Abstract The study of genomic aberrations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has yielded critical information, now routinely used for the prognostication of patients. An unbiased search for genome wide areas of copy number change is needed to identify possible primary genetic events in CLL and to elucidate their relationship to other known cytogenetic factors, such as deletions of 13q14, 11q23 and 17p13 and trisomy 12. Here we report on a study where we used a 60-mer oligo array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH, 44B platform from Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). We observed the most common genetic aberrations in CLL and in similar frequencies as would be predicted for CLL (e.g. 44% showing deletions of chromosome 13q14). Among those patients, 45% had no apparent other aberration. Of great interest, small bi-allelic deletions of chromosome 13, which predominantly involved the DLEU1 and DLEU2 locus, were detected in 4 patients (16%). Deletions of 11q23 were observed in 6 cases (24%), and while some involved the ATM locus one did not, casting doubt on the precise gene deregulated by these deletions. Large deletions of the whole 17p-arm were detected in three cases (12%). Trisomy 12 was present in only two cases (8%). No other trisomies were detected and also small regions of copy gain were uncommon. Monosomy of chromosomes 19, X and Y were present in three separate cases. Large deletions of chromosome 2p were seen in two cases, but an additional case had a small deletion involving the ALK gene. This case also had a breakpoint at chromosome 5 involving the NMP1 locus, suggestive of a t(2;5). A recent study (Mayr et al., Blood 2006) indicates that chromosomal translocations in CLL are present in 33% and were associated with a dismal prognosis. In our analysis we detected several breakpoints indicative of translocations. Detailed study is necessary to elucidate possible molecular events associated with these translocations. Other small regions of DNA copy loss were found at several locations throughout the genome. Regions of interest are shown in the table. In summary we show that multiple areas of recurrent genomic gain and loss can be identified in clonal cells of CLL and should lead to further insights into the understanding of disease pathogenesis. Chromosome Location Gene(s) of interest Loss 6q24.3 LATS Loss 10q23.3 LG11 Loss 10q24.2 PAX2, WNT8B, TLX1, POLL, NFKB2 Loss 11p15.4 PPFIBP2 Loss 12p13 TNFRSF1A and 7 Loss 15q22.1 TCF12 Loss 19p13.3 BAX, RUVBL2 Loss 20q11.2 TP53INP2 Loss 20q13.1 WFDC13
Expression of Tcl-1 as a Potential Prognostic Factor for Treatment Outcome in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
Abstract Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is primarily characterized by the presence of leukemic B lymphocytes resistant to the process of apoptosis. Causes for this resistance include aberrant expression of multiple anti-apoptotic proteins, perhaps including Tcl-1 (1). Tcl-1 is expressed during normal development of both B and T cells and activates Akt to provide a survival signal through phosphorylation and inactivation of apoptotic pathway components. Overexpression of Tcl-1 in the B cells of transgenic mice results in a B-cell leukemia phenotype typical of human CLL, suggesting a primary role for Tcl-1 in CLL tumorigenesis. A recent report showed that Tcl-1 protein expression in CLL cells correlated with other biological parameters, but no data were available as to its clinical relevance (2). We therefore examined Tcl-1 expression in relation to clinical outcome using 51 peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples from a Phase II clinical trial testing the combination of pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab in previously untreated CLL patients (Kay et al., ASH 2006). Tcl-1 protein expression was measured by immunoblot using GAPDH as a normalization control across lanes and lysate from a single Tcl-1 transgenic mouse spleen as a normalization control across immunoblots. All samples were run at least in duplicate and digital quantitation was performed using a ChemiDoc instrument (BioRad). Tcl-1 expression in patient cells was calculated in comparison to Tcl-1 expression in the mouse lysate, arbitrarily set to 1.0. Data were analyzed as a continuous measure as well as by specific cutoffs. Higher Tcl-1 expression was associated with failure to achieve a minimal residual disease-negative state after treatment. Specifically, Tcl-1 expression (measured as a continuous variable) was associated with residual disease measured by post-treatment CD5+/CD19+ cell percentages (continuous variable as well as dichotomized by cutpoint of 1.0% for CD5+/CD19+; p=0.03 for both comparisons). For the dichotomized Tcl-1 expression with the cutpoint of 0.275 (second tertile), this variable was marginally significantly associated with whether or not post-treatment CD5+/CD19+ was less than 1.0%. Using this same cutoff, there was also a suggestion that patients with reduced Tcl-1 were more likely to achieve a complete response. Finally, progression-free survival was shorter in patients with increased Tcl-1 expression, although these data did not reach statistical significance in this sample set. Tcl-1 < 0.275 Tcl-1≥ 0.275 p value CD5/CD19≥ 1% 15 10 0.046 CD5/CD19 < 1% 16 2 CR 17 3 0.064 No CR 18 13 Median PFS (mos.) 36.5 17.1 0.137 Statistically significant associations with other parameters including Rai stage, IgVH mutation status, ZAP-70 expression, CD38 expression, and interphase cytogenetics categories were not detected in this sample set. These data further support the clinical relevance of the Tcl-1 mouse model to human CLL, and provide preliminary evidence that Tcl-1 protein expression correlates with clinical outcome of CLL patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy. If validated in larger studies, Tcl-1 expression may serve as a novel prognostic factor.
