Citations

Objectives: The current study aimed to compare the efficacy of the two different prophylactic antibiotic regimens (2-days vs. 7-days) in preventing surgical site infection in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods : Patients undergoing CABG were included in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. From 2016 to 2017, 370 cases were allocated to one of two groups. The groups received prophylactic antibiotic therapy for either 2-days or 7-days. All CABG patients were followed for days for surgical site infections. Two of the patients died after surgery, and 3 patients did not show up during the three-month follow-up evaluation and thus did not meet the study criteria. Results: Of the remaining 365 patients who participated in the full study, 198 (54.2%) were male, and 167 (45.7%) were female patients. The mean age of these cases was 58.64± 11.4. Of the 365 study participants who received prophylactic antibiotics prior to surgery, 16 patients developed surgical site infections (legs and sternum). Among these 16 patients, nine cases belong to the 7-days prophylactic antibiotic therapy group (2.4%), and seven cases belong to the 2-day prophylactic antibiotic therapy group (1.9%) (P=0.771). Conclusion: Comparison of two 2-day and 7-day prophylactic antibiotic regimens showed no significant difference in the incidence of post-surgical infection in the two groups.

Introduction: Participation by American Indian and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) in clinical research may improve AI/AN health outcomes and generalizability of the research. Hypothesis: Cultural beliefs have a strong impact on willingness of AI/AN to participate in research. Methods: We developed a survey to identify if cultural beliefs impact perception of clinical research and the Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial (CREST-2) protocol. Stroke neurologists and CREST-2 investigators participated in the design of the survey. Participants were stratified based on AI/AN self-identification and level of education. Likert-scale responses were tested with the Mann Whitney-U test and dichotomous responses with the Chi-Square test. Results: There were 102 participants: 61% female, mean age 39, and 37% AI/AN. Eight questions evaluated understanding of research concepts within CREST-2; 89% of these responses were correct, with no significant difference in responses between AI/AN and non-AI/AN or between low (n=42) and high (n=60) education. Compared to other ethnic groups, AI/AN identify more with their culture (p=0.002) and consider cultural beliefs when making health care decisions (p=0.005), including participating in a research study (p=0.002). Using the same questions, we found no difference between respondents with low or high education.(Figure 1) Conclusion: These data support our hypothesis that cultural beliefs have a strong impact on AI/AN willingness to participate in research. It is important for researchers to consider cultural beliefs when designing recruitment strategies for AI/AN populations. Future work will address how cultural beliefs affect AI/ANs’ understanding of and willingness to participate in clinical research.

AbstractAmidst the COVID‐19 pandemic and social uprisings demanding social and racial equity worldwide, there is an increasing demand for health justice training for health workers. However, there are scant evidence‐based assessments of the impact of such courses. Between 2010 and 2020, SocMed—a 501(c)3 non‐profit social justice organization—offered two distinct courses about health equity, the social determinants of health, and social medicine to health workers through the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, Minnesota and Saint Mary Hospital Lacor in Gulu, Uganda. This study assesses the immediate impact of the SocMed curriculum on participants measured by a pre‐course and post‐course survey. In Minnesota, paired pre‐course and post‐course survey responses (mean n = 69; SD = 23) spanned years 2016–2019, while Uganda paired pre‐course and post‐course survey responses (mean n = 64; SD = 21) spanned years 2012–2013 and 2017–2019. Findings indicate that the course improved participants’ knowledge in all 24 of the topics in the Minnesota course and 42 of 44 topics in the Uganda course (significant at p < 0.05).

Surgical site infections (SSI) are a significant burden to patients and health care systems. They increase mortality rates, length of hospital stays, and associated health care costs.

