Back to Authors

Dahm, Diane L.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 109

Golf After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Jackson, Jeffrey D., Smith, Jay , Shah, Jay P. , Wisniewski, Stephen, Dahm, Diane L.

The American Journal of Sports Medicine | August 14, 2009 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2201-2204

10.1177/0363546509339009 Get It

Background Golf provides an opportunity for relatively low-impact exercise for nearly all age groups and is considered a recommended activity for patients after total knee arthroplasty. Hypothesis We hypothesized that total knee arthroplasty would afford patients increased ability to participate in and enjoy golf, allowing a large percentage of these patients to walk the golf course. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods Surveys were sent to 151 golfers who had undergone primary total knee arthroplasty from 1995 to 2000. The detailed survey included 33 questions specific to the patients’ golf performance, enjoyment of golf, frequency of participation, timing of return to play, presence of pain, use of a cart, and related golf-specific issues. Results We received and evaluated 93 responses (62%). Fifty-seven percent reported they had returned to golf within 6 months after total knee arthroplasty. Eighty-one percent of respondents reported golfing as frequently, or more frequently, than before knee replacement. Notably, golfers reported less pain while golfing after total knee arthroplasty than before (13% vs 83%; P < .0001), and 94% of respondents reported currently enjoying golf as much as or more than before surgery. Twenty-eight percent of respondents stated that they walked the course, rather than using a motorized golf cart, before surgery, while only 14% walked the course after surgery ( P = .02). Conclusion In this population of golfers, total knee arthroplasty reliably relieved pain that had been previously experienced while golfing, and increased or maintained this group’s enjoyment of playing golf. However, 86% of these patients reported using a cart while golfing. Further patient education is needed regarding the potential health benefits of walking during golf after total knee arthroplasty.
MRI Accuracy for Tears of the Posterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus in Patients With Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and the Clinical Relevance of Missed Tears
Laundre, Bryan J., Collins, Mark S., Bond, Jeffrey R., Dahm, Diane L., Mandrekar, Jayawant N. , Stuart, Michael J.

American Journal of Roentgenology | July 20, 2009 | Volume: 193 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 515-523

10.2214/ajr.08.2146 Get It

Shoulder activity level varies by diagnosis
Brophy, Robert H. , Levy, Bruce A. , Chu, Samuel K. , Dahm, Diane L., Sperling, John W. , Marx, Robert G. , Brophy, Robert H.

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | May 29, 2009 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1516-1521

10.1007/s00167-009-0820-2 Get It

AbstractPatient activity level may be an important prognostic variable relating to outcome in patients with shoulder disorders. The purpose of this cross‐sectional study was to test the hypothesis that a shoulder activity scale will detect differences in shoulder activity based on the patient diagnosis and age. A total of 157 patients of four academic orthopedic surgeons with a diagnosis of rotator cuff disease (86), glenohumeral instability (31) or osteoarthritis (40) were asked to fill out a previously validated shoulder activity scale and the ASES shoulder questionnaire. The patient's diagnosis, gender and age were recorded. The activity level was significantly higher in patients with instability than in patients with rotator cuff disease or osteoarthritis. Patients with rotator cuff disease were significantly more active than patients with osteoarthritis. Linear regression of activity level on patient age and diagnosis demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between activity level and both independent variables. Diagnosis influenced activity level independent of age. This is the first study to document diagnosis‐based differences in the shoulder activity level of patients with different shoulder disorders. Shoulder activity level should be evaluated as a prognostic variable in studies of patients with shoulder disorders that may predict outcome and guide treatment in these patients.
Operative management of the medial collateral ligament in the multi‐ligament injured knee: an evidence‐based systematic review
Kovachevich, Rudy, Shah, Jay P. , Arens, Ann M. , Dahm, Diane L., Levy, Bruce A. , Stuart, Michael J.

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | May 6, 2009 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 823-829

