Razak, Albiruni Ryan Abdul

TPS11588 Background: Imatinib is the worldwide standard for first-line therapy of advanced KIT-mutant GIST. However, secondary resistance mutations in the KIT ATP-binding domain (exons 13, 14), activation loop (exons 17, 18), or both develop and result in loss of imatinib-sensitivity. Bezuclastinib has a highly selective inhibition profile, leading to minimal off-target toxicities and allowing for combination with sunitinib. While no single tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) inhibits all KIT mutations, the combination of bezuclastinib + sunitinib targets commonly occurring primary (exons 9, 11) and secondary (exons 13, 14, 17, and 18) KIT mutations and may provide more durable responses. The early signs of clinical activity, tolerability, and safety observed with the combination thus far in Peak Part 1 (Somaiah et al. [presentation] CTOS 2023. Paper 62) are consistent with the completed Phase 1/2 study (PLX121-01). Methods: Peak (NCT05208047) is a global, randomized, open-label, multi-part Phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of bezuclastinib + sunitinib versus sunitinib as second-line treatment in adult pts who were intolerant to imatinib or whose tumors had imatinib-resistance. Current Peak study sites are located in North America (3 countries), South America (3 countries), Europe (12 countries), and Asia-Pacific (4 countries). The lead-in portion to test a new formulation of bezuclastinib, (Part 1) completed enrollment in April 2023. Based upon PK and safety, a dose of bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD was determined for Part 2 of the Peak study. Part 2 will enroll ~388 pts to be randomized (1:1) to bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD or sunitinib 37.5 mg QD alone. Key inclusion: >1 measurable lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) v1.1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-2, adequate organ function, and prior imatinib therapy (no other prior therapy). Key exclusion: known PDGFR mutations or succinate dehydrogenase deficiency, clinically significant cardiac disease, and use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) confirmed by blinded independent central review per mRECIST v1.1. Additional efficacy (including overall survival and objective response rate) and safety endpoints will be evaluated and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) will be collected and assessed. Clinical trial information: NCT05208047 .

Abstract Background: TIM3 is an inhibitory immunoreceptor linked to decreased activity of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. S095018 is a human anti-TIM3 IgG2 antibody which blocks binding of phosphatidyl serine to TIM3 promoting the stimulation of T-cells, dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages. Sym021 is a humanized IgG1 antibody that inhibits binding of PD-1 with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. Preclinical data demonstrated that Sym021 combined with S095018 results in enhanced immunostimulatory antitumor activity. Methods: S095018 in combination with Sym021 was tested in patients with advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancer whose disease progressed under treatment with at least one line of systemic therapy and who had not received prior treatment with PD-1/-L1 inhibitors (NCT04641871). The dose/schedule of Sym021 and S095018 was 3mg/kg IV Q2W and 10mg/kg IV Q2W, respectively. Primary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) using RECIST v1.1 and incidence/severity of adverse events. Key secondary endpoints included PK parameters, disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results As of 31-Oct-2023, 35 patients with stage IV biliary tract cancer (34 cholangiocarcinoma, 1 gallbladder adenocarcinoma) received S095018 in combination with Sym021. All patients were naïve to prior immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Twenty-two patients (62.9%) had received 1 prior antineoplastic systemic treatment for advanced/metastatic disease, 34.3% had received ≥2 prior treatments for advanced/metastatic disease. Overall, 34 patients (97.1%) discontinued treatment, 85.7% due to disease progression. Best overall response was 2 PR (5.7%), 11 SD (31.4%), 18 PD (51.4%) and 4 not evaluable. Median PFS and OS were 1.9 months (90% CI 1.8-3.7) and 13.4 months (90% CI 8.2-27.1) respectively. Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) with SD≥16 weeks, ≥24 weeks and ≥12 months was 28.6%, 22.9% and 8.6% respectively. Treatment emergent adverse events of any grade occurring in >5% of patients included fatigue, pruritus, alkaline phosphatase increase, amylase increase, IRR (each 8.6%) and hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, AST increase, lipase increase and myalgia (each 5.7%). Exploratory biomarker analyses in paired tumor biopsies (N=18) showed an intratumoral increase in CD8 T-cell density, as well as upregulation of gene signatures related to IFNg signaling, antigen presentation, T-cell activation and cytotoxicity upon treatment. Baseline tumor biopsies from the two patients who achieved confirmed PR showed high PD-L1 expression. Conclusions: S095018 in combination with Sym021 exhibited antitumor activity in patients with advanced/metastatic recurrent biliary tract cancer who had not received prior treatment with PD-1/-L1 inhibitors. The combination was well tolerated without new safety signals. Further biomarker analysis is ongoing. Citation Format: Francois Ghiringhelli, Richard Kim, Teresa Macarulla, Irene Moreno, Albiruni Razak, Jordi Rodon, Chih-Yi Liao, Thomas Marron, Judith Raimbourg, Helene Kaplon, Julia Geromini, Najah Harouki, Christelle Rodrigues, Pauline Darcel, Niels Jorgen Skartved, Rikke Hald, Daleen Lopez-Ravnborg, Peng He, Xenophon Ianopoulos, Vasileios Askoxylakis, Nehal J. Lakhani, Sarah Davis, Amit Mahipal. A phase 1b multicenter study of anti-TIM3 (S095018/Sym023) in combination with anti-PD1 (Sym021) in patients with advanced/metastatic recurrent biliary tract cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT133.

748 Background: Ripretinib is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) who received prior treatment with 3 or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Sunitinib is approved for advanced GIST after imatinib failure. In the second interim analysis of overall survival (OS) from the phase 3 INTRIGUE study, the OS event rate was 41% in the all-patient (AP) intent-to-treat (ITT) population, and OS was similar between treatment arms in both the KIT exon 11 ITT and AP ITT populations. Here, we present the final OS and updated safety from INTRIGUE. Methods: INTRIGUE (NCT03673501) is an open-label, phase 3 study of adults with advanced GIST who had disease progression on or intolerance to imatinib. Randomization was 1:1 to ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD) or sunitinib 50 mg QD (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) and was stratified by KIT mutational status and imatinib intolerance. OS was a key secondary endpoint (the primary endpoint of progression-free survival was reported previously); final OS analysis was prespecified to occur with ≥200 and ≥145 events in the AP ITT and KIT exon 11 ITT populations, respectively. Data cutoff was March 15, 2023. Results: Of 453 pts, 444 received treatment; 40 remain on treatment (ripretinib, 28/223 [13%]; sunitinib, 12/221 [5%]). Treatment discontinuation was due to progressive disease (PD) by independent radiologic review (56%), PD by investigator (11%), clinical PD (6%), withdrawal of consent (6%), and adverse events (AEs; 5%). Fewer pts discontinued treatment due to AEs with ripretinib vs sunitinib (3% vs 6%). There were 211 OS events (47%) in the AP ITT population and 151 OS events (46%) in the KIT exon 11 ITT population. OS was similar with ripretinib vs sunitinib in the 2 ITT populations (Table). Fewer pts had grade 3/4 treatment-emergent AEs with ripretinib vs sunitinib (43% vs 67%). Dose interruptions and reductions were lower with ripretinib vs sunitinib. Median treatment duration for ripretinib vs sunitinib was 7.9 vs 6.5 months. Conclusions: In the finalOS analysis from the INTRIGUE study, OS was similar between treatment arms. The safety profile remained consistent and more favorable for ripretinib vs sunitinib in pts with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib. Clinical trial information: NCT03673501 . [Table: see text]

