Thromboangiitis obliterans (TAO) is often cited as an extreme phenotype of vasculopathy and tobacco dependence. Although tobacco exposure is essential to progression of arterial ischemia in TAO, expert opinion differs regarding the degree of tobacco dependence in this population. The authors designed a prospective, case-control study to test the hypothesis that subjects with TAO have a greater degree of tobacco dependence than control subjects with coronary atherosclerosis (coronary artery disease [CAD]) do. Subjects with TAO (n=218, confirmed by angiography, biopsy, or noninvasive arterial testing) or CAD (n=343, diagnosed by coronary angiography) were mailed a standardized questionnaire regarding tobacco use, to which 103 and 273 responded, respectively. The degree of tobacco dependence in each group was ascertained by several methods, including the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence Questionnaire. The TAO group was younger at index date (year of first diagnosis for TAO patients, year of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA] for CAD patients) (TAO 37.6 ±9.0 vs CAD 43.3 ±4.9 yr, p<0.0001), but the groups did not differ in age at first tobacco exposure (TAO 16.7 ±3.1 vs CAD 17.3 ±4.2 yr, p=0.67), current tobacco use at time of survey (TAO 54% vs CAD 46%, p=0.17), or Fagerström score (TAO 4.7 ±2.3 vs CAD 5.1 ±2.3, p=0.24). Kaplan-Meier curves showed no significant difference in time to stopping tobacco use after first diagnosis (p=0.076). TAO subjects smoked fewer cigarettes per day than CAD subjects (TAO 22.3 ±10.7 vs CAD 27.7 ±15.3 cigarettes/day, p=0.003). Among current smokers (n=170), TAO subjects also smoked fewer cigarettes/day (20.2 ±8.2 vs 24.6 ±12.7, p=0.03), and were more likely to have made a serious attempt to stop (97% vs 90%, p=0.03). In contrast to case reports of extreme tobacco dependence in the TAO population, the degree of tobacco dependence in subjects with TAO is similar to that in subjects with CAD.
Iqmik – A form of smokeless tobacco used by pregnant Alaska natives: Nicotine exposure in their neonates
How many people do you know who have physical problems they attribute to computer use? (I wear wrist braces at night myself, so that my mild carpal-tunnel syndrome doesn't bother me much during the day.) Many of us seem to have the impression that such problems arise mainly from poor hardware design... or perhaps from an overindulgence in gaming, with its incessant, repetitive arm/wrist/hand/finger movements. But is it that simple? In this Whiteboard column, Doug Anderson points out how interaction design and usability efforts can overlook such problems, and urges us to pay more attention to them. I would add one more suggestion to his list of ideas: Even when longitudinal usability testing is not feasible, we can monitor our applications and systems in long-term use and note any physical problems that tend to appear among our users. ---Elizabeth Buie
Purpose: To determine whether (1) tailored nicotine patch therapy that is based on smoking rate can be carried out in a multisite oncology investigative group practice setting, (2) long-term use of bupropion reduces the rate of relapse to smoking in smokers who stop smoking with nicotine patch therapy, and (3) bupropion can initiate smoking abstinence among smokers who have failed to stop smoking after nicotine patch therapy. Participants and Methods: Fourteen North Central Cancer Treatment Group sites recruited generally healthy adult smokers from the general population for nicotine patch therapy and based the patch dosage on smoking rates. At completion of nicotine patch therapy, nonsmoking participants were eligible to be assigned to bupropion or placebo for 6 months (for relapse prevention). and smoking participants were eligible to be assigned to bupropion or placebo for 8 weeks of treatment. Results: Of 578 subjects, 31% were abstinent from smoking at the end of nicotine patch therapy. Of those subjects not smoking at the end of nicotine patch therapy who entered the relapse prevention phase, 28% and 25% were not smoking at 6 months (the end of the medication phase) for bupropion and placebo, respectively (P = .73). For those still smoking at the end of nicotine patch therapy, 3.1% and 0.0% stopped smoking with bupropion or placebo, respectively (P = .12). Conclusion: Tailored nicotine patch therapy for the general population of smokers can be provided in a multisite oncology investigative group setting. Bupropion did not reduce relapse to smoking in smokers who stopped smoking with nicotine patch therapy. Bupropion did not initiate abstinence among smokers who failed to stop smoking with nicotine patch therapy.
Tobacco Use Outcomes Among Patients With Lung Cancer Treated for Nicotine Dependence
PURPOSE: There is a current lack of consensus about the effectiveness of nicotine dependence treatment for cancer patients. This retrospective study examined the 6-month tobacco abstinence rate among lung cancer patients treated clinically for nicotine dependence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A date-of-treatment matched case control design was used to compare lung cancer patients (201 lung cancer patients, 41% female) and nonlung cancer patients (201 controls, 45% female) treated in the Mayo Clinic Nicotine Dependence Center between 1988 and 2000. The intervention involves a brief consultation with a nicotine dependence counselor. A treatment plan individualized to the patient’s needs is then developed. The primary end point was the self-reported, 7-day point prevalence abstinence from tobacco at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, compared with the controls, the lung cancer patients were significantly older (P < .001), reported higher motivation to stop smoking (P = .003), and were at a higher stage of change (P = .002). The 6-month tobacco abstinence rate was 22% for the lung cancer patients compared with 14% of the control patients (P = .024). After adjusting for age, sex, baseline cigarettes smoked per day, and stage of change, no significant difference was detected between lung cancer patients and controls on the tobacco abstinence rate. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that nicotine dependence treatment is effective for patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer. The majority of lung cancer patients were motivated to stop smoking.