Rajapakse, Nipunie

Abstract Background The BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel (BioFire Diagnostics) (GIP) is a multiplex stool PCR test that detects 22 organisms. Studies in adults suggest that the diagnostic yield of the GIP in hospitalized patients is low. The utility of the GIP among hospitalized pediatric patients and indications for diagnostic stewardship of this test are not well described. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of hospitalized pediatric patients who had a GIP ordered between October 2015 and October 2017. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory information was extracted from the medical record. Statistical analysis was completed using JMP Pro 13.0.0 (SAS Institute Inc.). Results Over the 2-year study period, 193 GIPs were obtained on 155 individual pediatric patients. The mean patient age was 8 years and 59% were male. Forty-four percent of patients were immunocompromised and 21% had inflammatory bowel disease. The pediatric infectious disease (PID) team was consulted in 15% of patients at the time the test was ordered. The overall positivity rate of the GIP for one or more pathogens was 42% (Figure 1), with 76% of GIPs positive for one, 23% for two, and 1% for three pathogens. No parasitic infections were diagnosed. The GIP was more likely to be positive if GI symptom onset was prior to admission (48% vs. 24%, P = 0.004), if GI symptoms had been present for < 2 weeks vs. ≥2 weeks (52% vs. 20%, P = 0.0001), and if GI symptoms were the primary reason for the hospital admission (50% vs. 32%, P = 0.012). Only Clostridioides difficile or viral pathogens were detected in patients whose symptoms began in the hospital (Figure 2). Among patients with a positive test, 40% received treatment targeted at one or more of the detected pathogens (Figure 1). Enteropathogenic E.coli (EPEC) and Enteroaggregative E.coli (EAEC) were never treated (Figure 3). Conclusion The GIP was positive for one or more pathogens in 42% of hospitalized children for whom the test was ordered, and led to specific therapy in 40% of those with a positive test. EPEC and EAEC were not treated. The diagnostic yield of the GIP was higher if GI symptoms were present for <2 weeks, began before hospitalization, and were the primary reason for admission. The GIP was frequently obtained without guidance from the PID team. Disclosures R. Patel, CD Diagnostics, BioFire, Curetis, Merck, Hutchison Biofilm Medical Solutions, Accelerate Diagnostics, Allergan, and The Medicines Company: Grant Investigator, Research grant – monies paid to Mayo Clinic. Curetis, Specific Technologies, Selux Dx, GenMark Diagnostics, PathoQuest and Genentech: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee – monies paid to Mayo Clinic. ASM and IDSA: Travel reimbursement and editor’s stipends, Travel reimbursement and editor’s stipends. NBME, Up-to-Date and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course: Varies, Honoraria. Mayo Clinic: Employee, Salary.

Abstract Background Medical trainees play a critical role in the prescribing of antimicrobials. Prescriber education is one of the CDC core elements of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Optimal strategies for educating residents about antimicrobials have not been identified; however, the common practice of teaching all classes of available antibiotics over a short period of time (usually a single 1–2 hour lecture or “bolus”) is generally not well received and likely ineffective. Methods We developed a novel antibiotic of the month (AOTM) education program (“continuous infusion”) for pediatric residents. It included a monthly 10-minute presentation by an infectious diseases physician or fellow about a single commonly prescribed antibiotic, a handout summarizing important aspects of the antibiotic and a display posted in the resident workroom. An anonymous survey was sent to all pediatric residents before and 6 months after implementation of the AOTM program. The survey consisted of questions on demographics, satisfaction with the program, and antibiotic knowledge. Responses were tabulated and analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Responses were summarized and reported as a proportion of total responses. Results Both pre- and post-implementation surveys were completed by 21 pediatric residents (51% response rate). Prior to the AOTM program, 55% of respondents felt very or somewhat uncomfortable about their current level of knowledge about antimicrobials and antimicrobial prescribing. Six months after initiation of the program, 86% and 76% agreed or strongly agreed that their knowledge of antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance, respectively, had improved. After introduction of the program, 81% felt more comfortable or much more comfortable with antimicrobial prescribing. Fifty-seven percent had referenced the handout at some point after the teaching session and 100% agreed that the program was worthwhile continuing in the next academic year. Conclusion A continuous infusion of antimicrobial education in the form of an AOTM education program was well received among pediatric residents and increased their knowledge and comfort level with antimicrobial prescribing. Further studies to measure knowledge retention with this strategy are required. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.