Whitwell, Jennifer L.

Purpose: Apraxia of speech (AOS) is a motor speech disorder affecting articulatory planning and speech programming. When AOS is the sole manifestation of neurodegeneration, it is termed primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS). Recent work has shown that there are distinct PPAOS subtypes: phonetic, prosodic, and those that do not clearly align with either (mixed). PPAOS subtypes differ with respect to the predominating motor speech difficulties, as well as disease progression and underlying pathology. Because past studies have determined PPAOS subtype based on clinical impression, the goal of the present study was to quantitatively determine the distribution of speech error types across PPAOS subtypes in a word repetition task and to investigate how word complexity affects the type and number of speech errors across PPAOS subtypes. Method: Forty-five patients with PPAOS (13 phonetic, 23 prosodic, and nine mixed) and 45 healthy controls produced multiple repetitions of words that varied in phonetic complexity. Sound additions, deletions, and substitutions/distortions (phonetic errors) and within-word segmentations (prosodic errors) were calculated. Results: All three PPAOS groups produced significantly more errors than controls, but the total number of errors was comparable among subtypes. The phonetic group produced more phonetic-type errors compared to the prosodic group but comparable to the mixed group. The prosodic group produced more segmentations compared to the phonetic and mixed PPAOS groups. As word complexity increased, the total number of errors increased for PPAOS patients. The phonetic and prosodic groups were more likely to produce phonetic- and prosodic-type errors, respectively, as word complexity increased. Conclusions: This study provides novel quantitative data showing that PPAOS subtype can be supported by the type and distribution of speech errors in a word repetition task. This may facilitate earlier, more reliable differential diagnosis and aid in disease prognosis, as PPAOS subtypes have distinct disease trajectories.

AbstractBackgroundThe language and visual variants are two common clinical phenotypes of atypical Alzheimer’s disease (AD). There are reports of overlap between these clinical phenotypes, however, the extent and frequency of overlap, and its neuroanatomical underpinnings remain unclear.MethodEighty‐two patients with biomarker‐confirmed AD who presented with either predominant language (n = 34) or visuospatial/perceptual (n = 48) deficits were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group and underwent neurological and neuropsychological testing, MRI and [18F]flortaucipir‐PET. The clinical examination included testing for simultanagnosia, Gerstmann’s syndrome, ideomotor apraxia, visuospatial‐visuoperceptual function, confrontational naming, sentence repetition and letter and animal fluency. Cut‐points for abnormality were defined for each test and used to classify the following groups: language‐pure (no visual‐function deficit), language‐plus (impaired on one visual‐function), language‐mixed (impaired on two visual‐functions), visual‐pure (no language‐function deficit), visual‐plus (impaired on one language‐function) and visual‐mixed (impaired on two language‐functions). Patterns of relative volume loss and flortaucipir uptake were assessed using SPM12.ResultOf the 82 patients, 11 (13%) were language‐pure, 16 (20%) language‐plus, 7 (8%) language‐mixed, 10 (12%) visual‐pure, 17 (21%) visual‐plus and 21 (26%) visual‐mixed, with no difference in disease duration across groups. Visual deficits in the language‐plus group consisted of mild simultanagnosia in 29%, Gerstmann’s syndrome in 24%, and mild visuospatial deficits. In the language‐mixed group 86% had simultanagnosia and 43% had Gerstmann’s syndrome, with visuospatial‐visuoperceptual deficits comparable to the visual‐pure group. Language deficits in the visual‐plus group consisted of mild anomia and reduced letter and animal fluency. The visual‐mixed group reported naming and repetition deficits, and reduced fluency, comparable to the language‐predominant groups. All three language groups showed left temporal volume loss and flortaucipir uptake, with greater involvement of the parieto‐occipital and frontal lobes in language‐plus and language‐mixed groups. All three visual groups showed occipital volume loss and flortaucipir uptake, with greater involvement of the parieto‐temporal and frontal lobes in visual‐plus and visual‐mixed groups.ConclusionOnly 25% of our cohort showed a pure language or visual presentation, highlighting the high frequency of syndromic overlap in atypical AD and the diagnostic challenge of categorical phenotyping. Syndromic overlap was associated with neuroanatomical overlap and more widespread patterns of atrophy and tau deposition.

