Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

1933 citation(s) found for "Wu, Albert W".

Very High vs. High Tumor Mutational Burden Across Tumors: Real-World Associations with MSI, Pathway Features, and Immunotherapy Outcomes
Teixeira, Maria Fernanda , Tomaz, Victoria, Silva, Lucas Campos Barbosa e, Donizete, Uelson, Tustumi, Francisco , Nakaya, Helder Imoto , Moura, Fernando, Borad, Mitesh, Junior, P. Serrano Uson, Usón, Pedro Luiz Serrano , Nakaya, Helder I. , Uson, Pedro L S , Tomaz, Victoria, Beal, Juliana Rodrigues , Moura, Fernando , Borad, Mitesh J. , Campregher, Paulo Vidal

Biomedicines | March 6, 2026 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 593

10.3390/biomedicines14030593 | PMID 41898240 Get It

Background: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is an FDA-approved biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. However, its predictive value varies among tumor types and molecular contexts. We investigated whether a very high TMB identifies a biologically distinct subset and whether a higher cutoff provides additional clinical insights beyond the conventional high TMB threshold. Methods: We analyzed 133 patients with advanced solid tumors and TMB ≥ 10 mutations/Mb (mut/Mb) who underwent tumor genomic profiling using a 523-gene DNA/RNA next-generation sequencing panel. Tumors were stratified into prespecified TMB categories: 10–20 mut/Mb (TMB-H) and >20 mut/Mb (TMB-VH). The clinical characteristics, ICI outcomes (in the treated subset), and pathway-level genomic features were compared between groups. Results: TMB-VH was observed in 42/133 (31.6%) patients and spanned more than 20 tumor types. MSI was markedly more prevalent in TMB-VH than in TMB-H tumors (38.1% vs. 2.2%; Fisher’s exact p = 8.9 × 10−8). Pathway-level comparisons did not identify statistically significant differences after false discovery rate correction (all q > 0.05), and the observed patterns were descriptive in nature. In the ICI-treated subset with complete follow-up, objective response did not differ according to the TMB group. Overall survival (OS) was also similar between groups, whether measured from metastatic diagnosis (log-rank p = 0.937) or from ICI initiation (log-rank p = 0.814), although OS was numerically longer in the TMB-VH group in both analyses without reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: In this cohort study, TMB-VH was strongly associated with MSI but not independently associated with improved ICI outcomes. Larger multicenter cohorts are needed to validate pathway-oriented patterns and clarify the clinical utility of extreme TMB thresholds across various histologies. Integrating the functional context (e.g., MSI status, gene-level context, and pathway-level features) with TMB magnitude may enable more robust, tumor-aware biomarker models for immunotherapy selection.
Performance, Safety, and Patient Experience of an Autonomous Robotic Phlebotomy Device: A Multicenter Trial
Giesen, Luuk, Roest, Jeroen A, Koopman, Frederique M A, Deckers, Martine, Chon, Helena, Hackeng, Christian M., Riedl, Jürgen, Bruin, Michiel de, Katzman, Brooke M. , Gelder, Warry van, Fouraux, Michael A., Holten, Thijs C. van, Jonge, Róbert de , Giesen, Luuk F P , Cadamuro, Janne , de Jonge, Robert , Nybo, Mads

Clinical Chemistry | March 3, 2026 | Volume: 72 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 845-856

