Wieruszewski, Patrick M.

AbstractBeta‐lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can improve precision dosing and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, but has not been implemented widely in the United States. Mayo Clinic recently implemented a beta‐lactam TDM program. This single‐center experience forms the basis of the manuscript which outlines practical considerations involved with beta‐lactam TDM implementation, including the pharmacist's role as a leader. Our implementation effort focused on three primary domains. First, we aimed to ensure a supportive organizational infrastructure. Early leadership engagement by the pharmacist‐led core team facilitated advocacy for the clinical need, allocation of resources, and assay development. Second, core clinical workflows were developed that addressed the preferred patient population for use, desirable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets, and the preferred sampling strategy. Clinical tools to guide pharmacists in interpreting the results (e.g., pharmacokinetics calculator) and documenting decisions were developed. Third, stakeholders were offered repeated exposure to evidence and expertise to facilitate understanding and application of the new practice. This act of ‘individual internalization’ seems to be uniquely important to beta‐lactam TDM implementation compared with the implementation of other antimicrobial TDM programs. Educational strategies and supportive materials that were developed were focused on providing substantive and varied information tailored to the stakeholders' role in the process. For pharmacists, this included both clinical and operational considerations. A continuous improvement plan to support management of the process was instituted to address necessary updates and changes that inevitably emerged. In summary, the described approach to implementation of a pharmacist‐led beta‐lactam TDM program could be used as a roadmap to aid other institutions that aim to develop such a program.

Introduction High-dose catecholamines can impair hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and increase shunt fraction. We aimed to determine if Angiotensin II (Ang-2) is associated with improved PaO 2 /FiO 2 and SpO 2 /FiO 2 in patients in shock. Methods Adult patients at four tertiary care centers and one community hospital in the United States who received Ang-2 from July 2018-September 2020 were included in this retrospective, observational cohort study. PaO 2 , SpO 2 , and FiO 2 were measured at 13 timepoints during the 48-h before and after Ang-2 initiation. Piecewise linear mixed models of PaO 2 /FiO 2 and SpO 2 /FiO 2 were created to evaluate hourly changes in oxygenation after Ang-2 initiation. The difference in the proportion of patients with PaO 2 /FiO 2 ≤ 300 mm Hg at the time of Ang-2 initiation and 48 h after was also examined. Results The study included 254 patients. In the 48 h prior to Ang-2 initiation, oxygenation was significantly declining (hourly PaO 2 /FiO 2 change −4.7 mm Hg/hr, 95% CI − 6.0 to −3.5, p < .001; hourly SpO 2 /FiO 2 change −3.1/hr, 95% CI−3.7 to −2.4, p < .001). Ang-2 treatment was associated with significant improvements in PaO 2 /FiO 2 and SpO 2 /FiO 2 in the 48-h after initiation (hourly PaO 2 /FiO 2 change +1.5 mm Hg/hr, 95% CI 0.5-2.5, p = .003; hourly SpO 2 /FiO 2 change +0.9/hr, 95% CI 0.5-1.2, p < .001). The difference in the hourly change in oxygenation before and after Ang-2 initiation was also significant ( p interaction < 0.001 for both PaO 2 /FiO 2 and SpO 2 /FiO 2 ). This improvement was associated with significantly fewer patients having a PaO 2 /FiO 2 ≤ 300 mm Hg at 48 h compared to baseline (mean difference −14.9%, 95% CI −25.3% to −4.6%, p = .011). Subgroup analysis found that patients with either a baseline PaO 2 /FiO 2 ≤ 300 mm Hg or a norepinephrine-equivalent dose requirement >0.2 µg/kg/min had the greatest associations with oxygenation improvement. Conclusions Ang-2 is associated with improved PaO 2 /FiO 2 and SpO 2 /FiO 2 . The mechanisms for this improvement are not entirely clear but may be due to catecholamine-sparing effect or may also be related to improved ventilation-perfusion matching, intrapulmonary shunt, or oxygen delivery.

