Citations

e14535 Background: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is the most common complication of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) for hematologic malignancies. We hypothesized that patients undergoing CAR-T therapy who are on metformin will experience a lower incidence or severity of CRS than patients not on this medication. Methods: We evaluated all patients treated with CAR-T at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1/1/2018 and 1/31/2023, and abstracted relevant clinical and laboratory characteristics to determine the incidence and severity of CRS, PFS as well as OS in patients who were, or were not, on metformin before and during CAR-T therapy for Type 2 diabetes mellitus. We used the Chi-Square test, Mann-Whitney test and the Kaplan-Meier method to analyze data. Results: In the 5-year interval under consideration 237 patients received CAR-T, 168 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and 69 for multiple myeloma (MM). 23 patients (15 NHL and 8 MM) were on metformin at the time of CAR-T. 15 patient developed CRS while on metformin and 175 patients not on metformin (p=0.05). Grade 3 or 4 CRS incidence was 4% in both groups (p=0.41). Of the 153 patients with NHL not on metformin, 121 developed any grade of CRS, while 10 of 15 patients on metformin developed CRS (p=0.268). 4 NHL patients developed CRS Grade ≥3 or higher, while 0 of 15 on metformin developed Grade ≥3 CRS (p=0.237). For the MM patients, the incidence of CRS was 49 patients not on metformin and 5 patients on metformin (p<0.001). 3 MM patients developed CRS Grade ≥3 or higher, while 0 of 8 on metformin developed Grade ≥3 CRS (p=0.346). 12 of 15 patients on metformin with NHL achieved CR compared to 92 of 153 patients not on metformin (p=0.1305). 3 of 8 patients with MM on metformin compared to 24 of 61 patients with MM not on metformin achieved CR or better post CAR-T (p=0.92). Tocilizumab was used in 40% of patients on metformin but in 66% of patients not on metformin (p=0.0016). In NHL patients, PFS from CAR-T infusion was not reached (range: 6.3 to NR) for patients on metformin versus 9.9 months (range: 6.3–19.5) in patients not on metformin (p = 0.3332). In the MM patients, progression-free survival (PFS) from CAR-T infusion was 8.4 months (95% CI: 7.9–not reached [NR]) for patients on metformin and 22.6 months (13.7–NR) for those not on metformin (p = 0.07). Median OS for NHL patients on metformin was not reached (9.766–NR) versus 32.6 months (18.6–NR) for patients not on metformin (p = 0.7022). Median OS was 17 months (95% CI: 8.3 to NR) for patients with MM on metformin vs NR (95% CI: 9.4 to NR) for patients not on metformin (p = 0.2559). Conclusions: In this retrospective study, the co-administration of metformin during CAR-T cell therapy for NHL and MM appears to be associated with a numerically reduced incidence of CRS. The effect appears to be particularly marked in patients with multiple myeloma. Metformin therapy did not seem to affect the response to CAR-T therapy in either NHL or MM.

Abstract Background: Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is a state where patients have more than 10% clonal plasma cells or a serum monoclonal protein &gt; 3g/dl but no evidence of end organ damage. Patients with SMM are at risk of developing active multiple myeloma (defined by the CRAB criteria). The best stratification system with respect to the risk of progression to active myeloma is the 20/2/20 (20% plasma cells, M protein &gt;2.0 g/dl, and involved to uninvolved immunoglobulin free light chain ratio &gt;20). The presence of ≥2 criteria predicts a 50 - 60% risk of progression within 2 years. Thus, many patients considered ‘high-risk’ may not progress in this time frame, and patients with ≤1 risk factor can progress to active myeloma. Therefore, improved risk stratification methods are needed to correctly identify patients at high risk of progression. We hypothesized that Fourier Transform InfraRed (FTIR) spectroscopic analysis of serum combined with artificial intelligence (AI) can correctly risk stratify patients with SMM. Methods: We identified 192 SMM patients: 96 who progressed and 96 who did not progress within 2 years of diagnosis. We used stored sera from the time of diagnosis to perform FTIR to determine differences in the spectra of patients who did/did not progress and train an AI algorithm. A randomized 10-fold cross-validation analysis was performed using 172 samples (86 from each group) for training and the remaining 20 for testing to assess the model across 10 independent iterations. Subsequently, we blindly tested the trained model against an independent set of serum samples (N=24) from patients who progressed ≤3 years of diagnosis. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the FTIR AI algorithm output compared to the clinical outcome data. Results: From the 96 patients who progressed, 48 had complete data for the 20/2/20 risk stratification. 11 patients (23%) had ≤1 of the criteria and so would have been considered at low likelihood to progress. Of the 96 who did not progress within 2 years, 49 had complete data for risk stratification. Of these, 27 (55.1%) met the high-risk criteria of the 20/2/20 classification and would have been predicted to progress within 2 years. FTIR/AI model correctly identified the patients at risk of progression (95% accuracy) with AUC of 0.96. Similarly, it was able to classify patients who did not progress within 2 years of diagnosis (94% accuracy) with an AUC of 0.96. FTIR/AI correctly predicted the patients at risk of progression within 2 years (90%) and 3 years (87.5%) in the blinded validation group with an AUC of 0.89 and 0.82, respectively. Conclusion: Analysis of serum in patients with newly diagnosed SMM with FTIR is able to correctly identify those at risk of progression within 2 or 3 years of diagnosis with an accuracy of ~90% in a blinded external validation study. FTIR may, therefore, be used to assess SMM patient risk before committing to potentially toxic therapy. Citation Format: David Dingli, Darlyna Khonkhammy, Caden Gunnarson, Grant Schlauderaff, Dan Q. Pham, Ali Khammanivong. Risk stratification of smoldering multiple myeloma using fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of serum [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6170.

