Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

3207 citation(s) found for "Vo, Mary".

Virtual AI-informed immunocyte profiling (VAIP) from H&E as a predictor of multi-cancer prognosis.
Jana, Mayukhmala , Aggarwal, Arpit, Shanbhogue, Nikhil, Pathak, Tilak, Toro, Paula , Lewis, James S., Wasman, Jay, Teknos, Theodoros N., Pan, Quintin, Shi, Qiuying , Schmitt, Nicole Cherie, Saba, Nabil F., Oršulić, Sandra , Bazzaro, Martina , Corredor, Germán, Madabhushi, Anant, Aggarwal, Arpit , Badve, Sunil , Thorat, Mangesh A. , Lewis, James S. , Pan, Quintin , Schmitt, Nicole C. , Steward-Tharp, Scott Michael , Saba, Nabil F. , Corredor, Germán

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 3118-3118

10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.3118 Get It

3118 Background: Improved risk stratification is critically needed across multiple cancers to guide treatment decisions. This includes reducing overtreatment in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS), addressing late recurrence risk in estrogen receptor-positive/lymph node-negative (ER+/LN-) breast cancer (BC), and refining prognosis in head & neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) reflect anti-tumor immunity, whereas tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) polarize toward anti-tumor M1-like (CD68+) or immunosuppressive M2-like (CD163+) phenotypes. Integrating TILs with TAM polarization markers may better capture inflammatory balance and improve outcome prediction. We developed a hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-only AI method (VAIP) to quantify TILs and virtual CD68/CD163 TAMs to develop multi-cancer based potential prognostic models. Methods: TILs were detected on H&E with HoVer-UNet, and virtual CD68 and CD163 macrophages were inferred with VISTA. In cancer regions, we computed cell densities and immune-balance ratios and trained cancer-specific Cox models with compact feature sets (DCIS 6; HGSOC 7; ER+ 4; HNSCC 4). Prognostic stratification used disease-free survival (DFS) for DCIS (N=273), HGSOC (training N=165, independent test N=220), and ER+ BC (training N=144, test N=622), and overall survival (OS) for HNSCC (N=77), reflecting clinical endpoints. Evaluation used cross-validation for cohorts without an external test set (DCIS, HNSCC) and independent training and testing when independent cohort was available (HGSOC, ER+). Results: Risk stratification performance across cancer types is in Table 1. The DCIS model used 6 features, largely TIL-macrophage contrast ratios (TIL/M2, TIL/M1). HGSOC used 7 features with a similar ratio-heavy immune-balance signature, plus macrophage-normalized density and polarization metrics (e.g., M1/N, M/N). In contrast, ER+ BC and HNSCC achieved best performance with 4 features dominated by macrophage measures, particularly M2 density and the M1/M2 ratio. Across sites, CD163-related macrophage metrics and immune-balance ratios were consistently informative. Conclusions: Integrating H&E-visible TILs with virtual CD68/CD163 TAMs enables fully automated, H&E-only prognostic biomarkers that stratify OS and DFS across multiple cancers, demonstrating consistent prognostic value in DCIS, ER+ BC, HGSOC, and HNSCC. These findings support further study of this histomorphometric risk classifier through broader external and prospective validation. Performance across cancer types. Cancer Type Cohort C-index HR [95% CI] p-value DCIS All 0.616 1.76 [1.20-2.59] <0.001 DCIS RT/No-treatment 0.624 1.94 [1.15-3.26] 0.003 HGSOC Test 0.553 1.38 [1.02-1.87] 0.030 ER+ BC Test 0.577 1.51 [1.00-2.28] 0.004 HNSCC All 0.603 1.92 [1.03-3.36] 0.012
Socioeconomic and treatment-related determinants of long-term cancer survival: A population-based SEER outcomes analysis.
Sharma, Akhilesh, Mal, Madho, TUMMALA, NAYANIKA, Nimmagadda, Rithish , Keswani, Shiwani, Jawed, Inshal, Kumar, Love, Maroules, Micheal, Nookala, Vinod, Gondhi, Venkatesh, Jawed, Inshal , Kumar, Love, Nookala, Vinod

