Citations

SummaryAttention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common and challenging comorbidity affecting many children with epilepsy. A working group under the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Pediatric Commission identified key questions on the identification and management of ADHD in children with epilepsy. Systematic reviews of the evidence to support approaches to these questions were collated and graded using criteria from the American Academy of Neurology Practice Parameter. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) requirements were followed, with PROSPERO registration (CRD42018094617). No increased risk of ADHD in boys with epilepsy compared to girls with epilepsy was found (Level A). Valproate use in pregnancy is associated with inattentiveness and hyperactivity in offspring (1 class I study), and children with intellectual and developmental disabilities are at increased risk of ADHD (Level A). Impact of early seizure onset on development of ADHD was unclear (Level U), but more evident with poor seizure control (Level B). ADHD screening should be performed from 6 years of age, or at diagnosis, and repeated annually (Level U) and reevaluated after change of antiepileptic drug (AED) (Level U). Diagnosis should involve health practitioners with expert training in ADHD (Level U). Use of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire screening tool is supported (Level B). Formal cognitive testing is strongly recommended in children with epilepsy who are struggling at school (Level U). Behavioral problems are more likely with polytherapy than monotherapy (Level C). Valproate can exacerbate attentional issues in children with childhood absence epilepsy (Level A). Methylphenidate is tolerated and effective in children with epilepsy (Level B). Limited evidence supports that atomoxetine is tolerated (Level C). Multidisciplinary involvement in transition and adult ADHD clinics is essential (Level U). In conclusion, although recommendations could be proposed for some of the study questions, this systematic review highlighted the need for more comprehensive and targeted large‐population prospective studies.

Abstract BACKGROUND Emergency department (ED) overuse is a costly and often neglected source of postdischarge resource utilization after spine surgery. Failing to investigate drivers of ED visits represents a missed opportunity to improve the value of care in spine patients. OBJECTIVE To identify the prevalence, drivers, and timing of ED visits following elective spine surgery. METHODS Patients undergoing elective spine surgery for degenerative disease at a major medical center were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal registry. Patient and surgery characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded at baseline and 3 mo after surgery, along with self-reported 90-d ED visits. A multivariable regression model was used to identify independent factors associated with 90-d ED visits. For a sample of patients presenting to our institution's ED, charts were reviewed to identify the reason and time to ED postdischarge. RESULTS Of 2762 patients, we found a 90-d ED visit rate of 9.4%. One-third of patients presented to our institution's ED and of these, 70% presented due to pain or medical concerns at 9 and 7 d postdischarge, respectively, with 60% presenting outside normal clinic hours. Independent risk factors for 90-d ED visits included younger age, preoperative opioid use, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, and more vertebral levels involved. CONCLUSION Nearly 10% of elective spine patients had 90-d ED visits not requiring readmission. Pain and medical concerns accounted for 70% of visits at our center, occurring within 10 d of discharge. This study provides the clinical details and a timeline necessary to guide individualized interventions to prevent unnecessary, costly ED visits after spine surgery.

Abstract Introduction Voyager-V1TM is derived from VSV, a bullet-shaped negative sense RNA virus with very low human seroprevalence; it is engineered to selectively replicate in and kill human cancer cells. Voyager-V1 encodes the human IFNβ gene to boost antitumoral immune responses and the thyroidal sodium iodide symporter NIS gene to permit noninvasive imaging of virus spread. FIH studies are underway via both IV and IT routes. Here we report safety and preliminary correlative data from the FIH IT study. Methods and objectives This is a classical 3+3 phase 1 design, using escalating single IT viral doses from 3 x 106 to 3 x 109 TCID50 into one target lesion. The primary objective is safety and tolerability, monitored by committee. Other objectives include PK by RT-PCR for viral genomes, serum IFNβ levels, Tc-99m SPECT/CT imaging to monitor virus infection in injected lesions, peripheral blood immunophenotyping with 11-color flow cytometry for activation markers on T cells, T-regs, NK cells, and MDSCs, and serial biopsies to assess the tumor microenvironment (TME). IHC was performed on tumor biopsies for CD3, CD8, CD4, FoxP3, CD68, PD-1 and PDL-1 pre and post treatment in non-injected and injected lesions. CD45 staining is ongoing. Results Dose level 3 is ongoing (n=8+). No DLTs have been observed to date. Most patients were male (75%), white (100%), with ECOG PS1 (75%) and a median of >6 lines of prior systemic therapy. AEs (in 63% patients) reported as related to study drug were mild-moderate, short-lived, and consisted of G1 fever, chills, hot flashes, nausea, vomiting, hyperhidrosis and G2 fatigue. Most patients had some mild AEs (pain, bruising, subclinical pneumothorax) related to biopsy and IT injection procedures and one had an SAE related to biopsy (G2 pneumothorax). There was no difference in incidence, intensity or duration of related AEs between dose levels so far. In patients analyzed to date, at the first three dose levels of 3 x 106, 1 x 107 and 3 x 107 TCID50 (n=7), viremia and serum IFNβ were below levels of detection after IT injection. There is evidence in all patients of an increase in PD-1 expression on CD4 and CD8 T cells, suggesting T cell activation post- single virus injection. One patient at dose level 2 had increased CD4 and CD8 T cells in the peripheral blood. TME analysis revealed increased infiltration of CD3 and CD8 cells in tumors of some patients. In addition, there are changes in numbers of FoxP3 and CD68 positive cells in the injected lesions compared to the pre-treatment and non-injected lesion. Two patients at dose level 3, one with an injected adrenal metastasis of colorectal cancer and another with a chest wall lesion from a head of pancreas primary, have positive SPECT/CTs on days 3-15 showing viral replication in tumor plus concomitant lymphocyte/neutrophil trafficking in the periphery. Conclusions IT injection of a single dose of the novel oncolytic virotherapy Voyager-V1 has proven safe at doses up to 3 x 107 TCID50. There was evidence of T cell activation with increased PD-1 expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes after a single IT injection. Tumor biopsies indicate increased lymphocyte infiltration. Two patients at the highest dose tested show signs of viral replication in the injected lesion plus evidence of systemic impact on leukocyte populations. Citation Format: Steven Powell, Manish R. Patel, Jaime R. Merchan, Timothy P. Cripe, James Strauss, Rosa M. Diaz, Nandakumar Packiriswamy, Bethany A. Brunton, Deepak Upreti, Rehan Khan, Lukkana Suksanpaisan, Rianna Vandergaast, Stephen J. Russell, Alice S. Bexon, Kah Whye Peng. Preliminary correlative and clinical data from a first-in-human (FIH) study of the intratumoral (IT) oncolytic virotherapy, Voyager-V1, in patients with solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT051.