10.1093/clinchem/hvag029 | PMID 41967464 Get It

Abstract Background Automated phlebotomy has the potential to improve patient outcomes and address phlebotomist workforce challenges. The Autonomous Blood Drawing Optimization and Performance Testing trial (ADOPT, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05878483) assesses performance, safety, and patient experience of an autonomous robotic phlebotomy device (ARPD) that utilizes multimodal imaging. Methods Patients were recruited from outpatient phlebotomy departments in the Netherlands. In cohort 1, analytical equivalence was assessed by comparing within-subject test results from ARPD-collected and manually collected samples using Passing–Bablok regression analysis. In cohort 2, the ARPD was assessed in routine use. The primary performance endpoint was first-stick success rate; the primary safety endpoint was the rate of adverse events. Exploratory endpoints assessed pain and patient preference. Results One hundred fifty-three patients were enrolled in cohort 1. No statistically significant differences were observed in activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate transaminase, or platelet count, indicating analytical equivalence. A total of 1633 patients were enrolled in cohort 2. The overall first-stick success rate, in patients where the ARPD could identify a suitable vein, was 94.5% (95% CI, 93.3–95.5) and remained high in patients with difficult venous access (92.7%), obesity (97.4%), and age ≥65 years (93.4%). Adverse events, all mild, occurred at a rate of 0.6%. Ninety percent of patients reported far less (19%), less (32%), or similar pain (39%) compared with manual phlebotomy. Eighty-two percent indicated they would strongly prefer (16%) or prefer (31%) use of the ARPD in the future or had no preference (35%). Conclusions Automated phlebotomy using the ARPD shows a favorable performance and safety profile and may improve patient experience. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT05878483
Long-term Results of the North American Phase II Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Multicenter Trial for Rectal Cancer
Donovan, Katherine F., Chadi, Sami A. , Ricardo, Alison, Bonaccorso, Antoinette, Tomada, Elisa Paoluzzi , Sands, Dana R., Jh, Marks, Maykel, Justin A. , Alavi, Karim, Zaghiyan, Karen , Whiteford, Mark, McLemore, Elisabeth C. , Shawki, Sherief , Steele, Scott, Pigazzi, Alessio , Albert, Matthew, DeBeche-Adams, Teresa, Wexner, Steven, Sylla, P., Carmichael, Heather , Whiteford, Mark H., Albert, Matthew R. , deBeche-Adams, Teresa , Avery, Lisa M. , Wexner, Steven

Annals of Surgery | March 3, 2026 | Volume: 284 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 236-243

10.1097/sla.0000000000007044 | PMID 41773887 Get It

Background: Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) facilitates sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer. Preliminary results and functional outcomes from the North American multicenter phase II taTME trial (NCT03144765) have been published. Three-year outcomes are reported. Methods: Patients with stage I to III rectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled across 11 centers (2017–2022). Endpoints included TME grade, 3-year overall survival, disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, recurrence, late (beyond 90 d) complications, and stoma-free survival. Surveillance followed National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, with pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 years to assess for pelvic sidewall recurrence when possible. Kaplan–Meier analysis assessed oncologic outcomes. Results: One hundred patients underwent taTME for tumors at a median of 5.8 cm from the anal verge, with intersphincteric resection in 36% and handsewn anastomosis in 54%. Median follow-up was 50.9 months. Late complications occurred in 32 patients, including 21 severe (Clavien-Dindo ≥3). Late anastomotic complications occurred in 5 patients; one required surgical revision. Estimated 3-year overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival were 93.7%, 96.6%, and 84.6%, respectively. Distant recurrence occurred in 15 patients (median: 17.6 months), most commonly in the lung and liver. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 2 patients. Preoperative N stage, lymph node yield, tumor deposits, and perineural invasion were associated with recurrence. Among 100 patients diverted at taTME, 97% were stoma-free at 3 years; 4 patients later underwent secondary diversion. Conclusions: Three-year outcomes of this multicenter trial support the safety and efficacy of taTME in resectable mid and low rectal tumors, with outcomes comparable to contemporary studies. Longer-term oncologic and functional outcomes are needed.
Structural Basis for C 8 methylation of 23S ribosomal RNA by Cfr
Esakova, Olga , Jung, James , Lee, Hyunwook , Cho, Sung Hyun , Alumasa, John N., Schwalm, Erica L. , Bauerle, Matthew , Hafenstein, Susan , Yu, Zhiheng, Booker, Squire J. , Esakova, Olga A , Alumasa, John , Hafenstein, Susan L , Booker, Squire J , Grove, Tyler L. , Yu, Zhiheng

No container title available | March 3, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.02.27.707579 | PMID 41867798 Get It