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 11186-11186

10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.11186 Get It

11186 Background: Cancer survival is shaped by tumor biology, treatment access, and socioeconomic context, yet population-level quantification of long-term survival disparities related to chemotherapy use and income is limited. We assessed five-year cancer-specific survival across demographic, treatment, and socioeconomic strata in a national registry. Methods: We performed a retrospective, population-based survival analysis using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Cancer-specific survival was evaluated at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after diagnosis. Outcomes were stratified by sex, race, chemotherapy receipt, and area-level median household income categories. Survival estimates were summarized descriptively and visualized using time-to-event curves. Results: Overall cancer-specific survival declined progressively over five years, from ~84% at 12 months to ~58% at 60 months. Sex differences were minimal, with similar five-year survival among males and females (~57–58%). Racial disparities were substantial: Asian/Pacific Islander patients demonstrated the highest survival across follow-up, while Black and American Indian/Alaska Native patients had lower early survival and persistent gaps at five years. Patients with recorded chemotherapy use had improved survival compared with those without or with unknown chemotherapy status; 12-month survival was ~88% versus ~80%, and five-year survival was ~65% versus ~57%, respectively. A pronounced socioeconomic gradient was observed: individuals in areas with median household income ≥$120,000 had higher five-year survival (~67%), whereas those in areas with income < $40,000 had markedly lower survival (~52%). Conclusions: In this national registry analysis, both chemotherapy utilization and higher socioeconomic status were strongly associated with improved long-term cancer survival, whereas persistent racial and income-related disparities remained evident. These findings highlight ongoing inequities in access to oncologic care and support the need for targeted policy interventions and equity-focused treatment delivery models. Interpretation should account for limitations inherent to observational registry data and potential residual confounding.
Implementation of a Bedside Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy Program in a Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellowship: Enhancing Patient Safety with a Checklist
Fernandes, Mateus , Schwartz, Jacob, GREENSTEIN, ZACK, Shayani, Kevin, PATEL, SONICA, Eldeiry, D, Zimnoch, Mary, Lakticova, Viera, Oks, Margarita, Meredith, Simon , Meredith, Simon , Shayani, Kevin E. , Laktičová, Viera, Singh, Anup K. , Oks, Margarita

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine | May 23, 2026 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 794-802