Background:Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare, indolent B‐cell lymphoplasmacytic malignancy. Patient outcomes are highly heterogeneous, with a proportion of patients surviving less than 5 years (short survivors) and another proportion that survive longer than 10 years. The laboratory parameters in the currently used International Prognostic Scoring System for WM (IPSSWM) include hemoglobin, serum IgM, platelet count, and serum β2‐microglobulin.Aims:We aim to identify unique patient characteristics and prognostic features associated with short survival in WM.Methods:The medical records of patients with active WM that were diagnosed at Mayo Clinic Rochester, Arizona, and Florida between January 1st, 1996 and December 31st, 2013 were reviewed. The patients with smoldering WM were excluded. Cohorts of patients who either survived ≤ 5 years (Short Survival Group) or those with an overall survival (OS) ≥ 10 years (Long Survival Group) from the diagnosis of active disease were compared. Survivors with a follow‐up of ≤ 5 years were not included in the analyses. Two‐sided Wilcoxon rank sum test and Chi square/Fisher's exact test were used to compare the continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The variables that were statistically significant on univariate analysis (P < 0.05) were included in a multivariate logisitic regression analysis.Results:Of 893 consecutively seen WM patients (median follow‐up of 9 years [95% CI 8.4–9.7]), we identified 387 patients who could be categorized into either the Short Survival Group (n = 171 patients, 44%) or the Long Survival Group (n = 216, 56%). The Short Survival Group had a median OS of 2.4 years (2.1–2.8) and median age at diagnosis of 73 years (42–93), while the Long Survival Group (n = 216, 56%) had a median OS of 18.9 years (16‐NR) and median age at diagnosis of 62 years (31–85). The baseline characteristics and significant findings between the two groups are listed in the Table. Parameters significant on univariate analysis included age >65 years, albumin < 3.5 g/dL, β2‐microglobulin >3 μg/ml, and LDH > upper limit of normal (ULN). On multivariate analysis, albumin <3.5 g/dL and LDH > ULN were independently associated with short survival. Among the Long Survivors, 60 (28%) patients survived 15 years or more.Summary/Conclusion:Lactate dehydrogenase above the ULN and serum albumin <3.5 g/dL are independent biomarkers of short survival in WM. The MYD88 L265P status and the size of serum IgM are not prognostic in WM. Our data suggest the need for simplification of the current staging system with the use of widely available markers: serum albumin and lactate dehydrogenase.image

Introduction: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, acquired hematologic condition characterized by complement-mediated, life-threatening hemolysis and thrombosis which are associated with significant impacts on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Pegcetacoplan is the first targeted complement component 3 (C3) therapy approved for adults with PNH (US) and adults with PNH plus anemia despite receiving a complement component 5 inhibitor (C5i) for ≥3 months (EU). In clinical trials including patients with PNH who were C5i-experienced or -naive, pegcetacoplan significantly improved levels of hemoglobin (Hb) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and reduced transfusion burden. Pegcetacoplan had a favorable safety profile in parent studies and an ongoing long-term, rollover, open-label extension study (NCT03531255). Compliance with pegcetacoplan treatment was high across all clinical studies. In the US real-world OPERA and Adelphi PNH Disease Specific Programme™ (DSP) patient-reported outcomes (PRO) studies, improvements in levels of Hb and LDH, along with self-reported fatigue and cognitive outcomes, were observed. Pegcetacoplan treatment also led to reductions in the frequency and severity of PNH symptoms (including shortness of breath and fatigue) and improvements in social, physical, and emotional HRQoL domains in the US real-world Voice of the Patient PRO study. Further, both patient and physician satisfaction with pegcetacoplan treatment was high in the Adelphi PNH DSP study. However, to date, compliance and safety with pegcetacoplan treatment in the real-world setting have not been described. The objective of this real-world evidence review study was to evaluate compliance and safety with pegcetacoplan treatment in patients with PNH in the US post-marketing setting. Methods: Post-marketing data from the US, including the number of patients who received pegcetacoplan and reported safety events, were collected and analyzed from the