Potter, John D.

Abstract Background: Cigarette smoking (CS) is an established, although relatively modest, colorectal cancer (CRC) risk factor. Emerging data suggest that CS might affect distinct pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis. In this study, we examined CS-associated CRC risks by KRAS mutation status in the population-based Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS). Methods: The IIWHS recruited 41,836 randomly selected Iowa women, ages 55-69 years, with a valid driver's license at study entry (1986). CS and other exposure variables were assessed at baseline, by self-report. Incident CRC cases were ascertained by annual linkage with the Iowa Cancer Registry. Archived, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were collected from 732 representative CRC cases diagnosed through 12/31/2002. CS was categorized by smoking status (current, former), average number of cigarettes per day (1-19, 20-39, > 40) and pack-years (1-19, 20-39, > 40); never smokers were defined as the reference group. KRAS mutation status (wildtype [wt] vs. mutated [mut]) was determined by direct sequence analysis of codons 12 and 13 (exon 2). Multivariate Cox regression models were fit to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Of the 732 available CRC cases, 507 (69%) had complete CS and KRAS data. Each of the CS-related variables was more strongly associated with KRAS-wt vs. KRAS-mut tumors (see Table). However, event rates were relatively small in some cells, and tests for heterogeneity between KRAS-defined subtypes were not statistically significant (p > 0.05 for each comparison). Conclusions: These findings suggest that CS may affect colorectal carcinogenesis through KRAS-independent pathways, but additional data are needed from larger, more diverse study populations. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1891. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1891

Abstract B128 Background The B vitamin folate affects colorectal carcinogenesis through effects on nucleotide synthesis and possibly DNA methylation. Animal models and epidemiologic evidence suggest that folate from diet and supplements can prevent the development of colorectal cancer (CRC), but that high folate intake after adenomas or cancer are established may accelerate progression or recurrence. The chemotherapeutic agent 5-fluorouracil inhibits thymidylate synthase, a folate-metabolizing enzyme, and the effect of folate intake on treatment efficacy is unknown. Supplement use and folate intake are high among adults in the U.S., particularly with food supply fortification, and higher still among cancer patients and survivors. However, few studies have addressed use of folic acid-containing supplements (FAS) among colorectal cancer patients, how use changes after diagnosis, and what factors determine changes in FAS use. Methods The Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) is a multicenter study of colorectal cancer cases, their family members and controls, recruited since 1998 at six sites in the United States, Australia and Canada. The current analysis includes 1,092 CRC cases with epidemiologic data available from questionnaires administered at enrollment, asking about supplement use and other risk factors before diagnosis, and from follow-up questionnaires about 5 years later. Baseline characteristics for cases who began using FAS (including multivitamins) after diagnosis were compared to those for cases who used FAS neither before nor after diagnosis. We used logistic regression models to evaluate associations between age, sex, CCFR site, race, education, income, lifetime exercise, smoking, body mass index, and diet and change in FAS use, adjusting each model for age, sex and site, when appropriate. Results FAS use before CRC diagnosis was 35.4%, while 55.1% of cases used FAS after diagnosis. Women were more likely to begin FAS use after diagnosis (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.17-2.19). Current smokers were less likely than nonsmokers to begin FAS use (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40-0.97), as were those consuming more red meat (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.70 for those in the highest versus lowest intake categories, ptrend=0.012). Subjects with higher fruit intake were more likely to begin FAS use (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.16-3.30 for highest versus lowest intake, ptrend=0.013). We also observed a suggestive association between lifetime physical activity and change in FAS use for active versus less active subjects (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.01-2.16), though there was no trend with increasing levels of physical activity (ptrend=0.27). Finally, we found that residents of non-U.S. countries were less likely to begin FAS use (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.96 for Ontario, Canada and OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.11-0.38 for Australia). Conclusions: Our analysis showed substantial increases in the use of folic acid-containing supplements after diagnosis with colorectal cancer in CCFR participants, especially among women, U.S. residents, nonsmokers, and those who consumed more fruit and less meat. This study begins to characterize CRC patients likely to be using FAS, and suggests that its use is widespread. This finding is notable given evidence that folate may accelerate progression of colorectal cancer, and the unknown effect that FAS intake may have on the efficacy of cancer treatment and on survival. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2008;1(7 Suppl):B128.