10.1177/08850666261446923 | PMID 42175802 Get It

Background Bedside percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy is a commonly performed procedure in the Intensive Care Unit with a steep learning curve. Checklists and standardized protocols have been established as essential tools for mitigating medical error and enhancing patient safety during critical care procedures. Research Question To assess the feasibility and safety profile of a percutaneous tracheostomy protocol, performed by pulmonary and critical care fellows, which integrates a multi-component checklist, tracheal ultrasound and a unique dual-visualization technique for endotracheal tube management. Study Design and Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all patients (n = 49) who underwent bedside percutaneous tracheostomy using a standardized protocol between November 1, 2022, and October 31, 2024. Key components of the protocol included rigorous pre-procedure assessment with standard tracheal ultrasound stations, a mandatory checklist, and endotracheal tube retraction under dual video laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. Outcomes analyzed included major bleeding, site infection, and airway complications. Results A total of 49 percutaneous tracheostomy procedures were successfully performed over the 24-month period. No major bleeding episodes or pressure ulcers were identified. There was a single complication involving loss of airway due to endotracheal tube balloon rupture. Critically, the patient was rapidly re-intubated without any hypoxemia or hemodynamic instability, which may be attributed to the immediate availability and use of the dual-visualization safeguard. Interpretation The implementation of this protocolized, checklist-driven approach to bedside percutaneous tracheostomy is feasible and safe within the framework of a pulmonary and critical care fellowship training model. The use of a novel dual-visualization technique (video laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy) during endotracheal tube retraction serves as a robust fail-safe, which may enhance patient safety during airway-compromised events.
Treatment Effect Reanalysis of the Randomized Individual Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma With External Control Data
Gupta, Tulika Rudra, Polley, Mei‐Yin C. , Redd, Robert , Lee, Eudocia Q., Arrillaga‐Romany, Isabel , Tan, Yujue, Welch, Mary R., Galanis, E, Ahluwalia, Manmeet S., Colman, Howard , Nabors, L. Burt, Hepel, Jaroslaw, Elinzano, Heinrich, Chukwueke, Ugonma N., Beroukhim, Rameen, Nayak, L., McFaline-Figueroa, J. Ricardo, Batchelor, Tracy T. , Lu‐Emerson, Christine , Bi, W. L., Arnaout, Omar, Peruzzi, Pier Paolo, Haas-Kogan, Daphne, Aizer, Ayal , Doherty, Lisa, Chiocca, E Antonio, Reardon, David A. , Wen, Patrick Y. , Trippa, Lorenzo , Rahman, Rifaquat, Gilbert, Mark R. , Redd, Robert , Lee, Eudocia Q , Gilbert, Mark R , Touat, Mehdi , Welch, Mary R , Ahluwalia, Manmeet S , Colman, Howard , Nabors, Louis Burt , Schiff, David , Nayak, Lakshmi , Batchelor, Tracy T , Kaley, Thomas , Lu-Emerson, Christine , Mellinghoff, Ingo K , Peruzzi, Pier Paolo , Haas-Kogan, Daphne , Tanguturi, Shyam K , Aizer, Ayal , Chiocca, E Antonio , Reardon, David A , Ligon, Keith L , Weller, Michael , Mehta, Minesh P , Wen, Patrick Yung , Rahman, Rifaquat , Lee, Eudocia Q. , Arrillaga‐Romany, Isabel , Drappatz, Jan , Galanis, Evanthia , Ahluwalia, Manmeet S. , Nabors, Burt , Hepel, Jaroslaw T., Elinzano, Heinrich, Chukwueke, Ugonma , Nayak, Lakshmi , McFaline-Figueroa, J Ricardo , Mellinghoff, Ingo K. , Arnaout, Omar M. , Haas‐Kogan, Daphne A. , Doherty, Lisa, Santagata, Sandro , Meredith, David M. , Mehta, Minesh P. , Rahman, Rifaquat

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 22, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 2048-2058

10.1200/jco-25-01586 | PMID 42172567 Get It

PURPOSE Integrating external control data into clinical trial designs and analyses has the potential to accelerate drug development processes. We reanalyzed the three experimental arms of the Individual Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT), a randomized phase II platform trial in newly diagnosed O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-unmethylated glioblastoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02977780 ). To evaluate the validity of using external data sets, we compared treatment effect estimates based on internal INSIGhT control data and matched external control data. METHODS The three experimental arms of INSIGhT (abemaciclib [n = 72], neratinib [n = 80], and CC-115 [n = 12]) did not improve survival compared with internal controls (standard chemoradiation [n = 70]). We derived external control patient-level data from multiple real-world and clinical trial data sets. We applied propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate treatment effects with external controls. Additionally, using this glioblastoma (GBM) data collection, we specified simulation scenarios to evaluate trial designs that integrate external controls. RESULTS After matching to external controls, no survival benefit was observed for patients receiving abemaciclib (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.34]), neratinib (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.70 to 1.24]), or CC-115 (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.41 to 1.88]). Simulations, together with the INSIGhT data and a collection of GBM data sets, allowed us to examine efficiencies and risks of clinical trial designs that leverage external control data. CONCLUSION The use of carefully matched external controls, to replace or augment the internal controls of INSIGhT, produced treatment effect estimates that were similar to previously published analyses. Single-arm trial designs and hybrid randomized designs incorporating propensity score–matched external control data evaluated treatment effects in the early-phase testing of experimental therapies in newly diagnosed GBM. The validity of this approach and risks of bias depended on the availability of comprehensive and accurate data on all potential confounders, in the absence of unmeasured confounding.
Current state of knowledge on the epidemiology, aetiology, diagnosis, and management of heart involvement in eosinophilia. A Clinical Consensus Statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial & Pericardial Diseases
Kuchynka, Petr, Brucato, Antonio , Tschöpe, Carsten , Castelleti, Silvia, Cooper, Leslie T, Dweck, Marc R. , Heidecker, Bettina, Kuusisto, J, Lazaros, G, Merlo, M, Pantazis, Antonis, Rigopoulos, Angelos G. , Ristić, Arsen D, Imazio, M, Brucato, Antonio , Cameli, Matteo , Frustaci, Andrea , Klingel, Karin , Lazaros, George , Tschöpe, Carsten , Kuchynka, Petr , Cooper, Leslie T. , Dweck, Marc Richard , Heidecker, Bettina , Petersen, Steffen E. , Ristić, Arsen , Sedlák, František , Sheppard, Mary N. , Imazio, Massimo