PURPOSE Distant metastases are present in 6% or more of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. In this context, locoregional therapy for the intact primary tumor has been hypothesized to improve overall survival (OS), but clinical trials have reported conflicting results. METHODS Women presenting with metastatic breast cancer and an intact primary tumor received systemic therapy for 4-8 months; if no disease progression occurred, they were randomly assigned to locoregional therapy for the primary site (surgery and radiotherapy per standards for nonmetastatic disease) or continuing sysmetic therapy. The primary end point was OS; locoregional control and quality of life were secondary end points. The trial design provided 85% power to detect a 19.3% absolute difference in the 3-year OS rate in randomly assigned patients. The stratified log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used to compare OS between arms. Cumulative incidence of locoregional progression was compared using Gray's test. Quality-of-life assessment used standard instruments. RESULTS Of 390 participants enrolled, 256 were randomly assigned: 131 to continued systemic therapy and 125 to early locoregional therapy. The 3-year OS was 67.9% without and 68.4% with early locoregional therapy (hazard ratio = 1.11; 90% CI, 0.82 to 1.52; P = .57). The median OS was 53.1 months (95% CI, 47.9 to not estimable) in the systemic therapy arm and 54.9 months (95% CI, 46.7 to not estimable) in the locoregional therapy arm. Locoregional progression was less frequent in those randomly assigned to locoregional therapy (3-year rate: 16.3% v 39.8%; P < .001). Quality-of-life measures were largely similar between arms. CONCLUSION Early locoregional therapy for the primary site did not improve survival in patients presenting with metastatic breast cancer. Although it was associated with improved locoregional control, this had no overall impact on quality of life.

AbstractRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard to evaluate clinical interventions, producing the highest level of evidence while minimizing potential bias. Inadequate recruitment is a commonly encountered problem that undermines the completion and generalizability of RCTs—and is even more challenging when enrolling amidst a pandemic. Here, we reflect on our experiences with virtual recruitment of non‐hospitalized patients in the United States for ColCorona, an international, multicenter, randomized, placebo‐controlled coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) drug trial. Recruitment challenges during a pandemic include constraints created by shelter‐in‐place policies and targeting enrollment according to national and local fluctuations in infection rate. Presenting a study to potential participants who are sick with COVID‐19 and may be frightened, overwhelmed, or mistrusting of clinical research remains a challenge. Strategies previously reported to improve recruitment include transparency, patient and site education, financial incentives, and person‐to‐person outreach. Active measures taken during ColCorona to optimize United States recruitment involved rapid expansion of sites, adjustment of recruitment scripts, assessing telephone calls versus text messages for initial contact with participants, institutional review board‐approved financial compensation, creating an infrastructure to systematically identify potentially eligible patients, partnering with testing sites, appealing to both self‐interest and altruism, and large‐scale media efforts with varying degrees of success.