11563 Background: Afami-cel is an autologous, T-cell receptor (TCR) T-cell therapy to treat human leukocyte antigen (HLA) A*02–eligible patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors positive for the cancer testis antigen melanoma-associated antigen A4 (MAGE-A4). The efficacy and safety of afami-cel in pretreated pts with advanced/metastatic synovial sarcoma or myxoid/round cell liposarcoma are being evaluated in the Phase 2, two-cohort, open-label, SPEARHEAD-1 (NCT04044768) trial. Here we report interim overall survival (OS) data in the pts with advanced synovial sarcoma in Cohort 1. Methods: Pts who were HLA-A*02 positive with advanced synovial sarcoma (with evidence of clinical/radiological progression) positive for MAGE-A4 received afami-cel after lymphodepleting chemotherapy containing fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. The primary endpoint was overall response rate per RECIST v1.1 by independent review. Secondary endpoints included OS and progression-free survival (PFS), estimated utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: As of August 29, 2022, 44 pts with synovial sarcoma received afami-cel (2.68–9.99×109 transduced T-cells) in Cohort 1. The median age was 41 years (range: 19–73 years), 50% of pts were female, 89% of pts were white, 96% of pts were typed as HLA-A*02:01P, and median tumor MAGE-A4 expression H-score was 257 (132–300). Pts were heavily pre-treated with a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range: 1–12). The median follow-up time at the data cut-off was 20.8 months. Median PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.8, 5.8) and 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.8, 6.9) by independent and investigator review, respectively. Median OS by independent review was 15.4 months (95% CI: 10.9, not estimable) with 52% of pts censored at the data cut-off. The 12-month OS probability was 60% and 24-month OS probability was 40%. Twenty-one pts received additional therapy during long term follow up (systemic therapy, n = 20; radiation, n = 6; other, n = 4). In the 17 pts who had a RECIST response by independent review, the median OS was not reached, the 12-month OS probability was 90%, and 24-month OS probability was 60%. Conclusions: Pts with advanced synovial sarcoma treated with afami-cel in SPEARHEAD-1 had encouraging survival, especially those pts with a RECIST response. Clinical trial information: NCT04044768 .

e14531 Background: Afami-cel is an autologous, T-cell receptor T-cell therapy engineered to target melanoma-associated antigen A4 (MAGE-A4) in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) A*02–eligible patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. SPEARHEAD-1 (NCT04044768) is a Phase 2, two cohort, open-label trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of afami-cel in pretreated pts with advanced/metastatic synovial sarcoma or myxoid/round cell liposarcoma. Here we report data on cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in the pts with advanced synovial sarcoma treated with afami-cel across Cohort 1 and Cohort 2. Methods: Eligible pts had advanced synovial sarcoma and were HLA-A*02 positive with MAGE-A4–positive tumors. Pts received afami-cel after lymphodepleting chemotherapy containing fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. Tocilizumab administration was permitted for Grade 1 CRS if symptoms persisted for ≥ 24 hours or if the pt had co-morbidities, and for Grade ≥2 CRS. Results: As of August 29, 2022, 72 pts with synovial sarcoma received afami-cel (n = 44 Cohort 1; n = 28 Cohort 2). Afami-cel dose range was 1.92–10.00×109 transduced T-cells. The median age was 39.5 years (range: 16–73 years), 47.2% of pts were female, 88.3% of pts were white, and tumor MAGE-A4 expression H-score was 244.5 (range: 66–300). CRS occurred in 72.2% of the pts with synovial sarcoma receiving afami-cel, including Grade 1 in 50% (36/72), Grade 2 in 20.8% (15/72), and Grade 3 in 1.4% (1/72) of pts as per American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy grading. The median time to onset was 2.5 days (range: 1–5 days), and the median time to resolution was 3 days (range: 1 to 14 days). Twenty-seven of 72 (37.5%) pts received at least one dose of tocilizumab. Consistent with expectations, higher serum IL-6 levels were associated with CRS events and the indicated use of tocilizumab for management. RECIST v1.1 responses were observed in pts with and without CRS. Correlation of clinical factors and CRS with response will be presented. Conclusions: CRS was common after afami-cel administration but was mostly low grade. Administration of tocilizumab in SPEARHEAD-1 was effective in the management of CRS. Clinical trial information: NCT04044768 .