Abstract Cfr methylates C 8 of adenosine 2503 (A2503) in 23 S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and will also methylate C 2 of A2503 after methylating C 8 . C 8 methylation confers resistance to more than five classes of clinically used antibiotics, highlighting it as a worrisome mechanism of antibiotic resistance. Here, we report the structure of Cfr, determined by cryogenic electron microscopy (Cryo-EM). Despite its small size (∼36 kDa), we exploit a transient protein–RNA crosslink that forms during catalysis, which requires Cys105 to resolve. Using a Cfr Cys105Ala variant and an 87-nucleotide strand of rRNA, we isolate the crosslinked species and determine its structure to 3.0 Å resolution. Notably, the 87-mer rRNA adopts an L-shaped conformation characteristic of tRNAs, rather than the conformation it assumes in the ribosome. One Sentence Summary Cryo-EM structure of Cfr, a radical S-adenosylmethionine methylase that confers antibiotic resistance
Rucaparib vs docetaxel (DTX) or second-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) therapy for patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with BRCA mutations based on
Fizazi, Karim , Chowdhury, Simon, Ryan, Charles J. , Villanueva, Noemí, Caffo, O., Chakmakjian, Carl, Ernst, D. Scott, Feyerabend, Susan , Font, Albert , Ganju, Vinod, Kushnir, Igal , MADSEN, CHRISTINE VESTERGAARD, Borrow, Jen, Ong, Valerie Shu Fei., Ostler, Peter , Reaume, Martin Neil , Bryce, Alan H. , Villanueva, Noemi , Caffo, Orazio , Ernst, D. Scott, Ganju, Vinod, Hajdenberg, Julio J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 2, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: 46-46

10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.46 Get It

46 Background: Primary results from the randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 TRITON3 (NCT02975934) study demonstrated that rucaparib significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) vs physician’s choice of DTX or an ARPI. ECOG PS is used as a predictor of prostate cancer survival. In this post hoc analysis, we report results from the BRCA1/2 subgroup of pts stratified by ECOG PS. Methods: Pts with disease progression after 1 prior second-generation ARPI in any setting were randomized 2:1 to rucaparib 600 mg BID or physician’s choice of DTX or ARPI (abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide). Primary endpoint was rPFS by independent radiology review (IRR). Objective response rate (ORR) for pts with measurable disease and overall survival (OS) were key secondary endpoints. Crossover from physician’s choice to rucaparib was allowed after radiographic progression was confirmed by IRR. Data cutoff was August 25, 2022. Results: Of 302 pts in the BRCA1/2 population, 147 had an ECOG status of 0 (97 rucaparib; 50 physician’s choice) and 155 had ECOG 1 (104 rucaparib; 51 physician’s choice). Baseline characteristics and demographics were generally similar between arms for pts in the ECOG 0 and ECOG 1 groups. Median rPFS favored rucaparib vs physician’s choice for pts with ECOG 0 (11.4 vs 8.2 months; HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.30-0.76]) and ECOG 1 (10.9 vs 6.1 months; HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.31-0.74]) (Table). Additionally, rPFS favored rucaparib for ECOG 0 and ECOG 1 including those whose prespecified physician’s choice was ARPI or docetaxel (Table). The confirmed ORR (95% CI) of rucaparib vs physician’s choice for ECOG 0 was 54% (37%–69%) vs 16% (3%–40%); the ORR for ECOG 1 was 37% (22%–53%) vs 18% (5%–40%), respectively. Median OS was similar between arms for rucaparib or physician’s choice; median OS was 23.7 vs 21.7 months (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.61–1.37]) for ECOG 0 and 21.8 vs 20.4 months (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.58–1.24]) for ECOG 1. Conclusions: Rucaparib improved rPFS and ORR in pts with BRCA-mutated prostate cancer with an ECOG PS of 0 or 1. OS was similar for these groups in both arms. These data support rucaparib as a treatment option for pts with BRCA-mutated mCRPC, whether ECOG 0 or 1. Clinical trial information: NCT02975934 . Median rPFS in patients in the ECOG 0 and ECOG 1 groups. Rucaparib, n Physician’s choice, n rPFS Rucaparib, median months rPFS Physician’s choice, median months HR (95% CI) rPFS, ECOG 0 97 50 11.4 8.2 0.48 (0.30–0.76) rPFS, ECOG 1 104 51 10.9 6.1 0.48 (0.31–0.74) rPFS, physician’s choice ARPI, ECOG 0 51 24 11.2 5.6 0.42 (0.22–0.78) rPFS, physician’s choice docetaxel, ECOG 0 46 26 11.5 8.8 0.49 (0.24–0.98) rPFS, physician’s choice ARPI, ECOG 1 52 17 11.2 4.5 0.33 (0.16–0.68) rPFS, physician’s choice docetaxel, ECOG 1 52 34 10.7 7.1 0.59 (0.34–1.01)
SPPADE symptom burden and ePRO-based outcome prediction in patients with mCRPC treated with 177 Lu-PSMA-617 (LuPSMA).
Muniz, Miguel, Tarhini, Ali, Grzegorczyk, Veronica , Zarka, Jabra , Orme, Jacob J. , Pachman, Deirdre R. , Ruddy, Kathryn Jean, Cheville, Andrea L., Tarhini, Ali , Zarka, Jabra G , Childs, Daniel S. , Jang, Albert , Riaz, Irbaz Bin , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Cheville, Andrea L.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 2, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: 142-142