Combination Chemoimmunotherapy with Pentostatin, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab Shows Significant Clinical Activity with Low Accompanying Toxicity in Previously Untreated B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
Abstract BACKGROUND: B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is still uncurable but very powerful new tools are available with the use of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). Purine nucleoside-based regimens that incorporate rituximab have generated very high levels of overall responses (OR) with significant percentage of those complete responses (CR) in previously untreated CLL. Here we report and update our experience with a phase 2 pentostatin-based CIT regimen for previously untreated CLL as conducted at 2 medical centers. We also studied the association of outcome based on risk stratification parameters and achievement of minimal residual disease. METHODS: Building on prior work of pentostatin in CLL by us (Kay ASH, 2004) and others, we initiated a trial of combined pentostatin (P)(2 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (C)(600 mg/m2) and rituximab (R)(375 mg/m2) for symptomatic, previously untreated patients (n=65). This PCR regimen is given on a 21-day, 6-cycle schedule. However, the initial cycle of treatment uses thrice weekly rituximab as described by us earlier. In brief, this was rituximab at 100 mg/m2 on day 1, 375 mg/m2 on days 3 and 5 of the first week only. Prophylactic Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim and Acyclovir were given to all patients for 1 year starting on the first cycle of therapy with PCR. All patients were risk stratified using CD38, ZAP-70, immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene (IgVH) and FISH panel assessments at entry. RESULTS: These patients were characterized as mostly in high-risk categories. Of 64 evaluable patients, 34 (53%) were high Rai risk (stage 3–4), 71% were non mutated for the IgVH gene, 34% were CD38+ and 34% were ZAP-70+. Thirty patients (52%) had one FISH anomaly, and 21 (36%) had complex FISH defects. Thirty-eight patients (58%) had grade 3+ hematologic toxicity but minimal transfusion needs, and no major infections. NCI Working Group Criteria Responses occurred in 58 (91%) with 26 (41%) complete responses (CR), 14 (22%) nodular partial responses (nodular PR), and 18 (28%) partial responses (PR) patients. Outcome for all 64 patients demonstrates a median progression-free survival of 32.6 months. Importantly, no high risk factor (i.e., age, FISH, IgVH status, CD38+, ZAP-70+) except for del (17p) defect (n=3) precluded attaining a CR or NPR. In contrast, we found this regimen was equally effective in young vs. elderly (>70 yrs) patients and in del(11)(q22.3) vs. other favorable prognostic FISH factors. Examination of outcome among CR and nodular PR patients for PFS by flow cytometry status (negative vs. positive, i.e., ≤ 1 % CD5+/CD19+ vs. ≥ 1 % CD5+/CD19+) demonstrated improvement in progression free survival for patients who attained flow cytometry negativity (p = 0.009). Conclusion: This novel regimen of pentostatin, cyclophosphamide and rituximab for previously untreated CLL demonstrated significant clinical activity despite poor risk-based prognoses with minimal toxicity in terms of bone marrow suppression and/or infections. The additional feature of this approach is the ability to have durable responses for all age groups and even CLL patients with a del(11)(q22.3).
Molecular Interrogation of Biclonal Multiple Myeloma for Clonal Relatedness.
