Citations

Key Points Organ progression at second-line therapy predicated inferior survival. Patients relapsing from >VGPR had a longer time to develop organ progression.

AbstractOutside of clinical trials, experience with daratumumab‐based combination therapies (DCTs) using bortezomib (V)/lenalidomide (R)/pomalidomide (P), and dexamethasone (d) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is limited. We reviewed the outcomes of 126 patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of any DCT. Median age at DCT initiation was 67 (range, 43‐93) years. High‐risk cytogenetics was present in 33% patients. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1‐14) and time to first DCT from diagnosis was 4.3 years (range, 0.4‐13.0). Seventeen (13%) patients were refractory to single agent daratumumab. Fifty‐two (41%), 34 (27%), 23 (18%), and 17 (14%) received DPd, DRd, DVd and “other” DCTs, respectively. Overall response rate was 47%. Median follow‐up was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2‐6.1). Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2‐7.8). Median overall survival was not reached (NR) with any regimen. Median PFS (months) was worst for penta‐refractory MM (n = 8) vs quadruple refractory MM (n = 18) and others (n = 100) (2.2 [95% CI, 1‐2.4] vs 3.1 [95% CI, 2.1‐NR] vs 5.9 [95% CI, 5.0‐NR]; P < .001); those who were refractory to ≥1 agents used in the DCT vs others (4.9 [95% CI, 3.1‐6.0] vs 8.2 [95% CI, 4.6‐NR]; P = .02); and those who received >2 prior therapies vs others (5.0 months [95% CI, 3.7‐5.9] vs NR [95% CI, NR‐NR]; P = .002). Non‐hematologic toxicities included infections (38%), fatigue (32%), and infusion reactions (18%). Grade 3 or higher hematological toxicities were seen in 41% of patients. DCTs are effective in RRMM. ORR and PFS in heavily pretreated patients are lower than those reported in clinical trials.

SummaryThe management of Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) relies predominantly on small trials, one of which has demonstrated activity of dexamethasone, rituximab and cyclophosphamide (DRC) in the frontline setting. We report on the efficacy of DRC, focusing on relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients. Ibrutinib, a recently approved agent in WM demonstrated limited activity in patients with MYD88WT genotype. Herein, we additionally report on the activity of DRC based on the MYD88L265P mutation status. Of 100 WM patients evaluated between January 2007 and December 2014 who received DRC, 50 had R/R WM. The overall response rate (ORR) was 87%. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) and time‐to‐next‐therapy (TTNT) were 32 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15–51) and 50 (95% CI: 35–60) months, respectively. In the previously untreated cohort (n = 50), the ORR was 96%, and the median PFS and TTNT were 34 months (95% CI: 23–not reached [NR]) and NR (95% CI: 37–NR), respectively. Twenty‐five (86%) of 29 genotyped patients harbored MYD88L265P. The response rates and outcomes were independent of MYD88 mutation status. Grade ≥3 adverse effects included neutropenia (20%), thrombocytopenia (7%) and infections (3%). Similar to the frontline setting, DRC is an effective and well‐tolerated salvage regimen for WM. In contrast to ibrutinib, DRC offers a less expensive, fixed‐duration option, with preliminary data suggesting efficacy independent of the patients’ MYD88 status.

