) obtained by Mass-Fix were compared to the pre-ASCT M-protein LC and/or IFE isotype. Patients with the following genetic alterations: deletion 17p, translocation (4;14), (14;16), t(14;20) and1q gain/amplification and were considered high risk. All time-to event analyses were performed on JMP 14.1.0 from the time of ASCT using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Sixty-two patients with MM (57 newly diagnosed and 5 relapsed/refractory) who underwent ASCT and were MRD- by BM based NGF around day 100 (range: day 60-120) were included in the study. Median age at ASCT was 61 (range: 40-76) years and 61% were males. Thirty (48%) patients had IgG MM, 15 (25%) patients had IgA MM and 17 (27%) patients had light chain only disease. Forty-one (66%) patients received bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRD) as induction regimen. Median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 6 months (IQ range: 4.7-7.2). Pre-ASCT fluorescence in- situ hybridization data were available on 47 (76%) patients; 23 (49%) were high risk. Of 62 patients, all of whom were day 100 MRD- by NGF, 36 (58%) patients had Mass-Fix identified MRD (MRD+). MRD positivity by Mass-Fix around day 100 was observed in 70% of patients with high risk MM versus 71% of patients with standard risk MM, p=0.9. The median follow-up was 18 months (95%CI: 14-21); 19 months (95%CI: 15-21) for patients who were MRD+ by Mass-Fix versus 17 months (95%CI: 12-21) for those who were MRD- by Mass-Fix at day ~100, p=0.5. Of 57 (92%) patients who received post ASCT maintenance therapy, 32 (89%) were MRD+ and 25 (96%) were MRD- by Mass-Fix, p=0.5. Eighty-seven percent of patients with IgG MM had MRD+ status by Mass-Fix at day~100. By contrast, only 33% and 30% of patients with IgA MM and light chain MM, respectively, had MRD+ status at day 100; p<0.0001. This suggests that IgG half-life which is longer than that of IgA or free light chains may affect the day 100 MRD status. At 18 months, 76% and 93% of patients, who were MRD+ and MRD- , respectively by Mass-Fix were alive and free from disease progression, p=0.03 (Table 1, Figure 1a). At 18 months after ASCT, none of the patients who were MRD- by Mass-Fix required salvage treatment following ASCT while 25% of patients who were MRD+ by Mass-Fix required next line of therapy due to disease progression, p=0.05 (Table 1, Figure1b). Conclusion Our data suggest that outcomes [progression free survival (PFS) and time-to-next therapy (TTNT)] of patients with MM who are in CR, and have achieved MRD- state by BM NGF post ASCT, can be adversely impacted if there is concurrent evidence of serum monoclonal protein by Mass-Fix, thereby demonstrating incremental prognostic value of this sensitive assay in clinical practice. Disclosures Murray: The Binding Site: Patents & Royalties: US Patent Rights on Mass Spectroscopy Licensing agreement with The Binding Site, Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Akcea: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding. Dasari:The Binding Site: Patents & Royalties: US Patent Rights on Mass Spectroscopy Licensing agreement with The Binding Site, Research Funding. Gertz:Teva: Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Consultancy; Prothena Biosciences Inc: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Annexon: Consultancy; Appellis: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; DAVA oncology: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Research to Practice: Consultancy; Abbvie: Other: personal fees for Data Safety Monitoring board; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Springer Publishing: Patents & Royalties; Amyloidosis Foundation: Research Funding; International Waldenstrom Foundation: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; Ionis/Akcea: Consultancy; Proclara: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; i3Health: Other: Development of educational programs and materials. Dingli:Karyopharm: Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; alexion: Consultancy. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Leung:Omeros: Research Funding; Aduro: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Kapoor:Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy.