Abstract Abstract 2928 Multiple myeloma (MM) is caused by the clonal expansion of malignant plasma cells (PCs) producing high levels of monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) or M-protein. However, ∼2% of all patients with monoclonal gammopathies (MG) have more than 1 M-protein, a condition termed biclonal gammopathy or double monoclonal gammopathy (DMG). These patients can express M-proteins with different heavy chain (HC) isotypes and different light chains (LCs) or different HCs that are LC-matched. Reports suggest that ∼87% of DMGs with different HCs have matched LCs, but without molecular analysis at the nucleotide level, clonal relationships are unknown. Thus, DMG patients may have either two independent malignant PC clones that coincidentally express the same type of LC or the two clones are related and reflect previous or ongoing class switch recombination (CSR). This latter variant would offer novel insight into the origin and differentiation of the malignant clone. Of note, prior reports of HC-dissimilar/LC-matched DMGs are limited to the analysis of single patients and with few exceptions; do not include molecular analysis of the variable regions in Ig HC or LC genes at the nucleotide level. In this study, we interrogate a cohort of MM patients with known HC-dissimilar/LC-matched DMGs for the frequency of clonal relatedness. The cohort was identified by searching our MG database for patients with: 1) HC-dissimilar/LC-matched Igs as determined by immunofixation; 2) >10% bone marrow (BM) PCs; and 3) no transplant prior to BM collection. Eight patients (7 MM and 1 smoldering MM/primary amyloid) were identified for further molecular evaluation. All 8 cases expressed IgG and IgA HCs. Three patients expressed kappa LC (K-LC) and 5 expressed lambda LC (L-LC). To determine if the IgG and IgA M-proteins were clonally related in each patient, we performed Ig HC variable gene (IGHV) PCR with sense primers to all IGHV genes and an antisense primer specific to IgG or IgA. In all 8 patients, a single productive IGHV gene was determined with IgG and IgA. In 2/8 patients, the IgG and IgA HC variable regions were clearly distinct and therefore genuinely biclonal. Of note, PCs from 6/8 patients used the same IGH V-D-J genes in both IgG and IgA transcripts. In 5 of these 6 patients, the entire IgG and IgA variable region and HCDR3 were identical at nucleotide and amino acid (AA) levels. Of interest, one patient had common, as well as distinguishing IGHV region somatic mutations (SHM) between the IgG and IgA transcripts. The HCDR3 regions (including N nucleotides) were highly homologous but differed by 7 nucleotides which resulted in 3 AA differences between the 2 clonally related sequences. While these are compelling data, it remained possible that the malignant PCs in these patients simultaneously expressed IgG and IgA as a result of long nuclear transcripts. To test this possibility, we used immunofluorescence (IF) and verified the presence of both IgG and IgA expressing PCs in all cases. Parallel analysis of both K-LC and L-LC variable gene by PCR was done on the 6 patients with the same IGHV gene in both IgG and IgA transcripts. In 3/6 patients, there was a single somatically mutated LC identified corresponding to the LC detected by immunofixation. These results were also confirmed by IF. The remaining 3 patients appeared to express more than 1 LC rearrangement. Taken together these results confirm that HC-dissimilar/LC-matched DMG can present with various phenotypes at the molecular level. We describe the largest cohort to date documenting the frequency of DMG patients that can be classified as expressing 2 identical HCs with either a single LC or >1 LC based on molecular analysis. The former case may reflect an original progenitor cell that divided with one daughter cell subsequently experiencing further CSR yet the LC remained untouched. In the case where the HCs were slightly different, there may have been CSR with additional SHM of a daughter cell, or the molecular differences may reflect random somatic mutations occurring independent of germinal center reactions. These results suggest that HC-dissimilar/LC-matched DMG may occur more often than thought. Larger studies tracking M-protein levels over time accompanied by cytogenetic analyses are needed to determine if the two clonally-related class switch variants in DMG patients exhibit similar biological properties. This analysis would offer new insight into the genesis of this unique subtype of MM. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Role of Lncrnas in Early Stage Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable Region (IGHV) Unmutated CLL Disease Progression