10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.142 Get It

142 Background: LuPSMA is a life-prolonging radioligand therapy that is widely considered to have favorable tolerability. SPPADE symptoms (Sleep disturbance, Pain, Physical dysfunction, Anxiety, Depression, low Energy) are common in prostate cancer, yet data on patient-reported outcomes with LuPSMA in real-world settings remain limited. Methods: The E2C2 study (NCT03892967) evaluates the impact of a collaborative care intervention on patient-centered outcomes and healthcare utilization. This analysis includes mCRPC patients who initiated LuPSMA at Mayo Clinic (June 2022-July 2023) and completed at least one symptom survey within 6 weeks before or 2 weeks after the first LuPSMA treatment (baseline survey). SPPADE symptoms were rated on 0-10 scales; scores of 4-6 indicate moderate and 7-10 severe burden. A composite z-score was derived by standardizing each SPPADE domain to the cohort mean and averaging z-scores across domains per patient. Patients were stratified by composite symptom burden using cohort median and upper-tertile cutoffs. Associations with PSA50 response and overall survival (OS, from start of LuPSMA) were assessed using chi-square and Kaplan-Meier methods. In a longitudinal subgroup of patients completing a baseline survey plus at least one additional PRO survey while receiving LuPSMA (≥2 surveys), scores were compared from baseline to best during-treatment using Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Of 373 patients starting LuPSMA, 51 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 71 years, 31% had visceral metastases, and median baseline PSA was 42.1 ng/mL. Overall, 85% of patients reported at least one moderate symptom and 46% at least one severe symptom. The most common moderate-to-severe symptoms were low energy (58%), pain (52%), and sleep disturbance (49%). Using an upper-tertile cutoff of the composite SPPADE score, 17 patients had high and 34 had low/moderate symptom burden prior to LuPSMA. PSA50 response was achieved in 17.6% of patients with high vs 47.1% with low/moderate composite symptom scores (p = 0.08). Median OS was 9.2 vs 16.7 months for high vs low symptom groups (p = 0.15, median split). The longitudinal subgroup included 24 patients with serial ePRO assessments while on LuPSMA. Composite SPPADE scores improved from baseline to the best during-treatment assessment in both PSA50 responders (n=10) and non-responders (n=14), with median composite z-score Δ of 0.35 vs 0.20, respectively (p = 0.68). Conclusions: Among patients with mCRPC receiving LuPSMA, baseline SPPADE symptom burden was high. Though not statistically significant in this underpowered cohort, PSA response and OS were numerically inferior in those with higher baseline burden. These findings suggest that ePRO-captured symptom burden may provide prognostic and patient-centered insights beyond traditional clinical variables. Clinical trial information: NCT03892967 .
CAST-AI: Cystectomy after systemic therapy with ADC and immunotherapy.
Zarka, Jabra , Bering, Elisabeth, Flickinger, Lynn M. , Gregory, Susanna, Roberson, Daniel S. , Sharma, Vidit, Chaudhuri, Aadel A. , Khanna, Abhinav, Karnes, R. Jeffrey, Boorjian, S., Sartor, Alton Oliver, Cheville, John C. , Domingo-Doménech, Josep, Shah, Paras H., Orme, Jacob J. , Zarka, Jabra G , Bobek, Olivia , Roberson, Daniel S. , Sharma, Vidit, Pritchett, Joshua C. , Jang, Albert , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Lucien, Fabrice , Ballman, Karla V. , Domingo‐Domenech, Josep

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 2, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: No page available

