Kennedy, Nicholas I.

Purpose To determine (1) the demographic characteristics as well as radiographic findings of medial versus lateral meniscal root tears at time of presentation, (2) treatment decisions and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing medial versus lateral root repair, and (3) risk factors for worse clinical and radiographic outcomes. Methods A retrospective review was performed to identify patients with symptomatic, medial, or lateral meniscus posterior root tears with a minimum 2‐year follow‐up. Radiographs were graded using Kellgren‐Lawrence scores. Subanalysis was performed on 62 patients who underwent root repair. Tegner, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee scores, and progression to arthroplasty were analyzed in the repair groups. Patient demographics, radiographic findings, and clinical outcomes were compared between medial meniscus posterior horn root tear (MMRT) and lateral meniscus root repair (LMRT). Results Of the 141 root tears, 109 were MMRTs, 30 were LMRTs, and 2 patients had both. At the time of injury, patients with MMRTs had a significantly higher age (MMRT = 51.4 vs LMRT=24.6, P < .0001), body mass index (MMRT = 32.1 vs LMRT 25.8, P < .0001), Kellgren‐Lawrence score (MMRT = 1.3 vs LMRT=0.6, P < .0001), and higher rate of major meniscal extrusion (MMRT = 72% vs LMRT = 20%, P < .0001). Of the 30 LMRT, 30/30 (100.0%) were treated with meniscal repair. With MMRT, 52/109 (48%) were treated nonoperatively, 27/109 (25%) with partial meniscectomy, and 30/109 (27%) with meniscal repair. Sixty‐two patients underwent meniscus root repair with an average 41‐month follow‐up. LMRT had significantly increased International Knee Documentation Committee (LMRT = 89.5, MMRT = 80.4, P = .02) and Tegner scores (LMRT = 6.5, MMRT = 5.1, P < .05) compared with MMRT. Conclusions Compared with MMRTs, LMRTs occur in younger male patients with lower body mass index, less cartilage degeneration, less extrusion on magnetic resonance imaging, and more commonly with a ligament injury. Although good to excellent clinical outcomes were attained in select patients for both medial and lateral meniscus root repair, LMRTs may have better results after repair, suggesting that differences in injury and patient characteristics may contribute to differences in these outcomes. Level of Evidence Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Background: There are limited data comparing the outcomes of similarly matched patients with a medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) treated with nonoperative management, partial meniscectomy, or repair. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to compare treatment failure, clinical outcome scores, and radiographic findings for a matched cohort of patients who underwent either nonoperative management, partial meniscectomy, or transtibial pull-through repair for an MMPRT. We hypothesized that patients who underwent meniscus root repair will have lower rates of progression to arthroplasty than patients who were treated with nonoperative management or partial meniscectomy. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent transtibial medial meniscus posterior horn root repair were matched by meniscal laterality, age, sex, and Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grades to patients treated nonoperatively or with a partial meniscectomy. Progression to arthroplasty rates, International Knee Documentation Committee and Tegner scores, and radiographic outcomes were analyzed between groups. Results: Forty-five patients were included in this study (15 nonoperative, 15 partial meniscectomy, 15 root repair). Progression to arthroplasty demonstrated significant differences among treatment groups at a mean of 74 months (nonoperative, 4/15; partial meniscectomy, 9/15; meniscal repair, 0/15; P = .0003). The meniscus root repair group had significantly less arthritic progression, as measured by change in K-L grade from pre- to postoperatively (nonoperative, 1.0; partial meniscectomy, 1.1; meniscal repair, 0.1; P = .001). Conclusion: Meniscus root repair leads to significantly less arthritis progression and subsequent knee arthroplasty compared with nonoperative management and partial meniscectomy in a matched cohort based on patient characteristics.

Objectives: Meniscus repair is desirable over resection to prevent post-meniscectomy arthritis, especially in young and active patients. However, long-term data is currently lacking following isolated meniscus repair, particularly in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to report long-term follow-up of isolated meniscus tears treated by meniscus repair in a pediatric population, and to compare those results to previous mid-term follow-up data reported. We hypothesized that these patients would have satisfactory function and reoperation rates at long-term follow-up. Methods: Patients less than 18 undergoing repair of an isolated (without concomitant ACL injury) meniscus tear performed between 1990 and 2005 were included. At the time of final followup, recurrent tear, reoperations, and IKDC and Tegner scores were determined. With logistic regression, the overall failure between different tear types was calculated. Wilcoxon signed ranks tests were performed to calculate the differences in clinical outcome for different time-points, and Spearman coefficients were calculated for Tegner and IKDC with different variables. Results: At an average followup of 17.6 years (13.1 - 26.0 years), 32 patients with 33 isolated meniscus repairs (29 M: 3F) with an average age of 16.1 (9.9 - 18.7) were included in this study. At early follow-up, complex tears (80%) had a higher overall failure rate compared to simple tears (18.2%). However, no further failures occurred since mid-term follow-up with any tear type. At final follow-up, the average IKDC score was 92.3, which was significantly increased when compared to both preoperative 65.3 (p< 0.0001) and mid-term scores, 90.2 (p= 0.01). However, the average Tegner score (6.5) was significantly lower than both pre-operative 8.3 (p< 0.0001) and mid-term 8.4 (p< 0.0001) scores. There was no correlation for Tegner or IKDC values with any risk factors. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study demonstrates overall good to excellent long-term clinical outcomes following isolated meniscus repair in a pediatric population. Early failure and reoperation rates were variable depending on tear type, with complex multiplanar tears having more failures at short-term follow-up. However, at long-term follow-up, IKDC and Tegner scores were not significantly different for those with complex tears compared to other tear types.