Abstract BACKGROUND: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains a heterogeneous disease despite significant advances in disease classification based upon cellular and molecular markers. Rai stage, immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region mutation status (IGHV), cytogenetic abnormalities, beta 2 microglobulin levels, expression of ZAP-70, CD38 and CD49d provide useful guides alone or in prognostic models for progression risk assessment but variability in clinical outcome in early Rai stage (Rai 0/I) unmutated (UM) IGHV patients persists. This variability in clinical outcome suggests that there are yet-to-be defined biologic/genetic factors that contribute to disease heterogeneity. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) display a range of diverse activities including regulation of gene transcription, post translational regulation and epigenetic regulation and represent an intriguing prospect for influencing CLL disease progression. LncRNAs have been implicated in diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of various cancers however their role in influencing disease progression in early Rai stage UM CLL has not yet been studied. Methods: To investigate a role for lncRNAs in UM Rai 0/I CLL patients we employed the Arraystar Human lncRNA Microarray v4.0. Using blood samples collected within 3 months of diagnosis, two cohorts of UM Rai 0/I patients were compared: one defined as progressive disease with time to first treatment (TTT) ≤ 2 years after diagnosis (n=34) and one as indolent disease with TTT ≥5 years after diagnosis (n=29). Differentially expressed lncRNAs were identified using Agilent GeneSpring GX Software v12.1. To be considered for further analysis, the difference in lncRNA expression had to have a fold change (FC) ≥ 2.0, a t-test p-value ≤ 0.05 and a false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.05. Results: Over 1100 lncRNAs were found to be differentially expressed between the progressive and indolent UM CLL cohorts. Greater than 150 of these lncRNAs have known associated genes and are well annotated and validated. Among the differentially expressed lncRNAs, several are of particular interest and potentially relevant to CLL disease biology. For example, the lncRNA AL833181 was overexpressed in the progressive group. The associated gene for AL833181 is BCL11A and encodes a zinc finger protein that interacts with BCL6 and may itself serve as a proto-oncogene. Translocations involving BCL11A have been shown to identify a very aggressive subset of CLL (Am J Pathology, 2009). Therefore it is possible this lncRNA may be playing a role in deregulated expression of BCL11A. Within the indolent disease group, CTD-2566J3.1 was overexpressed >10-fold as compared to the progressive disease group. Its associated gene RAD51B is essential for DNA repair, suggesting the possibility that CTD-2566J3 may protect CLL cells from further DNA damage and disease progression. Also overexpressed in the indolent disease group were 2 lncRNAs that are associated with genes that encode proteins involved in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. USP2-AS1 lncRNA is associated with the USP2 gene and encodes an ubiquitin-specific protease required for TNF-alpha induced NF-kB signaling and is a specific deubiquitinase for cyclin D1, a known proto-oncogene. Furthermore, USP2-AS1 may also be linked to MYC. RP11-522I20.3 is associated with the QBLN1gene which encodes a protein that mediates the proteasomal degradation of misfolded or accumulated proteins. Thus, the associated lncRNAs may be acting as post-transcriptional gene silencers. Although CLL is not viewed as an "invasive" cancer, there were 5 lncRNAs overexpressed in the indolent group that are associated with Ankyrin genes which play a role in cell motility, activation and proliferation along with the lncRNA RP11-477D19 that is associated with theTIAM2 gene. TIAM2is a Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor that can promote invasion and motility of cells. The respective lncRNAs may be down-regulating these genes and prohibiting malignant cell expansion. Conclusions: Our study reveals that there are indeed specific lncRNAs that are expressed at different levels in progressive versus indolent early Rai stage UM CLL and have the potential to impact a number of relevant biological processes and pathways. While these data are preliminary, the lncRNA AL833181 and its associated gene BCL11A may prove to be a potential marker and therapeutic target for aggressive disease. Disclosures Shanafelt: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithkKine: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding.