10.1007/s00167-009-0810-4 Get It

AbstractWhile it is generally accepted that most partial and isolated medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries can be treated non‐operatively, ideal treatment of the MCL in multi‐ligament knee injuries remains controversial. High failure rates with repair of the posterolateral corner in the multi‐ligament injured knee have been recently reported, favoring reconstruction instead. The same maybe true for MCL injuries, however evidence‐based treatment recommendations are lacking in the current orthopedic literature. The purpose of this study was to perform an evidence‐based systematic review of the operative management (repair and/or reconstruction) of the MCL in the setting of multi‐ligament knee injuries. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane databases for all relevant articles published in English from 1978 to 2008 on the outcomes of surgical management (repair and/or reconstruction) of the MCL in the setting of combined ligament injuries was performed. Inclusion criteria included articles published in (1) English, (2) on human subjects, (3) between the years of 1978 and 2008, (4) had minimum 12‐month follow‐up, with a mean of at least 24 months, (5) on surgical management of MCL injuries, (6) associated with multi‐ligament injuries (three or more ligaments) and/or knee dislocation, and (7) reported objective outcome data on the respective patient cohorts. Exclusion criteria consisted of technique papers, case reports, studies that included fractures associated with MCL injury and those that included pediatric patients. The review identified eight relevant studies. Five articles focused on MCL repair, while three articles focused on MCL reconstruction. No prospective studies compared MCL repair or reconstruction with non‐operative treatment or directly compared MCL reconstruction with MCL repair. Currently there is a paucity of objective data on the outcomes regarding surgical management of MCL tears in the combined ligament injured knee. This systematic review demonstrated satisfactory results in both repair and reconstruction groups. Future objective outcome‐based studies as well as comparative studies are needed to further evaluate the optimal treatment modality before evidence‐based recommendations can be made. Therefore, individual treatment decisions for each patient should be based on the characteristics and nature of the injury.
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in patients over 50 years
Dahm, Diane L., Wulf, Corey A., Dajani, Khaled, Dobbs, Ryan E., Levy, Bruce A. , Stuart, Morag

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume | November 3, 2008 | Volume: 90-B | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1446-1450

10.1302/0301-620x.90b11.21210 Get It

The records of patients aged 50 years or over who underwent primary reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament between 1990 and 2002 were reviewed. There were 35 knees in 34 patients that met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the patients was 57 years (50 to 66) and the mean clinical follow-up was for 72 months (25 to 173). A total of 23 knees were reconstructed with patellar tendon allograft, and 12 with patellar tendon autograft. The mean pre-operative knee extension was 1° (−5° to 10°) and flexion was 129° (125° to 150°) and at follow-up these values were 0° (−5° to 5°) and 135° (120° to 150°), respectively. Pre-operatively there were 31 knees (89%) with a Lachman grade 2+ or 3+. Post-operatively, 33 knees (94%) were Lachman grade 0 or 1+. The mean pre- and post-operative International Knee Documentation Committee scores were 39 (23 to 72) and 90 (33 to 100) respectively. The mean pre- and post-operative Lysholm scores were 50 (18 to 68) and 92 (28 to 100) respectively and the mean University of California Los Angeles activity scores were 8.5 before injury (4 to 10), 4.3 (3 to 6) after injury and 8.3 (4 to 10) post-operatively. There were three graft failures (8.6%) requiring revision. We conclude that reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in carefully-selected patients aged 50 years or over can achieve similar results to those in younger patients, with no increased risk of complications.
Arthroscopic Repair of Isolated Meniscal Tears in Patients 18 Years and Younger
Krych, Aaron J. , McIntosh, Amy L. , Voll, Anthony E., Dahm, Diane L., Stuart, Michael J. , Krych, Aaron J

The American Journal of Sports Medicine | March 4, 2008 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1283-1289

10.1177/0363546508314411 Get It

Background Isolated meniscal tears in the skeletally immature patient are infrequent but well-recognized injuries. Although few studies have evaluated the pediatric and adolescent population, arthroscopic surgical repair remains the standard of care for Patients in this age group with unstable meniscal tears. Purpose To review our results of arthroscopic repair of isolated meniscal tears in pediatric and adolescent patients to further define future management of these injuries. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods The records of all patients 18 years old or younger who underwent isolated meniscal repair between 1990 and 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-four patients (6 girls, 38 boys) with an average age of 15.8 years (range, 9.9-18.7 years) were included in this study, for a total of 45 isolated meniscal tears. Clinical examinations were performed, International Knee Documentation Committee forms were administered, and Tegner scores were determined at an average of 5.8 years (range, 2.5 months-13.8 years) postoperative follow-up. Three patients were lost to follow-up. Results The clinical success rate of arthroscopic meniscal repair was 80% for simple tears, 68% for displaced bucket-handle tears, and 13% for complex tears. Seventeen menisci (38% overall) failed initial repair at a mean of 17 months (range, 3-61 Months) postoperatively and underwent repeat arthroscopic surgery (15 partial meniscectomies, 2 rerepair). The average Tegner and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were 8 (range, 5-9) and 89.4 (range, 79-99), respectively, at the time of final follow-up. Risk factors for failure included complex tears and rim width greater than 3 mm. Conclusion Clinically successful repair of an isolated meniscal tear in patients 18 years or younger was variable depending on tear type, with complex tears and rim width 3 mm or greater being negative prognostic factors.
A Meta‐analysis of Patellar Tendon Autograft Versus Patellar Tendon Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Krych, Aaron J. , Jackson, Jeffrey D., Dahm, Diane L., Hoskin, Tanya L. , Krych, Aaron J