Introduction Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is an uncommon histiocytic disorder which is now categorized as a hematopoietic neoplasm. Most treatment and outcomes data in LCH are derived from pediatric studies, and there is a lack of FDA-approved treatment options for adult LCH. There is some evidence that cladribine may be toxic to monocytes and monocyte-derived dendritic cells. In this study, we report the efficacy of cladribine in adult LCH patients seen at our institution. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all LCH patients seen at our institution between 1998 and 2018. Where necessary, the radiological images and histopathological slides were reviewed by an expert radiologist and pathologist. Since prospective uniform response assessment was not performed, we utilized the clinical documentation and radiological reports to assess the overall response rate (ORR). All time to event analyses were performed from the time of cladribine initiation. Results We included a total of 37 adult LCH patients in the study. The median age at diagnosis for this cohort was 35 years (range, 21-76), and 51% were males. Although 31 (84%) patients had multi-system disease, all patients had more than one LCH lesion (multifocal). Most commonly involved organs were bone (65%), lung (60%), skin (38%), lymph nodes (30%), and pituitary/hypothalamus (27%). BRAF-mutational analysis was performed in 13 patients, with 7 (54%) demonstrating the presence of BRAF-V600E mutation. Cladribine was administered as first line therapy in 22 (59%) patients and subsequent line treatment in 15 (41%). Of the 15 patients who received cladribine in subsequent line, surgery (n=3), radiation (n=3), steroids (n=3), antibiotic with inhaled steroids (n=1), vinblastine (n=3), topical nitrogen mustard cream (n=1) and vemurafenib (n=1) were the treatments utilized before the initiation of cladribine. Two patients received the drug more than once during the course of their disease. The dosing of cladribine for all patients was based on one of the two intravenous regimens (0.14 mg/kg for days 1-5 every 28 days or 5 mg/m2 for days 1-5 every 28 days). The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 4.5 years (95% CI:2-7) and the treatment outcomes are shown in Table 1. Median number of cycles of cladribine administered was 1.5 (range, 1-9). Clinical/radiographic responses were noted in 29 (78%) patientsORR was 78%, with 24% complete responses and 54% partial responses (PR). Responses were seen in various disease sites: lung nodules/infiltrates (13/29, 45%), bone (12/29, 41%), lymph nodes (8/29, 28%), skin (3/29, 10%), pituitary/hypothalamus (4/29, 14%). Eight (22%) patients did not respond and had progressive disease (PD)- cystic/bullous lung disease (n=2), skin (n=2), abdominal/peritoneal lymph nodes (n=2), and hypothalamus (n=3).The treatment was well tolerated, with grade 3 or above adverse effects seen in three patients: two with lymphopenia requiring dose delays and one with congestive cardiac failure leading to drug discontinuation. After initial disease response, PD was seen in three patients. 89%, 78%, 64% of those who responded initially maintained their responses at years 1, 3, and 5, respectively (Table 1). The 5-year progression free survival (PFS) was 55% for the entire cohort. BRAF-status was evaluated on 13 of 37 patients in the entire cohort (35%): BRAFV600E positive [n=7 (53%)] and WT [n=6 (46%)]. Of the 7 patients who had BRAFV600E mutation, responses were seen in 71%, while 100% of those without BRAFV600E achieved a response (p=0.09). At the time of last follow-up, 9 patients (24%) were dead. Of those, cause of death were available on 5 patients; due to LCH (n=1), stroke (n=1), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n=1), acute myeloid leukemia (n=2). Conclusion In our study, cladribine monotherapy yielded a high ORR, with the majority of patients achieving a PR. The responses were durable with a small risk of subsequent disease relapse. Responses were seen irrespective of the presence of BRAFV600E mutation. Cladribine was well tolerated overall, and may be considered a potential therapy for adult LCH patients. Disclosures Vassallo: Sun Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Sun Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Cladribine for langerhans cell histiocytosis

Introduction: Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is characterized by circulating monoclonal IgM and bone marrow infiltration with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) cells. Presently, there is limited data to guide prognosis or treatment options of WM based on the proportion of lymphocytes or plasma cells in the LPL population on the pathology. In this study, we aim to look at differing clinical features and outcomes of patients with WM based on the plasma cell (PC) percentage in the diagnostic bone marrow biopsy. Methods Patients with WM seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN between January 2001 and December 2017, with a bone marrow biopsy and a corresponding serum free light chain (FLC) examination at diagnosis of WM were included. The percentage of lymphocytes and PCs in the marrow biopsy was determined based on morphology ± immunohistochemistry. On immunohistochemistry, CD138 and/or MUM-1 positivity was used to quantify PCs, whereas CD20 and/or PAX5 were used to quantify lymphocytes. Patients with ≥10% PC component in the lymphoplasmacytic (LPL) cells on bone marrow biopsy were considered to have WM with excess plasma cells (WMEPC), while those with &lt;10% PCs were considered to have lymphocytic WM (LWM). Continuous variables were compared using Wilcoxon test and categorical variables were compared using Chi square test or Fisher's exact test. Time-to-next therapy (TTNT) was defined