10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.tps892 Get It

TPS892 Background: Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab (Pembro) is now first-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC), yielding ~30% complete response (CR) rates; nevertheless, most patients (pts) progress within 1 year and median overall survival (OS) remains < 3 years. In muscle invasive bladder cancer, local consolidation after systemic therapy improves outcomes, suggesting that residual, treatment-refractory intravesical disease drives relapse. We hypothesize that cytoreductive cystectomy/nephroureterectomy (CC/U)—with metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) as needed—can consolidate responses to EV/Pembro and extend benefit in regionally advanced or metastatic UC. CAST-AI prospectively evaluates this multimodal strategy and integrates correlative studies of exosomal Nectin-4 and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood and urine as predictive/MRD biomarkers. Methods: CAST-AI is a phase II, decentralized single-arm trial enrolling pts with histologically confirmed UC of the bladder or upper urinary tract with ≥N1 and/or M1 disease and ECOG PS 0–2 who are potential surgical candidates (planned n = 75). Treatment: EV 1.25 mg/kg IV D1 & D8 + Pembro 200 mg IV D1 q21d, ≥4 cycles; MDT permitted any time pre-surgery. Response assessments occur q9 weeks (±4) to 18 months, then q12 weeks (±4). Surgical eligibility requires: (A) fitness for surgery; (B) complete or partial response (CR/PR) or, for select low-burden/unmeasurable disease, urologist-adjudicated candidacy; (C) all distant sites addressed; and (D) procedure in pt’s best interest. Post-CC/U maintenance EV/Pembro is encouraged per clinical discretion and guided by definitive surgical pathology results, which provide true pathologic staging often unattainable through imaging after systemic therapy. Primary endpoint: 12-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints: Objective response rate (ORR), CR rate, down-staging at CC/U, PFS, OS, and safety (using CTCAE). Exploratory endpoints: longitudinal exosomal Nectin-4 and ctDNA dynamics as MRD and early relapse indicators; tissue–blood–urine Nectin-4 concordance; pt-reported tolerability (using CIPN20). Key exclusions: > 20% variant histology or disallowed subtypes (e.g., micropapillary, plasmacytoid, sarcomatoid, neuroendocrine); prior chemotherapy for UC; contraindications to surgery/EV/ICI; or active uncontrolled comorbidities/infections. Status: Enrollment is open and ongoing, with 25 of 75 pts enrolled as of September 2025. The trial uses a decentralized model, allowing pts to receive EV/Pembro at their local facility, with central coordination, biospecimen shipping, and surgical evaluation at Mayo Clinic or affiliated sites. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06764095. Clinical trial information: NCT06764095 .
Dynamic investigator initiated enterprise (DIVINE) in prostate cancer: Randomized phase II trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy with or without short-course androgen deprivation and AR pathway inhibition in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate
Zarka, Jabra , Becker, Nicole A. , Gicobi, Joanina K. , Tabiim, Anthony, Heath, Elisabeth I. , Sartor, Alton Oliver, Park, Sean Sunghun, Ager, Casey, Andrews, Jack R. , Kase, Adam M. , YU, NATHAN Y., Vargas, C., Chaudhuri, Aadel A., Kim, Yohan, Cheville, John C. , Orme, Jacob J. , Tabiim, Anthony Jagri , Zarka, Jabra G , Tabiim, Anthony , Jang, Albert , Lucien, Fabrice , Childs, Daniel S. , Ager, Casey R. , Ballman, Karla V. , Chaudhuri, Aadel A.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 2, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: No page available

