Background: Graves' disease (GD), including Graves' ophthalmopathy or orbitopathy (GO), is an autoimmune disease with an environmental and genetic component to its etiology. The genetic contribution to the GO clinical phenotype remains unclear. Previous data from our laboratory and others have suggested that GO has no specific genetic component distinct from GD itself, while other reports have occasionally appeared suggesting that polymorphisms in genes such as CTLA4 and IL23R specifically increase the risk for GO. One of the criticisms of all these reports has been the clinical definition of the GO phenotype as distinct from hyperthyroid GD devoid of clinically significant eye involvement. The objective of this study was to take advantage of a phenotypically pure group of GD patients with GO and examine a series of genes associated with GD to determine if any were more definitively associated with GO rather than Graves' thyroid disease itself. Methods: To further examine whether specific susceptibility genes are associated with GO, we have performed further genetic association studies using highly characterized GO patients, many of whom had undergone orbital decompression surgery for their exophthalmos. We genotyped HLA , CTLA4 , IL23R, and TSHR genes in a group of 256 Caucasian patients with severe GO ( n =199) and less severe GO ( n =57), and 90 patients with GD but no clinically apparent GO. Results: We found that the allele and genotype frequencies were not statistically different between GO and non-GO patients for any of the genes and gene combinations assessed. Conclusions: These results provide further evidence that patients with GO do not have a distinct genetic susceptibility to their eye disease and again suggest that environmental and/or epigenetic influences are at play.
Facial asymmetry, hippocampal pathology, and remote symptomatic seizures
Abstract B128 Background The B vitamin folate affects colorectal carcinogenesis through effects on nucleotide synthesis and possibly DNA methylation. Animal models and epidemiologic evidence suggest that folate from diet and supplements can prevent the development of colorectal cancer (CRC), but that high folate intake after adenomas or cancer are established may accelerate progression or recurrence. The chemotherapeutic agent 5-fluorouracil inhibits thymidylate synthase, a folate-metabolizing enzyme, and the effect of folate intake on treatment efficacy is unknown. Supplement use and folate intake are high among adults in the U.S., particularly with food supply fortification, and higher still among cancer patients and survivors. However, few studies have addressed use of folic acid-containing supplements (FAS) among colorectal cancer patients, how use changes after diagnosis, and what factors determine changes in FAS use. Methods The Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) is a multicenter study of colorectal cancer cases, their family members and controls, recruited since 1998 at six sites in the United States, Australia and Canada. The current analysis includes 1,092 CRC cases with epidemiologic data available from questionnaires administered at enrollment, asking about supplement use and other risk factors before diagnosis, and from follow-up questionnaires about 5 years later. Baseline characteristics for cases who began using FAS (including multivitamins) after diagnosis were compared to those for cases who used FAS neither before nor after diagnosis. We used logistic regression models to evaluate associations between age, sex, CCFR site, race, education, income, lifetime exercise, smoking, body mass index, and diet and change in FAS use, adjusting each model for age, sex and site, when appropriate. Results FAS use before CRC diagnosis was 35.4%, while 55.1% of cases used FAS after diagnosis. Women were more likely to begin FAS use after diagnosis (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.17-2.19). Current smokers were less likely than nonsmokers to begin FAS use (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40-0.97), as were those consuming more red meat (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.70 for those in the highest versus lowest intake categories, ptrend=0.012). Subjects with higher fruit intake were more likely to begin FAS use (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.16-3.30 for highest versus lowest intake, ptrend=0.013). We also observed a suggestive association between lifetime physical activity and change in FAS use for active versus less active subjects (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.01-2.16), though there was no trend with increasing levels of physical activity (ptrend=0.27). Finally, we found that residents of non-U.S. countries were less likely to begin FAS use (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.96 for Ontario, Canada and OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.11-0.38 for Australia). Conclusions: Our analysis showed substantial increases in the use of folic acid-containing supplements after diagnosis with colorectal cancer in CCFR participants, especially among women, U.S. residents, nonsmokers, and those who consumed more fruit and less meat. This study begins to characterize CRC patients likely to be using FAS, and suggests that its use is widespread. This finding is notable given evidence that folate may accelerate progression of colorectal cancer, and the unknown effect that FAS intake may have on the efficacy of cancer treatment and on survival. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2008;1(7 Suppl):B128.
