Green, Isabel C.

Abstract Introduction: Laparoscopic salpingectomy is a commonly performed procedure and is often one of the first laparoscopic procedures performed by novice residents in Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN). Opportunities to practice before the operating room can be limited. Methods: We developed an animal tissue model and incorporated it into a laparoscopic salpingectomy simulation for OB/GYN residents in a single academic program. The simulation included a pre-simulation video describing the steps of laparoscopic salpingectomy, the laparoscopic salpingectomy simulation using an electrosurgical device, a post simulation survey, and debriefing with learner targeted feedback. Validity evidence for the simulation model was gathered using the Messick framework. Resident performance was assessed using the Objective Structured Assessment of Laparoscopic Salpingectomy (OSA-LS) and the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS). Performance was correlated to the year of training with upper-level residents grouped for analysis. Results: Twenty-five simulations of laparoscopic salpingectomy were performed by 14 learners (first through fourth year). The tool was highly rated by participants. We found a significant correlation between the mean OSA-LS score and surgical experience. The mean GOALS score also increased with experience and was significantly different between 1st and 2nd years and between 1st and upper-level residents. A passing score of 12 was established for each assessment rubric. Discussion: This low-cost surgical model addresses a gap in simulation options for preoperative use of electrosurgical devices. This simulation can be used in OB GYN residency as a method to assess competency or provide feedback.

What was done? A review of artificial intelligence (AI) applications for the imaging of uterine fibroids, endometriosis, and adenomyosis. What was found? AI models can assist with the recognition, segmentation, and localization of uterine fibroids, and the differentiation of benign fibroids and sarcomas. Models can aid in the diagnosis of adenomyosis and endometriosis, and the prediction of the impact of endometriosis on fertility. What the findings mean? Deployed thoughtfully, AI tools could reduce variability, shorten read times, and add objective measurements to routine care. Studies evaluating these models are limited by single-institution designs and continued reliance on expert sonologists and radiologists.

Purpose of review We present a review of the natural progression, response to hormonal therapy, and risk of malignancy associated with deep endometriosis (DE) to guide evidence-based discussion of conservative treatment. Recent findings Advanced imaging protocols have enhanced nonsurgical detection of DE, allowing noninvasive diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance. While some DE is progressive, 50% of disease appears stable over time, and progression is reduced by half with hormonal treatments (21 versus 12%). Hormonal treatment can reduce the size of DE lesions by 1 cm³, with reductions occurring after 6 months and remaining stable up to 3 years. Most hormonal therapies improve symptoms and quality of life, regardless of changes in DE size, with combined contraceptives and progestins being the most studied. DE may present a higher risk of ovarian and extraovarian cancer than previously hypothesized, though further research is needed to confirm findings. Limitations of DE research include differing imaging strategies, definitions of disease and progression, short follow-up, focus on rectosigmoid DE only, and lack of randomized trials. Summary DE is a subtype of endometriosis that is increasingly diagnosed and treated with noninvasive strategies. Hormonal treatments improve symptoms and reduce progression of DE. Further research on optimal conservative management and risk of malignancy is warranted.

AbstractChronic pelvic pain (CPP), a debilitating condition affecting an estimated 25% of women worldwide, represents a significant yet understudied global health crisis. Existing research is limited and likely fails to capture the true impact of CPP on global health. What is known is that CPP results in a profound health, societal, and economic burden on women. Our inability to fully understand this burden is a critical gap in women's healthcare. To address this urgent need, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) and the International Pelvic Pain Society (IPPS) have partnered to develop this consensus statement where we examine the key challenges to accessing CPP care and propose a framework for overcoming these barriers. We emphasize that effective global strategies for addressing the negative health consequences of living with CPP must prioritize the lived experiences of patients, empower healthcare professionals with the necessary tools and training, and drive meaningful policy change. This call to action is grounded in a comprehensive vision of women's health and rights to address the full spectrum of conditions women experience throughout their lives. Given its high prevalence, CPP must be a central focus of this expanded vision.

INTRODUCTION: Since the early 20th century, surgical practices on prophylactic oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy have fluctuated. This study aims to assess how current gynecologic surgeons are counseling patients on ovary-sparing benign hysterectomies and assess any gaps in provider knowledge. METHODS: Institutional review board exception was obtained. A survey was piloted and underwent several rounds of editing before being sent to members of American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) in April 2023. The questionnaire evaluated preoperative counseling on risks and benefits of ovary-sparing hysterectomy for benign indications and surgical practices for when to perform bilateral salpingectomy and oophorectomy. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The survey was sent out by email to 6,622 AAGL members, 3,576 opened the email, and 520 completed surveys (14% response rate). Approximately one-half (58%) completed subspeciality training. Most counsel patients on the benefits of ovarian conservation including the prevention of osteoporosis (88%), early onset menopause (87%), cardiovascular disease (84%), and dementia (52%). Fifty percent recommend routine bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at time of hysterectomy starting at age 61, whereas 38% recommend this be performed at age 51–55 years. CONCLUSION: Gynecologic surgeons are counseling patients on the risks and benefits of ovarian conservation. How frequently ovary-sparing hysterectomies are offered and the age at which bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended vary by provider. Additional high-quality studies are needed to further understand the optimal timing of oophorectomy at time of benign hysterectomy, and there is also a need for provider education to minimize discrepancy in practice patterns.