Reliability of Myeloma Model Systems: KP-6 Is a Novel Hyperdiploid Cell Line
Abstract Reliable model systems are critical for investigating the genetic and molecular drivers of disease pathogenesis. Although the number of cell line model systems for multiple myeloma is extensive, recent studies showed patient tumors and cell lines clustering separately based on gene expression profiles. Furthermore, the hyperdiploid karyotype, present in approximately 50% of myeloma patients, is also extremely underrepresented in established human myeloma cell lines (HMCLs): only one of 59 HMCLs contains this phenotype. These data suggests that the average HMCL does not accurately represent the average myeloma patient and questions the validity of using HMCLs as model systems. However, most HMCLs were established from patients with pleural effusions or plasma cell leukemia, which are highly progressed and rare forms of myeloma. To assess how cell lines correlate with patient material, we performed a copy number abnormality (CNA) comparison between four myeloma primary tumors and their corresponding HMCLs. Here, we show that established HMCLs maintain the majority of the CNAs, contain a ten-fold greater frequency of 7q gains compared to patients, and that KP-6 is the second hyperdiploid HMCL known to date. CNAs were identified using array comparative genomic hybridization (Agilent 244k) with data analyzed at a resolution of 26kb. On average 59% (46.7-77.3) of the CNAs were shared between the tumors and their cell lines, 17% (8.5-25.9) were unique to the patient samples, and 24% (13.6-36.6) were only detected in the HMCLs. To put these differences in context we also compared the diagnostic material from which JMW-1 was established with a progression sample collected 9 months later after 3 cycles of VAD followed by an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant. The patient diagnostic and relapse tumors showed 58% similarity based on CNAs while the diagnostic and relapse tumors contained 8% and 34% unique events respectively. These results indicate that established HMCLs are no more divergent from their primary cells as is the same patient's relapse material. Overall the HMCLs studied appear highly representative of the patient from which they were derived, with most differences attributed to an enrichment of subclonal populations present in the primary tumor admixture. Of particular interest, ubiquitous 7q gains were an unexpected unifying event across all patient tumors and their HMCLs. We then analyzed the 729 baseline myeloma tumors with copy number data from the MMRF CoMMpass study against our panel of 59 similarly characterized HMCLs. We observed that HMCLs contained a 10-fold increase in the occurrence of 7q gains with respect to non-hyperdiploid patients with 7q gains (35/59 in HMCLs and 19/344 in patients). Because 97% of HMCLs are non-hyperdiploid and 7q gains are extremely rare in this population, over-representation of 7q gains in cell lines suggests that this event may promote extra-medullary growth and the establishment of cell lines. Profiling of patient tumors for gains on 7q may therefore increase the probability of establishing a new HMCL and help expand our model systems for understanding this disease. Further studies are required to understand the potential biological significance of this event in vitro . We also identified the KP-6 cell line as a novel hyperdiploid HMCL established from an extramedullary site of an advanced hyperdiploid patient. The presence of trisomies for at least four of the odd-numbered chromosomes is characteristic of a hyperdiploid myeloma patient. From the patient's tumor, clear trisomies were observed on chromosomes 3, 7, 11, 15, 19, and 21 and the HMCL established from this hyperdiploid patient maintains full trisomies of chromosomes 15, 19, and 21, with partial p-arm trisomies on chromosomes 7, 11, and 17. Since this is only the second bona fied hyperdiploid myeloma cell line to date, KP-6 promises to play a major role in our ability to understand the pathogenesis and progression of this prominent patient population. Overall, our research indicates that, based on CNAs, HMCLs are as representative of the primary tumor as is the same patient's tumor at a later time point. Additionally, HMCLs contain a 10-fold overabundance of 7q gains. Finally, we showed that KP-6 is the second hyperdiploid HMCL known to date. Taken together, these results suggest that HMCLs are reliable model systems for investigating the underlying biology of multiple myeloma. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
The Prognostic Significance of Cytopenia in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL).
Abstract Background: Historically, CLL patients with cytopenia were thought to have a poor prognosis and cytopenia is a key feature of CLL clinical staging systems. The implications of cytopenia in CLL could have changed because of improved diagnostic accuracy, increased recognition of early stage disease, and better treatments. Newer data suggest that the etiology of cytopenia determines its prognostic importance in CLL. Patients with cytopenia caused by autoimmune disease (AID) are less likely to have the poor prognosis associated with patients with bone marrow (BM) failure. To determine the prognostic significance of cytopenia in patients with CLL, we performed an observational study at Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR). Methods: We studied all patients with CLL seen in the Division of Hematology at MCR from 1 January 1995 to 31 December 2004 (n = 1,750). Cytopenia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL or platelet count < 100 × 09/L) was considered due to BM failure in patients with extensive BM involvement by CLL (< 20% residual myeloid tissue on BM biopsy) or reticulocytopenia without other causes persisting > 3 months after CLL therapy. Cytopenia was attributed to AID in patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), pure red blood cell aplasia (PRCA), or autoimmune granulocytopenia (AIG). Results: Median age at diagnosis of CLL was 63.7 years (69% male). Cytopenia occured in 423 (24.2%) patients. In 303 patients, cytopenia was due to CLL (228 BM failure and 75 AID). In 120 patients cytopenia was due to CLL related factors (splenomegaly, n = 11; possible AID, n = 18; treatment of CLL, n = 16) or non CLL causes (other malignancy, n = 12; iron deficiency, n = 11; anemia of chronic disease, n = 10; renal failure, n = 6; drugs effect, n = 4; surgical blood loss n = 4). In 28 (6.6%) patients the cause of cytopenia was not definitively determined. Of the patients with BM failure, 97 (43%) had cytopenia at CLL diagnosis (70% male, median age 63.3 years [range 32–95]), The AID patients the median age of CLL diagnosis was 66.7 years (range 30–85) with 79% male. AID diagnoses were AIHA (n = 41), ITP (n= 35), PRCA (n=8), and AIG (n=3); 9 patients had > 1 AID. Survival from diagnosis of cytopenia was significantly better for patients with AID (median 9.1 years) than BM failure (median 4.4 years, p < 0.001). AID patients had a longer survival from diagnosis of CLL (median 12.4 years) versus the rest of the CLL population (median 9.5 years, p = 0.020) but patients with BM failure at diagnosis had a worse prognosis (median 6.2 years, p < 0.001). Conclusion: We show that the etiology of cytopenia in CLL patients determines its prognostic importance. Anemia and thrombocytopenia caused by BM failure, but not AID, are associated with a significantly worse prognosis. These data show the importance of accurate determination of the etiology of cytopenia in all patients with CLL. Cytopenia in patients with AID is not a marker of advanced stage disease; these patients often need different management compared to those with BM failure. Cytopenia due to AID versus BM failure can be difficult to distinguish and a BM study should be done in all patients considered for treatment. Patients with cytopenia due to AID cannot be meaningfully classified by current clinical staging systems. We believe that efforts to review the NCI-WG 96 criteria are timely and should consider the etiology of cytopenia in CLL patients.
Outcomes Of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients With Richter Syndrome
Abstract Introduction Approximately 2-8% chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients develop diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, so-called Richter syndrome [RS]) over long-term follow-up. The outcomes of patients with RS are variable and poorly understood. Methods CLL patients seen at Mayo Clinic from January 1995 to April 2013 who developed biopsy-proven DLBCL during follow-up were included in this analysis. Clinical characteristics, therapy and overall survival (OS) of all patients with RS were analyzed. Results One hundred and twenty patients with biopsy-proven RS were identified in the Mayo Clinic database. The median age at diagnosis of RS was 67 years (range, 29-88 years), 87 (73%) were male, and 83 (69%) had received prior CLL therapy. The median duration between diagnosis of CLL and development of RS was 3.8 years (range, 0-34.5 years). Stereotyped B-cell receptors were found in 9/30 (30%) RS patients compared to 219/1294 (17%) non-RS patients (OR=2.1, p=0.07). IGHV4-39 gene usage was present in 2/26 (8%) RS patients compared to 57/1354 (4%) non-RS patients (p=0.3). Of the 30 RS biopsy samples in which Epstein Barr virus (EBV) in-situ hybridization studies were performed, EBV was detected in 7 (23%) patients. After a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 86 (72%) patients have died. Causes of death were as follows: progressive DLBCL (n=46, 53%), progressive CLL (n=2, 2%), infection (n=8, 9%), unknown (n=20, 23%) and other (n=10, 12%). The median OS of the entire cohort was 0.9 years (95% CI, 0.5-1.3 years). Tsimberidou and colleagues proposed a prognosis score (RS score) based on the following variables at the time of RS diagnosis: Eastern Co-operative Group performance status of 2-4, lactate dehydrogenase >1.5 x normal, platelets<100 x 109/L, tumour size >5 cm and >1 prior therapy for CLL. Each parameter was assigned one point, and patients were then assigned to one of four risk groups based on their calculated RS score: 0 or 1, low risk; 2, low-intermediate risk; 3, high-intermediate risk; 4 or 5, high risk. The OS according to the RS score for our group of patients is shown in Figure 1. Median survival in the low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2 and high-risk groups were 2.4 years, 0.7 years, 0.3 years and 0.2 years, respectively (p<0.001). Fifteen (12%) patients received cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) as initial therapy for RS, and 68 (57%) received rituximab in addition to CHOP (R-CHOP). There was no difference in survival among patients who received CHOP compared to R-CHOP (median, 1.8 years. vs. 1.2 years, p=0.5). Twenty-four patients (20%) received non-CHOP-based chemotherapy, and treatment was unknown in 4 (3%) patients. Nine patients (7%) died before definitive therapy could be instituted. Thirteen (11%) patients were able to proceed to stem cell transplantation (SCT): 10 (8%) autologous SCT, 2 (2%) allogeneic SCT and 1 (1%) autologous SCT followed by an allogeneic SCT. Although RS patients who underwent SCT were younger compared to those who did not undergo SCT (median, 59 years. vs. 69 years, p=0.001), no differences in prior CLL therapy or receipt of R-CHOP therapy for DLBCL was noted between the two groups. The median survival of patients who proceeded to SCT was superior compared to those who did not (5.2 years vs. 0.7 years; p=0.005). Conclusion Stereotyped B-cell receptors but not VH4-39 had a suggested evidence of an increased risk of RS in our cohort. Although 90% RS patients received intensive chemotherapy, only 11% patients were able to proceed to SCT. Median survival of RS patients remains dismal at 1 year, and newer therapies are needed to improve outcomes. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Polyphenon E International: Research Funding.