Objectives The purpose of this study was to describe an arthroscopic surgical approach to identify and expose the popliteus tendon (PT), posterior fibular head, Fibular collateral ligament (FCL), popliteal fibular ligament (PFL), biceps femoris tendon, and the peroneal nerve. Methods 10 fresh human cadaveric knees were examined arthroscopically using standard anterior and posterior portals. The use of a transeptal approach with both posteromedial and posterolateral portals was required using a standard 30 degrees arthroscope. Optimal portal placement and specific technique and sequence for appropriate visualization of the PLC structures were tested and documented. Results In all specimens, all the PLC structures that we attempted to identify were successfully visualized. These included the PT, posterior fibular head, the FCL, the PFL, biceps femoris tendon, peroneal nerve, PT and FCL femoral attachments. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the identification and exposure of the PLC structures using an all arthroscopic approach can be successfully performed with precise portal placement. This technique may serve as a basis for arthroscopic treatment of PLC injuries.

AbstractBone marrow edema (BME) can be a late finding in osteoarthritis or a sign of subchondral insufficiency. The purpose of this study was to describe the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) finding we refer to as “osteomeniscal impact edema” (OMIE), or reactive BME adjacent to a displaced meniscus flap tear. In addition, this edema pattern is compared with a control group of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT) with subchondral insufficiency edema. MRI records from 2000 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed for studies that showed the presence of a medial meniscus displaced flap tear and an adjacent area of BME. The selected MRIs were matched to an equal number of MMPRT MRI studies. All MRI studies were assessed for cartilage surface grade using the modified Outerbridge classification system and for the extent of accompanying structural abnormalities using the whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score. Descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing were utilized to compare the MRI findings between groups. Twenty-two flap tear (OMIE group) patients with a mean age of 57 (SD: 15) and 22 root tear (MMPRT) group patients with a mean age of 61 (SD: 10) were included. MRIs in the OMIE group showed a distinctive pattern of focal, peripheral edema adjacent to the meniscus flap tear, compared with more diffuse, central edema in the MMPRT group. Quantitatively, MRIs of the MMPRT group showed significantly worse mean femoral Outerbridge scores (3.72 vs. 2.68, p < 0.0001), more severe central (1.63 vs. 0.5, p = 0.0007) and posterior (0.31 vs. 0.0, p = 0.04) subchondral edema grades, and a higher incidence of tibial subchondral fractures (3 vs. 0, p = 0.036). Meniscus flap tears may present with a distinct MRI pattern of focal, adjacent, peripheral edema, which we refer to as OMIE. Patients with meniscus flap tears showed significantly less arthritic change, lower subchondral edema grades, and a lower incidence of insufficiency fractures and subchondral collapse compared with the diffuse overload edema pattern found with root tears. The Level of Evidence for this study is III.

Background: Meniscal repair is desirable over resection to prevent postmeniscectomy arthritis, especially among young and active patients. However, long-term data are currently lacking following isolated meniscal repair, particularly in the pediatric population. Purpose/Hypothesis: To report long-term follow-up of isolated meniscal tears treated by meniscal repair in a pediatric and adolescent population and to compare those results with previous midterm follow-up data reported. The authors hypothesized that these patients would have satisfactory function and reoperation rates at long-term follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Forty-four patients aged ≤18 years undergoing repair of an isolated meniscal tear (without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament injury) between 1990 and 2005 were included. At the time of final follow-up, recurrent tear, reoperations, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner scores were determined. With logistic regression, the overall failure among tear types was calculated. Wilcoxon rank sum analysis were performed to calculate the differences in clinical outcome for different time points, and Spearman coefficients were calculated for Tegner and IKDC with different variables. Results: At a mean follow-up of 17.6 years (range, 13.1-25.9 years), 32 patients with 33 isolated meniscal repairs (29 male, 3 female) with a mean age of 16.1 years (range, 9.9-18.7 years) at surgery were included in this study. At early follow-up, the overall failure rate was 14 of 33 (42%); complex tears (80%) and bucket-handle tears (47%) had higher overall failure rates when compared with simple tears (18.2%), although only complex tears had a significantly higher failure rate. However, no further failures occurred since midterm follow-up with any tear type. At final follow-up, the mean IKDC score was 92.3, which was significantly increased when compared with preoperative (65.3, P < .0001) and midterm (90.2, P = .01) scores. The mean Tegner score (6.5) was significantly lower than both preoperative (8.3, P < .0001) and midterm (8.4, P < .0001) scores. There was no difference in Tegner or IKDC score for patients with successful versus failed repair. Conclusion: In conclusion, while there was a high early failure rate, this study demonstrated overall good to excellent long-term clinical outcomes after isolated meniscal repair in an adolescent population, even for those requiring reoperation. Early failure and reoperation rates were variable, depending on tear type, with complex multiplanar tears having more failures at short-term follow-up. However, at long-term follow-up, IKDC and Tegner scores were not significantly different for those with complex tears as compared with other tear types.

