Parsons, Benjamin M.

LBA3 Background: Bortezomib (btz) combined with lenalidomide (len) and dexamethasone (dex) (VRd) is a standard initial therapy for NDMM. Carfilzomib (cfz), a next-generation proteasome inhibitor, in combination with len-dex (KRd) has shown higher efficacy in phase II trials. This randomized phase III trial was designed to examine if KRd improves progression free survival (PFS) compared to VRd in NDMM (current results), and whether indefinite maintenance with len improves OS compared with two-year maintenance (to be analyzed once data matures). Methods: Patients (Pts) with NDMM, were randomized to receive VRd or KRd in a 1:1 fashion for 36 weeks followed by a second randomization (1:1) to indefinite versus two years of len maintenance. Pts without del17p, t (14;16), t(14;20), plasma cell leukemia or high-risk GEP70 profile, were enrolled. VRd arm included btz 1.3 mg/m2 on days(d) 1, 4, 8, and 11 (d 1, 8 for cycles 9-12), len 25 mg d 1-14, and dex 40 mg d 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 of a 3-week (wk) cycle for 12 cycles, while pts in the KRd arm received cfz 36 mg/m2 d 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 with len 25 mg daily on d 1-21 and dex 40 mg wkly, in 4 wk cycles for 9 cycles. Maintenance included len 15mg d 1-21 every 4 wks. The study was designed to detect a hazard ratio (HR)=0.75 with 80% power at 1-sided 2.5% alpha and 399 PFS events (progression or death regardless of intervening therapy). Results: The study accrued 1087 pts (VRd=542, KRd=545). The median age was 65y. Treatment, efficacy, and toxicity data are in the table. At the second of 3 planned interim analyses, with PFS HR=1.04 (95% CI, 0.8 to 1.3, p=0.74), futility was met. Median PFS was VRd=34.4m and KRd=34.6m; no differences were seen based on age (<65 or ≥65), presence or absence of t(4;14) or ISS stage. The three-year OS (95% CI) was similar: VRd 84% (80 to 88) and KRd 86% (82 to 89). Conclusions: In this randomized phase 3 trial, KRd did not improve PFS compared with VRd in NDMM. A significantly higher rate of cardio-pulmonary and renal toxicity was observed with KRd, while neuropathy rates were higher with VRd. VRd remains the standard triplet induction regimen in standard and intermediate risk NDMM, and a suitable backbone for 4 drug combinations. Clinical trial information: NCT01863550 . [Table: see text]

Abstract Background: Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) of the breast is a recently described clinicopathologic entity, almost always associated with breast implants, and does not overexpress the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) protein. Using the two largest US cancer databases, we describe its incidence, patterns of care, and clinical outcome. Methods: Incidence rate was calculated using 2000-2011 data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program and age-adjusted to the US 2000 standard population. For patient level data, we used the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Participant User File. We included all adult patients diagnosed from 1998-2011 with ALCL (ICD-O-3: 99714) who had breast as the primary site. Results: The incidence of breast ALCL was 0.001 per million. We identified 61 cases from NCDB. All of the patients were females and they were predominantly White (88.5%). The median age at diagnosis was 64 years (range, 18-90). The stage distribution was I (45.9%), II (21.3%), III (0%), IV (9.8%), and unknown (21.3%). The pattern of initial treatment was surgery alone (13.1%), chemotherapy alone (32.7%), chemotherapy and radiation (19.7%), surgery and chemotherapy (4.9%), surgery and radiation (4.9%), and tri-modality treatment (13.1%). In 7 patients (11.5%), no treatment was given. Two patients (1.6%) received stem cell transplant (1 autologous, 1 allogeneic) as part of initial treatment, one after chemotherapy and another one after surgery and chemotherapy. Overall survival data was available for patients diagnosed in 1998-2006 (29 patients). The median overall survival was 149.8 months (range, 2.6-157.9). Conclusions: ALCL of the breast is very rare. It presents mainly as early stage disease with very good prognosis. The patterns of care varied, although most patients received chemotherapy as part of the initial treatment. Table 1. Treatment type received Frequency Percent Cumulative Frequency Cumulative Percent Chemo only 20 32.79 20 32.79 Surgery only 8 13.11 28 45.90 Chemo, Radiation, No surgery 12 19.67 40 65.57 Chemo, Surgery, No radiation 3 4.92 43 70.49 Radiation, Surgery, No Chemo 3 4.92 46 75.41 All three combined 8 13.11 54 88.52 Nothing 7 11.48 61 100.00 Disclosures Parsons: Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