Abstract Lung cancer is the leading cancer-related cause of death in the United States. We had previously performed multipoint linkage analysis on families with a strong family history of lung cancer and found significant linkage to the 6q25 region. In order to find the source of that linkage signal, we performed targeted sequencing 6q23-6q27 on 75 individuals from the 9 most highly linked families. We performed two types of parametric linkage analysis, using an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance with 10% penetrance for carriers and a 1% phenocopy rate using a disease allele frequency of 1%. The first type was a two-point analysis using an Elston-Stewart algorithm. This approach did not lead to any genome-wide significant results but demonstrated significant heterogeneity throughout the nine families.In an effort to recover the power from the original multipoint analysis, we performed a regional linkage analysis using SEQLinkage and MERLIN. SEQLinkage built regional haplotypes that corresponded to a gene or an intergenic region - the regions were based on a customized map of our design. The regional markers were multiallelic which allowed for greater information content and were similar to the microsatellites that were used in the original multipoint analysis. The regional markers were then analyzed in a two-point linkage analysis via MERLIN. This allowed us to identify two genome-wide significant signals at PACRG-AS1 at 6q26 (HLOD = 3.4) and SAMD5 at 6q24 (3.3). The PACRG-AS1 is novel, though it is associated with the known lung cancer gene PARK2. SAMD5 may be involved in lung cancer cell proliferation. The heterogeneity of the two signals was particularly interesting. The PACRG-AS1 was driven primarily by two families. The SAMD5 marker was not being strongly driven by any of the families and appears to be a small cumulative effect across the nine families. In addition, several families have large, but non-significant LOD scores at other loci across the region. This further reinforces the locus heterogeneity within the region, and it is likely that our two significant signals here are not the only variants affecting the phenotype. We further attempted to localize the signals by running SEQLinkage using a custom map where genes are broken into exons and introns. Though this resulted in no significant markers, the highest signal was located in the intronic region of SAMD5 (HLOD = 3) and several other suggestive signals were localized to intronic regions of good candidate genes like SASH1 and ARID1B. Examination of predicted effects of the candidate regulatory variants using eQTL databases is ongoing. This is a region full of promising candidates, and it is likely that the two significant signals found here are just part of many that could be affecting lung cancer risk. We plan to do further analysis within the individual families to elucidate any more genes affecting this signal. Citation Format: Anthony M. Musolf, Claire L. Simpson, Bilal A. Moiz, Candace Middlebrooks, Mariza de Andrade, Diptasri Mandal, Colette Gaba, Ping Yang, Yafang Li, Ming You, Elena Y. Kupert, Marshall W. Anderson, Ann G. Schwartz, Susan M. Pinney, Christopher I. Amos, Joan E. Bailey-Wilson. A study in locus heterogeneity: Targeted sequencing analysis of 6q reveals multiple significant loci as the source of a previous linkage peak in familial lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4290. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4290

Abstract Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cancer killer of Americans; an estimated 158,000 people will die in the U.S. from LC in 2016. While it is well-known that LC risk is affected by the environment, particularly tobacco smoking, there is a substantial genetic risk to LC also. We examined genotype data from Illumina HumanCore-12v1-0 array (297,000 SNPs) on 175 individuals in 25 extended families with a strong history of LC recruited by the Genetic Epidemiology of Lung Cancer Consortium. The purpose of this study is to determine which families are segregating a high-penetrance genetic risk haplotype so that the most informative families can be selected for DNA sequencing studies. Quality control was performed to remove SNPs and individuals with greater than 1% missingness as well as monomorphic SNPs. SNPs with Mendelian errors in more than one family were dropped. Identity-by-descent values were calculated to confirm correct familial relationships; 1 individual was dropped. After quality control we were left with approximately 245,000 SNPs for analysis. We performed three types of parametric linkage analyses using an autosomal dominant model with 40% penetrance in carriers and 1% penetrance in non-carriers. A disease allele frequency of 0.01 was used. Standard single variant two-point analysis between the disease and each marker was performed using TwoPointLods. Multipoint linkage analysis was performed using SimWalk2. We also performed regional-based linkage analyses using SEQLinkage and MERLIN. SEQLinkage builds a multiallelic regional marker (similar to a microsatellite) that corresponds to a gene or a portion of a gene. Two-point linkage analyses were then performed on the regional markers using MERLIN. We identified five loci that were genome-wide significant (HLOD score ≥ 3.3) from the regional-based linkage analyses on 18p11.23 (HLOD = 4.1), 2p22.2 (3.9), 14q13.1 (3.7), 16p13.1 (3.4), and 20q13.11 (3.4). It is particularly exciting that the scores centered on prospective cancer genes. Our highest score was centered on PTPRM, a protein tyrosine phosphatase on chromosome 18 that has been implicated as a LC oncogene. The signal on 20q13 also centered on another protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTPRT) that has been shown to be mutated in LC cells. The source of the signal on 16p13 was RNA binding protein RBFOX1, which has been shown to be deleted in LC cell lines and the source of the signal on 2p22 was LRP1B, a LDL receptor-related protein that is often inactivated in LC cells. The source of the final signal on 14q13 was NPAS3, a transcription factor that is a tumor suppressor in brain tumors. It should be noted that all previous evidence linking these genes to cancer was based on somatic mutations; this is the first time any of these genes has been shown to be significantly linked to germline disease risk in a family-based study. We plan to perform targeted sequencing on the linked regions to elucidate the exact causal variant. Citation Format: Joan E. Bailey-Wilson, Anthony M. Musolf, Claire L. Simpson, Mariza de Andrade, Diptasri Mandal, Colette G. Gaba, Ping Yang, Ming You, Elena Y. Kupert, Marshall W. Anderson, Ann G. Schwartz, Susan M. Pinney, Christopher I. Amos. Familial lung cancer is significantly linked to cancer-associated genes on five chromosomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4268. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4268

