Citations

Poly-adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) are approved for BRCA1/2 carriers with HER2-negative breast cancer in the adjuvant setting with a high risk of recurrence as well as the metastatic setting. However, the indications for PARPi are broader for patients with other cancer types (e.g., prostate and ovarian cancer), involving additional biomarkers (e.g., ATM, PALB2, and CHEK) and genomic instability scores. Herein, we summarize the data on PARPi and breast cancer and discuss their use beyond BRCA carriers.

AbstractBackgroundPatients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute vertigo or dizziness represent a diagnostic challenge. Neuroimaging has variable indications and yield. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of neuroimaging for patients presenting with acute vertigo or dizziness.MethodsAn electronic search was designed following patient–intervention–control–outcome (PICO) question—(P) adult patients with acute vertigo or dizziness presenting to the ED; (I) neuroimaging including computed tomography (CT), CT angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and ultrasound (US); (C) MRI/clinical criterion standard; and (O) central causes (stroke, hemorrhage, tumor, others) versus peripheral causes of symptoms. Articles were assessed in duplicate. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to assess certainty of evidence in pooled estimates.ResultsWe included studies that reported diagnostic test accuracy. From 6309 titles, 460 articles were retrieved, and 12 were included: noncontrast CT scan—six studies, 771 patients, pooled sensitivity 28.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.4%–48.5%, moderate certainty) and specificity 98.9% (95% CI 93.4%–99.8%, moderate certainty); MRI—five studies, 943 patients, sensitivity 79.8% (95% CI 71.4%–86.2%, high certainty) and specificity 98.8% (95% CI 96.2%–100%, high certainty); CTA—one study, 153 patients, sensitivity 14.3% (95% CI 1.8%–42.8%) and specificity 97.7% (95% CI 93.8%–99.6%), CT had higher sensitivity than CTA (21.4% and 14.3%) for central etiology; MRA—one study, 24 patients, sensitivity 60.0% (95% CI 26.2%–87.8%) and specificity 92.9% (95% CI 66.1%–99.8%); US—three studies, 258 patients, sensitivity ranged from 30% to 53.6%, specificity from 94.9% to 100%.ConclusionsNoncontrast CT has very low sensitivity and MRI will miss approximately one in five patients with stroke if imaging is obtained early after symptom onset. The evidence does not support neuroimaging as the only tool for ruling out stroke and other central causes in patients with acute dizziness or vertigo presenting to the ED.

Abstract B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) is the most common leukemia in adults with CD19-targeting CAR T-cell therapy showing an excellent initial curative response. However, 10-20% of patients who receive anti-C19 CAR T-cell treatment experience relapse due to CD19 antigen loss. B-cell activating factor receptor (BAFF-R) that is expressed on the surface of normal and neoplastic B cells mediates the survival of mature peripheral B cells along with the B-cell receptor. Since B-CLL is characterized by apoptotic disruption and subsequent accumulation of mature B cells, BAFF-R is a logical, novel target for CAR T-cell therapy directed against B-CLL, especially if CD19 antigen loss occurs. In this study, we first manufactured BAFF-R CAR T-cells by infecting healthy donor Tnaïve/memory (Tn/mem) cells with BAFF-R CAR lentivirus before evaluating the antitumor activity of BAFF-R CAR T-cells on wild type MEC-1 (a B-CLL cell line), modified MEC-1, and primary cell lines. Antigen-specific cytotoxicity and activation of the BAFF-R CAR T-cells or control CD19 CAR T-cells were determined upon incubation with B-CLL cell lines and patient-derived primary B-CLL by measuring degranulation and IFN-γ release, respectively. BAFF-R CAR T-cells demonstrated substantial cytotoxicity against MEC-1, CD19-deficient MEC-1, and primary B-CLL cell lines; CD19 CAR T-cells showed no effect on CD19-deficient MEC-1 cells but did show effects with primary B-CLL and MEC-1 cells. Similarly, the release of IFN-γ was greater when BAFF-R CAR T-cells were co-cultured with CD19-deficient MEC-1 or primary B-CLL compared to CD19 CAR T-cells co-cultured with CD19-deficient MEC-1. In summary, BAFF-R CAR T-cells exert significant antitumor properties not only on patient-derived primary B-CLL cells but also on a CD19-deficient B-CLL cell line. We, therefore, assert BAFF-R-targeting CAR T-cells to be a novel therapeutic avenue for patients newly diagnosed with B-CLL and patients experiencing relapsed B-CLL after anti-CD19 therapy. Citation Format: Yan Luo, Kaihin Lui, Tommy T. To, Andrew liu, Farah Yassine, Mohamed A. Kharfan Dabaja, Martha E. Gadd, Hong Qin. Antitumor activity of BAFF-R targeting CAR T-cells on chronic lymphocytic leukemia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2855.