Abstract Background Multiple myeloma (MM) evolves from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), a clinically detectable but asymptomatic premalignant phase seen in ~3% of the general population 50 years of age or older. The prevalence of MGUS has not been described in a population at high risk of developing MM, specifically Black/African American (AA) individuals or first-degree relatives of patients with hematologic malignancies (HM). In 2019, we launched the first nationwide US screening study for individuals at high risk of MM to help better identify what population would benefit most from screening and early intervention for precursor MM stages. We aim to assess the prevalence of MGUS in a population at high risk of MM and characterize clinical variables of individuals who screen positive. Here, we report interim screening data on the first 2,960 participants. Methods Individuals aged 40 or older with an additional MM risk factor are eligible to be screened in the PROMISE Study. High-risk individuals include Black/AAs and those with a first-degree relative diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy or a precursor condition to MM. Blood from all participants was analyzed via serum protein electrophoresis, immunofixation, and Optilite® to measure the serum free light chains (sFLC), IgG, IgA and IgM. Results were returned to all participants, and those who tested positive for a monoclonal gammopathy (MGUS/SMM) were referred to a hematologist for clinical follow-up and invited to periodically complete epidemiologic exposure and psychosocial questionaries, including a 4-item cancer worry questionnaire and the RAND 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36). To investigate the use of the higher-sensitivity matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) with the Optilite® IgG, IgA, IgM and sFLC results as a screening test for all participants, we rescreened 1,092 samples from PROMISE. The Binding Site Group proprietary software was used for the analysis of the combined MS/Optilite® results, allowing for the detection and quantification of M-protein. Heavy-Chain MGUS (HC-MGUS) was defined by the presence of one or more paired heavy and light chain monoclonal peaks detected by MS. Pairing was based on mass to charge ratio of identified peaks. To enrich the PROMISE cohort with Black/AA individuals, we identified and screened 1,868 Black/AA additional individuals from the Mass General Brigham (MGB) Biobank who met the PROMISE enrollment criteria. Screening was performed by MS/Optilite®, and results have not been returned to participants. Results We screened 2,960 participants with the combined MS/Optilite® approach. We report here the prevalence of HC-MGUS and plan on presenting the estimated rate of light chain MGUS in our cohort, at the meeting. We detected HC-MGUS in 9.6% (95% CI: 8.6-11%) of our cohort, with a prevalence of 10% (95% CI: 8.3-12%) in the PROMISE cohort and 9.4% (95% CI: 8.1-11%) in the MGB cohort (Table 1 and Figure 1). HC-MGUS prevalence increased with age in high-risk individuals from 4.9% (CI: 3.3-6.9%) for participants aged 40-49 to 13% (CI: 10-17%) in the 70-79 range (P &lt; 1.2E-5). Among monoclonal HC-MGUS, we found 65% IgG, 18% IgM, and 18% IgA. M-spike was quantified in 97% of samples. Median M-spike concentration was, 0.058g/dL (max. 2.6g/dL) for IgG, 0.0043g/dL (max. 0.6g/dL) for IgM, and 0.067g/dL (max. 0.8g/dL) for IgA. In the Promise cohort, no significant change in cancer worry was observed across the pre- and post-screening interval among participants who screened positive (P = 0.52). Health-related quality of life, as measured by the SF-36, was not significantly different in screen-positive vs. screen-negative individuals for any of the eight subscales (all P &gt; 0.20). Conclusions We present the largest dataset on monoclonal gammopathy prevalence and screening in individuals at high risk for MM, and more specifically the largest cohort of Black/AA, using a novel high-sensitivity testing approach. Our results confirm that older adults who are Black/AA or have a first-degree relative with an HM have a high prevalence MGUS and may benefit from precision screening approaches to allow for early detection and clinical intervention. Preliminary data on cancer worry and quality of life indicates that the psychosocial burden of screening in this population is likely minimal. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sakrikar: The Binding Site: Current Employment. Krause: The Binding Site: Current Employment. Barnidge: The Binding Site: Current Employment. Bustoros: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Perkins: The Binding Site: Current Employment. Harding: The Binding Site: Current Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Kapoor: Ichnos Sciences: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Glaxo SmithKline: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Cellectar: Consultancy. Mo: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy; Eli Lilly: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Murray: The Binding Site: Patents & Royalties: Potential Royalties for use of mass spectrometry in M-protein detection. Getz: Scorpion Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; IBM, Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Marinac: JBF Legal: Consultancy; GRAIL Inc: Research Funding. Ghobrial: AbbVie, Adaptive, Aptitude Health, BMS, Cellectar, Curio Science, Genetch, Janssen, Janssen Central American and Caribbean, Karyopharm, Medscape, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Takeda, The Binding Site, GNS, GSK: Consultancy.

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the implementation of an intraoperative standardized surgical site infection (SSI) prevention bundle. Methods: The multimodal, evidence-based care bundle included nine intraoperative items (antibiotic type, timing, and re-dosing; disinfection; induction temperature control > 36.5°; glove change; intra-cavity lavage; wound protection; and closure strategy). The bundle was applied to all consecutive patients undergoing colonic resections. The primary outcome, SSI, was independently assessed by the National Infection Surveillance Committee for up to 30 postoperative days. A historical, institutional pre-implementation control group (2012–2017) with an identical methodology was used for comparison. Findings: In total, 1516 patients were included, of which 1256 (82.8%) were in the control group and 260 (17.2%) were in the post-implementation group. After 2:1 propensity score matching, the groups were similar for all items (p > 0.05). Overall compliance with the care bundle was 77% (IQR 77–88). The lowest compliance rates were observed for temperature control (53% overall), intra-cavity lavage (64% overall), and wound protection and closure (68% and 63% in the SSI group, respectively). Surgical site infections were reported in 58 patients (22.2%) vs. 21.4% in the control group (p = 0.79). Infection rates were comparable throughout the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) categories: superficial, 12 patients (4.5%) vs. 4.2%, p = 0.82; deep incisional, 10 patients (3.7%) vs. 5.1%, p = 0.34; organ space, 36 (14%) vs. 12.4%, p = 0.48. After propensity score matching, rates remained comparable throughout all comparisons (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: The implementation of an intraoperative standardized care bundle had no impact on SSI rates. This may be explained by insufficient compliance with the individual measures.