Back to Authors

Grainger, Rebecca

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9201-8678

Mayo Clinic

Health New Zealand

Citations 13

Antirheumatic Disease Therapies for the Treatment of COVID‐19: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Putman, Michael , Chock, Yu Pei Eugenia, Tam, Herman , Kim, Alfred H.J. , Sattui, Sebastian E. , Berenbaum, Françis , Korsten, Peter , Sánchez-Álvarez, Catalina , Sparks, Jeffrey A. , Coates, Laura C. , Palmerlee, Candace A, Peirce, Andrea, Jayatilleke, Arundathi , Johnson, Sindhu R., Kilian, Adam , Grainger, Rebecca , Wallace, Zachary S. , Alliance, the COVID‐19 Global Rheumatology, Korsten, Peter , Sanchez-Alvarez, Catalina , Sparks, Jeffrey A , Coates, Laura C , Liew, Jean , Grainger, Rebecca , Duarte-García, Alí , Jayatilleke, Arundathi , Kim, Alfred H J , Sattui, Sebastian E , Berenbaum, Francis , Danila, Maria I. , Johnson, Sindhu R. , Liew, Jean W. , Prokop, Larry J. , Murad, M. Hassan , Duarte‐García, Alí , Alliance, the COVID‐19 Global Rheumatology

Arthritis & Rheumatology | August 2, 2020 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 36-47

10.1002/art.41469 Get It

ObjectiveAntirheumatic disease therapies have been used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and its complications. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to describe the current evidence.MethodsA search of published and preprint databases in all languages was performed. Included studies described ≥1 relevant clinical outcome for ≥5 patients who were infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and were treated with antirheumatic disease therapy between January 1, 2019 and May 29, 2020. Pairs of reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. A meta‐analysis of effect sizes using random‐effects models was performed when possible.ResultsThe search identified 3,935 articles, of which 45 were included (4 randomized controlled trials, 29 cohort studies, and 12 case series). All studies evaluated hospitalized patients, and 29 of the 45 studies had been published in a peer‐reviewed journal. In a meta‐analysis of 3 cohort studies with a low risk of bias, hydroxychloroquine use was not significantly associated with mortality (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1.41 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.83, 2.42]). In a meta‐analysis of 2 cohort studies with some concerns/higher risk of bias, anakinra use was associated with lower mortality (pooled HR 0.25 [95% CI 0.12, 0.52]). Evidence was inconclusive with regard to other antirheumatic disease therapies, and the majority of other studies had a high risk of bias.ConclusionIn this systematic review and meta‐analysis, hydroxychloroquine use was not associated with benefit or harm regarding COVID‐19 mortality. The evidence supporting the effect of other antirheumatic disease therapies in COVID‐19 is currently inconclusive.
Balancing Between Privacy and Patient Needs for Health Information in the Age of Participatory Health and Social Media: A Scoping Review
Househ, Mowafa , Grainger, Rebecca , Petersen, Carolyn , Bamidis, Panagiotis D. , Merolli, Mark , Grainger, Rebecca , Petersen, Carolyn

Yearbook of Medical Informatics | April 22, 2018 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 01 | Pages: 029-036

10.1055/s-0038-1641197 Get It

Objectives: With the increased use of participatory health enabling technologies, such as social media, balancing the need for health information with patient privacy and confidentiality has become a more complex and immediate concern. The purpose of this paper produced by the members of the IMIA Participatory Health and Social Media (PHSM) working group is to investigate patient needs for health information using participatory health enabling technologies, while balancing their needs for privacy and confidentiality. Methods: Six domain areas including media sharing platforms, patient portals, web-based platforms, crowdsourcing websites, medical avatars, and other mobile health technologies were identified by five members of the IMIA PHSM working group as relevant to participatory health and the balance between data sharing and patient needs for privacy and confidentiality. After identifying the relevant domain areas, our scoping review began by searching several databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar using a variety of key search terms. Results: A total of 1,973 studies were identified, of which 68 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Results showed that challenges for balancing patient needs for information and privacy and confidentiality concerns included: cross-cultural understanding, clinician and patient awareness, de-identification of data, and commercialization of patient data. Some opportunities identified were patient empowerment, connecting participatory health enabling technologies with clinical records, open data sharing agreement, and e-consent. Conclusion: Balancing between privacy and patient needs for health information in the age of participatory health and social media offers several opportunities and challenges. More people are engaging in actively managing health through participatory health enabling technologies. Such activity often includes sharing health information and with this comes a perennial tension between balancing individual needs and the desire to uphold privacy and confidentiality. We recommend that guidelines for both patients and clinicians, in terms of their use of participatory health-enabling technologies, are developed to ensure that patient privacy and confidentiality are protected, and a maximum benefit can be realized.