Tris-hydroxymethyl aminomethane (THAM) is an amino alcohol used clinically to buffer acid loads and raise pH in acidotic conditions. Unlike sodium bicarbonate, which increases plasma sodium levels with use and produces carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) as part of the buffering process, THAM does neither. Although not widely used in modern critical care and unavailable for clinical use in 2016, THAM has been available in the United States since 2020. Clinical experience and existing literature suggest that THAM may have clinical utility in acid-base management in conditions such as liver transplantation where rising sodium levels during perioperative care may be dangerous, and in managing acid-base derangements during care of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). To clarify the evidence base supporting the clinical use of THAM, we conducted a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of THAM as a buffering agent in critically ill adults using Ovid EBM Reviews, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. Randomized-, crossover-, retrospective cohort-, parallel-designed clinical trials, case series, and case reports of adult patients who received THAM in the operative or critical care setting were included. Conference abstracts of qualifying study designs were also included. Two independent reviewers extracted the data regarding the study details, demographics, treatment, and outcomes data. A third reviewer adjudicated discrepancies. A total of 21 studies including 3 randomized controlled trials, 5 observational studies, 4 case series, and 9 case reports met inclusion criteria. Eight studies (38%) were abstracts published in conference proceedings. In total, 417 critically ill patients received THAM to treat acidosis in critically ill surgical and nonsurgical patients, during liver transplantation, and in ARDS. In general, THAM corrected acidosis with an efficacy equivalent to sodium bicarbonate and did so with less hypercarbia and hypernatremia. Adverse effects of THAM included hyperkalemia, hypoglycemia, ventilator depression, and tissue damage with extravasation. We conclude that THAM may have potential advantages in some critical care settings, but that clinical evidence is limited, and high-quality evaluations are necessary.

Abstract Purpose To describe the use of mechanical circulatory support in the setting of cardiac arrest and summarize pharmacists’ role in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Summary ECPR is increasingly used to reduce morbidity and improve mortality after cardiac arrest. ECPR employs venoarterial ECMO, which provides full circulatory perfusion and gas exchange in both adult and pediatric patients in cardiac arrest. After the emergency medicine team identifies potential candidates for ECPR, the ECMO team is consulted. If deemed a candidate for ECPR by the ECMO team, the patient is cannulated during ongoing standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A multidisciplinary team of physicians, nurses, perfusionists, pharmacists, and support staff is needed for successful ECPR. Pharmacists play a vital role in advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) prior to cannulation. Pharmacists intervene to make pharmacotherapy recommendations during ACLS, prepare medications, and administer medications as allowed by institutional and state regulations. Pharmacists also provide pharmacotherapy support in the selection of anticoagulation agents, ongoing vasopressor administration during ECMO cannulation, and the optimization of medication selection in the peri-ECPR period. Conclusion With the growing use of ECPR, pharmacists should be aware of their role in medication optimization during ECPR.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the wholistic costs of systemic anticoagulation delivery in heparin versus bivalirudin-based maintenance of adult patients supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Large academic ECMO center. PATIENTS: Adults on ECMO receiving heparin or bivalirudin for primary maintenance systemic anticoagulation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Electronic data were abstracted from a database maintained by our ECMO center, which transitioned to a preferred bivalirudin-based anticoagulation management in 2017. The pretransition group consisted of 126 patients (123 heparin and three bivalirudin), whereas the posttransition group included 275 patients (82 heparin and 193 bivalirudin). Drug costs were estimated using the wholesale acquisition cost, and laboratory assays costs were estimated using reimbursement fee schedules. Cost data were normalized to the duration of the ECMO run and reported in U.S. Dollar per ECMO day. Following the practice change, bivalirudin patients were less likely to receive AT supplementation (31.0 vs 12.4%; p < 0.0001) and had fewer coagulation assays ordered (6.1 vs 5.4 per ECMO day; p = 0.0004). After the transition, there was a dramatic decrease in costs related to AT assay assessments ($11.78 [interquartile range {IQR}, $9.48–$13.09] vs $1.03 [IQR, $0–$5.75]; p < 0.0001) and AT supplementation ($0 [IQR, $0–$312.82] vs $0 [IQR, $0–$0]; p < 0.0001) per ECMO day. Unadjusted survival at 28 days was higher posttransition (64.3 vs 74.9%; p = 0.0286). CONCLUSIONS: Antithrombin assays and supplementation compromise a significant proportion of heparin-based anticoagulation costs in ECMO patients and is substantially reduced when a bivalirudin-based anticoagulation strategy is deployed. A favorable association exists between the aggregate cost of administration of bivalirudin compared with heparin-based systemic anticoagulation in adults supported on ECMO driven by reductions in antithrombin activity assessments and the cost of antithrombin replacement.