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common incident cancer among women in the United States. Alcohol use has been proposed as a CRC risk factor, but existing observational data remain inconsistent. To date, relatively few studies have examined associations between alcohol use and CRC risk based on molecularly-defined subtypes. Aim: To evaluate associations between alcohol use and incident CRC overall, as well as by molecularly-defined subtypes including microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and BRAF mutation status in the prospective, population-based, Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS). Methods: The IWHS recruited 41,836 randomly selected Iowa women, ages 55–69 years at enrollment, in 1986. Women with prevalent cancers or no follow-up were excluded, leaving 38,001 eligible for this study. Alcohol use was obtained from a self-administered food frequency questionnaire at study baseline. Incident CRCs were identified through annual linkage with the State Health Registry of Iowa. Archived, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were recently requested for incident CRC cases diagnosed through December 31, 2002. In the present study, useable tissue specimens were obtained and molecularly characterized for 563/1,255 cases (45%), whose baseline age, body mass index, physical activity level, total energy intake and alcohol use were similar to non-retrieved cases (p > 0.05 for each comparison). Alcohol use was categorized as never (n=21,464), < 3.4 g/day (n=8,313) and > 3.4 g/day (n=8,224), based on the median split among users. Molecularly-defined CRC subtypes were categorized as MSI-high (MSIH; n=148), MSI-low or microsatellite stable (MSI-L/MSS; n=400); CIMP-positive (n=167) or CIMP-negative (n=368); and BRAF-mutation (n=154) or BRAF-wildtype (n=391). Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated for alcohol use compared to never drinkers, using multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, smoking status, physical activity level, exogenous estrogen use, and daily intakes of total energy, total fat, red meat, sucrose, calcium, folate, methionine and vitamin E. Results: There was no statistically significant association between alcohol use and overall CRC risk (RR=1.00; 95% CI = 0.86–1.15 for < 3.4 g/day versus none; RR=1.06; 95% CI=0.91–1.24 for >3.4 g/day versus none). Further, there were no associations with alcohol use for specific, molecularly-defined CRC subtypes (RRs shown for > 3.4 g/day versus none): MSI-H (RR=1.07; 95% CI=0.70–1.64); MSI-L or MSS (RR=1.12; 95% CI=0.85–1.47); CIMP-positive (RR=0.97; 95% CI=0.64–1.47); CIMP-negative (RR=1.13; 95% CI=0.85–1.50); BRAF-mutation (RR=0.94; 95% CI=0.61–1.45); and BRAF-wildtype (RR=1.20; 95% CI=0.91–1.57). Conclusion: In this cohort of older women, alcohol use did not appear to be a risk factor for incident CRC, overall or by the defined molecular subtypes. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2010;3(1 Suppl):A115.

Abstract Background: Postmenopausal hormone (PMH) therapy represents a controversial colorectal cancer (CRC) preventive intervention. Because colorectal carcinogenesis is a heterogeneous process, we evaluated associations between PMH therapy and incident CRC in relation to KRAS mutation status in a population-based cohort of older women [Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS)]. Methods: The IWHS enrolled 41,836 randomly selected women, ages 55 to 69 years, in 1986. PMH therapy and other exposure data were recorded at baseline. Tissue samples from prospectively identified CRC cases (n = 507) were analyzed for somatic KRAS mutations (exon 2, codons 12 and 13). Multivariable Cox regression models were fit to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: PMH therapy (ever vs. never) was inversely associated with KRAS mutation–negative (RR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.66–1.06; P = 0.14) and KRAS mutation–positive (RR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.58–1.16; P = 0.27) tumors, although the observed risk estimates were not statistically significant. When anatomic subsite was additionally considered, the strongest association was found for KRAS mutation–negative, distal colorectal tumors (RR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43–0.96; P = 0.03). Conclusions: To our knowledge, we provide the first report of KRAS-defined CRC risks associated with PMH therapy. These data suggest that PMH therapy may reduce CRC risk through mechanisms beyond KRAS mutation status but might provide greater benefits for KRAS mutation–negative than mutation-positive tumors (at least in the distal colorectum). Impact: Findings from this prospective cohort study provide novel insights about the molecular biology of PMH therapy–related CRC risk reduction. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(4); 681–4. ©2012 AACR.

Background Postmenopausal hormone (PMH) therapy may reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, but existing data are inconclusive. Objectives To evaluate associations between PMH therapy and incident CRC, overall and by molecularly defined subtypes, in the population-based Iowa Women's Health Study of older women. Methods Exposure data were collected from Iowa Women's Health Study participants (55–69 years) at baseline (1986). Archived, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens for 553 CRC cases were collected and analysed to determine microsatellite instability (MSI-L/MSS or MSI-H), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP-negative or CIMP-positive) and BRAF mutation ( BRAF -wildtype or BRAF -mutated) status. Multivariable Cox regression models were fit to estimate RRs and 95% CIs. Results PMH therapy (ever vs never use) was inversely associated with incident CRC overall (RR=0.82; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.93), with a significantly lower risk for MSI-L/MSS tumours (RR=0.75; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.94), and borderline significantly lower risks for CIMP-negative (RR=0.79; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.01) and BRAF -wildtype (RR=0.83; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.04) tumours. For PMH therapy >5 years, the subtype-specific risk estimates for MSI-L/MSS, CIMP-negative and BRAF -wildtype tumours were: RR=0.60, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.91; RR=0.68, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.03; and RR=0.70, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.05, respectively. PMH therapy was not significantly associated with the MSI-H, CIMP-positive or BRAF -mutated CRC subtypes. Conclusions In this prospective cohort study, PMH therapy was inversely associated with distinct molecularly defined CRC subtypes, which may be related to differential effects from oestrogen and/or progestin on heterogeneous pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis.