Abstract A1: SIAH E3 ligase as a novel anticancer drug target to inhibit RAS-mediated tumorigenesis and metastasis in human cancer cells
Abstract The central importance of the ERBB/RAS signal transduction cascade has been well established in human cancer. As such, novel approaches to counteract activated ERBB/RAS signals constitute important measures to reverse tumorigenesis and metastasis in human cancers. Instead of targeting an upstream signaling module such as ERBB/RAS/MEK/MAPK/AKT/mTOR, we targeted the most downstream signaling module in the ERBB/RAS pathway called the SIAH-dependent proteolytic machinery. SIAHs are the human homologs of Seven-In-Absentia (SINA), an evolutionarily conserved RING E3 ligase, an essential downstream signaling module and a critical “gatekeeper” required for proper Drosophila RAS signal transduction. Guided by the insights and principles learned from Drosophila RAS signaling pathway, we conducted preclinical studies to examine SIAH function in the context of RAS-mediated tumorigenesis and metastasis in human cancer cells.We found that (1) SIAH is a novel biomarker for human cancer, i.e. it specifically decorates proliferating tumor cells (not stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment). SIAH expression is progressively and markedly upregulated as human cancer progresses to the advanced stages in human pancreatic, lung, breast and prostate cancers; and (2) inhibiting the proteolytic function of SIAH is highly effective to abolish tumorigenesis and metastasis in eight of the most aggressive human cancer cell lines known in the literature that include pancreatic cancer cells (MiaPaCa and Panc-1), lung cancer cells (A549), invasive breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 and MDA-MB-435) and hormonal-refractory prostate cancer cells (PC-3 and DU-145) in soft agar as well as in athymic nude mice. These findings suggest that SIAH may be an attractive new therapeutic target for novel anti-RAS and anti-cancer therapy in human cancer. As a highly evolutionarily conserved E3 ligase and consistent with its “gatekeeper” function identified in the ERBB/RAS signaling pathway, SIAH is well positioned to become a next-generation and potent anticancer drug target to block the tumor-promoting RAS pathway and to treat the most aggressive types of human cancers. “Using anti-SIAH molecules to block active RAS signaling in human cancer” may be another example of “from the bench [basic science from fruitflies (model organism) to human cancers] to the bedside story [translational medicine in the near future]”. Anti-SIAH-based anticancer strategy may aid in expanding our arsenal of novel anticancer therapies. By attacking the oncogenic ERBB/RAS pathway using multi-pronged synergistic inhibitions at upstream (EGFR/HER2 membrane receptors), midstream (RAS/RAF/MEK/mTOR) and downstream (SIAH E3 ligase) signaling modules in parallel, we may be in a great position to halt the genesis, progression and metastasis of the most aggressive and lethal types of human cancers. If successful, we hope to translate our findings to the cancer clinics to treat many cancer patients with metastatic diseases in the future. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(23 Suppl):A1.
Comparative Effectiveness of Drug Treatments to Prevent Fragility Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
ObjectivesTo determine the cost of treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OP SCCA) with transoral surgery with concomitant neck dissection (TOS), TOS with adjuvant radiation therapy (TOS + RT), TOS with adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (TOS + CRT), and primary chemoradiation therapy (CRT).Study DesignCase series.SettingTwo tertiary care teaching hospitals.Subjects and MethodsUsing the databases of 2 teaching hospitals, patients were identified who had OP SCCA treated with TOS, TOS + RT, TOS + CRT, and primary CRT in 2009 to 2010. Costs were analyzed from an institutional perspective looking at reimbursement. Patients with government payers and patients with private payers in each group were identified, and net revenue data obtained for the 3‐month period from diagnosis were calculated and averaged for each group. Cost was defined as the reimbursement for all charges surrounding the 3‐month episode of treatment. All revenue associated with inpatient and outpatient care, including pharmacy charges, was included.ResultsThe mean cost of TOS (private payers/government payers) was $37,435/$15,664 (range, $22,486‐$48,746/$13,325‐$16,885). The mean cost of TOS + RT (private payers/government payers) was $74,484/$34,343 (range, $72,400‐$84,825/$31,565‐$40,810). The mean cost of TOS + CRT (private payers/government payers) was $191,780/$53,245 (range, $145,450‐$217,220/$49,400‐$58,325). The mean cost of CRT (private payers/government payers) was $198,285/$57,429 (range, $168,216‐$298,945/$52,900‐$59,545).ConclusionAn algorithm of transoral surgical treatment of OP SCCA with adjuvant treatment as indicated by pathology is more cost conscious than an algorithm of treatment of all OP SCCA with CRT.