Background: Studies have shown good and excellent clinical and radiographic results after meniscal repair. Limited published information exists on the long-term outcomes, however, especially in a pediatric and adolescent population. Purpose: To determine long-term results of meniscal repair and concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in a pediatric and adolescent population. Specifically, the aims were to determine the clinical success rate of meniscal repair with concomitant ACL reconstruction, compare results with midterm outcomes, and analyze risk factors for failure. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Cases of meniscal repair with concomitant ACL reconstruction between 1990 and 2005 were reviewed among patients aged ≤18 years. Patient demographics, injury history, and surgical details were recorded, and risk factors for failure were analyzed. Physical examination findings and clinical outcomes at latest available follow-up were collected. Subjective knee outcomes were compared with midterm results. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were used to evaluate the available data. Results: Forty-seven patients (30 females, 17 males) with a mean age of 16 years (SD, 1.37) and a mean follow-up of 16.6 years (SD, 3.57) were included in this study. Overall, 13 patients (28%) failed meniscal repair and required repeat surgery at the time of final follow-up. Of the 13 failures, 9 underwent a subsequent meniscectomy; 2, meniscectomy and revision ACL reconstruction; 1, meniscal repair and revision ACL reconstruction; and 1, meniscal repair and subsequent meniscectomy. Mean International Knee Documentation Committee scores improved from 47.9 preoperatively to 87.7 postoperatively ( P < .01), and the mean score at long-term follow-up (87.7) did not significantly differ from that at the midterm follow-up (88.5) at a mean 7.4 years ( P = .97). Mean Tegner Activity Scale scores improved from 1.9 preoperatively to 6.3 postoperatively ( P < .01) and decreased from 8.3 at preinjury to 6.3 at final long-term follow-up ( P < .01). Conclusion: In conclusion, the long-term overall clinical success rate (failure-free survival) was 72% for repair of pediatric and adolescent meniscal tears in the setting of concomitant ACL reconstruction. Patients reported excellent knee subjective outcome scores that remained favorable when compared with midterm follow-up.

Background: Meniscal repair is desirable over resection to prevent post-meniscectomy arthritis, especially in young and active patients. However, long-term data is currently lacking following meniscus repair, particularly in the pediatric population. Purpose: To report long-term follow-up of isolated meniscus tears treated by meniscal repair in a pediatric population, and to compare those results to previous mid-term follow-up data reported. We hypothesized that these patients would have satisfactory function and reoperation rates at long-term follow-up. Methods: Patients less than 18 that had a meniscal repair procedure performed between 1990 and 2005 were included. Concomitant ACL reconstructions were excluded from the present study. At the time of final follow-up, recurrent meniscus tear, reoperation rates, and IKDC and Tegner scores were determined. Wilcoxin signed ranks tests were performed to calculate the differences in clinical outcome for the 3 time points (pre-operative, average 7 years post-op, and average 18 years post-op) and Spearman coefficients were calculated for Tegner and IKDC with different variables. Results: At an average follow-up of 18 years (range 13.2 - 25.9 years), 34 patients with 35 isolated meniscus repairs (4F: 30 M) with an average age of 16 (9.9 - 18.7) were included in this study. Of the 35 knees (34 patients), none had “failed” or re-injured their affected meniscus since mid-term follow-up in 2008. The average IKDC score was 92.1 which was found to be significantly increased when compared to both preoperative IKDC 64.7 (P<.0001) and mid-term IKDC scores, 89.8 (p=.02). However, the average Tegner score (6.5) was significantly lower than both pre-operative 8.28 (p<.0001) and the mid-term Tegner average 8.25 (p<.0001). Patients with a meniscus re-tear and subsequent partial meniscectomy had lower IKDC scores than clinically successful repairs (88.9 vs 94.0), but this did not reach statistical significance (p=.09). There was no correlation for Tegner or IKDC values with 1) rim width, 2) current age, 3) time elapsed since surgery, or 4) time from injury to surgery. There were also no differences in Tegner or IKDC scores when comparing; medial versus lateral, left versus right, tear types, surgical repair technique, or male vs female. Conclusion: This study demonstrates very good clinical long-term outcomes following meniscal repair in a pediatric population.