OBJECTIVES: To summarize the most impactful articles relevant to the pharmacotherapy of critically ill adult patients published in 2021. DATA SOURCE: PubMed/MEDLINE. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, or systematic review/meta-analyses of adult critical care patients assessing a pharmacotherapeutic intervention and reporting clinical endpoints published between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. DATA EXTRACTION: Candidate articles were organized by clinical domain based on the emerging themes from all studies. A modified Delphi process was applied to obtain consensus on the most impactful publication within each clinical domain based on overall contribution to scientific knowledge and novelty to the literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: The search revealed 830 articles, of which 766 were excluded leaving 64 candidate articles for the Delphi process. These 64 articles were organized by clinical domain including: emergency/neurology, cardiopulmonary, nephrology/fluids, infectious diseases, metabolic, immunomodulation, and nutrition/gastroenterology. Each domain required the a priori defined three Delphi rounds. The resultant most impactful articles from each domain included five randomized controlled trials and two systematic review/meta-analyses. Topics studied included sedation during mechanical ventilation, anticoagulation in COVID-19, extended infusion beta-lactams, interleukin-6 antagonists in COVID-19, balanced crystalloid resuscitation, vitamin C/thiamine/hydrocortisone in sepsis, and promotility agents during enteral feeding. CONCLUSIONS: This synoptic review provides a summary and perspective of the most impactful articles relevant to the pharmacotherapy of critically ill adults published in 2021.

Background: Patients supported on mechanical circulatory support devices experience vasodilatory hypotension due to high surface area exposure to nonbiological and non-endothelialized surfaces. Angiotensin II has been studied in general settings of vasodilatory shock, however concerns exist regarding the use of this vasopressor in patients with pre-existing cardiac failure. The objective of this study was to assess the systemic and central hemodynamic effects of angiotensin II in patients with primary cardiac or respiratory failure requiring treatment with mechanical circulatory support devices. Methods: Multicenter retrospective observational study of adults supported on a mechanical circulatory support device who received angiotensin II for vasodilatory shock. The primary outcome was the intraindividual change from baseline in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and vasopressor dosage after angiotensin II. Results: Fifty patients were included with mechanical circulatory devices that were primarily used for cardiac failure (n = 41) or respiratory failure (n = 9). At angiotensin II initiation, the norepinephrine equivalent vasopressor dosage was 0.44 (0.34, 0.64) and 0.47 (0.33, 0.73) mcg/kg/min in the cardiac and respiratory groups, respectively. In the cardiac group, MAP increased from 60 to 70 mmHg (intraindividual P < .001) in the 1 h after angiotensin II initiation and the vasopressor dosage declined by 0.04 mcg/kg/min (intraindividual P < .001). By 12 h, the vasopressor dosage declined by 0.16 mcg/kg/min ( P = .001). There were no significant changes in cardiac index or mean pulmonary artery pressure throughout the 12 h following angiotensin II. In the respiratory group, similar but nonsignificant effects at 1 h on MAP (61-81 mmHg, P = .26) and vasopressor dosage (decline by 0.13 mcg/kg/min, P = .06) were observed. Conclusions: In patients requiring mechanical circulatory support for cardiac failure, angiotensin II produced beneficial systemic hemodynamic effects without negatively impacting cardiac function or pulmonary pressures. The systemic hemodynamic effects in those with respiratory failure were nonsignificant due to limited sample size.