Arthroscopy | November 14, 2007 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 292-298

10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.029 Get It

Purpose Studies have suggested good long‐term success rates with bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) autograft and BPTB allograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but the numbers reported in available prospective studies may be underpowered to elucidate significant differences between the two groups. Here, we present a meta‐analysis to compare the results of BPTB autograft and BPTB allograft in primary ACL reconstruction. Methods A systematic review of prospective trials using BPTB autograft and BPTB allograft tissue for ACL reconstruction with a minimum 2‐year follow‐up was performed. Summary odds ratios (ORs), confidence intervals, and P values were calculated. Results Of 548 studies, 6 fulfilled our inclusion criteria, with 256 patients in the autograft and 278 patients in the allograft group. Allograft patients were more likely to rupture their graft than autograft patients (OR, 5.03; P = .01) and more likely to have a hop test less than 90% of the nonoperative side (OR, 5.66; P < .01). When irradiated and chemically processed grafts were excluded from analysis, no significant differences were found between allograft and autograft patients with respect to graft rupture, rate of reoperation, normal/near normal IKDC scores, Lachman exam, pivot shift exam, patellar crepitus, hop test, or return to sport. Conclusions In this meta‐analysis, ACL reconstruction with BPTB autograft was favored over BPTB allograft for graft rupture and hop test parameters. However, when irradiated and chemically processed grafts were excluded, results were not significantly different between the two graft types. Level of Evidence Level III, systematic review of prospective nonrandomized cohort studies.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Skeletally Immature Patient
McIntosh, Amy L. , Dahm, Diane L., Stuart, Michael J.

Arthroscopy | December 7, 2006 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1325-1330

10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.014 Get It

Purpose Our purpose was to evaluate the results of transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with medial hamstring autograft in skeletally immature patients. Methods We reviewed the records of all skeletally immature patients who underwent transphyseal ACL reconstruction with medial hamstring autograft between 1988 and 2002 at our institution. Inclusion criteria were age less than 15 years for male patients, age less than 14 years for female patients, and radiographic evidence of wide open physes. We identified 16 patients (11 male and 5 female). All underwent preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluation (physical examination and modified Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores), and knee radiographs. Each patient was followed up until skeletal maturity was confirmed, with a mean clinical follow‐up of 41.1 months (range, 24 to 112 months). Results The mean time from ACL injury to reconstruction was 5.6 months (range, 0.7 to 26.9 months). During the preoperative time period, 4 patients (25%) developed meniscal tears that were not visualized on the index magnetic resonance imaging scans. At last follow‐up, the mean leg length discrepancy measured 0.62 cm (range, 0.2 to 1.5 cm), and clinical or radiographic evidence of malalignment was not present in any of the patients. In 1 patient a symptomatic 1.5‐cm limb overgrowth developed, which was treated with an internal shoe lift. At follow up, the mean modified Lysholm score was 98.8 (range, 94 to 100), and the mean International Knee Documentation Committee score was 89.9 (range, 73.6 to 94.3). Of the patients, 7 (43.8%) underwent a reoperation, and 2 suffered traumatic graft disruption. Conclusions ACL reconstruction with a medial hamstring autograft via a transphyseal technique yields satisfactory clinical results in skeletally immature patients. No new meniscal tears were identified after ACL reconstruction, and most patients (87.5%) returned to their previous level of activity. The rate of reoperation was high (43.8%). Physeal growth arrest did not occur. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Double Suture Technique to Delineate PASTA Lesions
Sperling, John W. , Dahm, Diane L.

Arthroscopy | June 8, 2006 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.047 Get It

Abstract A common method of treating PASTA (partial articular surface tendon avulsion) lesions involves completing the tear followed by arthroscopic repair. Frequently, the boundaries of the tear are difficult to determine from the bursal side with the use of a single marking stitch. Therefore, we describe a simple technique that allows the surgeon to reproducibly define the boundaries of the partial tear. Following a standard arthroscopic examination of the articular portion of the shoulder joint, the PASTA lesion is identified. A spinal needle is introduced and the most anterior and posterior aspects of the tear are marked by passing 2 sutures. Following a bursectomy, the 2 sutures that clearly define the boundaries of the tear are identified. The tear is then completed by “connecting the dots” outlined by the sutures and an arthroscopic repair is performed in the standard manner.