11536 Background: Ripretinib is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) who received prior treatment with ≥3 kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Exploratory baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis from INTRIGUE showed pts with second-line advanced GIST with primary KIT exon 11 mutations and secondary resistance mutations exclusively in KIT exons 17/18 derived clinical benefit from ripretinib but not sunitinib (Bauer S et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023; Abs 397784). Outcomes in pts with advanced GIST with ctDNA not detected (ctDNA-ND) had not been evaluated. Here, we present exploratory data from INTRIGUE in pts who had baseline ctDNA-ND vs ctDNA detected (ctDNA-D). Methods: INTRIGUE is an open-label, phase 3 study that enrolled pts with advanced GIST who had disease progression on or intolerance to imatinib (NCT03673501). Pts were randomized 1:1 to ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD) or sunitinib 50 mg QD (4 wks on/2 wks off) and stratified by mutation according to local pathology report. Baseline peripheral whole blood was analyzed by Guardant360, a 74-gene ctDNA NGS-based assay. Pts with ctDNA-D had ≥1 somatic alteration in the 74 genes analyzed. Results: Pts with ctDNA-ND (82/362, 22.7%) were younger (median: 55.5 vs 62.0 years) and had smaller sums of longest diameters of target lesions (median [range]: 57.6 [11–459] vs 108.8 [15–418] mm) vs ctDNA-D (280/362, 77.3%). Progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in pts with ctDNA-ND vs ctDNA-D and numerically higher with ripretinib vs sunitinib in pts with ctDNA-ND (Table). Pts with ctDNA-ND categorized as not having a KIT exon 9 mutation at randomization ( KIT exon 11, other KIT/PDGFRA, or KIT/PDGFRA wild-type; n = 71) had longer PFS with ripretinib vs sunitinib (median not estimable [NE] vs 11 months; HR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.28 to 1.12). Objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) were higher with ctDNA-ND vs ctDNA-D. Safety was similar between groups and consistent with the primary analysis. Conclusions: Pts with ctDNA-ND had better efficacy outcomes vs pts with ctDNA-D in both treatment arms; PFS was numerically higher with ripretinib vs sunitinib in pts with ctDNA-ND. Although little is known about the biology driving ctDNA in GIST, these data suggest pts may have improved outcomes and different treatment sensitivity based on ctDNA detectability. Clinical trial information: NCT03673501 . [Table: see text]

11524 Background: Ripretinib is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) who received prior treatment with ≥3 kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Sunitinib is approved for advanced GIST after imatinib failure. In the first interim analysis (IA) for overall survival (OS) in the INTRIGUE trial, data were immature (OS event rate, 22.3%), and median OS was not reached in either arm for the KIT exon 11 intent-to-treat (ITT) and all-patient (AP) ITT populations (S Bauer, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022). Additionally, ripretinib had a more favorable safety profile with fewer grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) than sunitinib. Here, we present the second IA of OS and updated safety from INTRIGUE. Methods: INTRIGUE is a global, open-label, phase 3 study that enrolled adult pts with advanced GIST who had disease progression on or intolerance to imatinib (NCT03673501). Randomization was 1:1 to ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD) or sunitinib 50 mg QD (4 wks on/2 wks off) and was stratified by KIT mutational status and imatinib intolerance. OS was a key secondary endpoint; data cutoff for the second IA was Sept 1, 2022. Results: Of 453 pts in the AP ITT population, 444 received treatment; 51 remain on treatment (33/223 [14.8%] with ripretinib and 18/221 [8.1%] with sunitinib). Common reasons for treatment discontinuation were progressive disease (PD) assessed by independent radiologic review (55.4%), PD assessed by investigator (10.6%), clinical PD (5.9%), withdrawal of consent (5.4%), and adverse event (AE; 4.5%); fewer pts discontinued due to an AE for ripretinib vs sunitinib (2.7% vs 6.3%). Following study treatment discontinuation, 58 pts (25.6%) from the sunitinib arm received ripretinib; 139 pts (61.5%) from the ripretinib arm later received sunitinib. There were 185 OS events (40.8%) in the AP ITT population; median duration of follow-up was 28.7 and 28.5 months for ripretinib and sunitinib, respectively. OS was similar with ripretinib vs sunitinib in the AP ITT (median 35.5 vs 30.9 months; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.18; nominal P = 0.39) and KIT exon 11 ITT populations (median 34.0 vs 31.5 months; HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.48; nominal P = 0.77). The updated safety profile was consistent with the primary analysis; fewer pts had grade 3/4 TEAEs with ripretinib vs sunitinib (95 [42.6%] vs 149 [67.4%]). Dose interruptions and reductions were lower with ripretinib vs sunitinib. The median (range) treatment duration was 7.9 (0.2–38.2) months for ripretinib and 6.5 (0.2–38.3) months for sunitinib. Conclusions: In the second IA from INTRIGUE, OS was similar between treatment arms. The safety profile remained consistent with additional data, and results demonstrate favorable safety with ripretinib in pts with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib. Clinical trial information: NCT03673501 .

