Back to Authors

Cagney, Daniel

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2753-5497

Mayo Clinic

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

Citations 14

Estrogen/progesterone receptor and HER2 discordance between primary tumor and brain metastases in breast cancer and its effect on treatment and survival
Sperduto, Paul W. , Li, Jing , Cagney, Daniel , Aizer, Ayal A. , Nesbit, Eric , Chan, Jason W., Breen, Will, Brown, Paul D. , Shi, Diana D. , Soliman, Hany , Sahgal, Arjun , Shanley, Ryan , Sperduto, William , Everett, Ashlyn S. , Boggs, Drexell H. , Masucci, Laura , Plichta, Kristin A. , Buatti, John M. , Jain, Supriya , Gaspar, Laurie E., Wu, Cheng–Chia , Wang, Tony J. C. , Bryant, John , Chuong, Michael D. , Chiang, Veronica , Nakano, Toshimichi , Shi, Diana , Buatti, John M , Wang, Tony J C , Mesko, Shane , Lin, Nancy U. , Kruser, Tim J. , Braunstein, Steve , Lee, Jessica , Kirkpatrick, John P. , Shih, Helen A. , Lou, Emil , Roberge, David , Remick, Jill S. , Bryant, John, Yu, James B. , Aoyama, Hidefumi , Mehta, Minesh P.

Neuro-Oncology | February 6, 2020 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1359-1367

10.1093/neuonc/noaa025 Get It

Abstract Background Breast cancer treatment is based on estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors (PRs), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). At the time of metastasis, receptor status can be discordant from that at initial diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of discordance and its effect on survival and subsequent treatment in patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). Methods A retrospective database of 316 patients who underwent craniotomy for BCBM between 2006 and 2017 was created. Discordance was considered present if the ER, PR, or HER2 status differed between the primary tumor and the BCBM. Results The overall receptor discordance rate was 132/316 (42%), and the subtype discordance rate was 100/316 (32%). Hormone receptors (HR, either ER or PR) were gained in 40/160 (25%) patients with HR-negative primary tumors. HER2 was gained in 22/173 (13%) patients with HER2-negative primary tumors. Subsequent treatment was not adjusted for most patients who gained receptors—nonetheless, median survival (MS) improved but did not reach statistical significance (HR, 17–28 mo, P = 0.12; HER2, 15–19 mo, P = 0.39). MS for patients who lost receptors was worse (HR, 27–18 mo, P = 0.02; HER2, 30–18 mo, P = 0.08). Conclusions Receptor discordance between primary tumor and BCBM is common, adversely affects survival if receptors are lost, and represents a missed opportunity for use of effective treatments if receptors are gained. Receptor analysis of BCBM is indicated when clinically appropriate. Treatment should be adjusted accordingly. Key Points 1. Receptor discordance alters subtype in 32% of BCBM patients. 2. The frequency of receptor gain for HR and HER2 was 25% and 13%, respectively. 3. If receptors are lost, survival suffers. If receptors are gained, consider targeted treatment.
Tumor subtype and other prognostic factors in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: The updated graded prognostic assessment (Breast-GPA).
Sperduto, Paul W. , Cagney, Daniel , Nesbit, Eric , Chan, Jason W., Breen, Will, Soliman, Hany , Shanley, Ryan , Everett, Ashlyn S. , Masucci, Laura , Plichta, Kristin A. , Jain, Supriya , Bryant, John , Nakano, Toshimichi , Mesko, Shane , Lee, Jessica , Shi, Diana D. , Remick, Jill S. , Wu, Cheng–Chia , Yu, James B. , Mehta, Minesh P.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 1079-1079

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.1079 Get It

1079 Background: Brain metastases (BM) are a common and fatal complication of breast cancer but survival varies widely based on various prognostic factors (PF). Hence, patient counseling and therapeutic decisions should be individualized. We previously published a prognostic index (Breast GPA) based on cohort A (1985-2007, n = 642), updated it with tumor subtype in cohort B (1993-2010, n = 400) and are now updating it with a larger contemporary cohort (C). Methods: A multi-institutional (19) multi-national (3) retrospective database of 2473 breast cancer patients with BM diagnosed from 1/1/2006-12/31/2017 was created and compared to our prior cohorts. Demographic, clinical, molecular factors, tumor subtype and treatment were correlated with survival. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated and compared with log-rank tests. Results: The median survival (MS) for cohorts A, B and C improved over time [12, 14 and 16 mo, respectively ( < 0.01)] despite the subtype distribution becoming less favorable: Luminal B (ER/PR/HER2+) decreased from 26% to 21%; HER2 (HER2+/ER/PR-) decreased from 31% to 17%, Luminal A (ER/PR+/HER2-) increased from 20% to 31%; Basal (ER/PR/HER2-) was unchanged at 24%.MS by subtype improved from 21 to 27 mo in Luminal B, 18 to 25 mo in HER2, 10 to 14 mo in Luminal A and 6 to 9 mo in Basal tumors. The number of BM was 1 in 35%, ≤4 in 67% and > 10 in 18%. PF significant for survival were tumor subtype, age, KPS, number of BM and extracranial metastases (ECM) (all < 0.01). Surprisingly, Hispanic women (7%) showed improved survival (p < 0.01). BRCA1 was mutated in 57/533 (11%) and those patients showed a trend (0.16) toward improved survival. Treatment patterns have changed: the use of whole brain radiation therapy decreased from 71% to 67% to 47% in cohorts A, B and C, respectively. Conclusions: Despite the shift to less favorable tumor subtypes, MS has improvedbut varies widely by diagnosis-specific PF. Compared to prior cohorts, number of BM and ECM were identified as new PF. Ethnic, genetic and treatment differences between the eras are apparent. The updated Breast GPA, based on these data, and the correlation between BRCA1 and tumor subtype will be presented.
Implications of Screening for Brain Metastases in Patients With Breast Cancer and Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Cagney, Daniel , Catalano, Paul J. , Brown, Paul D. , Aizer, Ayal A. , Martin, Allison M. , Alexander, Brian M. , Lin, Nancy U.

JAMA Oncology | May 17, 2018 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1001

10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0813 Get It