pegcetacoplan Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) program which controls the distribution of pegcetacoplan and the pharmacovigilance safety database through May 13, 2023. Treatment compliance was calculated as the proportion of days a patient had the drug in possession, divided by the total number of days of follow-up, using central pharmacy prescription refill data. Thrombosis (a leading cause of death in patients with PNH prior to the availability of complement inhibitors) and meningococcal infections (a potential risk with complement inhibitors) were safety events of interest. To reduce the risk of serious meningococcal infections, clinical trial protocols and pegcetacoplan labeling required vaccination against Streptococcus pneumoniae; N meningitidis types A, C, W, Y, and B; and Haemophilus influenzae type B before starting treatment with pegcetacoplan. If pegcetacoplan treatment must be initiated before vaccination, the US label mandates prophylactic antibiotic use. In this study, the rates of thrombosis and meningococcal infection per 100 patient-years were estimated based on the total number of thrombosis and meningococcal infection events reported in the REMS program. Results: As of May 13, 2023, the cumulative pegcetacoplan exposure was 273.10 patient-years in the US post-marketing setting. Based on prescription refill data, compliance with pegcetacoplan treatment was ~98%. There were 2 confirmed thrombotic events reported and the incidence of thrombotic events was 0.73 events/100 patient-years in 273.10 patient-years. Similar to clinical trials, no meningococcal infections were reported in the US post-marketing setting. Conclusions: The high compliance rate and favorable safety profile of pegcetacoplan in the US post-marketing setting were consistent with clinical trial observations. These data, coupled with the effectiveness on hematologic parameters and improvements in symptoms and HRQoL reported in pegcetacoplan real-world PRO studies, support a positive benefit:risk profile for pegcetacoplan in the real-world setting.

Background: The use of CAR-T cell therapy has transformed treatment paradigms in B-cell malignancies. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) was approved for use in RRMM after four or more prior lines of therapy in 2022. While the pivotal studies exclusively treated patients in an inpatient setting, robust infrastructure planning at some centers across US has fostered outpatient administration of the commercially available product. Outpatient administration of CAR-T is more desirable due to superior financial sustainability, lower healthcare resource utilization, and greater patient autonomy during the treatment. Hence, we conducted a qualitative study to evaluate clinical and administrative perspectives and trends in outpatient administration of commercialized cilta-cel with an aim to understand best practices from certified CAR-T centers in the USA. Methods: A targeted literature review was conducted to better understand current practices around outpatient administration of CAR-T, and inform the development of primary research materials for designing subsequent interviews. Next, two 60-minute exploratory interviews were conducted with multi-stakeholder participants (n=5) from two certified cilta-cel centers, each with significant volume of outpatient administration of cilta-cel. Following the qualitative analysis of interviews, two 90-minute panels were conducted with multi-stakeholder participants (n=14) from six certified cilta-cel centers, including centers from exploratory interviews, focusing on clinical and administrative topics across the patient journey. Results: Each center in the study treated approximately 15-30 patients with cilta-cel in the outpatient setting. Using Likert scales, participants from all centers ranked space/capacity as the most important factor in decision-making process for outpatient cilta-cel administration, and ranked reimbursement incentives as a highly (67% of participants) or a moderately (33%) important factor. All participants agreed that having a dedicated outpatient infrastructure (dedicated space such as bed availability and internal processes including standard operating procedures (SOPs)), 24/7 support, outpatient bone marrow transplant (BMT) or cell therapy experience, and robust multidisciplinary teams were key to setting-up successful outpatient centers for cilta-cel therapy. The participants agreed that cilta-cel can be administered safely in an outpatient setting due to generally predictable, delayed onset of potential AEs, except in patients with significant comorbidities or organ dysfunction. Participants also considered caregiver support and