397784 Background: Ripretinib, a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is indicated for patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) who received prior treatment with ≥3 TKIs, including imatinib. Sunitinib is approved for advanced GIST after imatinib failure. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis may provide insight into the efficacy of these agents in second-line advanced GIST. Here, we present exploratory baseline ctDNA results from INTRIGUE. Methods: INTRIGUE is an open-label, phase 3 study that enrolled adult pts with advanced GIST who progressed on or had intolerance to imatinib (NCT03673501). Randomization was 1:1 to ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD) or sunitinib 50 mg QD (4 wks on/2 wks off). Baseline peripheral whole blood was analyzed by Guardant360, a 74-gene ctDNA next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assay. Only KIT mutations are reported here. Results: Of 453 pts in the overall intent-to-treat (ITT) population, 362 (80%) samples were analyzed. ctDNA was detected in 280/362 (77%), with KIT mutations detected in 213/280 (76%). Common resistance mutations were in the KIT activation loop (AL; exons 17/18; 89/213, 42%) and ATP-binding pocket (ATP-BP; exons 13/14; 81/213, 38%). Efficacy in pts with detectable ctDNA in the KIT exon 11 and overall ITT populations was consistent with the primary analysis based on tumor data used for randomization. Pts with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 (−9/13/14) mutations had superior progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) with ripretinib vs sunitinib, whereas pts with exon 11 + 13/14 (−9/17/18) mutations had better PFS, ORR, and OS with sunitinib vs ripretinib (Table). Subgroup safety profiles were consistent with the primary analysis. Conclusions: While KIT ATP-BP mutations predicted clinical benefit from sunitinib vs ripretinib, pts harboring resistance mutations in the KIT AL derived meaningful clinical benefit from ripretinib but not sunitinib. This study demonstrates the value of ctDNA NGS-based sequencing of the complex landscape of KIT mutations to predict the clinical benefit of ripretinib or sunitinib as second-line therapy in pts with advanced GIST. Clinical trial information: NCT03673501 . [Table: see text]

11562 Background: Afami-cel is an autologous, HLA-A*02-restricted, specific peptide enhanced affinity receptor, T-cell therapy engineered to target MAGE-A4+ solid tumors. The pivotal, 2-cohort, single-arm, Phase 2, SPEARHEAD-1 trial (NCT04044768) with afami-cel met its primary endpoint based on Cohort 1 data. As of September 1, 2021, in 47 patients (pts) with metastatic synovial sarcoma (SyS) or myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCLS), the overall response rate (ORR) per independent review was 34% with encouraging durability (Van Tine, et al. Paper 30: CTOS 2021; Virtual). To identify potential stratification factors for response and assess whether response is a proxy for progression-free survival (PFS), we present pooled analyses using data from the prior Phase 1 trial (NCT03132922) and Cohort 1 of the SPEARHEAD-1 trial. Methods: Eligible pts (16–75 years) were HLA-A*02+ with MAGE-A4+ tumors. Pts received afami-cel after lymphodepleting chemotherapy. The pooled analyses evaluated ORR per RECIST v1.1 by investigator review, stratified by 7 factors, and safety. Results: In the pooled data, 69 pts received afami-cel (2.12–9.99×109 transduced T-cells) and were evaluable for response (Phase 1, n = 18; Phase 2, n = 51); all expressed one eligible HLA-A*02 allele. Median (range) for: age was 42 years (19–76), number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (1–12), and tumor MAGE-A4 H-score was 230 (60–300). Median (range) H-score was higher in SyS (256 [60–300]) than in MRCLS (180 [112–230]). The pooled investigator-assessed ORR was 36.2% (40.7% in SyS; 10.0% in MRCLS). Responses occurred across a wide MAGE-A4 H-score range (134–300). Median (range) duration of response was 52 weeks (8.29–75.14). Response rate was higher in the 59 pts with SyS: with ≤2 vs ≥3 prior lines of therapy (55.2% vs 26.7%), baseline target lesion sum of longest diameters <10cm vs ≥10cm (53.1% vs 25.9%), MAGE-A4 H-score ≥200 vs <200 (46.3% vs 27.8%), without vs with bridging therapy (48.6% vs 29.2%), who were female vs male (46.4% vs 35.5%), aged ≥40 vs <40 years (45.7% vs 33.3%), and from North America vs Europe (42.6% vs 33.3%). In responders vs non-responders with SyS, respectively, median PFS was 58.3 vs 11. 