e19049 Background: Prognosis of COVID-19 is poor in the setting of immunosuppression. Casirivimab/imdevimab (REGEN-COV), bamlanivimab, and sotrovimab are investigational monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) authorized for treatment of mild/moderate COVID-19 for patients (pts) 12 years or older and who are at high-risk for progression to severe COVID-19. These neutralizing antibodies, against SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins, have been shown to decrease risk of progression to severe disease. Recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants (allo-SCT) or chimeric antigen T cell therapy (CAR T cell) represent a high risk population. However, treatment outcomes with these MoAbs in these pts are not well described. Methods: This retrospective study included 33 consecutive adult pts who developed mild/moderate COVID-19 and received anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 MoAbs between December 2020 and November 2021. Allo-SCT (N=27) or CAR T cell (N=6) recipients were included, and outcomes were analyzed separately. Pts received REGEN-COV (N=19), bamlanivimab (N=11), or sotrovimab (N=1), missing (N=2). Results: In the allo-SCT cohort (N=27), median age at time of COVID-19 was 55 (23-76) years. Median time from allo-SCT to COVID-19 was 31 (22-64) months. Two pts received CAR T-cell therapy prior to allo-SCT. Diagnoses included leukemia or myeloid diseases (82%), lymphoma (11%), or myeloma (7%). Transplant characteristics are summarized (Table). Thirteen pts were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 prior to breakthrough COVID-19. Events considered included hospitalization due to COVID-19, disease progression, or death from any cause. The 6-month event-free and overall survivals were 81% and 91%, respectively. In the CAR T cell recipients cohort (N=6), 4 pts received axicabtagene ciloleucel for diffuse large B-cell or follicular lymphoma and 2 received brexucabtagene autoleucel for mantle cell lymphoma. The median follow-up was 8 (1-11) months. Two pts received autologous SCT prior to COVID-19. Median time from CAR T cell therapy to COVID-19 was 10 (3-24) months. Three pts were vaccinated prior to COVID-19. Only 1 pt was hospitalized due to severe COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation leading to death. Conclusions: These results show a potential benefit of MoAbs in high-risk pts, namely allo-SCT or CAR T cell recipients. Future studies should evaluate the role of prophylactic use MoAbs in these populations. A comparative analysis with a matched control cohort (who did not receive MoAbs) will be provided at the meeting. [Table: see text]

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Approximately 40% of patients with DLBCL will experience disease relapse or will be refractory to first line chemoimmunotherapy, necessitating second-line salvage therapy. This has historically consisted of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with curative intent for transplant-eligible patients or palliative chemotherapy for transplant-ineligible patients. In recent years there have been several new therapeutic agents approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL, thereby expanding the therapeutic landscape. These agents include polatuzumab vedotin, tafasitamab, loncastuximab tesirine, selinexor, and anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies such as axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel. This review summarizes the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, dosing, and administration of new agents recently approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