European Journal of Heart Failure | May 21, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ejhf/xuag043 | PMID 42166484 Get It

Abstract Heart involvement in eosinophilia represents a rare entity with substantial cardiac morbidity and mortality. This disorder is often overlooked and diagnosed in its advanced stages. In a subgroup of patients with eosinophilic heart disease, peripheral blood eosinophilia may not be present, and the biopsy of the affected organ or tissue is essential to establish the correct diagnosis. In this clinical consensus statement, an expert consensus group reviews the epidemiology, aetiology, diagnosis, and management of eosinophilic heart disease. The aim of the document is to increase awareness about the cardiac involvement associated with eosinophilia in order to diagnose the disease in early phases and prevent deleterious heart damage and adverse outcomes of affected individuals. The spectrum of physiological and immunological derangements requires a multidisciplinary approach for optimal management of affected individuals.
Risk of Glaucoma Progression in Patients Using a Calcium Channel Blocker: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study
Qozat, Ibrahim , Abubaker, Yazan , Vasu, Pranav, Lang, Mary V. , Dorairaj, Syril, Wagner, Isabella V. , Vasu, Pranav , Dorairaj, Emily , Miller, Darby D. , Dorairaj, Syril

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | May 21, 2026 | Volume: 67 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 59

10.1167/iovs.67.5.59 | PMID 42165646 Get It

Post-dural Puncture Headache in Dural Puncture Epidural and Combined Spinal-Epidural Using 24- and 25-Gauge Needles Versus Conventional Epidural Labor Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Chino, Kumiko , Rollins, Mark D. , Warrick, Christine, Vinsard, Patrice A , Pace, Nathan L. , Walsh, Emily E., Sharpe, Emily E. , Vinsard, Patrice , McFarland, Mary M , Sharpe, Emily E , Warrick, Christine M.

Anesthesia & Analgesia | May 19, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1213/ane.0000000000008083 | PMID 42155003 Get It