Background: Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive form of Non Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) and typically presents in patients over the age of 60 years. Bendamustine and rituximab (BR) combination is one of the standard treatments for MCL and is given to patients for whom high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue is planned in the first remission. Progression free survival (PFS) with BR is approximately 36 months (Rummel M Lancet 2013; Flinn IW Blood 2014) and the regimen is overall well tolerated. Venetoclax (VEN) is an orally available inhibitor of BCL2, an anti-apoptotic protein highly expressed in several NHL. Single agent activity has mostly been studied in a Phase I study (in various NHL histologies) where 28 MCL patients were enrolled. Overall response rate was 75% (21 of 28) but complete response (CR) rate was only 21% (6 of 28). Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) has been associated with VEN and initial dosing requires a ramp up period (Davids MS JCO 2018). VEN has also been combined with other agents in MCL with promising activity (Tam CS NEJM 2018) VEN has been studied as a chemotherapy sensitizer and has shown pre-clinical synergy with chemotherapy. In Follicular lymphoma, BR+VEN was studied at 800mg PO continuous daily dosing and showed an excessive Grade 3-4 adverse event (AE) rate of 78% compared to historical studies of 46% (Zinzani ASH 2016). We hypothesize that, in MCL, VEN can be safely combined with BR at a lower dose and intermittent dosing with improvements to the response rate based on historical controls and maintain a better safety profile. Study Design: This Phase II single arm, multicenter study evaluates VEN at a max dose of 400mg with BR (Bendamustine 90mg/m2 IV day 1 and 2; rituximab 375mg/m2 IV or SQ equivalent day 1) for six 28-day cycles in untreated patients with MCL over the age of 60 years (NCT03834688). Cycle 1 will include a VEN dose titration over the 4 week course (20mg D1-7, 50mg D8-14, 100mg D15-21, and 200mg D22-28). For Cycles 2-6, VEN will be given at 400mg daily x 10 days starting with day 1. Participants are followed for 6 cycles, though will be followed for progression and survival afterward. Participants may receive maintenance rituximab at investigator's discretion. Eligible participants, age 60 years or older, must have biopsy proven untreated MCL with t(11;14) or cyclin D1 expression, though a short course of steroids is allowed for symptomatic MCL. They must have adequate organ function and not require any prohibited concomitant medications. Primary outcome is CR rate as assessed by the Lugano criteria. We estimate a historical CR rate of BR after induction of about 70%. A 15% increase in this rate, to 85% CR, is considered promising for the combination. To achieve this goal, the study will enroll 56 participants (53 eligible) to achieve a 90% power to detect the difference with a 10% Type I error rate. We will also evaluate PFS and overall survival. TLS is an AE of interest and will be evaluated after 19 participants have been enrolled and treated during cycle 1. Minimal residual disease (MRD) will be assessed throughout the study. MRD from peripheral blood will be compared to bone marrow aspirates in all participants undergoing bone marrow aspirate at the end of treatment. Tumor samples at screening and progression will be collected for future study. This study is conducted through PrECOG and is funded by Genentech, a member of the Roche Group. Venetoclax is co-developed by Genentech and AbbVie. The study is slated to open in Fall of 2019 at 10 US sites. Figure Disclosures Portell: AbbVie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding. Bennani:Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board. Naik:Celgene: Other: Advisory board. Parsons:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Kahl:BeiGene: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Venetoclax is not approved for use in MCL.

Abstract Background: Prolymphocytic leukemia (PLL) is a rare cancer with incidence of 0.48/1,000,000. It is comprised of 2 subtypes, T or B cell. It generally is associated with a poor median OS of 1-3 years. However, some patients have an initial smoldering course not requiring treatment. Limited population data exists describing the outcomes of PLL. We studied PLL patients who met a definition of smoldering, not requiring treatment within 180 days of diagnosis, using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). Methods: Patient level data were obtained from the NCDB Participant User File. The NCDB collects hospital cancer registry data representing 70% of newly diagnosed cancer cases in the US population. We identified PLL patients (ICD-O: 9832 PLL, NOS, ICD-O: 9833 B-PLL, and ICD-O: 9834 T-PLL) diagnosed in 2004-2015 for demographics, disease and treatment characteristics. We included patients diagnosed from 2004-2013 in the overall survival (OS) analyses. Patients who received no treatment as part of their first course of treatment and who did not have a subsequent treatment within 180 days were considered smoldering PLL. Results: From 2004-2015, 1606 patients were diagnosed with PLL and 451(28%) were smoldering PLL. Of the 1606 patients, T-PLL represented 781(49%), B-PLL 480(30%), and PLL, NOS 345(21%). Of the 451 smoldering PLL patients observed as T-PLL represented 48%(215), B-PLL 29%(133), and PLL, NOS 23%(103). The median age at diagnosis was 69 [59 - 78] years. There was a male predominance with 60 % males. The median OS for the entire cohort was 20.6 months. The % 5yr overall survival (OS) for smoldering PLL was 40% vs 29%(for non-smoldering). Within the PLL subtypes PLL, NOS and B-PLL were associated with better 5yr OS 38.56% and 35.53%, compared to T-PLL 12.89%. Only 65(4%) patients underwent an early stem cell transplant(SCT). Conclusions: We identified a population of patients not needing treatment within 180 days of diagnosis representing smoldering PLL with a significantly improved OS. Additionally, PLL, NOS and B-PLL were associated with an improved OS. The use of early SCT is low in PLL. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.