Purpose of review Endometriosis is a complex benign gynaecologic condition with heterogenous presentations and a large impact on the global healthcare system and on the quality of life for millions of women. Currently, the gold standard for diagnosis involves direct visualization of lesions during surgery confirmed by histopathological diagnosis, resulting in an average delay in its initial diagnosis of 8–10 years. Therefore, the search for noninvasive diagnostic testing options has been subject to a large body of research. Recent findings Multiple potential biomarkers have been explored for noninvasive testing for endometriosis, including glycoproteins, inflammatory cytokines, immunological molecules, angiogenesis markers, hormones, micro RNAs (miRNAs), proteomics, metabolomics, genomics and the microbiome. Summary Although there are challenges to consider, areas for real promise and advancement in the noninvasive diagnosis of endometriosis are currently being explored with real promise in the area of miRNAs, proteomics, metabolomics, genomics and the microbiome.

INTRODUCTION: Emergencies during gynecologic office procedures are uncommon. However, knowledge in management of these complications is essential as more gynecologic procedures move from the operating room to the office. Our goal was to develop an interactive curriculum to address a gap in residency training in the management of office-based procedural emergencies. METHODS: A curriculum including management of unanticipated bleeding, anaphylaxis, vasovagal response, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) was developed and implemented using a combination of simulated patient sessions, a “choose-your-own-adventure” PowerPoint, and a mock oral board session. Pre and post intervention surveys queried participants’ confidence in recognition and management. The curriculum was delivered as in-person simulation sessions or virtual sessions due to COVID restrictions. Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained. Mean pre and post intervention scores were compared using paired t-test. RESULTS: Four accredited obstetrics and gynecology residency programs participated. Twenty-nine trainees completed the curriculum, and 24 submitted pre and post surveys (82.8% response rate). There was significant improvement in confidence scores for management of unanticipated bleeding (mean difference 0.96, P<.001), anaphylaxis (mean difference 1.7, P<.001), vasovagal response (mean difference 1.0, P<.001), and LAST (mean difference 2.5, P<.001). Additionally, significant improvement in confidence scores for identification of risk factors and signs/symptoms of vasovagal response (mean difference 0.96, P<.001, and 0.46, P=.005) and LAST (mean difference 2.3, P<.001, and 2.2, P<.001) was noted. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an office emergencies curriculum significantly increased confidence in identification and management of unanticipated bleeding, anaphylaxis, vasovagal response, and LAST. Future studies evaluating knowledge-based assessments of learners are needed.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the benefits, convenience, and acceptability of office hysteroscopy (OH), 20% of patients find OH unacceptable. In this study we defined acceptability as willingness to undergo office hysteroscopy in the future and investigated whether patients with co-existing pelvic pain disorders were more likely to find OH unacceptable. METHODS: Patients who underwent OH from 12/2016 to 6/2018 were included. Patients were asked to rate acceptability at the time of their procedure. Retrospective chart review was used to identify patients with pelvic pain disorders defined as chronic pelvic pain (CPP), dysmenorrhea, vulvodynia, dyspareunia, or high tone pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). Patients rating OH as acceptable (Likert scale 4–5) were compared to those rating it as unacceptable (Likert scale 1–2). Comparisons between groups were made using a t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous data, and a Chi-square test for categorical data. This study was determined to be exempt from the requirement for IRB approval (IRB #20–009387). RESULTS: Compared to patients in the “acceptable” group (n=929), patients who rated OH as “unacceptable” (n=55) reported higher during and post-procedure pain scores and lower satisfaction rates (P<.001). Prior diagnosis of PFD (P<.001) and dyspareunia (P=.003) were both associated with finding OH unacceptable. Dysmenorrhea, CPP, and vulvodynia were associated with unacceptability but did not achieve significance. CONCLUSION: A preexisting diagnosis of a pelvic pain disorder, specifically PFD and dyspareunia, was associated with unacceptability of OH. Implementing triage criteria for patients to pursue hysteroscopy with sedation or anesthesia could help improve patient satisfaction and warrants additional study.

INTRODUCTION: Nonrelaxing pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a condition characterized by tension of the pelvic floor musculature, often resulting in pelvic pain. The objective of this study was to review patient-reported pain outcomes following treatment of nonrelaxing pelvic floor dysfunction to identify gaps in current evidence. METHODS: A systematic review of the following databases from inception to July 2020 was performed: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Two authors reviewed titles and abstracts for relevance, and full articles were obtained and evaluated for inclusion. Studies were included if they assess interventions for nonrelaxing PFD characterized by pelvic pain. The third author was consulted in instances of disagreement. RESULTS: Of the 1,184 abstracts identified and reviewed, 36 full text articles were reviewed. Treatments for nonrelaxing PFD included biofeedback, botulinum toxin injections, electrical stimulation, intravaginal diazepam, massage, osteopathy, psychiatric interview, physical therapy, sacral nerve stimulation, trigger point injection, and combined therapies. Nineteen studies assessed the effectiveness of treatment based on patient reported pain outcomes. All studies demonstrated an improvement in pelvic pain. Several limitations were identified including varied pre-treatment diagnostic evaluation, small sample size, retrospective and single arm design, heterogeneity in treatment administration within and between studies, lack of standardized pain assessments, and limited long term outcome data. CONCLUSION: Nonrelaxing PFD is a debilitating condition. There is a paucity of high-quality clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction treatments. Although preliminary studies support multi-modal treatment options, robust trials assessing patient-centered outcomes are necessary.