AbstractBackground: Supplement use among cancer patients is high, and folic acid intake in particular may adversely affect the progression of colorectal cancer. Few studies have evaluated the use of folic acid–containing supplements (FAS) and its predictors in colorectal cancer patients.Objective: To assess the use of FAS, change in use, and its predictors after colorectal cancer diagnosis.Design: We used logistic regression models to investigate predictors of FAS use and its initiation after colorectal cancer diagnosis in 1,092 patients recruited through the Colon Cancer Family Registry.Results: The prevalence of FAS use was 35.4% before and 55.1% after colorectal cancer diagnosis (P = 0.004). Women were more likely than men to use FAS after diagnosis [odds ratio (OR), 1.47; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.14-1.89], as were those consuming more fruit (Ptrend < 0.0001) or vegetables (Ptrend = 0.001), and U.S. residents (P < 0.0001). Less likely to use FAS after diagnosis were nonwhite patients (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.97), current smokers (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.96), and those with higher meat intake (Ptrend = 0.03). Predictors of FAS initiation after diagnosis were generally similar to those of FAS use after diagnosis, although associations with race and vegetable intake were weaker and those with exercise stronger.Conclusions: Our analysis showed substantial increases in the use of FAS after diagnosis with colorectal cancer, with use or initiation more likely among women, Caucasians, U.S. residents, and those with a health-promoting life-style.Impact: Studies of cancer prognosis that rely on prediagnostic exposure information may result in substantial misclassification. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(8); 2023–34. ©2010 AACR.

Abstract Genetic risk factors are important contributors to the development of colorectal cancer. Following the definition of a linkage signal at 9q22-31, we fine mapped this region in an independent collection of colon cancer families. We used a custom array of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) densely spaced across the candidate region, performing both single-SNP and moving-window association analyses to identify a colon neoplasia risk haplotype. Through this approach, we isolated the association effect to a five-SNP haplotype centered at 98.15 Mb on chromosome 9q. This haplotype is in strong linkage disequilibrium with the haplotype block containing HABP4 and may be a surrogate for the effect of this CD30 Ki-1 antigen. It is also in close proximity to GALNT12, also recently shown to be altered in colon tumors. We used a predictive modeling algorithm to show the contribution of this risk haplotype and surrounding candidate genes in distinguishing between colon cancer cases and healthy controls. The ability to replicate this finding, the strength of the haplotype association (odds ratio, 3.68), and the accuracy of our prediction model (∼60%) all strongly support the presence of a locus for familial colon cancer on chromosome 9q. Cancer Res; 70(13); 5409–18. ©2010 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: Lynch syndrome family members with inherited germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes have a high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), and cases typically have tumors that exhibit a high level of microsatellite instability (MSI). There is some evidence that smoking is a risk factor for CRCs with high MSI; however, the association of smoking with CRC among those with Lynch syndrome is unknown. Experimental Design: A multicentered retrospective cohort of 752 carriers of pathogenic MMR gene mutations was analyzed, using a weighted Cox regression analysis, adjusting for sex, ascertainment source, the specific mutated gene, year of birth, and familial clustering. Results: Compared with never smokers, current smokers had a significantly increased CRC risk [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 1.62; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.01-2.57] and former smokers who had quit smoking for 2 or more years were at decreased risk (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.82). CRC risk did not vary according to age at starting. However, light smoking (<10 cigarettes per day) and shorter duration of smoking (<10 years) were associated with decreased CRC risk (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29-0.91 and HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30-0.89, respectively). For former smokers, CRC risk decreased with years since quitting (P trend <0.01). Conclusions: People with Lynch syndrome may be at increased risk of CRC if they smoke regularly. Although our data suggest that former smokers, short-term smokers, and light smokers are at decreased CRC risk, these findings need further confirmation, preferably using prospective designs. Clin Cancer Res; 16(4); 1331–9

Abstract Epidemiologic evidence supports a role for vitamin D in colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Variants in vitamin D–related genes might modify the association between vitamin D levels and CRC risk. In this analysis, we did a comprehensive evaluation of common variants in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and the vitamin D–binding protein (GC; group-specific component) genes using a population-based case–unaffected sibling control design that included 1,750 sibships recruited into the Colon Cancer Family Registry. We also evaluated whether any associations differed by calcium supplement use, family history of CRC, or tumor characteristics. Heterogeneity by calcium and vitamin D intake was evaluated for a subset of 585 cases and 837 sibling controls who completed a detailed food frequency questionnaire. Age- and sex-adjusted associations were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Overall, we did not find evidence for an association between any single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in VDR or GC and risk for CRC (range of unadjusted P values 0.01-0.98 for VDR and 0.07-0.95 for GC). None of these associations was significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. We also found no evidence that calcium or vitamin D intake (food and supplement) from the food frequency questionnaire modified the association estimates between VDR and GC SNPs and CRC. We did observe associations between SNPs in GC and microsatellite unstable CRC, although these results should be confirmed in additional studies. Overall, our results do not provide evidence for a role of common genetic variants in VDR or GC in susceptibility to CRC. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(2); 525–36