Somatic Hyperrepair: A Novel Tumor Suppression Mechanism for Germinal Center B Cells.
Abstract Abstract 92 BACKGROUND: All somatic cell types, including all B lineage cells, constitutively express a number of DNA repair proteins to maintain genomic stability and thwart tumorigenesis in the face of ongoing constitutive levels of DNA damage. Compromises in expression of these essential DNA repair factors have been shown to readily induce the development of various cancers including B cell lymphomas, suggesting expression levels are tightly regulated and limited in quantity. In germinal center (GC) B cells, however, additional DNA repair capacity is likely required to counterbalance the heightened level of mutagenic activity owing to the induced expression of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) during somatic hypermutation (SHM). AID is a DNA editing enzyme which introduces somatic mutations into immunoglobulin (Ig) V regions at an estimated rate which is almost a million-fold higher than the spontaneous rate in somatic cells. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that to maintain the genomic wellness of GC B cells which are undergoing SHM, there is a need for induction of an accompanying robust DNA repair system. We further hypothesize that inefficient induction of these repair genes may predispose to malignant transformation. METHODS: Using tonsillar tissue sections and purified tonsillar B cell subpopulations, we compared expression levels of various DNA repair genes and related these levels to AID expression across the subsets using immunohistochemistry, real-time RT-PCR, and Western blot analysis. To characterize the nature of signals capable of inducing expression levels of AID and/or DNA repair proteins, peripheral blood B cells were activated in vitro using a panel of stimuli, including coculture with activated CD4 T cells. As a surrogate measure of mismatch repair (MMR) activity in the relative absence of T cell help, we quantitated the number of somatic hypermutations at A/T sites in the Ig heavy chain variable (IGHV) region genes in a collection of IGHV sequences obtained from normal B cells and HIV-related lymphoma cells. RESULTS: Using immunohistochemistry, we observed that, similar to the expression of AID, DNA MMR genes are significantly induced in tonsillar GC B cells. These results were further validated using a more sensitive real-time RT-PCR assay and analysis by Western blotting. By expanding our DNA repair gene panel, we observed that proteins of homologous recombination, base excision repair and DNA single strand break signalling pathway are also similarly induced in GC B cells at RNA, protein, and functional levels compared to their expression in naïve and memory B cells. By contrast, expression of non-homologous end joining and DNA double strand break signalling molecules are unchanged. We have termed this selective induction of repair mechanisms in GC B cells as somatic hyperrepair (SHR). To identify pathways that lead to the activation of AID and SHR, we used an in vitro system and a variety of stimuli and we discovered that multiple B cell stimuli including CpG, CD40L, and anti-BCR could each independently induce the expression of AID while SHR induction strictly required the engagement of CD4+ T cells. This provocative observation suggests a novel role for CD4+ T cells in mitigating tumorigenesis of post-GC B cells through their ability to induce the SHR pathway in cells that have been induced to undergo SHM. To demonstrate the possible role of SHR in lymphomagenesis, we analysed the mutation pattern of IGHV genes from a panel of B cell lymphomas obtained from HIV infected (CD4+ T cell suppressed) patients. We found that HIV-related lymphoma cells displayed a significantly lower frequency of SHM at A/T positions relative to normal memory B cells, indicative of compromised MMR of their precursor cells during GC transit. Our findings resolve the lingering paradox that B cell malignancies are overwhelmingly prevalent under T cell suppression conditions such as HIV infection, post-organ transplant, and aging. Finally, our results also suggest for the first time that mounting efficient tumor suppression for some cells may depend on signals transmitted by neighboring cells and the specific microenvironment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Aberrant Regulation of the LEF-1 Locus in Monoclonal B Cell Lymphocytosis (MBL) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): A Possible Role for Epigenetic Regulation.
