Boettcher, Brennan J.

Abstract: A 19-year-old female collegiate swimmer presented to our sports medicine clinic with a history and physical examination consistent with right ulnar neuropathy at the cubital tunnel. Diagnostic ultrasound (US) revealed compression of the ulnar nerve under the cubital tunnel retinaculum (CTR) with nerve swelling proximal to the site of compression. Electrodiagnostic studies confirmed the diagnosis of a moderate to severe ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Treatment consisted of an US-guided decompression of the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel by cutting the CTR using a rotated stylet “v” cutting technique. The patient's symptoms resolved, and she was able to begin a swimming progression 2 weeks after the procedure. After completion of this progression, she was able to successfully resume full, unrestricted competitive collegiate swimming without return of her symptoms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of an US-guided cubital tunnel decompression surgery.

ObjectiveThe primary aim of this study was to determine the inter‐ and intrarater reliability of ultrasound (US) measurements of the ischiofemoral space (IFS) following a brief training session. A secondary aim was to determine if reliability correlated with sonographer experience.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingPhysical medicine and rehabilitation department within a tertiary care institution.ParticipantsSeven male and 3 female individuals were recruited to serve as models. Nine physician sonographers (3 postgraduate year [PGY]‐2 residents, 3 PGY‐4 residents, 3 physicians) were recruited to serve as sonographers.Methods or InterventionsSonographers received a 15‐minute educational session on identifying the IFS with US, followed by 20 minutes of practice. Models were then placed in a prone position and secured to prevent hip movement. All operators measured bilateral IFSs in each model twice with a washout period between measurements. Operators were blinded to all measurements.Main Outcome MeasuresPrimary outcomes were inter‐ and intrarater reliability interclass coefficients (ICCs) of IFS measurements among the groups with different levels of US experience. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of inter‐ and intrarater reliability ICCs of IFS measurements between groups, and the difference of mean IFS measurements between groups.ResultsIntrarater reliability ICCs were 0.829, 0.680, and 0.596 for physician, PGY‐4, and PGY‐2 groups, respectively. Interrater reliability ICCs were 0.722, 0.427, and 0.558 for physician, PGY‐4, and PGY‐2 groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences in reliability were identified between groups. Mean IFS measurements were 31.2, 33.4, and 34.0 mm for physician, PGY‐4, and PGY‐2 groups, respectively. Physician measurements were significantly smaller than the PGY‐4 and PGY‐2 measurements (P < .049 and P < .01).ConclusionsFollowing a brief training session, experienced sonographers demonstrated excellent IFS measurement intrarater reliability, whereas PGY‐4 and PGY‐2 sonographers demonstrated fair intrarater reliability. All sonographers demonstrated fair interrater reliability.Level of EvidenceII