as the period from initiation of first line therapy to start of second line therapy or death due to any cause before second line therapy. Time-to-event analyses were conducted using Kaplan Meier method. Results: Of 228 evaluable patients, 147 (64%) had ≥ 10% PCs in the initial marrow biopsy. The median follow-up was 3.4 years (95% CI: 2.3-4.3 years) for LWM and 4.3 years (95% CI: 3.4-4.8 years) for WMEPC (p=0.33). The baseline characteristics of WMEPC versus LWM are depicted in Table 1. Patients with WMEPC had lower bone marrow involvement by LPL (30%) compared to LWM (60%; p&lt;0.001) at diagnosis, but the rate of symptomatic hyperviscosity was higher in WMEPC during the disease course (Table 1). The TTNT was shorter for WMEPC [2.6 years (95% CI: 1.8-4.5 years)] compared to LWM [4.5 years (95% CI 3.2-8.2)], although it did not reach statistical significance (p=0.09, Figure 1). There was a trend towards shorter OS for WMEPC [Not reached (95% CI 7.2- NR)] compared to LWM [10.7 years (95% CI 7.3 -12.1 years); p=0.28], Figure 2. Of the 228 patients, 79% (n=182) had data available for systemic therapy. The rate of PR or better with frontline therapy was higher in rates in LWM compared to WMEPC (61 % vs 42% p=0.02, Table 1). Among WMEPC cohort, patients receiving either a proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based or an immunomodulatory (IMiD)-based combination as frontline therapy (n=16) had higher rates of partial response or better (68%) compared to non-PI/non-IMiD based therapy (n=114), p=0.04. Conclusion: WM with excess plasma cells at diagnosis is associated with a trend towards shorter TTNT and OS compared to WM with &lt;10% plasma cells in the lymphoplasmacytic population at diagnosis. Our preliminary data shows higher rates of partial response or better with the use of PI/IMiD based therapy, but the small cohort size limits the strength of this finding which needs to be validated externally. Disclosures Ansell: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Regeneron: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Trillium: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Trillium: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Affimed: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Trillium: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Trillium: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding. Gertz:Spectrum: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Prothena: Honoraria; Alnylam: Honoraria; Ionis: Honoraria. Dingli:alexion: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Nowakowski:Selvita: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NanoString: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Alnylam: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Akcea: Consultancy. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Kapoor:Janssen: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria.

Introduction Histiocytic neoplasms are rare disorders of the monocyte-macrophage-dendritic cell lineage that pose significant management challenges to the clinicians. Over the last five years, there has been emerging data on the role of MAPK/ERK pathway (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK) in their pathogenesis. In this study, we report the molecular alterations among patients with histiocytic neoplasms seen at our institution. Methods We pursued target-capture next generation sequencing (NGS) on tissue specimen of patients with various histiocytic neoplasms- Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD), histiocytic sarcoma (HS), and Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS). We used three NGS platforms, Tempus® xO (1,714 genes), Tempus® xT (596 genes), or Foundation One® CDX (324 genes). All platforms used formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue specimens for detection of substitutions, insertion and deletion alterations, and copy number alterations, and gene rearrangements. The Tempus assays also utilized matched blood or saliva samples for germline DNA sequencing in addition to whole-transcriptome RNA sequencing. The tumor cellularity threshold for pursuing RNA sequencing was 30% so the test was not pursued specimens for lower cellularity. Results We included 31 cases with histiocytic neoplasms in this study. The disease distribution was as follows: ECD (n=6), LCH (n=7), RDD (n=12), ECD-RDD overlap (n=3), HS (n=2), and LCS (n=1). Among the 13 patients with ECD and LCH, BRAF-V600E mutations were found in 8 (62%) cases. We found several novel DNA alterations in this study in all disease groups: ECD (BRAFV471F), LCH (MAP2K1 in-frame deletion), and RDD (frameshift mutations of DNMT3A, SMARCA4, KMT2A, and CDC73 truncation). In one LCH patient without any DNA alterations, we found MAPK1 and MAP2K1 overexpression on RNA sequencing. We also had two cases with HS, both of which were found to have KRAS exon 3 mutations. One of these cases had concomitant JAK2V617F+ myelofibrosis and the tissue specimen for HS demonstrated TET2 and SRSF2 mutations as well. Our cohort included one patient with multifocal lymph node LCS that demonstrated NRAS and TP53 mutations, who did not respond to MEK-inhibitor therapy. Alterations in epigenetic regulators (TET2, DMNT3A, KMT2A, ASXL1) were found in 5 (16%), potentially suggesting clonal hematopoiesis in a subgroup of histiocytosis. Conclusions Histiocytic neoplasms demonstrate diverse somatic oncogenic alterations. In our study, we noted several novel alterations beyond the MAPK-ERK pathway in RDD that may point toward other potentially pathogenic mechanisms for these rare disorders. In cases where the DNA sequencing does not reveal pathogenic alterations, transcriptome analysis may aid in the diagnosis and management. OffLabel Disclosure: Trametinib use for Langerhans cell sarcoma