Sharma, Akanksha

Abstract Sex differences in brain tumor related epilepsy (BTE) as an initial symptom of glioma are rarely investigated. Sex differences are being explored with increased interest more recently. Epidemiological studies have generally indicated overall incidence of epilepsy to be slightly higher in males than females, but a higher incidence of idiopathic generalized epilepsy has been seen in females in some studies. Clinicians regularly face the challenge of anti-epileptic drug prescription determination in patients with newly identified brain mass and would greatly benefit from knowing clinical characteristics in BTE. We analyzed clinical characteristics in patients with pathologically-determined glioma with known seizure status at clinical presentation using non-parametric and Fisher’s Exact tests with the entire cohort and male and female separately. From our clinical data repository, we identified 223 patients (females, n=86 (39%); males, n=137 (61%)) divided by those that presented with seizure (SP, n=96, 43%; F, n= 28; M, n= 68) and those that presented without seizure (nSP, n=127, 57%, F n=58, M n=69). In sex-specific analysis males had a significantly (x2=6.28, p=0.01) higher proportion of SP (49.6%) than females (32.6%). There was a dependence between seizure presentation status and tumor grade in males (x2=5.94, p=0.015). Tumor kinetics in the female cohort showed significantly (p< 0.0001) more diffuse tumors in SP compared to nSP. Right-sided tumors were predominantly nSP, while left-sided tumors were split more evenly between SP and nSP. The predominance of nSP among right-sided tumors seems to be driven by females (74%), male right-sided tumors were split more evenly between SP and nSP. Seizure status is dependent on tumor location for the combined cohort, however not for males (x2=5.23, p=0.16) or females (x2=4.34, p=0.23). Clearly there are sex differences and similarities in clinical characteristics at glioma presentation. Further characterization could lead to improved adherence of national standards for AED prescription.

Abstract Background: Central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma manifests as a highly aggressive non-Hodgkins lymphoma, either confined to the central nervous system or secondary to spread of systemic diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Rising incidence of CNS lymphoma has been observed, especially in elderly populations. Presentation depends on the burden and location of disease, with a varying spectrum of symptoms ranging from headaches and cognitive changes to focal neurological deficits and seizures. Neuropsychiatric presentation of CNS lymphoma has been seen and anecdotally reported but appears to be under-represented in the literature. In this retrospective review of patients with CNS lymphoma at MCA we report a cohort of patients who presented with primarily neuropsychiatric symptoms Methods: After receiving IRB approval, we retrospectively identified 135 patients with ICD 9 and 10 codes consistent with CNS lymphoma, seen at Mayo Clinic Arizona, between 1998-2018. Symptoms identified prior to presentation with the CNS component of the lymphoma were recorded with attention to those with depression, anxiety, agitation, psychosis, disinhibition, and apathy. Patients with long term premorbid psychiatric disease or symptoms that developed later in the course as a result the stressors of disease and treatment were excluded. Results: A total of 19 out of 136 patients (14%) were noted to have primarily neuropsychiatric symptoms prior to diagnosis of CNS lymphoma. Symptom onset to diagnosis of PCNSL ranged from 3 weeks to 11 months. The average age was 65, and 47% of subjects were male. Depression, apathy, agitation and features of parkinsonism were the most common neuropsychiatric symptoms identified, with psychosis and disinhibition being the least frequent. The majority of these patients had frontal lobe lesions (42%), although several also had multifocal disease at time of diagnosis. Improvement of neuropsychiatric disease was not explicitly discussed or noted in the treatment and post-treatment notes. In fact, we found it notable that follow up notes generally did not comment on these psychiatric symptoms at all, and there was no clear management plan separate from treating the disease process. Parkinsonian features were observed in 5 patients (26%), with onset range from 2 weeks to 29 months prior to PCNSL diagnosis. The associated lesions were mostly deep basal ganglia or corpus callosum except in one case of left parietal lobe tumor. Notably, all patients had resolution of their parkinsonism with treatment of the lymphoma. Conclusions: Neuropsychiatric symptoms are a rare but noteworthy presentation of CNS lymphoma, distinct from cognitive changes that have been previously described with this condition. There is an increasing awareness of neurological illness presenting as pure psychiatric disturbance, prompting exclusion of organic disease, particularly in elderly patients who present with new psychiatric complaints. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background Guidelines to provide recommendations about driving restrictions for patients with brain metastases are lacking. We aim to determine whether clinical neurologic examination is sufficient to predict suitability to drive in these patients by comparison with an occupational therapy driving assessment (OTDA). Methods We prospectively evaluated the concordance between neurology assessment of suitability to drive (pass/fail) and OTDA in 41 individuals with brain metastases. Neuro-oncology evaluation included an interview and neurological examination. Participants subsequently underwent OTDA during which a battery of objective measures of visual, cognitive, and motor skills related to driving was administered. Results The mean age of patients who failed OTDA was age 68.9 years vs 59.3 years in the group members who passed (P = .0046). The sensitivity of the neurology assessment to predict driving fitness compared with OTDA was 16.1% and the specificity 90%. The 31 patients who failed OTDA were more likely to fail Vision Coach, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Trail Making B tests. Conclusions There was poor association between the assessment of suitability to drive by neurologists and the outcome of the OTDA in patients with brain metastases. Subtle deficits that may impair the ability to drive safely may not be evident on neurologic examination. The positive predictive value was high to predict OTDA failure. Age could be a factor affecting OTDA performance. The results raise questions about the choice of assessments in making recommendations about driving fitness in people with brain metastases. OTDA should be strongly considered in patients with brain metastases who wish to continue driving.