lodging availability as factors of importance for outpatient administration. Institutionally established AE monitoring protocols are critical for safe use of cilta-cel in an outpatient setting. Over 50% of the centers interviewed have recently started to administer tocilizumab to treat mild grade 1 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in an outpatient setting. Based on the findings across the phases of research, the patient journey for outpatient administration of cilta-cel was updated (Figure 1). While patients may be admitted for toxicity events, 100% of centers interviewed had 24-hour coverage and bed availability for these patients if needed. Conclusions: Overall, this study further supports the notion that centers can safely administer cilta-cel in an outpatient setting, if appropriate infrastructure is in place. Additional best practices for new outpatient sites include adequate infrastructure, SOPs, a well-trained and multidisciplinary team, and education of patients and caregivers (Table 1). Outpatient management and earlier intervention for low-grade AEs is currently evolving, with more real-world research required. Continued expert sharing of best practices can aid centers in implementing outpatient administration of CAR-T therapies. Funding: This analysis was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC and Legend Biotech USA, Inc

Background: Despite the development and approval of effective therapies for multiple myeloma (MM), MM remains an incurable disease. Moreover, patients with high-risk cytogenetics, like translocation t(4;14), continue to have a poor prognosis compared to standard-risk patients. No novel agents have been approved specifically for this population. There remains an unmet need for precision therapies for MM that can target specific drivers of high-risk MM like t(4;14). Multiple myeloma SET domain-containing protein (MMSET) overexpression observed in 100% of patients with t(4;14) acts through the MMSET-H3K36me2 axis, which promotes malignant transformation through regulation of multiple oncogenic programs. KTX-1001, a methyl transferase inhibitor, is a novel, first-in-class, potent, oral, small molecule that inhibits MMSET and the methylation of lysine K36. KTX-1001 had favorable drug-like properties, demonstrated in vivo activity, and was well tolerated in non-clinical studies. Based on these data, KTX-1001 is now being studied in a Phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Study Design and Methods: This multi-country, Phase 1, open-label study (NCT05651932) is designed to assess the safety, tolerability, and initial clinical activity of KTX-1001. The study will also examine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Part A of this trial includes an accelerated titration, followed by 3+3 dose escalation with backfill of cohorts for dose optimization prior to moving to Part B, which is an expansion phase at the RP2D (please see Figure 1 for study design schematic). The expansion phase will only include patients with t(4;14). KTX-1001 will be administered orally daily and given until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from the study. Estimated enrollment for Parts A and B will be approximately 60 patients. The study will enroll patients with RRMM who have received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor (PI), immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and anti-CD38 antibody. Patients must have measurable disease, be ≥18 years of age, have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of ≤2, and adequate bone marrow, liver, and kidney function. Key exclusion criteria include history of or current plasma cell leukemia, active central nervous system (CNS) disease, or active unstable cardiovascular function. The primary endpoints of safety and tolerability include incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLTs), treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), and treatment-related AEs. Secondary endpoints include plasma concentrations of KTX-1001 and efficacy outcomes such as objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Exploratory biomarker and pharmacodynamic assessments will also be performed. The sample size was not determined by formal statistical methods but will be sufficient to provide preliminary information on safety, PK, PD, and efficacy. Statistical analyses will be primarily descriptive. Conclusion: This Phase 1 study will evaluate a potential treatment for RRMM utilizing KTX-1001, which is a novel, first-in-class, potent, oral small-molecule MMSET inhibitor. The study is open and actively enrolling patients at centers in the United States, Spain, France, and Canada.

