Shanmugam, Kandavel

BACKGROUNDA point mutation (V600E) in the BRAF oncogene is a prognostic biomarker and may predict for nonresponse to anti‐EGFR antibody therapy in patients with colorectal carcinoma. BRAFV600E mutations are frequently detected in tumors with microsatellite instability and indicate a sporadic origin. We used a mutation‐specific antibody to examine mutant BRAFV600E protein expression and its concordance with BRAFV600E mutation data.METHODSPrimary stage III colon carcinomas were analyzed for BRAFV600E mutations in exon 15, and 50 BRAFV600E mutation carriers and 25 wild‐type tumors were selected for analysis of BRAF proteins by immunohistochemistry (IHC). IHC was performed in archival tissue specimens using a pan‐BRAF antibody and a mutation‐specific antibody against BRAFV600E proteins. Staining was scored by 2 pathologists who were blinded to clinical and mutation data.RESULTSUsing a pan‐BRAF antibody, total BRAF protein expression was observed in the tumor cell cytoplasm in 74 of 75 colon carcinomas. A mutation‐specific antibody identified diffuse cytoplasmic staining of mutant BRAFV600E proteins in 49 of 74 cancers. Analysis using a polymerase chain reaction‐based assay revealed that all 49 of these cancers carried BRAFV600E mutations. In contrast, BRAFV600E staining was absent in all 25 tumors that carried wild‐type copies of BRAF.CONCLUSIONSA BRAF mutation‐specific (V600E) antibody detected tumors with BRAFV600E mutations and exhibited complete concordance with a DNA‐based method. These results support the use of IHC as a simplified strategy to screen colorectal cancers for BRAFV600E mutations in clinical practice. Cancer 2013;119:2765–2770. © 2013 American Cancer Society.

Abstract MUC1 is a heterodimeric transmembrane glycoprotein that is overexpressed and aberrantly glycosylated in ductal adenocarcinomas. Differential phosphorylation of the MUC1 cytoplasmic tail (MUC1CT) has been associated with signaling events that influence the proliferation and metastasis of cancer cells. We identified a novel tyrosine phosphorylation site (HGRYVPP) in the MUC1CT by mass spectrometric analysis of MUC1 from human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines. Analyses in vitro and in vivo showed that platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ) catalyzed phosphorylation of this site and of tyrosine in the RDTYHPM site. Stimulation of S2-013.MUC1F cells with PDGF-BB increased nuclear colocalization of MUC1CT and β-catenin. PDGF-BB stimulation had no significant effect on cell proliferation rate; however, it enhanced invasion in vitro through Matrigel and in vivo tumor growth and metastases. Invasive properties of the cells were significantly altered on expression of phosphorylation-abrogating or phosphorylation-mimicking mutations at these sites. We propose that interactions of MUC1 and PDGFRβ induce signal transduction events that influence the metastatic properties of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. [Cancer Res 2007;67(11):5201–10]

Abstract Much of the ability of the MUC1 oncoprotein to foster tumorigenesis and tumor progression likely originates from the interaction of its cytoplasmic tail with proteins involved in oncogenic signaling. Many of these interactions are regulated by phosphorylation, as the cytoplasmic tail contains seven highly conserved tyrosines and several serine/threonine phosphorylation sites. We have developed a cell line–based model system to study the effects of tyrosine phosphorylation on MUC1 signaling, with particular emphasis on its effects on gene transcription. COS-7 cells, which lack endogenous MUC1, were stably infected with wild-type MUC1 or a MUC1 construct lacking all seven tyrosines (MUC1 Y0) and analyzed for effects on transcription mediated by the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathways. COS.MUC1 Y0 cells showed heightened active ERK1/2 with increased activator protein-1 (AP-1) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) transcriptional activity; there was also a simultaneous decrease in NF-κB transcriptional activity and nuclear localization. These changes altered the phenotype of COS.MUC1 Y0 cells, as this line displayed increased invasion and enhanced [3H]thymidine incorporation. Analysis of the three lines also showed significant differences in their cell cycle profile and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation when the cells were serum starved. These data support the growing evidence that MUC1 is involved in transcriptional regulation and link MUC1 for the first time to the NF-κB pathway. (Mol Cancer Res 2006;4(7):489–97)