0 weeks (log-rank p-value <0.0001); the probability of being progression-free at 24 weeks was 0.8 vs 0.2. The pooled benefit:risk profile of afami-cel was similar to that in the SPEARHEAD-1 trial (Van Tine, et al. Paper 30: CTOS 2021; Virtual.). Conclusions: We show that baseline tumor burden, prior systemic treatment history, and MAGE-A4 tumor expression levels are potential factors associated with response to afami-cel, although their true predictive value for response status awaits confirmation. Our findings will inform the ongoing clinical development of afami-cel in sarcoma, especially for prognostic studies with PFS or overall survival endpoints. Clinical trial information: NCT04044768, NCT03132922.

11541 Background: Ripretinib (R) is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated for the treatment of patients (pts) with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) after prior treatment with ≥3 TKIs. In the INTRIGUE study (NCT03673501) there was no significant difference in median PFS (primary endpoint) between R and sunitinib (S). We present exploratory analyses of tolerability data and selected pt reported outcomes (PROs). Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to R 150 mg QD or S 50 mg QD 4 weeks on/2 weeks off.Dose modification was allowed for toxicity management. The event of interest was severe or life-threatening (grade ≥3) treatment-related adverse event prior to progression (sTRAE). Days with at least one sTRAE were summed for all treated pts and for pts with ≥1 sTRAE event. PROs were assessed using questions from EORTC QLQ-C30 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at cycle 1 (C1) day 1 (D1), D15, and D29; D1 and D29 of all other cycles; as well as at end of treatment. Differences in PRO scores between baseline and later assessments were calculated across visits. Long-term data will be presented. Results: Pts receiving R (n = 223) versus (vs) S (n = 221) experienced fewer sTRAEs (24% vs 51%, respectively). For all treated pts, the mean time with sTRAEs was 11 days for R and 42 days for S (ratio 0.27, P<0.0001). For pts with ≥1 sTRAE, the mean number of days with a sTRAE was 48 days for R vs 81 days for S (ratio 0.59, p = 0.037). Completion of PRO assessments across the two treatment arms was similar (baseline: R [n = 199], S [n = 199]; C1 D29: R [n = 167], S [n = 177]). Significant differences in self-reported functioning and symptoms were observed by C1 D29. For PROs relating to commonly reported sTRAEs, except constipation, pts in the R arm reported better outcomes than pts in the S arm. Pts in the R arm reported significantly (p<0.05) less decline compared to baseline in pt-reported role function as well as less increase, or improvement, in symptoms of fatigue, appetite loss, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and pain vs pts in the S arm. Moderate or severe effect of skin toxicity on pt life, as measured by DLQI in the R arm (n = 165) and in the S arm (n = 175), was observed in 6.6% of pts in the R arm vs 14.8% of pts in the S arm (p = 0.015). Conclusions: In the INTRIGUE study the total number of days with sTRAEs was fewer for pts receiving R vs S. Pts in the R arm also reported significantly less decline in pt-reported role function and less increase in symptoms related to commonly reported sTRAEs, except constipation, vs pts in the S arm. Medical writing provided by Costello Medical. Clinical trial information: NCT03673501.