BACKGROUND: Compared to standard labor epidurals, placement of a dural puncture epidural (DPE) has been shown to improve labor analgesia efficacy, speed onset of analgesia, and decrease failure rates. However, there is a concern of increased post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) risk. A 25-gauge or larger spinal needle is typically needed for a DPE to have improved efficacy over a standard epidural. A prior meta-analysis comparing combined spinal-epidurals (CSEs) with epidurals did not identify a difference in PDPH rates, but many of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) used smaller diameter (27–29 gauge) spinal needles. This systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs evaluates headache frequency following CSE or DPE labor analgesia techniques with 24- or 25-gauge spinal needles. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane databases were searched on May 7, 2024, for RCTs comparing either DPE or CSE techniques using 24- or 25-gauge spinal needles with epidural labor analgesia. The primary outcome was headache. The risk-of-bias 2 tool was used to assess bias. The odds ratio (OR) was the chosen effect size using binomial family Bayesian estimation. The reference category for estimation was the conventional epidural technique group. RESULTS: Encompassing 3278 patients, 1765 (53.8%) received labor epidurals, 971 (29.6%) received DPEs, and 542 (16.5%) received CSEs. The rate of headaches in both groups was low, with headache rates of CSE/DPE and epidural groups (0.59% vs 0.34%), respectively. Headache was a secondary outcome in all the RCTs. In 10 of the 16 RCTs (62.5%), no patients of 1428 (0%; 95% credible interval [CI], 0.00–0.25) reported a headache. A total of nine (0.6%) headaches were reported in the DPE/CSE patients (denominator 1513) and six (0.3%) headaches were reported in the traditional epidural patients (denominator 1765). The posterior distribution of the treatment effect ( θ ) showed that the log OR of 0.35 favored the control group as having fewer events, but the number of events was rare, and the 95% CI was wide (−0.49 to 1.22). CONCLUSIONS: Headache was a rare event in both groups. Although these results are reassuring that either technique is clinically safe, they should be interpreted cautiously. A large RCT examining PDPH as the primary outcome with long-term follow-up is needed to more precisely determine if placement of a DPE or CSE with a 24- or 25-gauge spinal needle increases the risk of PDPH.
D22-04 Demographics, Disparities, and Donor Dynamics: A Comprehensive Evaluation of US Lung Transplant Trends (1988-2025)
Chinnamuthu, R, Bohra, R, Fernandes, W, Fernandes, B C, Cho, T, Phadke, R, Senthilkumar, V, Geetha, H Shanmugavel, Chinnamuthu, Rajaeaswaran, Bohra, Rhea, Fernandes, Bolivia Crocete Aloysia, Phadke, R, Geetha, Harinivaas Shanmugavel

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | May 18, 2026 | Volume: 212 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.6657 Get It