AbstractBackgroundPosterior cortical atrophy (PCA) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) show overlapping patterns of hypometabolism affecting posterior regions of the brain. Both syndromes show disruptions in functional connectivity, but it is unknown how patterns of disruption within and between networks compare between PCA and DLB.MethodThirty amyloid‐positive PCA, 27 amyloid‐positive DLB (DLB+), 24 amyloid‐negative DLB (DLB‐) patients and 30 cognitively normal amyloid‐negative (CN) individuals were recruited at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, and underwent structural and resting state functional MRI. Spatially preprocessed data was analyzed using the CONN functional connectivity toolbox to explore nine networks: visual, sensorimotor, dorsal‐attention, cerebellar, frontoparietal, memory, language, salience, and default mode networks (DMN). Multivariate linear regression models corrected for multiple comparisons and adjusted for age and sex were fit to analyze within‐network connectivity (Fisher’s R‐to‐Z transformations). Between‐network connectivity was assessed with group level difference maps (two‐sample t‐test) corrected for false discovery rate at p<0.05.ResultMultivariate linear regression models showed reduced within‐network connectivity across all DMN components, sensorimotor, and dorsal‐attention networks, with trends for the visual network in PCA compared to CN. Both DLB‐ and DLB+ showed reduced within‐network connectivity for the cerebellar network, with DLB+ showing reduced connectivity in the posterior‐DMN, memory, and salience networks compared to CN. DLB‐ showed increased connectivity in dorsal‐attention and DMN, while DLB+ showing reduced connectivity in the memory network compared to PCA. Between‐network analysis showed an increase in cerebellar‐to‐sensorimotor connectivity in all three groups, with increase in cerebellar‐to‐dorsal‐attention connectivity in DLB‐ and PCA compared to CN. DLB‐ showed a decrease in posterior‐DMN‐to‐sensorimotor connectivity, while PCA showed reduced connectivity between all DMN components and dorsal‐attention‐to‐sensorimotor connectivity compared to CN. There was an increase in connectivity between all DMN components and a reduction in dorsal‐DMN‐to‐sensorimotor connectivity in both DLB‐ and DLB+ compared to PCA.ConclusionPCA was associated with connectivity disruptions across all DMN components, sensorimotor, dorsal‐attention and visual networks, while both DLB groups showed disruptions in cerebellar networks, with DLB+ showing further disruptions in posterior‐DMN, memory and salience networks. These findings suggest that both PCA and DLB have unique brain network disruptions, with amyloid status influencing connectivity in DLB.

AbstractBackgroundPredictive models of tau‐PET accumulation have largely relied on the functional connectome to estimate its spatial patterns in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Patterns of global functional organization represent a promising avenue as they encapsulate many biological properties relevant to neurodevelopment, cognition and degeneration. We compared approaches based on local connectivity (from task‐free fMRI) and global organization (from FDG‐PET) to predict regional tau‐PET across AD phenotypes.MethodWe included 430 cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals (214 A+T‐, 216 A+T+) and 62 amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), 64 amnestic AD, 21 dysexecutive AD (dAD), 41 logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) and 49 posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) patients (all A+T+) from the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, and Neurodegenerative Research Groups (referred to as “Mayo cohort”). The connectivity approach consisted of assessing the relationship between a region’s tau level and its functional connectivity to the region of highest tau (epicenter). The global organization approach consisted of 1) performing a principal component analysis on 3000 FDG‐PET images that did not overlap with the Mayo cohort, 2) projecting FDG‐PET images of the Mayo cohort onto the low‐dimensional space generated in Step 1 and extracting corresponding weighted values across the first 100 components, 3) using these weighted values as predictors of regional tau‐PET in a linear model and determining optimal parameters based on predicted R 2 values, and 4) using the parameters from the model built in Step 3 to predict tau‐PET in the ADNI cohort (n = 86) (Fig.2).ResultThe connectivity‐based approach yielded adjusted R 2 values ranging from 0.19‐0.45 across diagnostic groups (Fig.1). The global organization approach yielded averaged adjusted R 2 and predicted R 2 values of 0.71 and 0.63, respectively, in the Mayo cohort. Out‐of‐sample median R 2 in the ADNI cohort was 0.41 (range 0.10‐0.60) (Fig.3).ConclusionAn unbiased approach based on the global functional organization of the brain and using an imaging modality widely used in clinical settings outperformed a connectome‐based one to predict regional tau‐PET across the AD phenotypic spectrum. Patterns of tau accumulation may better relate to the large‐scale physiology of the brain underlying specific mental functions rather than local connectivity factors.