Purpose To construct an algorithm to optimize clinical outcomes in subacromial impingement based on current, high‐level evidence. Methods A systematic review of all clinical trials on subacromial impingement published from 1999 to 2020 was performed. Demographic, clinical, range of motion (ROM), and patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM) data were collected. Interventions were compared via arm‐based Bayesian network meta‐analysis in a random‐effects model and treatments ranked via surface under the cumulative ranking curves with respect to 3 domains: pain, PROMs, and ROM. Results A total of 35 studies comprising 3,643 shoulders (42% female, age 50 ± 5 years) were included. Arthroscopic decompression with acromioplasty ranked much greater than arthroscopic decompression alone for pain relief and PROM improvement, but the difference in absolute PROMs was not statistically significant. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) alone demonstrated inferior outcomes across all 3 domains (pain, PROMs, and ROM) with low cumulative rankings. Physical therapy (PT) with CSI demonstrated moderate‐to‐excellent clinical improvement across all 3 domains whereas PT alone demonstrated excellent ROM and low‐moderate outcomes in pain and PROM domains. PT with nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs or alternative therapies ranked highly for PROM outcomes and moderate for pain and ROM domains. Finally, platelet‐rich plasma injections demonstrated moderate outcomes for pain, forward flexion, and abduction with very low‐ranking outcomes for PROMs and external rotation. Conclusions Arthroscopic decompression with acromioplasty and PT demonstrated superior outcomes whereas CSI demonstrated poor outcomes in all 3 domains (pain, PROMs, and ROM). For patients with significant symptoms, the authors recommend PT with CSI as a first‐line treatment, followed by acromioplasty and PT if conservative treatment fails. For patients with symptoms limited to 1 to 2 domains, the authors recommend a shared decision‐making approach focusing on treatment rankings within domains pertinent to individual patient symptomatology. Level of Evidence I, systematic review and network meta‐analysis of Level I studies.

Objective: To review the new indication of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK4/6) inhibitor abemaciclib for the adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2−), axillary lymph node (LN) positive early breast cancer (EBC) at high risk of recurrence and a Ki-67 ≥20%. Data Sources: A literature search was performed through PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website (February 1, 2018, to December 23, 2021) to identify relevant information. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Human and animal studies related to pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of abemaciclib were identified. Data Synthesis: Addition of abemaciclib to standard of care endocrine therapy (ET) for patients with high-risk clinicopathologic features and Ki-67 ≥20% demonstrated 30% reduction in the risk of developing invasive disease and distant recurrence. At 15.5 months, abemaciclib + ET demonstrated a significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) vs ET alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.93, P = 0.01). At 27 months, IDFS benefit was maintained (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.82, P < 0.0001). Diarrhea occurred in more than 80% of patients in the abemaciclib arm. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review describes the clinical applicability of adjuvant abemaciclib for patients with HR+, HER2− EBC at high risk for recurrence. Conclusion: Adjuvant abemaciclib significantly reduces the risk for early development of invasive disease and distant recurrence in patients with HR+, HER2− node positive EBC. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the impact of adjuvant abemaciclib on late disease recurrence and survival outcomes.

AbstractBackgroundBlack/African Americans (B/AA) are nearly twice as likely as White/European Americans (W/EA) to have Alzheimer’s or other dementias and are more likely to provide care for persons with dementia (PwD). Evidence indicates that B/AA desire having someone to talk with who understands their caregiving challenges, yet are less likely than W/EA to ask for support. Further, community resources supporting caregivers’ ability to maintain health and well‐being developed with input from B/AA are lacking. We aimed to determine how a technology‐assisted caregiver matching service designed with user input could address diverse caregiver needs.MethodsFor this Phase I project, 32 caregivers of PwD (31% B/AA) participated in semi‐structured focus groups and completed surveys to provide input regarding characteristics deemed valuable in someone they would choose to be connected with for emotional support. Through an iterative process as new information emerged, a web‐based prototype and matching algorithm were developed.ResultsAge and sex distribution were similar between B/AA and W/EA (71 and 68 yrs; 90% and 86%, respectively). W/EA were most likely caring for a spouse/significant other (73%) whereas B/AA were caring for spouse/significant other (30%), a parent (30%;18% W/EA), a sibling (10%; 0% W/EA), or other (30%; 9%W/EA). Level of emotional support was rated “poor” (50% B/AA, 18% W/EA); “average” (0% B/AA, 14% W/EA); “good” (40% B/AA, 41% W/EA); and “excellent” (10%, 27% W/EA). Characteristics B/AA deemed “very important” or “absolutely essential” for a supportive match included living in close proximity, same ethnicity, similar lifestyle, and common values. Alternatively, W/EA selected similar age, living in close proximity, same sex, similar lifestyle, common values and interests, having the same caregiving relationship, and having the same diagnosis in their PwD (see chart).ConclusionIn this cohort, B/AA reported poorer levels of emotional support than W/EA. B/AA were equally likely to be supporting a spouse/significant other as a parent or other acquaintance, whereas W/EA provided support primarily for a spouse/significant other. Characteristics B/AA and W/EA consider important in a supportive caregiver match show important differences that should be considered when optimizing caregiving resources. Phase II will explore further in a much larger sample.