Alternating electrical fields can disrupt mitosis leading to apoptosis of rapidly dividing cancer cells. The device that utilizes this mechanism is known as tumor-treating fields (TTFields). TTFields can be applied by ceramic transducer arrays on a shaved scalp to deliver the alternating electric activity to patients with glioblastoma (GBM). It has FDA approval for use in both recurrent and newly diagnosed GBM. The objective is to critically appraise the current evidence for the use of TTFields as adjunctive treatment to newly diagnosed GBM. The objective was addressed through the development of a structured, critically appraised topic. We incorporated a clinical scenario, background information, a structured question, literature search strategy, evidence summary, clinical bottom lines, and expert discussion. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, a medical librarian, clinical epidemiologists, and content experts in the field of neurooncology. A randomized controlled trial was selected for critical appraisal. Patients with newly diagnosed GBM completing standard radiation and chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) were subsequently randomized to receive maintenance TMZ with TTFields, or TMZ alone. With the addition of TTFields, median progression-free survival was 6.7 months compared with 4 months without the addition of TTFields (95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.76; P<0.001) and overall survival was 20.9 months compared with 16.0 months without the addition of TTFields (95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.76; P<0.001). TTFields may increase both progression-free and overall survival in patients receiving standard chemoradiation therapy for GBM.

Following acute West Nile virus (WNV) infection in humans, there is upregulation of pro-inflammatory molecules that promote neuroinflammation, including S100 calcium binding protein B (S100B), high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), and osteopontin (OPN). The effects of S100B and HMGB1 are transduced by the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). Interestingly, the same immunoregulatory proteins that fuel neuroinflammation can also promote tumorigenesis. We present 2 cases of glial neuronal tumors, a glioblastoma multiforme and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor, in patients with severe West Nile neuroinvasive disease (WNND). In these cases, the viral infection was a precursor to the development of the aggressive brain tumors. We describe a potential mechanism where the presence of tumorigenic proteins in the microenvironment induced by WNV, and subsequent RAGE and OPN signaling, may contribute to development or aggressive growth of these tumors. Although it is certainly possible that the occurrence of primary brain tumors following WNND is coincidental, the ability of WNV to alter cellular signaling and increase expression of pro-inflammatory and tumorigenic molecules merits further investigations to determine whether there is an association between these disease processes or implications for brain tumor patients who develop WNV infection.

Abstract Background Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a key player in tumor angiogenesis. The drug can halt tumor progression, treat radiation necrosis, and reduce peritumoral edema. Although it does not increase overall survival, bevacizumab can improve progression-free survival and quality of life. In many countries, bevacizumab use in the inpatient setting is restricted due to its significant cost. Here, we explore attitudes towards the use of bevacizumab amidst practitioners treating brain tumors and assess ease of accessing the drug in the inpatient setting. Design/Methods A 10-question survey querying practitioners’ opinions of inpatient bevacizumab utility and its availability was distributed to the membership of the Society of Neuro-Oncology in July 2016. Results Eighty-seven percent felt that there was a role for bevacizumab in the inpatient setting, and 69% reported favorable experiences with bevacizumab use. However, 40% encountered difficulty in obtaining approval for inpatient use. We present two contrasting clinical cases that highlight favorable and unfavorable outcomes when bevacizumab use was and was not permitted, respectively. Conclusions In this sample of neuro-oncology practitioners, there is general consensus that bevacizumab plays an important role in the inpatient treatment of brain tumors. In light of ongoing barriers to inpatient bevacizumab use due to cost concerns, these data motivate the creation of standardized policies for inpatient bevacizumab use that balances its important role in improving quality of life with financial considerations.