The authors present a case of delayed peroneal neuropathy following a lateral gastrocnemius rotational flap reconstruction. The patient presented 1.5 years after surgery with a new partial foot drop, which progressed over 3 years. At operation, a fascial band on the deep side of the gastrocnemius flap was compressing the common peroneal nerve proximal to the fibular head, correlating with preoperative imaging. Release of this fascial band and selective muscle resection led to immediate improvement in symptoms postoperatively.

Background: Muscle bellies of the hamstring muscles are intimately associated with the sciatic nerve, putting the sciatic nerve at risk of injury associated with proximal hamstring avulsion. There are few data informing the magnitude of this risk, identifying risk factors for neurologic injury, or determining neurologic outcomes in patients with distal sciatic symptoms after surgery. Purpose: To characterize the frequency and nature of sciatic nerve injury and distal sciatic nerve–related symptoms after proximal hamstring avulsion and to characterize the influence of surgery on these symptoms. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients with proximal partial or complete hamstring avulsion. The outcome of interest was neurologic symptoms referable to the sciatic nerve distribution below the knee. Neurologic symptoms in operative patients were compared pre- and postoperatively. Results: The cohort consisted of 162 patients: 67 (41.4%) operative and 95 (58.6%) nonoperative. Sciatic nerve–related symptoms were present in 22 operative and 23 nonoperative patients, for a total of 45 (27.8%) patients (8 [4.9%] motor deficits, 11 [6.8%] sensory deficits, and 36 [22.2%] with neuropathic pain). Among the operative cohort, 3 of 3 (100.0%) patients showed improvement in their motor deficit postoperatively, 3 of 4 (75.0%) patients’ sensory symptoms improved, and 17 of 19 (89.5%) patients had improvement in pain. A new or worsening deficit occurred in 5 (7.5%) patients postoperatively (2 [3.1%] motor deficits, 1 [1.5%] sensory deficit, and 3 [4.5%] with new pain). Predictors of operative intervention included lower age (odds ratio [OR], 0.952; 95% CI, 0.921-0.982; P = .001) and complete avulsion (OR, 10.292; 95% CI, 2.526-72.232; P < .001). Presence of neurologic deficit was not predictive. Conclusion: Sciatic nerve–related symptoms after proximal hamstring avulsion are underrecognized. Currently, neurologic symptoms are not considered when determining whether to pursue operative intervention. Given the high likelihood of improvement with surgical treatment, neurologic symptoms should be considered when making a decision regarding operative treatment.