AbstractBackgroundPredictive models of tau‐PET accumulation have largely relied on the functional connectome to estimate its spatial patterns in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Patterns of global functional organization represent a promising avenue as they encapsulate many biological properties relevant to neurodevelopment, cognition and degeneration. We compared approaches based on local connectivity (from task‐free fMRI) and global organization (from FDG‐PET) to predict regional tau‐PET across AD phenotypes.MethodWe included 430 cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals (214 A+T‐, 216 A+T+) and 62 amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), 64 amnestic AD, 21 dysexecutive AD (dAD), 41 logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) and 49 posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) patients (all A+T+) from the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, and Neurodegenerative Research Groups (referred to as “Mayo cohort”). The connectivity approach consisted of assessing the relationship between a region’s tau level and its functional connectivity to the region of highest tau (epicenter). The global organization approach consisted of 1) performing a principal component analysis on 3000 FDG‐PET images that did not overlap with the Mayo cohort, 2) projecting FDG‐PET images of the Mayo cohort onto the low‐dimensional space generated in Step 1 and extracting corresponding weighted values across the first 100 components, 3) using these weighted values as predictors of regional tau‐PET in a linear model and determining optimal parameters based on predicted R2 values, and 4) using the parameters from the model built in Step 3 to predict tau‐PET in the ADNI cohort (n = 86) (Fig.2).ResultThe connectivity‐based approach yielded adjusted R2 values ranging from 0.19‐0.45 across diagnostic groups (Fig.1). The global organization approach yielded averaged adjusted R2 and predicted R2 values of 0.71 and 0.63, respectively, in the Mayo cohort. Out‐of‐sample median R2 in the ADNI cohort was 0.41 (range 0.10‐0.60) (Fig.3).ConclusionAn unbiased approach based on the global functional organization of the brain and using an imaging modality widely used in clinical settings outperformed a connectome‐based one to predict regional tau‐PET across the AD phenotypic spectrum. Patterns of tau accumulation may better relate to the large‐scale physiology of the brain underlying specific mental functions rather than local connectivity factors.

Background: Posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) and logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) are two common atypical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) variants. Little is known about behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms or activities of daily living (ADLs) in PCA and LPA, and whether they differ across syndromes. Objective: To characterize the behavioral and neuropsychiatric profiles and ADLs of PCA and LPA and compare presence/absence and severity of symptoms between syndromes. Methods: Seventy-eight atypical AD patients, 46 with PCA and 32 with LPA, completed the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) and Cambridge Behavioral Inventory-Revised (CBI-R) at baseline and longitudinally over-time. Mann-Whitney U and Fisher’s Exact Tests assessed for differences in symptoms between the two syndromes with significance set at p ≤0.01. To eliminate demographic differences as confounders the groups were matched, and differences reanalyzed. Results: PCA were younger at onset ( p = 0.006), at time of baseline assessment ( p = 0.02) and had longer disease duration ( p = 0.01). Neuropsychiatric symptoms were common in PCA and LPA, although more common and severe in PCA. At baseline, PCA had a higher NPI-Q total score ( p = 0.01) and depression subscore ( p = 0.01) than LPA. Baseline total CBI-R scores were also higher in PCA than LPA ( p = 0.001) with PCA having worse scores in all 10 CBI-R categories. Longitudinally, there was no difference between groups on the NPI-Q. However, on the CBI-R, PCA had faster rates of worsening on self-grooming ( p = 0.01) and self-dressing ( p = 0.01) compared to LPA. Conclusions: Behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms are common in PCA and LPA although these symptoms are more common and severe in PCA.