Abstract Abstract 669 Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia in the Western world but its pathogenesis remains largely unknown. More recently, a widely prevalent premalignant condition termed monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis (MBL) has been defined and similarly involves expansion of a CD19+CD5+ population of B cells. MBL has been the focus of a wide number of recent studies in hopes it can provide insight into the early pathological events that lead to clonal expansion of a pre-leukemic CLL-like clone. Previously, we and others identified the transcription factor lymphocyte enhancer-binding factor-1 (LEF-1) as one of several genes significantly over expressed in CLL B cells relative to blood CD19+ B cells from healthy adults. LEF-1 is crucial for the proliferation and survival of pro-B cells during B cell development and deregulated LEF-1 activation has been directly linked with leukemogenesis in a transgenic murine model. In the present study, we addressed three critical questions concerning LEF-1 and CLL: 1) do CD5+ normal B cells express LEF-1; 2) at what stage of transformation does LEF-1 expression first appear; and 3) what mechanism(s) underlies LEF-1 expression in leukemic B cells. Methodology: The goals of our study were to: 1) determine the LEF-1 expression status of normal CD 19+/CD5+ human B cells; 2) determine the expression status of LEF-1 in clonal B cells present in patients with MBL; and 3) identify regulatory mechanisms that control aberrant expression of LEF-1 in CLL B cells. In order to achieve the first two goals, a 3-color flow cytometry assay for CD19, CD5, and intracellular LEF-1 was developed. To achieve the third goal, we performed in silico analysis of the LEF-1 locus and correlated this with publicly available genome wide methylated CpG island recovery assay (MIRA) data describing the methylome of normal human B cells (Rauch, T. A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(3): 671-8). Results: Analysis of human umbilical cord blood B cells, a rich source of the CD19+/CD5+ B cell subset, revealed that all normal CD 19+/CD5+ human B cells are negative for LEF-1 protein expression. These data demonstrate LEF-1 expression by CLL B cells is truly aberrant and does not simply reflect the phenotype of CD5+ lineage B cells. We next tested if the CD19+/CD5+ cells obtained from patients with MBL express LEF-1 protein. In these analyses, we restricted our study to MBL patients with absolute B cell counts of less than 2.5 ×10 9 cells/(L) (range: 0.756 - 2.44 × 10 9 cells/(L)), which is significantly below the upper limit that defines the MBL to CLL transition. Of interest, each MBL sample analyzed (n=6) revealed the presence of two populations of cells: 1) CD19+/CD5+ B cells expressing LEF-1; and 2) CD19+/CD5- B cells lacking expression of LEF-1. To confirm the clonal nature of the CD19+/CD5+ cells from MBL patients we demonstrated that the cells were light chain restricted. These data clearly indicated that LEF-1 expression becomes deregulated in the premalignant state of MBL and may therefore represent an early event in CLL leukemogenesis. In order to identify differential pathways of LEF-1 regulation that may be altered in CLL and MBL B cells, in silico promoter analysis of LEF-1 was performed. We identified a number of potential transcription factor binding sites as well as a putative CpG island in the 5' promoter region of LEF-1. Using data from a human B cell genome wide methylation array, we were able to determine that this same putative LEF-1 promoter CpG island was highly methylated in normal human B cells. Methylation of promoter region CpG islands is known to play an important role in developmental regulation of gene expression and may be the operative mechanism underlying silencing of LEF-1 expression in normal B cells. Conclusions: LEF-1 expression is deregulated in MBL and appears to be an early and possibly key event in the transition of normal B cells into a premalignant/malignant state. Our data suggest that loss of epigenetic regulation of this developmentally important locus may play a role in aberrant LEF-1 expression in MBL and CLL B cells. Ongoing studies are aimed at determining the methylation status of the LEF-1 promoter in CLL B cells and the functional role of this protein in transcriptional regulation and survival of CLL and MBL cells. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.