Citations

Abstract Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a molecularly heterogeneous group of malignancies with frequent genetic abnormalities. G-quadruplex (G4) DNA structures may facilitate this genomic instability through association with activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), an antibody diversification enzyme implicated in mutation of oncogenes in B-cell lymphomas. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analyses in this study revealed that AID hotspots in both activated B cells and lymphoma cells in vitro were highly enriched for G4 elements. A representative set of these targeted sequences was validated for characteristic, stable G4 structure formation including previously unknown G4s in lymphoma-associated genes, CBFA2T3, SPIB, BCL6, HLA-DRB5 and MEF2C, along with the established BCL2 and MYC structures. Frequent genome-wide G4 formation was also detected for the first time in DLBCL patient-derived tissues using BG4, a structure-specific G4 antibody. Tumors with greater staining were more likely to have concurrent BCL2 and MYC oncogene amplification and BCL2 mutations. Ninety-seven percent of the BCL2 mutations occurred within G4 sites that overlapped with AID binding. G4 localization at sites of mutation, and within aggressive DLBCL tumors harboring amplified BCL2 and MYC, supports a role for G4 structures in events that lead to a loss of genomic integrity, a critical step in B-cell lymphomagenesis.

48 Background: Improving new patient access to medical oncology clinics is a priority. Unlike external referrals which undergo a review process, internal referrals (from any Mayo department or community-based, affiliated health system) are scheduled directly. At times, these internal referrals lack necessary clinical information, or may be more appropriate for electronic consultation (e-consult). This impacts the patient experience, provider satisfaction, and access to new patient visits. A pilot program was implemented in the Medical Oncology breast clinic to review new internal referrals prior to scheduling. Methods: In 2018, all internally referred patients to Medical Oncology breast clinic were reviewed by an advanced practice provider in breast oncology. Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect diagnosis, pathology, radiology information and treatment to date. Internal referrals were either accepted directly to medical oncology breast clinic, triaged to an internal medicine clinic for workup of a new breast mass, converted to an e-consult, or declined as no medical oncology need was identified. Results: 52 patients were referred internally to Medical Oncology breast clinic. Of these, 29 (55.8%) were accepted directly as new consultations, 8 (15.4%) were triaged to the Internal Medicine clinic, 6 (11.5%) were converted to e-consults, and 6 (11.5%) were declined as not requiring breast medical oncology input. Of the 8 patients that started in the IM clinic, 6 eventually required Medical Oncology breast clinic consults for invasive breast cancers. The most common e-consult was for extending adjuvant endocrine therapy (3/6). 1/6 e-consults required a follow up consultation. The most common reason for declining a consult was no diagnosis of an invasive breast cancer (4/6). A total of 16/52 referrals (30.2%) did not require a breast oncology new consultation. Conclusions: Review of internal referrals improved the efficiency of new breast cancer medical oncology consultations. This review process has been implemented across the entire Medical Oncology practice.

On 24 August 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated its website to highlight that asymptomatic individuals, even those with exposure to a COVID-19-positive contact, do not necessarily need to be tested unless they have medical conditions associated with increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19. The CDC subsequently updated its guidance on 19 September 2020 to support testing of asymptomatic persons, including close contacts of persons with documented SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Interest continues to grow regarding the role of serologic assays for the detection of prior infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted emergency use authorization (EUA) status to many SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays. In this document, expert recommendations from clinical microbiologist members of the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) concerning detailed verification strategies for SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays with FDA EUA are provided, as are insights into assay limitations and reporting considerations for laboratories.

A fetus harboring a duplication of SMAD2 exons 1-6 presented with dextrocardia and pulmonary hypoplasia. Mate-pair sequencing revealed the duplication to be in inverted tandem orientation to the wild-type SMAD2 allele, disrupting its sequence and decreasing expression. These observations suggest SMAD2 to be responsible for the fetal dextrocardia.

Abstract BACKGROUND Occipital-cervical fusion (OCF) and ventral decompression (VD) may be used in the treatment of pediatric Chiari-1 malformation (CM-1) with syringomyelia (SM) as adjuncts to posterior fossa decompression (PFD) for complex craniovertebral junction pathology. OBJECTIVE To examine factors influencing the use of OCF and OCF/VD in a multicenter cohort of pediatric CM-1 and SM subjects treated with PFD. METHODS The Park-Reeves Syringomyelia Research Consortium registry was used to examine 637 subjects with cerebellar tonsillar ectopia ≥ 5 mm, syrinx diameter ≥ 3 mm, and at least 1 yr of follow-up after their index PFD. Comparisons were made between subjects who received PFD alone and those with PFD + OCF or PFD + OCF/VD. RESULTS All 637 patients underwent PFD, 505 (79.2%) with and 132 (20.8%) without duraplasty. A total of 12 subjects went on to have OCF at some point in their management (PFD + OCF), whereas 4 had OCF and VD (PFD + OCF/VD). Of those with complete data, a history of platybasia (3/10, P = .011), Klippel-Feil (2/10, P = .015), and basilar invagination (3/12, P < .001) were increased within the OCF group, whereas only basilar invagination (1/4, P < .001) was increased in the OCF/VD group. Clivo-axial angle (CXA) was significantly lower for both OCF (128.8 ± 15.3°, P = .008) and OCF/VD (115.0 ± 11.6°, P = .025) groups when compared to PFD-only group (145.3 ± 12.7°). pB-C2 did not differ among groups. CONCLUSION Although PFD alone is adequate for treating the vast majority of CM-1/SM patients, OCF or OCF/VD may be occasionally utilized. Cranial base and spine pathologies and CXA may provide insight into the need for OCF and/or OCF/VD.