Introduction While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has transformed the management of hematologic malignancies, it requires frequent monitoring for acute toxicities, almost universally achieved through mandatory hospitalizations, therefore utilizing a significant amount of healthcare resources. At Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, our standard practice is administering CAR-T cell therapy in the outpatient setting through a multi-disciplinary hospital-based outpatient (HBO) unit and remote patient monitoring (RPM) program. Our CAR-T RPM program consists of in-home, electronic health record-integrated technology to monitor vital signs and neurologic symptoms for 30 days post CAR-T infusion. Here we report the healthcare utilization outcomes of CAR-T patients managed in the outpatient setting enrolled in the RPM program. Methods Patients undergoing FDA-approved CAR-T cell treatment in the outpatient setting and participating in the CAR-T RPM program at Mayo Clinic Rochester were included in this IRB-approved study. Patient characteristics, healthcare utilization metrics, inpatient interventions, and patient satisfaction data regarding the RPM program were reviewed. Length of stay (LOS) includes any hospitalizations for which the admission date falls within the RPM monitoring period (CAR-T cell infusion to day +30), even if the hospitalization continued past day +30. Results A total of 123 patients participated in the CAR-T RPM program and underwent treatment in the outpatient setting. Median age at CAR-T infusion was 63 years (range 22 - 83), and most patients were male (n=78, 63%). Non-Hodgkin lymphoma was the most common diagnosis (n=74, 60%), followed by multiple myeloma (n=47, 38%), ALL (n=1, 1%) and other (n=1, 1%). During the PRM monitoring period, 19 (16%) patients were managed entirely in the outpatient setting. The remaining 104 (84%) patients required at least one hospitalization, with most patients (n=70, 57%) hospitalized only once [26 (21%) patients were hospitalized twice, and 7 (6%) patients were hospitalized 3 times, and 1 (1%) patient hospitalized 4 times during the monitoring period]. When considering the first hospitalization post CAR-T infusion, the median LOS was 6 days (range 2 - 47). When considering all hospitalizations post CAR-T, the median LOS was 8 days (range 2 - 47). Only 7 (6%) patients required an ICU stay, with a mean ICU stay of 0.2 days (standard deviation 0.9). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was noted in 92 (75%) of patients at a median of 3 days (range 0 - 18) post CAR-T infusion. All patients with CRS received tocilizumab, at a median of 4 days post CAR-T infusion. Steroids for CRS were administered in 63 (68%) of these patients. Neurotoxicity was reported in 45 (37%) patients at a median of 7 days (range 1 - 19) post CAR-T infusion. During the RPM monitoring period, patients were seen in our HBO unit with a median of 18 outpatient visits (range 4 - 30). Patient survey data, obtained at the end of the RPM monitoring period, were available from 37 patients. The majority of patients felt that the RPM program helped them feel comfortable managing their health at home, were able to reach a team member, and receive an appropriate response promptly. The majority of patients felt comfortable using the RPM equipment and interacting with providers virtually. Overall, 83% of patients were satisfied with the RPM program and 6% were neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. When asked about the reason for disappointment, technical difficulties/issues with the devices were the themes mentioned by the few patients (11%) who were unsatisfied with the RPM program. Conclusion: Despite the complexities and frequent monitoring associated with CAR-T cell therapy, outpatient CAR-T cell treatment is a feasible model of care. As the standard practice at our institution, the CAR-T RPM program was part of the management of nearly all patients undergoing an FDA-approved CAR-T product in the outpatient setting. RPM in the acute setting post CAR-T infusion is a well-received practice initiative by the majority of patients, including a high level of comfort utilizing the RPM equipment and virtual interaction with the RPM providers.

Background: Patients (pts) receiving FDA-approved chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy or Bispecific antibody Teclistamab (Tec) are commonly managed in the inpatient setting given the common adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome ICANS. We have previously reported that hospital-based outpatient (HBO) management of pts receiving CAR-T is feasible and safe (Bansal et al, ASH2022). In 2023, HBO management at our institution began incorporating home health visits and management of grade 1 CRS in outpatient setting for select pts receiving standard of care (SOC) CAR-T. Here, we report outcomes of our updated practice. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical records and remote monitoring data of adult pts who received SOC CAR-T or Tec between 10/2020 and 7/2023 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester under an IRB approved protocol. Results: In 3/2023, pts deemed to be low risk for severe CRS (fever onset &gt;= 3 days from infusion, CRP&lt;100) received HBO management for grade 1 CRS, including outpatient administration of tocilizumab. If CRS improved or resolved, outpatient monitoring was continued. If CRS persisted within the observation period on HBO, pts were admitted. Recurrent CRS after the first episode were all managed inpatient. Nine pts met these criteria for HBO CRS management and their outcomes were compared to those who received initial inpatient (INPT) CRS management (INPT, n=17) during the same timeframe, as well as the outcome of 164 pts who had CRS management INPT prior to our practice change (Table 1). Two-third of the pts with initial management of CRS outpatient did not require hospitalization. Median time to hospitalization trended later than those managed inpatient at the onset of CRS. The duration of hospitalization was comparable for all pts admitted between initial HBO and INPT CRS management. However with fewer admissions in the initial CRS HBO group, the average hospitalization days (LOS) per patient treated for that group was lower compared to initial INPT CRS management. Data on additional pts will be presented at ASH. In 1/2023, pts on RPM with no ongoing CRS symptoms, no language barriers, and no compliance concerns received home health visits during weeks 3 and 4 post CAR-T infusion in place of clinic visits on HBO. Home health visit team communicated with HBO staff to review assessment and plan. Changes in HBO utilization will be presented. Finally, 24 pts received 223 Tec infusions on HBO. Median age was 66 years, 15 (61%) were males, 9 (38%) had high risk cytogenetics. The median prior lines of therapy was 5. Among these pts, 220/223 (99%) doses were performed on HBO and 204/220 (93%) infusions never required admission for management. Twenty pts enrolled in RPM (Figure 1). An average of 2 alerts were generated per patient during the 2 week period and median time from infusion to alert was 1.5 days. Majority of alerts were resolved over a phone call and only 13/114 (11%) alerts required a physician visit/hospital admission. Of the 16 Tec infusions resulting in admission, 4/16 (25%) required re-admission resulting in a total of 20 hospitalizations. Admissions mostly occurred during step-up dosing (18/20; 90%). Most common reason for first admission was fever (13/16, 85%) and median time to admission was 1 day from infusion. Median LOS was 1.5 days (range, 0-12). In terms of CRS, majority were Grade 1 (12/13, 93%) which were managed with steroids (dexamethasone/ prednisone) alone. One patient had CRS grade 4 event, in the setting of concurrent decompensation during dialysis, and was treated with steroids, tocilizumab, vasopressor, CRRT, thoracentesis, intubation and mechanical ventilation. The rate of second CRS event after management of first CRS with steroid (dexamethasone/ prednisone) was 15% (2/13). These second CRS episodes also resolved with steroid alone. Data on additional pts receiving Tec will be presented at ASH. Conclusion: Our data showed that additional advances in outpatient practice, including initial outpatient management of CRS and outpatient administration of Tec step up dosing are feasible, safe and reduce hospital resource utilization.

Background: Cytopenias are a common complication of and prolonged (beyond month 3 post CAR-T infusion), severe (grade 3 or higher) cytopenias can be difficult to manage. Stem cell boosts have been reported to restore hematopoiesis; however, stem cells would need to be available prior to CAR-T therapy for potential use post CAR-T. Most lymphoma patients and limited number of myeloma patients may have pre-collected stem cells in storage. Identifying patients at high risk for prolonged and severe cytopenia post CAR-T at the time of CAR-T evaluation (baseline), before leukapheresis, can help identify the patients for coordination of stem cell collection during CAR-T manufacturing and increase the likelihood that the collected stem cells would be used. In this study, we aim to identify clinical variables at the time of CAR-T evaluation, prior to leukapheresis, that are associated with severe cytopenias at month 3 post CAR-T infusion and identify patients who could be considered for pre-emptive stem cell collection prior to CAR-T therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who received CAR-T products at Mayo Clinic from 01/2016 to 06/2022. Patients with progressive disease in the first year post CAR-T were excluded from the analysis. Baseline (at CAR-T evaluation, prior to leukapheresis) variables were compared between those with and without severe cytopenia at month 3 post CAR-T. Severe cytopenias were defined as hemoglobin (Hg) &lt; 8 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) &lt; 0.5 x 10 9/L, and/or platelet count (PLT) &lt; 50 x 10 9/L. Statistically significant variables (p&lt;0.05) by analysis were examined for statistical significance in multivariate analysis (MVA). Results: Among the 166 patients who received CAR-T (88 NHL, 78 MM) during the study period, 31 (18.67%) had a severe cytopenia at month . Twenty baseline variables were examined; HGB, PLT, ANC, and c-reactive protein (CRP) We devised a cytopenia risk score using 1 point each for Hg&lt;10 or PLT&lt;100k at baseline, with a range of 0 to 2. Demographics and clinical outcome by cytopenia risk score is shown in Table 1B. A higher percentage of patients with a score of 1 or 2 had a severe cytopenia at month 3 (Figure 1). In particular, there was a . In addition Conclusion: Baseline cytopenias before leukapheresis may identify patients with increased risk for severe cytopenias at month 3 post CAR-T. These patients can have continued slow hematopoietic recovery in the first year. Stem cell collection, if feasible, could be considered before CAR-T to alleviate post-CAR-T severe prolonged cytopenias.