10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.tps283 Get It

TPS283 Background: Emerging evidence suggests that metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) can delay systemic therapy in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). However, the optimal timing of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) initiation in this setting remains undefined. While deferred ADT following MDT may preserve quality of life, early short-course ADT/ARPI may eradicate micrometastatic disease and extend progression-free survival. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) carrying PSMA-positive prostate cancer (PC) signals and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may serve as real-time biomarkers of MRD and treatment response. Methods: DIVINE [NCT06378866] is an open-label, phase II, randomized trial enrolling men with omCSPC defined by 1–5 metastases (≥1 extrapelvic) on conventional imaging (CT/MRI and bone scan) and testosterone >100 ng/dL. PSMA PET may be obtained for correlative purposes but does not determine eligibility. Participants (N = 220) are randomized 1:1 to: Arm A (Early systemic): SBRT plus 6 months of ADT + ARPI. Arm B (Deferred systemic): SBRT alone with observation, reserving systemic therapy until radiographic progression not amenable to further SBRT (mrPD). SBRT is delivered per institutional standard; repeat SBRT is allowed until lesions become non-addressable. The primary endpoint, modified radiographic progression-free survival (mrPFS), is the time from randomization to death or radiographic progression not amenable to further MDT, defined by PCWG3 (bone) and modified RECIST 1.1 (soft tissue) criteria on conventional imaging. Soft-tissue progression requires ≥ 20% increase in measurable disease or a new lesion; bone progression requires ≥ 2 new confirmed lesions. Secondary endpoints include OS, biochemical PFS, time to local and distant progression, and grade 3–5 adverse events during systemic therapy. Exploratory endpoints evaluate EV and ctDNA kinetics as MRD markers, correlation of PSMA-positive EV burden with outcomes, and duration of response after short-course ADT/ARPI. Correlative analyses will longitudinally quantify PSMA-positive EVs and ctDNA at baseline, on treatment, and at progression to define MRD dynamics and resistance patterns. The trial uses Pocock–Simon dynamic allocation by EV strata and metastatic burden to ensure balance across arms. The trial is open and actively enrolling across all Mayo Clinic sites; as of October 2025, 35 of the planned 220 patients have been accrued. Clinical trial information: NCT06378866 .
Integrating circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and TP53 alteration variant allele frequency (VAF) to predict outcomes in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) treated with enfortumab vedotin (EV).
Kumar, Hamsa L.S., Wu, Chen‐Han Wilfred , Kyasaram, Ravi Kumar , Sheng, Iris Yeong- Fung , Mendiratta, Prateek, GARCIA, J, Barata, Pedro C., Rao, Santosh, Grier, Abby , Jang, Albert , García, Jorge A. , Barata, Pedro C. , Brown, Jason R.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 2, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: 815-815

10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.815 Get It

815 Background: EV, alone or combined with pembrolizumab (EVP), is a standard of care for patients (pts) with aUC. Markers predictive of early or durable treatment response in aUC remain limited. Here, we investigate serial ctDNA monitoring and TP53 VAF as complementary predictors of early EV/EVP response. Methods: This single-institution IRB-approved study included pts with aUC treated with EV/EVP between 1/2021 and 9/2025. Pt demographics, clinicopathologic features, serial Signatera ctDNA results, and somatic tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS) data were abstracted from medical records. Primary refractory disease (PRD) was defined as progressive disease on first restaging scan or earlier clinical progression resulting in death from disease. PRD and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Fisher’s exact and log-rank tests. Results: Out of 158 pts, 67 pts were included in study cohort. Median follow-up was 13.2 months, with 52% of pts alive at time of data cutoff. Clinical characteristics at EV start include median age 69 years (range 41-99), 78% male, 91% white, 15% variant-predominant histologic subtype, 15% upper tract disease, 43% with visceral metastasis (24 lung, 7 liver), 66% frontline treatment (42 EVP, 2 EV), and 34% refractory setting (6 EVP, 17 EV). At first restaging scan, observed response rate was 50%; 23% had PRD. TP53 alterations on NGS were identified in 39 pts (58%); TP53 VAF was available for 36 pts (92%), with median VAF 50.7% (range 8-82%). While TP53 mutation presence did not significantly associate with PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% CI 0.68-2.42; log-rank p = 0.45), pts with TP53 VAF ≥ 50% had significantly longer PFS compared with TP53 VAF < 50% (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.18-1.04; log-rank p = 0.03). PRD was more commonly observed with TP53 VAF < 50% than with TP53 VAF ≥ 50% (odds ratio [OR] 0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.48, p = 0.01). 23 pts (21 EVP, 2 EV) had ≥ 2 serial ctDNA draws ≤ 120 days apart, including baseline draw within 2 months of EV start. Median time between 1 st and 2 nd ctDNA draws was 43 days. 70% (16 pts) had ≥ 90% ctDNA decline and 17% (4 pts) had ctDNA rise. The 2 pts with PRD exhibited ctDNA rise, whereas no pts with ctDNA decline had PRD (p = 0.04). 10 of these pts (43%) had TP53 mutations with available VAF. Of those 5 pts with TP53 VAF ≥ 50%, 3 had ctDNA clearance over 90%, 1 had 0-90% ctDNA clearance, and 1 had ctDNA rise. Of those 5 pts with TP53 VAF < 50%, 2 had ctDNA clearance over 90%, 1 had 0-90% ctDNA clearance, and 2 had ctDNA rise. Conclusions: Integrated serial ctDNA monitoring and tumor TP53 VAF may capture early treatment sensitivity to EV/EVP. Limitations include retrospective analysis, small sample size/power, combined EV/EVP cohort, and lack of centralized imaging review. Further validation in large, prospective cohorts is warranted.