Abstract Purpose This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive overview of lung transplantation trends in the United States from January 1, 1988, through January 31, 2025. By examining key variables such as recipient ABO blood group, donor type (deceased or living), demographic factors, and geographic distribution, the goal is to highlight the evolution and current state of lung transplantation practices. Methods Data were obtained from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), encompassing all reported lung transplants during the specified time period. Relevant metrics included the number of transplants per year, recipient characteristics (blood type, race/ethnicity, gender, and age), donor type (deceased versus living), and state-level transplant volumes. Simple descriptive statistics (e.g., frequencies and percentages) were used to identify trends and capture the distribution of transplants among different demographic groups and geographic regions. Results A total of 55,435 lung transplants were performed in the United States between 1988 and early 2025. The vast majority (over 99%) utilized deceased donors, underscoring the limited role of living-donor lobar transplantation, with only 253 procedures reported nationally. Among recipients, ABO blood group O was the most common (∼45%), followed by group A (∼40%), group B (∼11%), and group AB (∼4%). Male recipients represented approximately 57% of transplants, while females accounted for 43%. Regarding race/ethnicity, White non-Hispanic patients constituted roughly 80% of all recipients, with Black non-Hispanic (8%) and Hispanic/Latino (8%) recipients forming smaller but significant proportions. Age distribution data revealed that individuals aged 50 to 64 years received nearly half of all lung transplants, and those over 65 years composed about a quarter of total recipients, reflecting a gradual shift in acceptance criteria favoring older adults. Geographically, California reported the highest volume of lung transplants, attributable to its large population and multiple high-volume transplant centers, while other states such as Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, and Missouri also demonstrated notable activity. Conclusion Lung transplantation in the United States has witnessed substantial expansion in both volume and scope since 1988, with the majority of procedures involving deceased donor lungs. A small number of living-donor lung transplants, while demonstrating innovative clinical possibilities, remains limited. The demographic profile of recipients continues to shift, evidenced by a growing proportion of older adults and a predominance of ABO type O and White, non-Hispanic recipients. Despite these advancements, persistent gaps in access, particularly among underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, highlight the need for further refinement in organ allocation policies and broader support services. This abstract is funded by: None
Resolving inflammatory bowel disease risk variants to genes and cell types
Zhang, Rui, Gettler, Kyle , Haritunians, Talin , Cleynen, Isabelle , Stevens, Christine R , Zhang, Qian , Tastad, Christopher, Medici, Catalina, Abreu, María T. , Achkar, Jean-Paul, Ahmad, Tariq, Bernstein, Charles, Brooks, Johanne , Bujanda, Luis, Butterworth, Jeffrey, Clark, Katie, Cummings, F, Buono, Joanne Del, Foley, Stephen, Franchimont, Denis , Hancock, L, Hart, Ailsa, Hooper, Patricia, Jarvis, Mark , Johnston, EL, Kemp, Cheryl, Kennedy, Nick, Lewis, James D. , Li, Andy, Louis, Édouard , Moayyedi, Paul, Moran, G , Newman, Bill, Oglesby, Arabis, Pekow, Joel, Perez, Kate J., Pollok, R, Radford-Smith, Graham , Raffals, L, Raine, Tim, Ramadas, Arvind, Ramakrishnan, S., Reinisch, Walter , Satsangi, Jack, Selinger, Christian, Shedwell, Sophy, Silverberg, Mark S. , Singh, Salil, Steel, Alan, Uhlig, Holm H. , Verma, Ajay, Weersma, Rinse K. , Xavier, Ramnik, Parkes, M, Lee, James C. , McGovern, D, Anderson, Carl A. , Lee, James , Raine, Tim , Zhang, Rui , Haritunians, Talin , Raine, Tim , Anderson, Carl A , Fachal, Laura , Cleynen, Isabelle , Stevens, Christine R. , Zhang, Qian , Tastad, Christopher , Do, Ron , Achkar, Jean–Paul , Ahmad, Tariq , Kok, Klaartje Bel , Butterworth, Jeffrey R., Cummings, Fraser , D’Amato, Mauro , Duerr, Richard H , Ellinghaus, David , Franchimont, Denis , Franke, André , Hart, Ailsa , Hooper, Patricia, Irving, Peter Miles , Julià, Antonio , Kennedy, Nicholas Alexander , Kupcinskas, Juozas , Latiano, Anna , Lewis, James D , McLaughlin, John , Moayyedi, Paul , Mowat, Craig , Newberry, Rodney D. , Perez, Kate J, Prescott, Natalie , Radford‐Smith, Graham L , Raffals, Laura E. , Reinisch, Walter , Rogler, Gerhard , Sands, Bruce E , Satsangi, Jack, Scharl, Michael , Schreiber, Stefan , Sebastian, Shaji , Selinger, Christian P. , Steed, Helen , Vermeire, Séverine , Halfvarson, Jonas , Daly, Mark J. , Lamb, Christopher A , Huang, Hailiang , McGovern, Dermot P.B. , Rioux, John D. , Cho, Judy H , Zhang, Rui

No container title available | May 18, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.05.13.26352926 Get It

Abstract Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), principally Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are common chronic disorders involving inflammation and often progressive tissue damage. Genome-wide association studies have mapped many risk signals, but the causal variants, effector genes and relevant cellular contexts remain difficult to resolve, limiting mechanistic interpretation and therapeutic translation. Here we performed a multi-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis of 125,992 individuals with IBD and more than 1.2 million controls, identifying 619 independent association signals (374 novel) at 420 IBD regions that account for 77–80% of SNP-based heritability. Fine-mapping resolved 81 high-confidence variants, 41 not previously reported. Although most signals were shared between CD and UC, 39% showed IBD subtype specificity, with UC signals showing stronger enrichment in functional annotations from intestinal epithelial, secretory and enteroendocrine cells, and CD showing stronger genetic correlations with circulating inflammatory biomarkers, including C-reactive protein and glycoprotein acetylation. Latent causal modelling supported a causal effect of decreased high-density lipoprotein on CD risk. By integrating bulk and single-cell eQTL and pQTL resources using colocalisation and Mendelian randomisation, together with coding-variant evidence from exome sequencing, we prioritised 664 candidate effector genes across 341 signals, including 390 newly implicated IBD genes, revealing new biological mechanisms and candidate therapeutic targets supported by human genetics.